User talk:Lk95/Archive 9
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Lk95. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Happy New Year, Lk95!
Lk95,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 18:51, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 18:51, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. Happy New Year to you too! Lk95 (talk) 10:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:La loto, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 23:38, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:La loto
Hello, Lk95. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "La loto".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:10, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
January 2023
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Everybody Dies in Their Nightmares. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks! Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Rush!
I thought you would've accepted by now that I am going to do things before you sometimes. After all these years Lk, and you're still competing with me to do some of them. You added the Irish chart at the split second the chart was updated on Rush!. You were very clearly waiting there on that article to add that chart with the formatting already added and that's silly. You even added it before the number-one album in Ireland this week. Please stop this nonsense and don't try and compete with me on topics I'm very clearly interested in. This is far from the first time you've clearly lied in wait. You can handle not doing everything, and if you remember, I told you you could take over doing the Irish chart a couple of years ago. Before that you never had any interest. Really petty behaviour from you. Ss112 15:04, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- See your email. I'm done asking you for favours. Ss112 15:10, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
BVMI website
Hey, Do you still have access to the German certification database? TheWikiholic (talk) 22:20, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- @TheWikiholic: The new link is https://www.musikindustrie.de/wie-musik-zur-karriere-werden-kann/markt-bestseller/gold-/platin-und-diamond-auszeichnung/datenbank –IWL04 • 16:46, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Simply the Best (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anitta.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Lord of the Lost - Blood & Glitter.png
Thanks for uploading File:Lord of the Lost - Blood & Glitter.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:YoungBoy Never Broke Again - WTF.png
Thanks for uploading File:YoungBoy Never Broke Again - WTF.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:59, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
May 2023
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Speak Now (Taylors Version). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 07:45, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Hy
I have a website and I would like to create a Wikipedia page for it.
I've seen you done a lot of edits and page creations, so I thought I might approach and ask you if you would like to help me create one.
Would love to hear from you.
Have a great day! Wagnertattoo (talk) 16:33, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Doja Cat - Streets (Silhouette Remix).png
Thanks for uploading File:Doja Cat - Streets (Silhouette Remix).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
In the End It Always Does moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to In the End It Always Does. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and advertorials does not satisfy WP:GNG. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 12:04, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Reading Beans: Fundamentally disagree. This satisfies WP:NALBUMS with the amount of sources reporting on its impending release. Dismissing sources reporting on a band's upcoming release as "advertorials" when this is the sourcing all upcoming albums generally have and this is so soon before its release is a bizarre overcompensation and something I have rarely come across on this website. I have reverted your move into draftspace, and if you disagree beyond this point, please take said disagreements to AfD by filing a discussion there. This is absolutely a notable release, as the band's debut album was widely reviewed by critics upon release in 2019. There is enough reason (given the sources reporting its impending release) that it will be reviewed pretty widely upon release in five days. Ss112 11:55, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks @Ss112: definitely agree. @Reading Beans: While probably not being on too many people's radar, the album has at least been notable since April 2023. The sources provived (and surely more out there) prove that there is enough coverage to warrant an encyclopedic article. I personally find it a little discouraging to editors to revert music articles back into draft space without perhaps fully grasping the extent of notability. Lk95 (talk) 14:57, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Lk95, @Ss112, I'll have to wait till the next seven days before taking it to AfD since it looks promising. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 16:36, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks @Ss112: definitely agree. @Reading Beans: While probably not being on too many people's radar, the album has at least been notable since April 2023. The sources provived (and surely more out there) prove that there is enough coverage to warrant an encyclopedic article. I personally find it a little discouraging to editors to revert music articles back into draft space without perhaps fully grasping the extent of notability. Lk95 (talk) 14:57, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Pink Friday 2
Hi @Lk95, I have completed your requested move. It included swapping the two pages and that's left an unneeded redirect at User:Lk95/Pink Friday 2 which I have CSD'ed for deletion. Please let me know if you need my assistance anywhere else. Best regards, ─ The Aafī (talk) 16:54, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @TheAafi. Thank you for the quick assistance in moving the pages and nominating the redundant subpage for deletion. Lk95 (talk) 16:58, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Page
Hi @Lk95, Why do you always use R/T requests to delete/move an article you didn't create? What's wrong with editing without having to delete? Silencedoc (talk) 17:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Silencedoc. For the most part, I'd like to create articles in a namespace I started, that's why I request moves. There's absolutely nothing wrong with starting an article on someone else's namespace/redirect, just that I don't usually do it. Lk95 (talk) 17:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Gucci Mane - Delusions of Grandeur.png
Thanks for uploading File:Gucci Mane - Delusions of Grandeur.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Billie Eilish - What Was I Made For.png
Thanks for uploading File:Billie Eilish - What Was I Made For.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Invitation
Hello Lk95!
