User talk:Mark Linton

Proposed deletion of Funk Masters of Wrestling

The article Funk Masters of Wrestling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:ENTERTAINER. No significant coverage in reliable independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki♥311 03:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Funk Masters of Wrestling for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Funk Masters of Wrestling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funk Masters of Wrestling until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nikki♥311 13:31, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Enough content

I have contributed to the article and edited enough to make it a proper article. I have provided detailed information on the article which makes it a complete article and relevant sources have been provided. I will further improve it. Kindly do not delete it and keep it. I have worked very hard on it.--Mark Linton (talk) 04:38, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Funk Masters of Wrestling. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Nihlus 12:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Team No Respect) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Team No Respect, Mark Linton!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for your wrestling related articles. Keep up the good work! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:08, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of Katsuji Ueda

The article Katsuji Ueda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ENTERTAINER. No significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Only source is an internet database with no criteria for inclusion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki♥311 00:53, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mayhem (1999), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Robinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hello, can you please add your sources to CWA Submission Shootfighting Championship? It has none at the moment. It has 'external links' but that just means 'suggestions for further reading' rather than sources used in the article's creation. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 08:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of FMW 4th Anniversary Show for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FMW 4th Anniversary Show is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FMW 4th Anniversary Show until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ifnord (talk) 23:37, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Response

I don't think I found it non-notable. It was the biggest annual event of FMW and there is no specific reason to find it non-notable. It was the most significant event in the company's history and the sources have indicated it. If you still want to delete it after adding enough sources and working very hard then I shall restrain myself from wasting time in working hard to create articles in Wikipedia.--Mark Linton (talk) 04:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Such people who may want to get detailed information on the event which they may be unable to get on other websites will be convenient in getting information on FMW's flagship event at Wikipedia. A free encyclopedia, as it claims, must provide information on FMW's biggest yearly event. Maybe puroresu fans are looking for such information and they may find it helpful. This information is definitely not false or wrong. Sources provided in the article are accurate, not only in the FMW 4th Anniversary Show but also in FMW 5th Anniversary Show, FMW 6th Anniversary Show, FMW 7th Anniversary Show, FMW 8th Anniversary Show, FMW 9th Anniversary Show, FMW 10th Anniversary Show, FMW 11th Anniversary Show, and FMW 12th Anniversary Show. The information in these articles may be helpful for readers who want to read and research on these below mentioned articles. Thanks. --Mark Linton (talk) 04:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing the deletion tag from these articles because I don't find them non-notable. If you still want to delete then you are admins and you have authority to do it. I cannot do anything about it and I don't need to give any explanation on it. I have already worked very hard and provided enough sources, which are true. If you will encourage me to expand these articles by removing "deletion tag" then I will provide more information and I think sources are enough to give information. If you do have any solid and suitable answer to my claims then do reply me on my talk page instead of deleting these articles and if you wanted to place "deletion tag" then you could have done it when I created these articles. Now, I can only request you, not to delete them after a lot of hard work and after a very long time. Thanks.--Mark Linton (talk) 04:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm going to explain this to you so you understand. Your personal opinion on what is notable doesn't mean anything to wikipedia. You need reliable independent sources to prove notability. If you don't know what those are you should read up on pages about Wikipedia standards and guidlines. Also, you are not allowed to remove AFD tags form articles under any circumstances except if they are blatant vandalism. You could end up getting yourself blocked if you do that again.★Trekker (talk) 16:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is not my personal opinion on the FMW Anniversary Show being notable. It was a damn notable event. Just check the history. Just check the attendance records. I have even provided references of books in these articles but if you still want to delete them then nothing can be done about it. Furthermore, I would like to ask where were you when these articles were new and now you are wanting to delete them after two-three months?--Mark Linton (talk) 12:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your attempt at transcluding your Rfa

