User talk:Lil-unique1/Archive 13

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

Re:She Wolf

Why thank you! Thank you very much! It feels real good when someone appreciates your work. I already thanked you for your edits and I thank you for your help again here too :)
Hopefully someone takes the review soon and it becomes a GA class article ;)
I've also readied the singles from the album for Ga class too. Did It Again (Shakira song) is already a GAN, and I'll nominate She Wolf (Shakira song) and Gypsy (Shakira song) as soon as one of these nominations is done.
The only article left to work on is The Sun Comes Out World Tour which, if it and all the aforementioned articles becomes GA class, will make She Wolf a GA topic. I've never done a tour article before so I think this one is going to be the toughest. The first Shakira article I got to GA was Loca.
Thanks for appreciating again!
--WonderBoy1998 (talk) 18:14, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Glassheart Tour/GA1

 — Statυs (talk, contribs) 04:40, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Glassheart

When do you want to do it?  — AARON • ^TALK 16:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey

I was going to email you about something but I can't see the email this user link here?  — AARON • ^TALK 21:27, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Aaron, Zac (Status) asked me the same thing. I had email this user turned on but my Hotmail was hacked and I can't gain access to it. give me a chance to create a new one and ill link it back up. I couldnt see a link on zac's either. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:14, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

I don't think you can see the "email this user" feature unless you have an email specified. Let me know when you got something up and running.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 10:02, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

What do you think of this?

Here. Very interesting. I remember reading somewhere else that radio stations had been informed that Leona was releasing another unnamed single from the album too.  — AARON • ^TALK 15:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

A few months ago back on Heart FM, they played an interview with Leona and she said there was probably not be another single from the album. Maybe RCA want to recoop some money from the project and try a stateside launch along with the Xmas album. That takes Lewis to the end of her contract (she owes Sony 1 more album plus 1 re-release or greatest hits). — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 19:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

So her Christmas album is her final album under her Sony contract? What about RCA and Syco? I heard that she was planning a 2014 album too.  — AARON • ^TALK 21:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

It was my understanding that she owes Syco/RCA 5 albums. Spirit = one, Echo = two, Glassheart = three, Xmas = 4. So it depends how they view the Hurt EP and any forthcoming re-release of Glassheart as the link you sent me is not the only one claiming a potential re-release of Glassheart stateside. Also she was originally working on her fourth album for release this year but Cowell has postponed that to get the Xmas album done. I can't help but feel that this is one way of helping her to finish her contract quicker. Tbh an Xmas album doesn't otherwise make much sense :/ — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 13:42, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

The Xmas album will be her fourth though. Yeah it is a bit out of the blue, but if she does the Motown feel right, it could be huge. It needs to be upbeat though. No sad songs. I just want her to release "Glassheart" and get some US exposure on the charts.  — AARON • ^TALK 23:55, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Live It Up music video

Why do you think that the music video beach part is set in Fort Lauderdale? It was filmed there but not "set". The clip itself sources this. If you want an actual source, which I really don't think even needs to be in the lead, then here[1] Arre 11:46, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to join a discussion

Through this way, I inform there is a discussion about partially disambiguated titles, known as "PDABs". This subguide of WP:D was approved at VPP. I notify you about this because you has participated in at least one RM discussion in which PDAB is cited (in any form). You are welcome to give ideas about the future of this guideline at WT:D or to ignore this message. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:57, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Hotel Cabana

Orlady (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Lovebird (song)

I am happy to inform you this has been promoted to GA. The review follows. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 17:55, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lovebird (song)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adam Cuerden (talk · contribs) 19:28, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Right. Well. First of all, this article is fairly nearly there, but it has some issues.

First, though, the good. This article handles the reviews and analysis sections a lot better than most pop song articles, and they flow really well. Sources are a little sparse, but - correct me if I'm wrong - I believe the singer is still primarily known in the UK, so gets less coverage abroad? So we can let that pass.

However, there are a few issues with the opening few sections (the Lead through Production and composition). In general, this could use a copyedit, and... well, honestly, that's pretty much it, but I can be a bit more specific.

