User talk:Madreterra

May 2013

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Back to School (Mini Maggit), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. I call the big one bitey (talk) 00:42, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Madreterra, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 15:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Channel Orange, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 15:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to PBR&B. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 05:39, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Nostalgia, Ultra, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 08:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have a talk page, you (obviously) have a talk page, either article you edit has a talk page (Talk:Channel Orange, Talk:Nostalgia, Ultra). If you can justify your changes, do so there. Otherwise, you're edits suggest you are pushing your agenda of using the phrase "alternative R&B" instead of "PBR&B" (for which there is an article; PBR&B, and for which there are source citing it as the genre of the aforementioned album articles). Originally, you made an unsourced addition ([1]) purely based on your POV, then you found a source with the title "Alt R&B" in it ([2]), even though nothing in that article actually says Channel Orange is an Alternative R&B album, so you were engaging in original research. Then you inexplicably restored your addition ([3]) without any explanation (although you do know how to use an edit summary, as shown here). The genres in the infobox for Channel Orange are directly supported in the article's Music and lyrics section, second sentence. So why do you insist on restoring your change? Dan56 (talk) 08:41, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of U.S. cities with large Polish-American populations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Little Poland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Texian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scots-Irish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Channel Orange, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dan56 (talk) 00:21, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scarface (1932 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Minerva (song), you may be blocked from editing. It seems you have been warned about this too much. ^Myname^isnot^dave (talk/contribs) 14:35, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Back to School (Mini Maggit), you may be blocked from editing. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 15:56, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Around the Fur, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 17:03, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crosses (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Witch house (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:31, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you recently removed some content from South Philadelphia without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SummerPhD (talk) 22:08, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited EP 2 (Crosses EP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Witch house (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to South Philadelphia, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 19:51, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm John from Idegon. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bensonhurst, Brooklyn, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 22:33, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TEDickey (talk) 07:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crosses (Crosses album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Witch house (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crosses (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Witch house. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Angelo Dundee

re cat, I don't think he ever boxed Unibond (talk) 11:59, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Working Class

Since you continue to insist on editing the Delaware County page and saying it is majority working class, what communities would you say are legitimately working class? I'd like to see a list of them, and see how they make up the majority of the county. Having grown up in a legitimately working class/lower-middle class part of the county I can say for a fact that only a very small part of the county consists of that. Have you actually looked at this county objectively before? The majority of it is middle class suburbia, just like the majority of this metro is. The only legitimately working class communities are Chester, Marcus Hook, Trainer and the other communities along the Delaware River, and the communities along the lower Darby Creek like Folcroft (to an extent), Sharon Hill, Darby, Colwyn, Collingdale, Clifton, parts of Lansdowne, parts of Yeadon, parts of Upper Darby township, Millbourne, and the part of Havertown the old Newtown Square branch freight line used to run through. No other part of the county is the least bit working class. It's either newer exurban sprawl or aged suburban sprawl, with the exception of older urban places like Swarthmore and Media. Therefore, I'm not sure how anybody can objectively claim the majority of the county is working class. 24rhhtr7 (talk) 04:45, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Adrenaline (album), you may be blocked from editing. I have started a post on the talk page where consensus can be reached regarding this issue. Please refrain from using a concert review as a reliable source for the genre of an album. While you may not agree personally with Ultimate Guitar Archive and iTunes, they are reliable sources dealing specifically with the album. PS-edit summaries are very helpful. Rob van vee 09:57, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Josh Homme, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 19:54, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Deftones, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fezmar9 (talk) 06:32, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Political hip hop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fun Lovin' Criminals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mafioso. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Political hip hop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public Enemy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Italian regions

The Italian names are enough in order not to overload the pages with other names (including dialects).--93.32.187.207 (talk) 19:16, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is that your reasoning? Or do you just dislike dialects and view them as low-class? Madreterra (talk) 19:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I don't hate anything. Next time you start the discussion with a similar attack, I will ask for a block. There are hundreds of dialects in Italy, one for each town, it is impossible to write the way each town names its own region. So Italian names are enough.--93.32.187.207 (talk) 19:22, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Sia (musician), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Reliable sources only Weegeerunner (talk) 21:42, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Demographics of Philadelphia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nativism and Puerto Rican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jewish-American organized crime, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Lowery and Showtime. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Valley girl, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 12:45, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greaser (subculture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Biker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Northwestern Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frankish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Human Beans

added a link pointing to Desert rock

Tres Dias (album)

added a link pointing to Desert rock

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:17, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas DeSimone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jimmy Burke. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sophie Dee