Hi Mark. I've reverted your Rfa transclusion because you had added your Rfa page incorrectly. At the same time, in my opinion, you should re-consider transcluding your Rfa. For example, the reasons you mention in your Rfa for wanting to be an admin (Que 1) have no relation to adminship. Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship would provide exhaustive inputs on what is expected of admin candidates. Feel free to ask me for any assistance. Thanks, Lourdes 14:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied why I want to be an admin in the question 1. I recommend to transclude my nomination request on the RFA page.--Mark Linton (talk) 14:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you did. But, virtually everything you stated in your response to question 1 are things that any editor, even the newest editor making their first edit, can do without using any administrator tools. The only thing you indicated that had to do with administrator tools was "take corrective measures". This is, at best, vague. You have no experience in discussing problematic users, have never made a report to WP:AIV, have contributed to just one WP:AFD, and have never made a single warning to a vandal editor. In short, you have no experience that I can find in anything having to do with "corrective measures". So, why do you want to be an administrator? What tools in the administrator tool box do you feel you need to have to do things you can not do now? Once you've assessed that, then try to put yourself in the shoes of people trying to decide if you should have those tools; what about your experience would give them reason to believe you have such need and can be trusted with using the tools for that need? Right now, and I mean no harsh criticism here, you have not demonstrated this. You've been directed to Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship. I recommend you read it carefully before considering attempting to transclude your RfA again. If you want to transclude your RfA, and can follow the instructions to do so, feel free to do so. However, there is zero chance it will pass at this time. I applaud your efforts on the project. None of this should be in any way interpreted that anyone thinks you are a bad editor. All the best, --Hammersoft (talk) 15:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mark, If you do an RfA right now, I honestly don't think it will succeed. Have you read and fully understood WP:RFAADVICE? If you have, I suggest you take a look at WP:ORCP and decide to do a poll there first. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just read your message on Lourdes's talkpage and came to say exactly what everyone else has - Your RFA will not succeed by a long mile and it'll probably be closed as NOTNOW after about an hour of it being open, As noted by Kudpung you need to read WP:RFAADVICE and I would go as far as to say you need to visit previous 2017/2016 RFAs to get a better understanding of how RFA is and what expectations us editors have. –Davey2010^Talk 15:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add on some more advice, and please believe me when I say this is meant with the best of intentions. In 2008, you had a long series of images that were deleted under WP:CSD#F9 and WP:CSD#F6. No worries; that's all from 2008, and I think everyone would presume you've since learned more about our Wikipedia:Image use policy, and have since adjusted your editing. We all make mistakes; it's one of the best ways to learn. But, the only image you've uploaded since then was two months ago (File:Tetsuhiro Kuroda.jpg). Unfortunately, it too was speedily deleted for having a copyright issue. I raise this to encourage you to carefully read Wikipedia:Image use policy, and make sure that any future image uploads you make comply with that policy. We're all here for the same purpose; to build an encyclopedia. We'll be happy to help if you have a question, so ask away, most especially before you make another upload. Sometimes the policies here seem arcane, and having some help to navigate them is no shame. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All I want is a bit support on the deletion attempt of the FMW 4th Anniversary Show and a list of relevant articles because some of your admins think that this is a "non-notable event" because "reliable sources" are not provided. A YouTube video link was provided as an independent source and sources of several books have also been provided but in such stress and circumstances where "delete tags" are being placed on articles, it is difficult for me to contribute and work hard on an article which I fear that may be deleted. Kindly assist me in keeping these articles and preventing the admins from deleting them because it was the biggest annual flagship event of Frontier Martial-Arts Wrestling and there is no issue in keeping them. Instead, it will be useful and helpful for FMW and puroresu fans.--Mark Linton (talk) 16:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators do not have a supervote that supersedes the opinions of other editors. Being an administrator would not mean keep/delete comments somehow carry more weight. They do not. Further, if you were an administrator and attempted to use your administrator privileges on an AfD such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FMW 4th Anniversary Show, you would very likely run into serious issues because you had used your privileges in a discussion in which you are WP:INVOLVED. As for using YouTube as a source, hmm. Have a read through Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hammersoft, I do not want to misuse my privileges as an admin. I am just asking for support. I have worked very hard on these articles and provided a lot of useful information which is obviously true and the YouTube links were provided just for those who were trying to delete them by considering them "vandal", "false" and "non-notable". That's it.--Mark Linton (talk) 21:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

I'm going to echo some of the previous comments on your talk page and say that opening a RFA is in no way going to help your cause in deletion discussions. Actually, the fact that you seem to think being an administrator will help keep your articles from getting deleted is going to make 100% of people oppose your nomination. You cannot use admin tools to advance your own articles.