Lead:

• "The subject matter of the lyrics focus on how Lewis informers her lover that enough time has passed since their relationship ended for her to have developed as a person." - ignoring the glaring typo (should be informs), that's awkward phrasing, and has a lot of superfluous words, as well as a lack of clarity. I think what's meant is something like "The lyrics consist of Lewis informing her ex-lover that enough time has passed since their relationship for her to have moved on and to have developed as a person."
• "To promote "Lovebird", Lewis performed the song on Daybreak and Loose Women in the United Kingdom, in addition to La Voz in Spain." - Perhaps it's me not owning a television, but I have no idea what Daybreak, Loose Women, or La Voz are, and I'm certain people not from Britain won't either. Add a few descriptive words for each programme.
  • You don't need to own a TV to know what they are. I've added a description for each, but to be honest, if you don't know what they are, then click on them, that's the whole point of wiki-linking.  — AARON • ^TALK 19:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
    • I know, but it's better if it's not necessary, if it's likely a significant proportion of the audience won't know what they are. After all, pop music is international, and it's not that unlikely a lot of Americans will be reading this as well. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:45, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
      • Like I said, that's the reason why they are linked. But I've given a description of what they are anyway. So this point is done.  — AARON • ^TALK 16:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
• Structure: The structure is kind of a mess. By the second paragraph, very fewconsecutive sentences have at all similar themes. The lead needs reconstructed into a basic narrative.
  • It is in a basic narrative. This is how all (well-written) music articles are written. It's certainly is for the 68 GA's of mine that have passed.  — AARON • ^TALK 19:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
    • I apologise: let me clarify. The structure of the lead is a bit of a mess. I think a little reorganising to put related ideas together will help. It's not a huge mess, but it feels a little disjointed, and I'm not quite sure the paragraph divisions are in the right places. This is, however, one of the more difficult things to get "perfect" in an article. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:33, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
      • I think it's personal preference to be honest. Not all leads are the same, and this one is cohesive.  — AARON • ^TALK 16:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
        • Looking at it again, I've made a small rearrangement, and added a linking word. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 17:51, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Background

• The end of the first paragraph should read: "...had worked on a track with Scottish DJ Calvin Harris, and that Fraser T Smith would be producing for the album." Done.

Production

• "...produced by Josh Abrahams, Oligee and Coleman, under his production name Ammo" - who has the production name Ammo?
  • Coleman...  — AARON • ^TALK 19:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
    • Think we can fix that by putting parentheses around "under his production name, Ammo". I have done so. Also added an Oxford comma to help keep Coleman distinct from Oligee. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:33, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Live performances

• "Lewis leaves wearing an ivory sleeved dress and long skirt while she is trapped in the cage along with "jewelled eye decorations" in the video" - that makes no sense. She leaves the cage while being trapped in it?
  • She same dress that she wore while trapped in the cage. I have reworded.  — AARON • ^TALK 19:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
    • I've rearranged it a little bit more. I think it's better to mention her costume in the setup, not at the end. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:42, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

A decent start. As I said, mostly copyediting. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 19:28, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, though I disagree with some points.  — AARON • ^TALK 19:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

One additional point: Besides the typo of "where", what, exactly, is wrong with this reverted edit? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lovebird_%28song%29&diff=566326524&oldid=566324840 I was trying to simplify the explanation by making it apply more specifically to this video. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:42, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

I think Lil-Unique reverted it because he might have felt that the addition of "the occasionally used" but might have been unnecessary and a bit pointless to include.  — AARON • ^TALK 16:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Looked everything over, and made a minor edit to deal with the last thing holding me back from full support. I am now happy to ✓ Pass. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 17:51, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks  — AARON • ^TALK 18:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Just to note

The bot's gone a bit crazy, and decided to fail Lovebird despite me following the instructions to promote it. I've opened a message on WT:GAC. No clue what's happening - maybe all the miscellaneous old GA messages screwed the bot up. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:07, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 July newsletter