Please do not unsourced content to Wikipedia like you did to Sophie Dee, you are already on thin ice as it is. --Fruitloop11 (talk) 23:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Haunted attraction (simulated), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Woodlands. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mosaic

Hallo Madreterra in principle you are right, for the mosaic that you removed there is clearly non consensus. Please comment on the thread, your observation are welcome. Alex2006 (talk) 07:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of diasporas page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Korn (album), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Rob van vee 16:47, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Korn

I removed your edit on Korn (album) because the consensus for the genre field on that album is simply and only nu metal. Nu metal is a subgenre of alternative metal and adding alternative metal is quite redundant. The review for the album probably was typed before the nu metal label was famous and known among music journalists and critics. If that review was typed today, I bet it would be calling the album nu metal instead. The consensus for that album is for the genre field to just say "nu metal". Before you try re-adding alternative metal to the genre field on the Korn (album) article. Just leave me a message on my talk page and start a new section on that Korn album article's talk page. Statik N (talk) 23:54, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we can assume that Erlewine was unaware of the nu metal label when he wrote the review. Nu metal was already a 'thing' when the Korn album came out in '94. Binksternet (talk) 00:56, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah but the nu metal label probably didn't come out in 1994 and it didn't become commonly used until the 2000s. I think 2003 is when critics and music journalists started to use the label "nu metal" a lot and again the consensus for the Korn (album) article's genre field is just nu metal. Nu metal is a subgenre of alternative metal. So adding alternative metal is quite redundant. Statik N (talk) 01:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Either way, I fail to see how adding "alternative metal" to the genre description of a clearly alternative metal album is a problem. I can understand a problem with removing "nu metal," but the addition of "alternative metal" is not redundant to the point of being unproductive or confusing. "Funk metal" is also technically a subgenre of alternative metal, but numerous articles on bands and albums contain both "alternative metal" and "funk metal" side-by-side. If anything, I think it especially makes sense considering the application of the term "nu metal" to Korn's debut album is, as you argue, more commonly found in retrospective reviews of and commentary on the album rather than contemporaneous reviews of the album in 1994. However, User:Binksternet is also correct in that the term was in fact already in use at the time, albeit to a lesser extent. Once again, either way, it is a sourced genre that does not take away from the article but could arguably in fact improve the article by showing that the album has not always been blanketly labeled "nu metal." I hardly have a dog in this fight, and I certainly have no diehard agenda; while Korn isn't my favorite band or even close, I've heard the album, and I would say that, in the context in which it was released, it would likely have been labeled "alternative metal" by most critics in 1994, especially prior to the later commercial breakthrough of the genre known as "nu metal." But, as my opinion is irrelevant, and as there is nothing that says that later retrospective genre labels can't be used in describing an album, I have no problem with using "nu metal" to describe the album. Rather, I simply don't see what problem exists with adding "alternative metal" to the genre box. Adding "rock" or "heavy metal" or such would be overly redundant and unnecessary, but adding "alternative metal" should hardly be controversial or utterly redundant, especially seeing as there is a large overlap and much inconsistency in what critics classify as "alternative metal" and "nu metal," to the point where in many cases it often seems as if the two are different genres rather than a genre and subgenre. Madreterra (talk) 18:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think some articles that call an album both funk metal and alternative metal are about an album that has songs that are standard alternative metal or maybe these articles' genre fields are redundant and should just say "funk metal". I do not consider your opinion irrelevant. In the 1990s, the term nu metal may have been around but hardly any critics even knew the term. Critics started to actually often use the term in like 2001, 2002 or 2003. Yes, the album is truly alternative metal. However, it is 100% nu metal and nu metal is a subgenre of alternative metal. I will agree that adding heavy metal to the genre field is very redundant though. Remember some funk metal bands also probably play standard alternative metal. Some don't, and if alternative metal is on their genre field then it's obviously redundant. Statik N (talk) 21:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karma to Burn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Desert rock. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Acid Rock, you may be blocked from editing. --76.107.252.227 (talk) 08:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Acid Rock. --76.107.252.227 (talk) 11:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Acid rock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Psychedelic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Concept album, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Poliziotteschi