I also want to give you some advice about deletion discussions, which was my original purpose for coming to your talk page. I suggest you read Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions because thus far, every single argument you have given at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FMW 4th Anniversary Show is listed on that page. You like it, you worked hard on it, it's useful....that's great, but those aren't reasons to keep an article. What are reasons? See WP:GNG. The subject of an article needs to have significant coverage in reliable independent sources. The FMW website does not count because it is a primary source. YouTube does not count because it isn't a reliable source. Cagematch, purolove, and the internet wrestling database have no criteria for inclusion, so they don't count because they do not demonstrate notability. Please provide legitimate news coverage, book sources, and articles from experts in the field.

I suggest you read the policies and guidelines I've linked above. Otherwise, you are just wasting your time making articles that are likely to be deleted. Nobody wants to see their hardwork go to waste, but until you become more familiar with this information you are at risk for just that. I hope this doesn't come of as rude or harsh, as I am genuinely trying to help you with your future article making. If you have any questions about reliable sourcing or notability criteria, you can ask me on my talk page. Good luck. Nikki♥311 23:47, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Diva Dirt - Is It Reliable?

There is a discussion currently ongoing in which we are trying to reach a consensus if Diva Dirt is reliable. You can view the discussion here. There has only been a couple of people who have responded. We need a wider input from more people. You're response is needed and appreciated. Thanks. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 21:33, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mr. Gannosuke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary Wolfe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Old WCW PPVs

Mark, it appears that you have an interest in breaking out and expanding the old WCW pay-per-views. I too have been working on this. I recently broke out the Halloween Havoc, Fall Brawl, Slamboree, and WCW Uncensored individual shows. My expansion focused mostly on the event itself. I would appreciate it if you could put a second set of eyes on my expansion of them, and potentially add to them, like I saw you do with the Road Wild ones recently, and many others last year. Thanks! - Galatz ^Talk 17:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Galatz, its not just the case with WCW events but with the ECW pay-per-view events as well. I will definitely create and contribute to these articles and you can also contribute to them. If you want to contribute to the WCW pay-per-view events, which you just broke then these links [1] and [2] will be useful for them. You may use these links and I will also continue to edit and expand these articles. Thanks for breaking away some pay-per-view events.--Mark Linton (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I started with WCW, but I also plan to eventually work on the ECW, TNA, ROH and the European WWF ones that don't currently have the details. - Galatz ^Talk 18:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Dear Mr. Linton. I wanted to let you know that I've enjoyed your work and look forward to future articles. Sincerely, a fellow wrestling fan. 72.74.198.247 (talk) 07:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WMF Junior Heavyweight Championship

The article WMF Junior Heavyweight Championship has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. No significant coverage in reliable independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki♥311 22:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Koji Nakagawa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Junior heavyweight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WMF Junior Heavyweight Championship

Hello, Mark Linton. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, WMF Junior Heavyweight Championship, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:02, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Background vs Storyline

I appreciate you expanding the article at SuperBrawl V‎, however please stop changing the Storyline header to Background. WP:PW/PPVG is clear that these should be storylines. Also just an FYI, per Template:Reflist you no longer need to put {{reflist|2}} or {{reflist|30em}}, just {{reflist}}. The 2 is depreciated and no longer splits them into 2 columns, and the 30em now happens automatically when needed. Thanks again! - Galatz ^Talk 17:07, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SuperBrawl V, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nick Patrick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Image	What to type
	For all your hard work on the old WCW and ECW articles! - Galatz ^Talk 19:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)}}[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

WAR (wrestling promotion) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mr. Hughes