We're halfway through this year's penultimate round, and the competition is moving along well. Pool A's Sasata (submissions) currently leads overall, while Pool B's Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) is second. Both leaders are WikiCup veterans, and both have already scored over 600 points this month. If the round were to end today, Miyagawa (submissions), with 274 points, would be the lowest-scoring participant to make it through. This indicates that participants will need a score comparable to last year's (573, the highest ever) to qualify for the final. The high scores this year are a testament both to the quality of participants and to the increased focus on significant content (eligible for bonus points) in this year's competition. So far this round, both Sasata and Cwmhiraeth (submissions) have made up over half of their score through bonus points, with, for example, high importance FA koala earning Sasata a total of 440 points (from a multiplier of 4.4) and high-importance GA sea earning Cwmhiraeth a total of 216 points (from a multiplier of 7.2). Other articles on important topics submitted this round include a featured article on the Norman conquest of England by Ealdgyth (submissions), and good articles on Nobel laureate in literature Henryk Sienkiewicz, Nobel laureate in physics Hans Bethe, and the noted Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū. These articles are by Piotrus (submissions), Hawkeye7 (submissions) and Sturmvogel_66 respectively.

Other than that, there is not much to report! If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:10, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Ashanti Douglas

Just to notify you, BDD has made an alternative suggestion at Talk:Ashanti (entertainer). In ictu oculi (talk) 03:43, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Nicki Minaj videography

I currently opened a peer assess for the article Nicki Minaj videography, I was hoping that you could take a look, leave feedback for improvement and contribute to the article where you see it's nessessary. If you can help it would be appreciated. :-) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/Nicki_Minaj_videography/archive1 KaneZolanski (talk) 12:04, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Sexy to Me

[2] But according to you on "Hummingbird Heartbeat", label confirmation is not needed? — Status (talk · contribs) 23:01, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

HH received third party coverage confirming its single release. The label sent it to radio in Australia. STM was put on iTunes as part of the clearasil production promotion campaign that the song was used in. Much like "Heat" was released by Beyoncé in support of her fragrance of the same name. Also when releasing "Demonstrate" JoJo said it was her first single since "Disaster" and that she'd taken the album in a dofferent direction. I've always said in the numerous disxussions that there has been about songs and when they become singles, that every song/single has to be looked at individually and that a song released to retailers alone is NOT a single. Retailers dont decide what a single is, labels do. To my knowledge there was no promotion of the somg as a single other than a release and partial visual for the advertising campaign. Much the same as the iTunes coutdown singles, their release to iTunes does not automatically make them a single. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:10, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

That's not what I was referring to. I was just commenting on the matter of "needing label confirmation", when that's not the case. I agree that it's promo single, per sources that state so (I don't think any are included in the article, but I have seen the song be referred to as a "buzz single"). — Status (talk · contribs) 02:33, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Flat lists

This is what I wanted to email you about. — Status (talk · contribs) 02:06, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

I tried to email you but I couldnt find your email address anywhere or a link to email you? — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 15:16, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Yeah... I disabled my email a few days ago and forgot to re-enable it... It's enabled again now, haha. — Status (talk · contribs) 02:34, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Lil-unique1.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Lil-unique1.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Lil-unique1.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Lil-unique1.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 02:58, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Lil-unique1.gif

Hello, I stumbled across your userpage image when it was tagged by my bot as it did not have a proper license tag. On the image page you state that you only grant license to use it on your own pages and I am concerned that the image might not meet policy per this where it states that all user created images must be licensed under a free license. Because of this I'd like to ask if you would consider re-licensing the image under a free license as to meet the policy and to allow others to use the image should they wish. Thanks, Mifter (talk) 02:59, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

The New Classic

Here's something else that comes come directly from the horse's mouth, straight from her Twitter feed. User: 1Sire talk 06:59, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

About Heartbeat (Enrique Iglesias song)

The Heartbeat single was released September 30 and Nicole's single Poison around the same time, October 25. Who's to say that Heartbeat was not released as part of the promotion for Killer Love?