added a link pointing to Militant

Taxi Driver

added a link pointing to Depression

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of conspiracy theories, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nativist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diminutive, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darling. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Prehistoric Italy into Hill people. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. --Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:18, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Sirius XM Radio channels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of conspiracy theories, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reptilian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:15, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did at Kiss Land. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 16:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research and neutral point of view policies by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Channel Orange. Dan56 (talk) 23:28, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned numerous times in the past about genre warring, adding improperly cited material, and original research. The sources you cited do not explicitly call Channel Orange an alternative R&B album or anything along those lines. They merely mentioned in in an overall discussion on alternative R&B artists, but there's already a source cited in the article in which Barry Walters from Spin mentioned it as being part of "the second wave of PBR&B releases". Why do you insist on making your recent edits, fishing for any source (even those as obscure as "Hitthefloor"?), just to justify changing "PBR&B" to "alternative R&B"? Your recent slew of edits shows your trying to push a particular point of view rather than contribute or improve any of those articles ([4], [5], [6], [7], [8]). Dan56 (talk) 23:50, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deftones & Post-Metal

Hello! I noticed that with these edits[9][10][11] you have silently reverted my edits without comment in such a way that won't set off the notice in my alerts. Did you have a chance to read my edit summaries before reverting? In them I mentioned (or at tried to in the small space I'm provided) that while the view or belief that Deftones are a post-metal band does exist within a tiny subset of the metal blog community, it is very much a minority view only held only by an almost insignificant percentage of the vast abundance of sources. Here on Wikipedia, we try to only represent prominent and significant view points. Per WP:WEIGHT, "Generally, the views of tiny minorities should not be included at all, except perhaps in a "see also" to an article about those specific views." Given the sources provided and additional research I conducted on the matter, out of hundreds of thousands of articles on Deftones, only a really small handful of sources made a passing reference to Deftones having a small influence from post-metal. It might be okay to make a small mention of this on the band's page (as I left behind in my edits) but to claim that the band is purely a post-metal band or that any of their albums are purely post-metal albums is not only unsupported by the majority of sources (or in some cases, ANY of the sources) it appears to be a plainly false claim. I thought I'd discuss this with you here before opening an WP:ANI discussion about it. Fezmar9 (talk) 04:00, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for reverting in that way, I wasn't trying to be sneaky. That's just the way I've always done it, I never even considered the notice alerts. Anyway, I agree that, for some of the albums, "post-metal" is inadequately (or not at all) sourced. There is, I believe, sufficient sources for Gore being explicitly labeled as "post-metal." I think the confusion with the other albums lies in the fact that many of the sources state that the albums contain a mix of metal and shoegaze, which would seem to fit the definition of "post-metal." That said, you're right: in regards to the other albums (other than Gore), there aren't enough sources, or at least mainstream sources, that explicitly mention "post-metal." However, I disagree with the removal of Deftones from the List of post-metal bands article. I'd say there are more than enough reliable sources referring to Deftones as "post-metal" to warrant their inclusion on the list. The problem, however, is that, although there are some mainstream sources explicitly using "post-metal" in reference to the band, the vast majority of mainstream sources mention them as "shoegaze metal," "metalgaze," or a mix of shoegaze or dream pop with metal. So, while in my opinion (which obviously isn't relevant) those terms are interchangeable with "post-metal," I'd agree they are probably not explicit enough. Madreterra (talk) 03:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Acid rock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did at Trilogy. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 19:38, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research and neutral point of view policies by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Kiss Land. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 19:52, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how I'm adding personal analysis. Both of the sources that I provided refer to the Kiss Land album as "alternative R&B." Admittedly, I could see where the LA Times source is less direct in calling the album "alternative R&B," but I assumed the context was enough: the article is titled "Grammys: Alternative R&B largely overlooked in nominations," and it specifically discusses alternative R&B artists at the Grammys. The article includes Kiss Land as an example of an Alternative R&B album snubbed by the Grammys. Furthermore, and perhaps more importantly, there is NO SOURCE for the "PBR&B" tag on the article. I fail to see how I'm the one in violation of POV policies. You are removing the sourced content I provided, while the "PBR&B" tag, which is not only unsourced but redirects to the same page as "alternative R&B," is left untouched. It's more than a little ludicrous. I'm thoroughly confused as to why you find the "alternative R&B" link so contentious. I do not intend to add contentious or original content.