WAR tournaments (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Akio Sato

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited November to Remember (1996), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary Wolfe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chris Chetti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middletown, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited House Party (1997), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of ECW World Television Champions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tape delay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement

Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Khilona (1996 film). I have removed the infringing text, but the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Khilona (1996 film)

Hello, Mark Linton. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Khilona (1996 film), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Hzh (talk) 22:23, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saikyo Tag League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Wolfe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sky Diving J

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sky Diving J requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kleuske (talk) 09:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please don't remove speedy deletion tags from a page you have created yourself, but if you believe you have good reasons to think the speedy deletion nomination was mistaken then explain why on the relevant talk page. This applies whether or not you are logged in to the account you used to create the page. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mark Linton. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speed of Sounds moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Speed of Sounds, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering^(t) 14:02, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Osaka Hurricane

Thanks for creating Osaka Hurricane.

A New Page Patroller Meatsgains just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 19:07, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SuperClash III, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Gagne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BJW Death Mania

The article BJW Death Mania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I have not found any significant coverage by any reliable sources. Possible that Japanese sources exist, please provide if they do

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MPJ-DK (talk) 01:08, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BJW Ryōgokutan

The article BJW Ryōgokutan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I have not found any significant coverage by any reliable sources. Possible that Japanese sources exist, please provide if they do

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MPJ-DK (talk) 01:15, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryōgokutan (2015)

The article Ryōgokutan (2015) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I have not found any significant coverage by any reliable sources. Possible that Japanese sources exist, please provide if they do

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MPJ-DK (talk) 01:15, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryōgokutan (2016)

The article Ryōgokutan (2016) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I have not found any significant coverage by any reliable sources. Possible that Japanese sources exist, please provide if they do

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MPJ-DK (talk) 01:15, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryōgokutan (2017)

The article Ryōgokutan (2017) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I have not found any significant coverage by any reliable sources. Possible that Japanese sources exist, please provide if they do

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MPJ-DK (talk) 01:15, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryōgokutan (2018)

The article Ryōgokutan (2018) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I have not found any significant coverage by any reliable sources. Possible that Japanese sources exist, please provide if they do

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MPJ-DK (talk) 01:15, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Speed of Sounds

Hello, Mark Linton. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Speed of Sounds".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:38, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Kevin Owens. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 17:18, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Samoa Joe, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 01:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kairi Sane, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 06:42, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:BRD. If an editor reverts your edit with a valid reason. Do not restore it a few days later without saying anything. That is disruptive. StaticVapor message me! 06:43, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I have not made any hoax editing in that article. I have only changed one heading of Kairi Sane's WWE career to "Kabuki Warriors", which is more appropriate to cover that phase of her WWE career. That's it. And I have also given adequate explanation for that.--Mark Linton (talk) 12:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained already. Not everyone is gonna know the name of the tag team if they don't follow the weekly show. A casual fan probably does not know who the Kabuki Warriors are. That is why "teaming with Asuka" is better. You also fail to explain why you are removing the "main roster" part of the heading. Again WP:BRD if you don't understand what's going on here. StaticVapor message me! 04:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeevan Daata

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jeevan Daata requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0284218/plotsummary. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. →ᴇmɑdıx ^T ^C 08:28, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kairi Sane. StaticVapor message me! 07:43, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Bollywood films of 1989, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandakini (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOPIPE

Hey, I just wanted to remind you of WP:NOPIPE, you seem to be force piping a bunch of links that should not be. Also duplicate links are fine in a table per WP:OLINK. I appreciate all your hard work expanding the old WCW PPVs! - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 20:26, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited World War 3 (1996), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nick Patrick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FOW International Heavyweight Championship

Template:FOW International Heavyweight Championship has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. StaticVapor message me! 21:48, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FOW Light Heavyweight Championship