- The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Edit dispute
Hi, I opened up a discussion on The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill regarding the co/additional producers being removed from the infobox. If you’re able to could you please leave your opinion on the matter, if possible. I’ve seen your name around editing music articles before, I’m not quite sure if we’ve ever had an interaction or not, but I figured I’d reach out since there’s a dispute going on and I’m in need of some feedback from some smart editors regarding the issue. Thank you so much!
Talk:The_Miseducation_of_Lauryn_Hill#Producer/writing_credits Pillowdelight (talk) 09:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Lk95. Thank you for your work on For All the Dogs. User:Losipov, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good work!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Losipov}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Losipov (talk) 17:18, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Guts (Olivia Rodrigo album)
On 3 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Guts (Olivia Rodrigo album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when discussing her album Guts, Olivia Rodrigo said she "grew 10 years between the ages of 18 and 20"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Guts (Olivia Rodrigo album). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Guts (Olivia Rodrigo album)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Ways to improve Zone (EP)
Hello, Lk95,
Thank you for creating Zone (EP).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
You should use other sources Twitter posts are user generated sources
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Egeymi}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Egeymi (talk) 07:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Olivia Rodrigo - Bad Idea Right.png
Thanks for uploading File:Olivia Rodrigo - Bad Idea Right.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Single Soon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmopolitan.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
"Illusion or Forever" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Illusion or Forever has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 29 § Illusion or Forever until a consensus is reached. BangJan1999 02:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Rabbit Rabbit moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Rabbit Rabbit. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because It is an empty page.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Oliver Anthony
On 13 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oliver Anthony, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Rich Men North of Richmond" by Oliver Anthony was the first single to chart at number one on the Billboard Hot 100 with no previous chart history for its artist? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oliver Anthony. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Oliver Anthony), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Kusma (talk) 12:33, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Rich Men North of Richmond
On 13 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rich Men North of Richmond, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Rich Men North of Richmond" by Oliver Anthony was the first single to chart at number one on the Billboard Hot 100 with no previous chart history for its artist? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oliver Anthony. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rich Men North of Richmond), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Kusma (talk) 12:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 10,554 views (917.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2023 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Upcoming Olivia Rodrigo album has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 3 § Upcoming Olivia Rodrigo album until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:16, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Lil Tay - Sucker 4 Green.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lil Tay - Sucker 4 Green.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B3251 (talk) 06:56, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sudley - Fumble.png
Thanks for uploading File:Sudley - Fumble.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Rina Sawayama - Hold the Girl (2023).png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rina Sawayama - Hold the Girl (2023).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:31, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Chasing That Feeling
Thanks for creating the page "Do It Like That". I really enjoyed reading it. You might be interested in creating an entry on "Chasing That Feeling". It is in first place in World Digital Song Sales. Estyxxxx (talk) 13:21, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Nicki Minaj - Pink Friday 2 (vinyl cover).png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nicki Minaj - Pink Friday 2 (vinyl cover).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:46, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of For All the Dogs Scary Hour Edition
Hi, i’d like to inform you that your article is included in main article For All the Dogs Scary Hours Edition TheDarkKnightGotham (talk) 11:46, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Iñigo Quintero - Si No Estás.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Iñigo Quintero - Si No Estás.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Manchesterunited1234 (talk) 15:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Spiritual Cramp - Spiritual Cramp.png
Thanks for uploading File:Spiritual Cramp - Spiritual Cramp.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Not an Angel (song)
Hi, you have now created 4 redirects for the above song. I have added the Template:R avoided double redirect to three of these redirects, which read inter alia, "This is a redirect from an alternative title for Not an Angel (song), another redirect to the same title. Because double redirects are disallowed, both pages currently point to Tems#Discography. If Not an Angel (song) is expanded into a separate article or it is retargeted, this redirect will be recategorized to be updated." (My underlining).