That said, I was mistaken with the link I provided for the Trilogy article. The article linked does not in fact reference Trilogy. That's my mistake. I intended to link [ http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/features/alternative-rb-much-more-than-bump-n-grind-9142021.html ] This article (from a major news publication) refers to Trilogy as being Alternative R&B ("alt-R&B"): ("The year 2011 was a turning point, when music makers began to break with convention, leading to the emergence of some of the key artists that have defined the alt-R&B sound. Frank Ocean’s February 2011 mixtape, Nostalgia, Ultra, was the first to hit, featuring samples of MGMT and Radiohead. A month later, The Weeknd, aka the Canadian vocalist Abel Tesfaye, released the first of three mixtapes, now known collectively as Trilogy, also heavily relying on samples.") Again, I assumed the context was clear despite the article not clearly stating word-for-word "Trilogy is alternative R&B." But apparently I was wrong to assume this. Madreterra (talk) 01:27, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Those sources are not reliable enough for genres, and Alternative R&B and PBR&B are the same genre. Me and Dan56 already explain it to you last month ago. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 20:37, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Still not sure about the sources being unreliable (LA Times?), but I concede that maybe the sources rely too much on context and perhaps are not explicit enough. And seeing as it's the same genre, it's not a big deal to me. Although I realize this isn't the first time we've butted heads over this, I really never intended to edit war. I just didn't realize the sources were so contentious. My mistake. I should've talked this out with you both before. I will say, though, that part of the reason that I put "alternative R&B" in addition to "PBR&B" is that it seemed to me, based on the sources that I've come across, that "alternative R&B" is a bit more of a mainstream (and certainly less contentious) way of referring to the genre. Though there is the SPIN article that Dan56 referenced before, so it seems pretty neck and neck as to which is the more frequently used term. In the end, not a big deal either way to me. Madreterra (talk) 02:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the best thing you can do is, establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. That's why we have them. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:11, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sixth family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rival. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Guido (slang)

added a link pointing to Lower-class

List of fictional gangs

added a link pointing to Triads

Poliziotteschi

added a link pointing to Cynicism

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation page style: One bluelink (live link) per line

Thank you for your work on Greenfly. Unfortunately, disambiguation pages do not follow the same stylistic rules as normal pages. In particular,

there should be only one live link per entry.

Please see the disambiguation style guide for more information. If you have any questions not answered there, drop me a note or try the help desk. By the way, I have already brought Greenfly into line with the guidelines.. Ubcule (talk) 12:50, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Genres

It's not that it's against the rules, but why are genres the only thing you seem concerned about? Can't you actually help cite some real content? dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 19:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited British Expeditionary Force (World War II), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mortar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Battle of Dunkirk into British Expeditionary Force (World War II). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 03:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Horrorcore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Absurdist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Madreterra. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Acid rock

An article that you have been involved in editing—Acid rock—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. --MASHAUNIX 12:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Garage rock

Would you be interested in joining the garage rock task force? It focuses on 1960s music (as well as a smaller 1980s subgenre known as garage punk) that was, for the most part, underground for its time but largely popular for revivalists. Hope this interests you and that you can join!TheGracefulSlick (talk) 18:08, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am interested. Thank you for the invite!

Madreterra (talk) 22:41, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Italians

Do you actually read the sources?--93.36.7.58 (talk) 07:03, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire

All material on Wikipedia must be verifiable and supported by citations from reliable sources. Please read the following text, taken from WP:Verifiability, one of our basic policies:

All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed.

So, if you want to add a statement to the above article which says that the majority of the victims were Jewish or Italian, you must provide a citation from a reliable source to support it. Please do not add the information to the article again without such a citation. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not quite sure what you mean. I merely added wiki-links around the aforementioned ethnic groups, not content. The material to which you are referring is already in the article, and it is quite well-sourced as far as I can tell. Multiple sources throughout the article, in fact, state that the victims of the fire were almost entirely Jewish or Italian immigrants. Regardless, I haven't really added any new material; I only provided wikilinks brackets around the ethnic group names in the article.

However, I did previously add the categories of "Category:Jewish-American history" and "Category:Italian-American history", if that's what you're referring to. I'm not sure how one provides sources when adding categories, but I could most certainly provide such sources, even just by using sources already in the article. However, if it helps, here are two sources I found right now that not only support the fact that the majority of victims were Italian and Jewish women, but also specifically refer to the factory fire as part of "Italian-American history" and "Jewish-American history".