Template:FOW Light Heavyweight Championship has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. StaticVapor message me! 21:48, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Volunteer Slam I for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Volunteer Slam I is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volunteer Slam I until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 13:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, this is a significant and important event of professional wrestling promotion SMW. This must not be deleted and kept here. It is undoubtedly a notable event.--Mark Linton (talk) 18:36, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Unbreakable (2019), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eddie Edwards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:20, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello, I'm STATicVapor. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from Unbreakable (2019). Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! StaticVapor message me! 06:59, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Unbreakable (2019). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 22:32, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Charlotte Flair, you may be blocked from editing. StaticVapor message me! 19:41, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It seems from your recent discussions with me that you are trying to discourage me from editing on Wikipedia. I am an experienced user on Wikipedia, not new here. I have contributed to so many professional wrestling articles here since 2007 and have helped create some of the most important professional wrestling articles you see and read today here. I was one of the first people to create split PPV articles and expand them back in 2007 but you have ignored all of my contributions on the basis of your "no original research policy". Just watch WWE TV and you will see if Charlotte Flair is playing the role of a heel or a babyface and as far as Unbreakable (2019) is concerned, I have added all the reliable sources and I have given references, so you may visit and check them and see if I have provided any incorrect information. Thanks for your concern, User:STATicVapor.--Mark Linton (talk) 11:19, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is not "my" policy. It is a Wikipedia editing policy that you choose not to follow. You cannot add content if you do not back it with reliable sources. Read WP:OR and WP:BURDEN. StaticVapor message me! 17:15, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Lio Rush. StaticVapor message me! 00:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MLW War Chamber

The article MLW War Chamber has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:11, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Captain Raju, it is under construction. It will be completed within one or two days.--Mark Linton (talk) 12:19, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Era Hart Foundation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fireball (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:17, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Impact Wrestling A Night You Can't Mist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joey Ryan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lockdown (2020) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lockdown (2020), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 22:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- I have just created it and I have just started editing it. Now check. Sources have been added and more sources will be added with the passage of time.--Mark Linton (talk) 22:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Impact Wrestling A Night You Can't Mist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Street Fight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Impact Wrestling Rebellion moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Impact Wrestling Rebellion, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 19:28, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lockdown (2015), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Team Angle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:47, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve MLW Fury Road (2019)

Hello, Mark Linton,

Thank you for creating MLW Fury Road (2019).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for this new article, but please try to find additional reliable sources that are not directly affiliated with MLW, such as mainstream media coverage and the like.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:54, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hardcore Justice (2014), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Street Fight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Tnadestinationx15.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tnadestinationx15.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Impact specials