So. if Not an Angel (song) is repointed to an album, or becomes an article, or even if somebody spots that the redirect should be at Not an Angel without disambiguation and with the correct capitalisation all these redirects will have to be administered again.
In short, the creation of multiple redirects for the same non-notable song is never, if ever, beneficial to Wikipedia, its editors or its readers. You are creating clutter which does not help. Assuming readers of WP have a basic knowledge of search engines there is also a reasonable argument that song redirects are surplus generally.
Thanks for your consideration and happy editing. Richhoncho (talk) 10:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- PS. You will also note I removed the R from song template on the miscapitalisations and unnecesary disambuguation pages because they are not songs, but incorrect titles.--Richhoncho (talk) 10:18, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
I note with sadness you are still creating redirects which are disallowed. Please explain how you think this is of any benefit to reader, editor or WP? Richhoncho (talk) 13:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- There might be notable songs titled the same in the future (or they exist already but without a namespace on this Wikipedia), so to be precautionally more precise with song titles I always create an extra redirect that specifies the artist in brackets. Lk95 (talk) 13:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Then you accept you are creating redirects which are 'disallowed' (the actual word you are adding to these redirects) Or to put it more plainly, not approved of. A quick read of Wikipedia:Article titles will confirm this. You are merely wasting your time, creating redirects which serve no purpose, cause problems at the time of creation and possibly again further down the road and, you should enlighten yourself as to how many people see these redundant redirects. Richhoncho (talk) 15:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- I have never once created a double redirect since I first started creating redirects around six years ago, which, by definition, describes a redirect that points to another (already existing) redirect. Can you point me to a guideline where it states that a potentially necessary disambiguation in redirects is disallowed? I know for a fact redirects even have been nominated at WP:RfD before and not been deleted.
- Another thing, Wikipedia:Article titles also states: "Article titles and redirects should anticipate what readers will type as a first guess and balance that with what readers expect to be taken to". In this specific instance, years are very commonly used as song or album titles. So is the title "Not an Angel". Song titles with such generic titles are fine to have an additional redirect that specifies the artist when it is likely that another artist releases a (notable) song with that exact same title. Lk95 (talk) 15:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- You say, "I have never once created a double redirect since I first started creating redirects around six years ago" yet the very redirect we are discussing is a redirect, created and notated as a disallowed redirect by you earlier today. --Richhoncho (talk) 17:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- No, the template you keep coming back to says double redirects are disallowed. I did not create a redirect pointing to another redirect here or ever, I created a redirect with additional disambiguation pointing to an actual article. Therefore that is not disallowed. You are mistaken. I wish to end this discussion now. Thanks. Lk95 (talk) 10:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Read it again. Richhoncho (talk) 12:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- I did – "double redirects are disallowed" – I did not create a double redirect. If you have an issue, nominate it at WP:RfD, otherwise please refrain from replying. Archiving this discussion now. Lk95 (talk) 11:16, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Read it again. Richhoncho (talk) 12:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- No, the template you keep coming back to says double redirects are disallowed. I did not create a redirect pointing to another redirect here or ever, I created a redirect with additional disambiguation pointing to an actual article. Therefore that is not disallowed. You are mistaken. I wish to end this discussion now. Thanks. Lk95 (talk) 10:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- You say, "I have never once created a double redirect since I first started creating redirects around six years ago" yet the very redirect we are discussing is a redirect, created and notated as a disallowed redirect by you earlier today. --Richhoncho (talk) 17:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Then you accept you are creating redirects which are 'disallowed' (the actual word you are adding to these redirects) Or to put it more plainly, not approved of. A quick read of Wikipedia:Article titles will confirm this. You are merely wasting your time, creating redirects which serve no purpose, cause problems at the time of creation and possibly again further down the road and, you should enlighten yourself as to how many people see these redundant redirects. Richhoncho (talk) 15:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
"PSA (SZA album)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect PSA (SZA album) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 20 § PSA (SZA album) until a consensus is reached. Elias 🌊 💬 "Will you call me?"
📝 "Will you hang me out to dry?" 13:34, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Revert
Hello. Sorry about that revert, I did not even realize I did that! It was purely an accident. Sorry for the confusion. Seacactus 13 (talk) 16:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- No problem, it happens. Lk95 (talk) 17:00, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
"PSA (album)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect PSA (album) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 27 § PSA (album) until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 18:10, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Ariana Grande discography. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
"Èko" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Èko has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 29 § Èko until a consensus is reached. (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)