Thank you for taking time to ensure reliability and properly sourced content, and I certainly don't mean to add any unsourced material. However, I don't see why adding wikilink brackets and categories would be contentious considering the abundance of reliable sources.

Madreterra (talk) 07:09, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that was entirely my mistake, I misread what you did in your edit. I've self-reverted to restore your edits, and I offer you my apologies. Beyond My Ken (talk) 14:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclops

Please review WP:OVERLINKING, Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 20:45, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject Organized crime


	Hello, Madreterra. You are invited to join WikiProject Organized crime, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of Organized crime topics. Please check out the project, and if interested feel free to join by adding your name to the member list. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:41, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern or Central

Hi,

I see that another user has removed your added content from the article Poland. I think it's best if you take it to talk and start another vote or discussion. It's a fair option. Oliszydlowski (TALK), 13:44, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

It's pretty obvious that Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary are the core countries of Central Europe. I do understand that some other sources simplify geographical division of Europe and and divide the continent simply on west and east but every single source which include Central Europe puts all above mentioned countries in this region. What is so special for you about location of Poland in Europe. I can show you many sources according to which Slovenia is placed in Eastern Europe and Austria which lies exactly north of the Slovenia is described as wester european country. The simplified UN classification is a perfect example of such simplification which has nothing to do with real location of some countries. They are both descirbed in the first line as a Central european countries beacuse this is simply the truth. The same truth as the fact that Poland is situated in Central Europe also. My proposition is to to leave a Central Europe as it was and rework a "note" similar to the the one which is included in Slovenia lead section. NeonFor (talk) 11:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Risk of 3RR at Poland

Poland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Even if you are right, it is unwise to risk violating WP:3RR over the Central Europe/Eastern Europe thing. Better to propose something on the talk page. A WP:Request for comment is one option to consider. EdJohnston (talk) 22:12, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EdJohnston. I understand that taking a disagreement to the talk page is always the better option, or at least always better than edit-warring. And I probably should get a consensus on the talk page before I add the note that details the common regional descriptions of Poland. However, (and I am genuinely asking for you opinion here, not being facetious), do you believe it's necessary for me to start yet another talk page discussion or RfC on the regional placement of Poland? It's been discussed time and again and fairly recently, and it appears the outcome in previous discussions was that both "Eastern Europe" and "Central Europe" should remain.

Looking through the edit history, it seems that this compromise never materialized on the page due to constant reverts by editors opposed to the inclusion of "Eastern Europe." I'm just wondering how it will be any different after another discussion. The outcome of a discussion will likely be the same, while in practice the page will continue to just use "Central Europe" in the opener, as highly motivated and passionate editors will likely continue to revert any sourced content referring to Poland as part of Eastern Europe. I understand these editors' impassioned motivation for removing "Eastern Europe" from the page; I really do, I get it, I understand the reasons behind it. But it's highly POV and seems awfully unencyclopedic to ignore a countless number of sources due to personal or politically-motivated disagreement with said sources. Madreterra (talk) 15:52, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If the words of the article were never modified due to the RfC, that is a thing which you could discuss on the talk page. I was hoping you could ask the closer of the RfCs, i.e. User:LavaBaron but he is currently blocked. Since asking the closer is not an option, would you consider reading over the two RfCs on your own and making a judgment on a new article wording that would best satisfy the concerns expressed? If you find one, you could propose it on talk. It is not hard for admins to enforce a clear talk page agreement when there is one, so if you manage to get support for a compromise on the talk page, it will be possible for admins to defend it. EdJohnston (talk) 16:16, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Poland is covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBEE

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EdJohnston (talk) 12:51, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Heavy psych article

Hello,
I saw your edits on the heavy metal article. I've been working on a new article titled as heavy psych, which is a precursor to heavy metal music. However, I'm not sure how to get around it; would you be interested in contributing?