Hi. I see you have created some articles about Impact specials. Just two things. One, use reliable sources. Most of the sources aren't reliable. Here is a list [3]- Two, do you think the events are notable? I don't follow Impact, just big PPVs, but looks like just Impact episodes. It barely has sources (most of them, the usual sources covering an episode). We don't use to create articles for special episodes, just very big episodes. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:30, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, usually, we start a discussion if we want to change the name of an article. I don't think Lefort is best know for 9 months in TNA. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:32, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have just started creating and editing these articles. I am keen on editing them further and I will add more information and more sources to them.--Mark Linton (talk) 21:42, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but several years ago, it was decided we don't create this kind of articles. Most of them are just TV shows, like many TV Shows produced by WWE. We can't create one article for every special show a promotion held. Most of them aren't notable for their own articles, like the 2012 Great American Bash or the 2017 Starrcade edition. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:03, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you are right but there is a lot of difference in the special episodes that have been produced by WWE and Impact. The special episodes of Impact for which I have created articles are pay-per-view callibre episodes which have featured major matches and important storylines and these special episodes were used as equivalents to TNA/Impact pay-per-view events since Impact discontinued the PPVs in 2013. These special episodes are not just ordinary TV episodes but have been significant television episodes for TNA/Impact. If we can have articles of WWE Raw 1000 and WWE Raw 25 on Wikipedia, which are barely anniversary shows and nothing special about them, then TNA/Impact special episodes are more significant than them.--Mark Linton (talk) 22:23, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, there is a huge difference between the Impact specials and the RAW specials: the coverage. Even the RAW 1000 was proposed for deletion because, as I said, very few TV specials have their own article (No Raw is Owen, no SmackDown Blast from the Past). RAW 1000 and RAW 25th have an article because were highly promoted and highly covered before and after the show, also because the historic meaning (1000 episode and 25 anniversary). However, I don't see the same coverage for the TNA TV specials, so the project [4]. Just the usual coverage for a TV show like Raw or SmackDown. Every Impact, RAW, SmackDown, Dynamite episode has hundreds of websites writing about the episode. There is exceptions, yes. Look at AEW Bash at the Beach, it's a TV Special, but it was highly covered because the WCW name. However, Turning Point 2013 just have 3 reliable sources. No huge media coverage, like RAW 1000, the usual coverage for a TV Show. I think we can include just in the main article. For example, A Night you can't Mist had no significant coverage, just a few mentions [5] --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:10, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on what one follows. There are some fans who are diehard fans of TNA/Impact, some are committed to MLW, some are committed to AEW, some are committed to ROH, some are committed to WWE. TNA heavily promoted these special episodes replacing their former pay-per-view events "Destination X", "Turning Point", "Sacrifice", "No Surrender", "Hardcore Justice" and "Lockdown" etc. on their television networks at the time such as Spike TV, Destination America, Pop!, Pursuit and others. You have written yourself that you have never followed TNA/Impact except for their pay-per-view events. We do have an article of AEW Blood and Guts on Wikipedia as well, so why can't we have articles on these special episodes, which were not just ordinary special episodes, but were equivalent to pay-per-view events, where major storylines were resolved and major matches took place. For example, they crowned Magnus as the TNA World Heavyweight Champion at the 2013 Final Resolution special episode rather than on an ordinary Impact! episode and they chose the 2014 Genesis special episode to retire Sting rather than put him on an ordinary Impact! episode because these were meant to be pay-per-view equivalents at a time when TNA/Impact stopped running and promoting regular monthly pay-per-view events. I have written all I can regarding these episodes. If you want to keep them on Wikipedia then it is your will and if you do not want to keep them then inform me that you are deleting and merging them, so I may stop working on them and wasting my time. I have worked very hard on these articles but that does not matter. If you want to delete them I am okay with it. Please inform me beforehand.--Mark Linton (talk) 18:14, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, no articles about special episodes, redirect to the event article where we put the episodes. Like the ONO, there is no article for every singles ONO event. Blood and Guts it's a PPV and has coverage. Special episodes are special episodes, most of them, received the same coverage of the Impact weekly show since are just TV shows. Most RAW and SmackDown has historic moments (Foley winning the World title, The Rock's return). Even if TNA promoted as a big event, it was just a show for television. Also, as I said, most of the sources you used are unreliable. Destination X 2013, for example. 8 sources, 4 of them aren't reliable. Just two talks about the event and it's the weekly coverage from PWTorch and PW Insider. These are minor events and doesn't need their own article, like SmackDown Great American Bash, Starrcade or Halftime Heat. Results in the general article are fine. BTW, I watched TNA from 2008 to 2015, so I watched several of the episodes. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:02, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blood and Guts is not a pay-per-view, it is just a plain simple special episode of AEW Dynamite.--Mark Linton (talk) 21:12, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't know it. Due to the lockdown, I haven't seen the last two episodes of Dynamite. However, watching the article, it's the same. Sources, the event has coverage. Maybe for the War Games concept, like the Bash at the Beach. But other specials doesn't have article. Again, we don't create articles for TV Shows since there is every week a lot of wrestling shows with weekly coverage. Only the most important ones, like the RAW 1000. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:43, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clash of the Champions

HHH Pedrigree, I am keen on creating separate articles for the Clash of the Champions supercard events of WCW. These events were pay-per-view equivalents of WCW and were not just "special episodes" but "supercards", not a regular weekly television show but a special show which took place after several months a year. If you assure me that you are not going to delete them then I will create their articles. These events were heavily promoted on TBS and were significant events for WCW when pay-per-view events were not around. I cannot say the same about Saturday Night's Main Event because WWE did not promote or build them as heavily as WCW hyped and promoted Clash of the Champions.--Mark Linton (talk) 18:17, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. If the articles have enough coverage from reliable sources, it's possible. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:02, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Signature moves