I'd also like to point out that in WP:CITELEAD, it says that there is no "exception to citation requirements specific to leads." If necessary, simply add a reflink to those citations below. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 01:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

I suppose you're right then. But what about "Music Video for "Heartbeat (India Mix)" was made...". Shouldn't that at least require a citation? Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 01:36, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Redirecting

The article in question is Alive (Jessie J album). MUSICBIO is a criteria for notability for musicians and bands, which is what I go off of to determine notability for albums as well. By criteria No. 1, the album is already notable for its own article on this encyclopdia.

• The Guardian
• Digital Spy (track listing)
• Idolator (track listing)
• Irish Mirror

So, I guess are these four sources enough for you to revert your redirect?HotHat (talk) 05:50, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

I went ahead and reverted you because it meets GNG guidelines now, after I added in the sources.HotHat (talk) 01:23, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Favorable

This is in conjunction with your editing of Talk a Good Game, which you removed an actual rating for a subjective opinion that is not a rating because The Boston Globe does not provide an actual rating.HotHat (talk) 06:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 August newsletter

This year's final is upon us. Our final eight, in order of last round's score, are:

1. Hawkeye7 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer who has contributed on topics of military history and physics, including a number of high-importance topics. Good articles have made up the bulk of his points, but he has also scored a great deal of bonus points. He has the second highest score overall so far, with more than 3000 points accumulated.
2. Casliber (submissions), another WikiCup veteran who reached the finals in 2012, 2011 and 2010. He writes on a variety of topics including botany, mycology and astronomy, and has claimed the highest or joint highest number of featured articles every round so far this year. He has the third highest score overall, with just under 3000 points accumulated.
3. Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 WikiCup champion, who writes mostly on marine biology. She has also contributed to high-importance topics, seeing huge numbers of bonus points for high-importance featured and good articles. Previous rounds have seen her scoring the most bonus points, with scoring spread across did you knows, good articles and featured articles.
4. Sasata (submissions), a WikiCup veteran who finished in second place in 2012, and competed as early as 2009. He writes articles on biology, especially mycology, and has scored highly for a number of collaborations at featured article candidates.
5. Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), the winner of the 2010 competition. His contributions mostly concern Naval history, and he has scored a very large number of points for good articles and good article reviews in every round. He is the highest scorer overall this year, with over 3500 points in total.
6. Ealdgyth (submissions), who is competing in the WikiCup for the second time, though this will be her first time in the final. A regular at FAC, she is mostly interested in British medieval history, and has scored very highly for some top-importance featured articles on the topic.
7. Miyagawa (submissions), a finalist in 2012 and 2011. He writes on a broad variety of topics, with many of this year's points coming from good articles about Star Trek. Good articles make up the bulk of his points, and he had the most good articles back in round 2; he was also the highest scorer for DYK in rounds 1 and 2.
8. Adam Cuerden (submissions) has previously been involved with the WikiCup, but hasn't participated for a number of years. He scores mostly from restoration work leading to featured picture credits, but has also done some article writing and reviewing.

We say goodbye to eight great participants who did not qualify for the final: Piotrus (submissions), Figureskatingfan (submissions), ThaddeusB (submissions), Dana boomer (submissions), Status (submissions), Ed! (submissions), 12george1 (submissions), Calvin999 (submissions). Having made it to this stage is still an excellent achievement, and you can leave with your heads held high. We hope to see you all again next year. Signups are now open for the 2014 WikiCup, which will begin on 1 January. All Wikipedians, whatever their interest or level of experience, are warmly invited to participate in next year's competition.

This last month has seen some incredible contributions; for instance, Cwmhiraeth's Starfish and Ealdgyth's Battle of Hastings—two highly important, highly viewed pages—made it to featured article status. It would be all too easy to focus solely on these stunning achievements at the expense of those participants working in lower-scoring areas, when in fact all WikiCup participants are doing excellent work. A mention of everything done is impossible, but here are a few: Last round saw the completion of several good topics (on the 1958, 1959 and 1962 Atlantic hurricane seasons) to which 12george1 had contributed. Calvin999 saw "S&M" (song), on which he has been working for several years, through to featured article status on its tenth try. Figureskatingfan continued towards her goal of a broad featured/good topic on Maya Angelou, with two featured and four good articles. ThaddeusB contributed significantly to over 20 articles which appeared on the main page's "in the news" section. Adam Cuerden continued to restore a large number of historical images, resulting in over a dozen FP credits this round alone. The WikiCup is not just about top-importance featured articles, and the work of all of these users is worthy of commendation.