Thanks, Myxomatosis57 (talk) 07:26, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Capaci bombing

Hey Madreterra. I couldn't believe the Capaci bombing wasn't a page on the English Wikipedia, so I've recently created it. Feel free to take a look and add info. Saluti, Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 17:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Maremma Sheepdog a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:49, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove sourced content (Italians)

Again, you can have your point of view on the matter, but reality is pretty different in Italy as explained by the sources. E.g. I am from Sicily and I am able to speak just few words and famous or folkloristic sentences in Sicilian and totally unable to write or read that language. Same situation for my parents and friends. Some people here are more fluent in Sicilian and this is true, but a clear majority of people speak Italian much better than Sicilian and as the only mother tongue. Italian is the only official language in Sicily and used in the everyday life. Moreover between the Sicilian young generations the second language is often becoming English surpassing Sicilian. The same situation occurs in Italy with the exception of Valle d'Aosta and Trentino Alto Adige and some parts of Venezia Giulia. I strongly recommend you to further study modern Italy or to come here and visit us. :) --79.12.107.189 (talk) 16:55, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Listen, I do understand the reality. Infatti, sono italiano. But Wikipedia has certain rules about sourced content. Unfortunately, your personal and anecdotal experiences with parents and friends are not an adequate source and should not be used as a basis for defining "Italians" as a whole. That's just how Wikipedia works. But besides that fact, there are a two other important things to consider regarding this issue.

First, let me assure you that no one is trying to deny that the majority of Italians in Italy speak Italian. However, it's just not necessary or completely accurate to put "speak the Italian language as a mother tongue" in the first sentence as a absolute defining and necessary feature of "Italians". While today the majority of Italian nationals certainly speak Italian as a mother tongue, this has not always been the case and was definitely not the case until fairly recently. Nevertheless, those older Italian nationals who did not speak Italian as a mother tongue would still be considered "Italians", would they not? Yet, according to the definition you currently are putting in the lead sentence, these people would not be "Italians" because they did not "speak Italian as a mother tongue." You understand what I mean?

Secondly, the addition of "speak the Italian language as a mother tongue" is also unnecessary and needlessly specific because the Italian language would already be included under the definition of a shared Italian culture. The prior part of the lead sentence thus already includes the Italian language when it mentions "culture" ("who share a common culture, history and ancestry") Do you see how "who share common culture" already addresses the Italian language?

Also, I have to say that I think you're exaggerating a little bit here. MANY, MANY people in the older generations still speak their regional language. Most of the city of Naples and the surrounding area, including children and young people, speak napoletano as their major day-to-day language. People in valley towns near Bergamo in the North still speak Bergamasco dialects regularly. People in the mountain cities of Abruzzo still speak local languages with each other. All over Italy (including Sicily), many people of all ages speak regional dialects with family and friends. It's less common among younger Italians and upper middle class or upper class Italian people, sure. So, depending on your economic and social group, you could have grown up with less exposure to regional languages. But they remain spoken all over the country, and this is exactly what the sources indicate as well.

Again, no one is denying that the vast majority of Italian nationals are native Italian speakers. But it's just not necessary to put it in the lead sentence as an absolute defining trait of "Italians", especially without a source. Also, please see my edits on the Italians talk page for more of an explanation as to why the sources do not support the assertion that speaking Italian as a mother tongue is a necessary trait that defines all Italians.

Madreterra (talk) 00:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In fact there are sources who support the initial statement so please do not remove sourced statements. Mine was just a personal clarification in a talk page and of course not to be used as source, sources which supports the things you continuously remove are already in the page: I am not even commenting on your point about upper/middle classes cause I find it absurd in the year 2000 and also offensive for the people who also speak the regional languages.--79.12.107.189 (talk) 10:39, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Categories in biography articles

Please do not add religion, ethnic, or descent categories or information to biography articles without first ensuring that 1) the category is supported by reliably sourced article content, 2) the individual identifies as such, and 3) it is a defining characteristic of the individual . Please see WP:BLPCAT, WP:EGRS, and WP:CATDEF for additional information.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:46, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Madreterra. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dragpipe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punk metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category for merging

Hi there, I nominated a category you started for merging.--TM 23:51, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:OVERLINKING

Please see MOS:OVERLINK. Things like country names and common words should not be linked. -- Ssilvers (talk) 08:25, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Before adding, find wide consensus and valid sources.Thanks.Maxim3377 (talk) 08:13, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus

You've no consensus in adding last sentences on Italy article.They'll be removed.I checked Italy history and you were stopped several times.If you won't revert i'll do that.AllianzAG2018 (talk) 10:30, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Observe and Report, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Madreterra. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Philadelphia English, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 02:31, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Warned numerous times previously. Knock it off please. Toddst1 (talk) 03:35, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hill people for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hill people is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