Hi. If you are gonna include signature moves for wrestler, you have to find sources calling them signature moves. You can't just include a match report and put the moves. That's why the In wrestling section was removed. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 23:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please, remember to source the moves. Most of Koko's moves weren't in the source, nor The Holly Ghost nickname. Also, OWOW isn't relibale. I recomend to read Gran Metalik article, it's a very good example of a style and persona section. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 13:26, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hello, I'm HHH Pedrigree. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Okay, I apologize for what you perceive as vandalism. It is not actually vandalism but vandalism in your perception, so I will not make unconstructive edits in Wikipedia. I am not new here. I have been making articles in Wikipedia since 2007 and I have contributed a lot but if you still find my contributions unconstructive then I will refrain from vandalizing Wikipedia. I have always improved standards of the articles.--Mark Linton (talk) 09:23, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, it's amazing that you edit since 2007, but several of the sources you used are unreliable. As I told you, these TV shows had the same coverage of any Impact episode. For example, Hardcore Justice 2014. 23 sources, but 15 are unreliable. The others are just TV reports of previous and future shows. Reading the 23 sources, Hardcore Justice is just mentioned in 4 sources: PW Mania results (unreliable) OWOW results (unreliable), SmackDown Hotel results (unreliable) Bleacher report results (unreliable). No mention of Hardcore justice before or after the event, just the usual coverage for a TV Show like Raw or Dynamite. No notable for his own article. On the other hand, WWE RAW 1000 has 43 sources, some of them, national media like USA Today, NY Times, Los Angeles Times and Variety. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:21, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, no offence but AEW Blood and Guts special episode also does not deserve its own article in such context.--Mark Linton (talk) 13:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Hardcore Justice 2013 poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hardcore Justice 2013 poster.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:46, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hardcore Justice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Street Fight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crockett Cup (1986), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Gibson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NJPW Final Dome moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, NJPW Final Dome, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 21:05, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kabuki Warriors 2019.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Kabuki Warriors 2019.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.straitstimes.com/lifestyle/entertainment/wwes-kabuki-warriors-have-their-eyes-on-the-prize. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 01:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TNA 1st Anniversary Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don West (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mark Linton

Thank you for creating TNA 1st Anniversary Show.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MLW Spring Break moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, MLW Spring Break, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 19:26, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TNA specials again

Sorry to revert you on so many articles but it looks like HHH Pedrigree already talked to you about this earlier this year. The consensus in place for many years has been that these events do not get separate articles. You would need to get a new consensus before this changes.LM2000 (talk) 20:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Then you must also remove Fyter Fest and Fight for the Fallen.--Mark Linton (talk) 20:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - We should probably have discussions about those articles as well, but it's WP:OTHERSTUFF because we decided no to have separate articles for the TNA events years ago. I don't think we've had any discussions regarding these particular AEW shows. I'm also not totally familiar with these shows because I don't follow wrestling as closely as I used to. It looks like Fyter Fest was supposed to be a PPV and only got changed because of COVID, so that may be a special case, but just from glancing at the article, I would agree that Fight for the Fallen (2020) should probably be merged with the main article. But that's a discussion that needs to happen before changes are boldly made.LM2000 (talk) 20:13, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Turning Point (2020 wrestling) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Turning Point (2020 wrestling), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 15:12, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Opera Cup (2020) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Opera Cup (2020), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 19:37, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:The-rise-of-contra-unit.png

Thanks for uploading File:The-rise-of-contra-unit.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kings of Colosseum (2021), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greatest of All Time.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Anu Malik

Hi Mark Linton, in your recent edits to Anu Malik you have been adding some highly promotional language. It looks like you plan to add more content to the Career section (since you have prepared it with subheadings) so I wanted to ask you to please make sure that you don't include language like "appreciation and immense popularity", "a huge success", or say that a film "flopped" (or for that matter that it was a "hit" or a "blockbuster"). Please also add the sources you base your content on as soon as possible – ideally, sources should be added together with the content they support. Thanks! --bonadea contributions talk 15:27, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anu Malik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aa Gale Lag Jaa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:MLW Spring Break

Hello, Mark Linton. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MLW Spring Break".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:00, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Killer Death Machines moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Killer Death Machines, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 20:24, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced

Hello, Mark. Thank you for your contributions on the Jushin Liger article. However, remember that you have to include sources in the article. If you don't source your material, it would be unsourced and, maybe, removed. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:37, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The-rise-of-contra-unit.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The-rise-of-contra-unit.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:MLW World Middleweight Championship

Template:MLW World Middleweight Championship has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:12, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Killer Death Machines

Hello, Mark Linton. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Killer Death Machines, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Britt Baker, you may be blocked from editing. It's unfortunate that the disruption for which you've received multiple warnings has continued. Should you revert again, I'm prepared to create an WP:ANI report. Thanks. KyleJoan^talk 20:12, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

- KyleJoan^talk, since you do not know, I am just improving the standard of a professional wrestling article rather than disrupting it. See my history and you will get to know how well I have contributed to professional wrestling articles and I have provided descriptive articles and helped creating many high standard articles of professional wrestling on Wikipedia.--Mark Linton (talk) 20:14, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The history I see on this talk page consists of the aforementioned warnings about disruptive editing (that evidently has continued). Your changes to the Baker article did not improve the standard of a professional wrestling article for these reasons. Again, it's unfortunate and also astounding that you've been editing for as long as you have but think that that edit was acceptable. KyleJoan^talk 20:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Strictly Business (professional wrestling)

Hello, Mark Linton,

Thank you for creating Strictly Business (professional wrestling).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

There are numerous unsourced statements, which require inline citations per WP:BURDEN.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Meena}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

– DarkGlow • 09:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dynamite Duumvirate Tag Team Title Tournament, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burbank.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Garcia (wrestler).

There are multiple issues with these edits, which include:

"After making a few appearances as an enhancement talent, Garcia picked up his first win..." The source does not say this.
"Garcia made his Dynamite debut at Homecoming..." Source?
"However, Garcia received praise for his performance." Source?
Multiple matches are not notable per this discussion.

Please re-familiarize yourself with the relevant policies and guidelines as well as this style guide. Much of this is very inappropriate, especially for a user who has been editing for as long as you have. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 17:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Battle of Los Angeles (2006)

Hello, Mark Linton,

Thank you for creating Battle of Los Angeles (2006).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

A few sentences need a reference.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SL93}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SL93 (talk) 21:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Los Angeles (2006), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dragon Gate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Artist Collective (professional wrestling) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artist Collective (professional wrestling), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artist Collective (professional wrestling) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited PWG Anniversary Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dalton Castle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Rushmore of Wrestling moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mount Rushmore of Wrestling, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:18, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Hardcore Justice 2013 poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hardcore Justice 2013 poster.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:05, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Hardcore Justice 2014.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hardcore Justice 2014.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:05, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Hardcore Justice 2015.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hardcore Justice 2015.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:No Surrender 2013.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:No Surrender 2013.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:No Surrender 2014.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:No Surrender 2014.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:42, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Dollhouse (professional wrestling) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Dollhouse (professional wrestling) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dollhouse (professional wrestling) (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ric Flair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gene Anderson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm DMacks. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. It is not your place to declare that Ahmadiyya are not Muslims. DMacks (talk) 16:39, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. The Ahmadiyyas are considered Muslims for Wikipedia. — kashmīrī ^TALK 18:20, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

16 Carat Gold Tournament (2016) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 16 Carat Gold Tournament (2016). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 05:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mark Linton. Thank you for your work on British J-Cup (2021). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mark Linton. Thank you for your work on The Billington Bulldogs. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mark Linton. Thank you for your work on Strong Style Evolution. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:16 Carat Gold Tournament (2016)

Hello, Mark Linton. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "16 Carat Gold Tournament".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]