You contributed to this article some time ago. You may want to contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hill people. Thanks, Aymatth2 (talk) 01:35, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vito Marcantonio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Socially liberal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:24, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mid-Atlantic accent (disambiguation)

The article Mid-Atlantic accent (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:ONEOTHER, "If there are only two topics to which a given title might refer, and one is the primary topic, then a disambiguation page is not needed".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:45, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mid-Atlantic accent (disambiguation)

Could you explain why you think this disambiguation page is necessary? Since there are only two articles that could be known by that name (one of which isn't even about an accent, strictly speaking), they can be (and are) disambiguated using hatnotes, with no need for a disambiguation page. It's possible I've missed something though. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 11:41, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mid-Atlantic accent (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mid-Atlantic accent (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mid-Atlantic accent (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:32, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited African-American organized crime, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Migration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at You Keep Me Hangin' On. SummerPhD^v2.0 16:45, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fig sign, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Latin Europe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sunflower (Post Malone and Swae Lee song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:26, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Sunflower (Post Malone and Swae Lee song). SummerPhD^v2.0 22:06, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northeast Philadelphia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puerto Rican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:30, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Psychological horror, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emotional disturbance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Fell in Love with a Girl. SummerPhD^v2.0 05:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Southern Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Axeman of New Orleans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ant-Man (film), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —El Millo (talk) 06:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thor (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —El Millo (talk) 06:25, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Marvel Comics characters: H, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bear trap.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fringe Science

Hi Madreterra. You have added Mad Scientist as a See Also on Fringe science twice now, and both times this has been reverted. It is unclear to me why you want to add this. A mad scientist is a fictional concept, fringe science is a real-world subject. If you want to add it back, please discuss the proposed change at Talk:Fringe science before changing the article again. See WP:BRD. Thanks, Laplorfill (talk) 18:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please use edit summaries - these help other editors understand why you are making changes and avoid cycles of reversion. Thanks, Laplorfill (talk) 18:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mid-Atlantic / Philly English

Hello! As a frequent editor on the Mid-Atlantic American and Philadelphia English dialect pages, I wondered if you had any thoughts you'd like to add for or against this merger proposal. Thanks! Wolfdog (talk) 16:43, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edgar Allan Poe

Hello, friend. Would you be kind enough to clarify your additional information and citations in the article on Edgar Allan Poe? One sentence now has three references and another has two, but it is unclear what information can be cited to which source. It is more than acceptable to include a reference mid-sentence, if that helps. As you may know, the article is at featured status as well as a "vital" article and is, therefore, intensely scrutinized. Thank you in advance. --Midnightdreary (talk) 17:57, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, I would echo a comment above requesting consistent use of edit summaries, especially on high profile articles with many watchers. Thank you again. --Midnightdreary (talk) 17:58, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Organised crime newsletter

Hello, Madreterra.

You are receiving this one-time message because in the past, you have shown immense interest in the articles coming under the scope of Wikipedia:WikiProject Organized crime, or you have contributed to these articles substantially.

It is my pleasure to tell you that we starting a semi-annual newsletter, and if you would like to receive this quarterly newsletter, then kindly add your name in list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Organized crime/newsletter. Regards, —usernamekiran (talk) sign the (guestbook) 19:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2nd FAR on heavy metal music

Hey again. I started the 2nd FA review on heavy metal music. You were involved on the article in the past, so I wonder whether you're still interested in it. Thanks. --George Ho (talk) 06:32, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Based on" additions at Marvel Cinematic Universe film articles

Please stop mass-adding every comic counterpart to every character in MCU-film cast lists. Discuss its inclusion at WT:MCU first. —El Millo (talk) 17:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Madreterra, those links are excessive because they can already be found on their MCU character page or at the top of their sections on Characters of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Captain America: The First Avenger, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —El Millo (talk) 17:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald Paul Bucca

Your addition of uncited material to Ronald Paul Bucca has been reverted. Since this talk page is filled with various warnings about your violations of Wikipedia's policies on Verifiability, No Original Research and Source Citation, which you have spent years ingoring, I will contact an administrator about this. Nightscream (talk) 14:47, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Guappo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Code of honor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 14:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have had many final warnings over the years about original research; enough is enough. Graham87 14:56, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify re my edit summary: I have never been directly involved with responding to your edits on this article, though I have noticed your behaviour there over the years. Graham87 14:56, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Madreterra. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:31, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]