Finally, the usual notices: If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 05:22, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

re: Naughty Boy peer review

Hey Lil-unique1/Archive 13, you have a reply at my talk page, for when you have a moment czar · · 14:12, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

I wish Leona would do something with "Glassheart" like Xtina did with "Let There Be Love"

I hate that the masses have never heard "Glassheart" and most likely never will. There's no chance of it now. She's finished the Christmas album. It needs to be a number one hit. It would smash US Holiday charts too, because as far as I know, no one is major is doing a Christmas album.  — ₳aron 21:16, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Couldn't agree more. Why doesn't she just release a fan gift? Erm... Kelly Clarkson has an Xmas album coming out as does Mary J Blige. Lewis is gonna have tough competition! @→ Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 21:20, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Oh really? I didn't know about them. Well Leona will do better here anyway. I feel compelled to get some sort of awareness/petition for her to give Glassheart some sort of release. It really bothers me!  — ₳aron 21:34, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Maybe one of those online petition things? We could link it on our talk pages and also popular forums like UKMIX? See if we can at least get people to download the song on a particular date even if Lewis won't release it? → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 21:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Yeah. I mean I think it could chart well on the Dance chart. I'm really up for trying and setting up a download weekend/week. I don't know how to start one though.  — ₳aron 21:53, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

I think getting on the forums is a good way and contacting Lewis' fansite. Tweeting Lewis (if you follow her on Twitter) etc? → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 22:28, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

WP:AGF

Read it. I have no idea how long you've been editing for, and to be honest, it's neither here nor there. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 13:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

And WP:BEFORE too. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 17:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Looks like snow. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 06:35, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Pink's The Truth About Love - pop punk earworm?

Hello. We all know Pink's album The Truth About Love is a pop album. But the term 'pop punk' in the infobox came from The Guardian says 'convert raw emotion into pop-punk earworms', it doesn't make sense. Earworm is a phrase include 'musical imagery repetition', 'involuntary musical imagery' and 'stuck song syndrome'.

Pop punk seems like an influences, not really a music genre. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.178.61 (talk) 04:56, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

whats wrong with the compromise

i don't know why you all dodge this question. and it starting to show that andy mabett is using the same "i ask what i want to ask" tactic in other music related templates...so i'm asking, why would we need an artist parameter if already proven not to be necessary for data granularity? He's proving to want additional parameters in other music templates. And i don't want these questions dodged and Andy assume consensus.Lucia Black (talk) 17:22, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Leona's Instagram picture

She posted a picture of her at a dance rehearsal and most of the comments speculated that it is something to do with "Glassheart"  — ₳aron 15:54, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps we'll get a "Glassheart" promo single? I hope so. Maybe they'll re-release the album in Europe/Australia. It didnt really impact anywhere outside of UK/Germany/Switzerland. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 19:38, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Yeah. I can't think what else she would be in dance rehearsal for?  — ₳aron 13:05, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Wikipedia Motivation Barnstar
		Good on you for being bold and initiating progressive discussion, particularly with regards to {{Infobox album}} and WP:DISCOGSTYLE! Adabow (talk) 02:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Aww many thanks! I really appreciate this! → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 15:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

[[Home Run (song)

Many thanks for your review and contribution. (Sometime genres might be peacefully entered on Misha B's main page LOL) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bodney (talk • contribs) 10:01, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Misha B

I see i added my thanks above regards Home Run in the wrong way. Sorry :)

Noting your semi-retirement ...If you have time could you pop along to the music genre discussion on the Misha B talk page MUSIC GENRES. I would value your independent third party contribution. Bodney (talk) 16:58, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

"Glassheart"

I set up a Twitter account and have tweeted so many times to different Leona fans with the hash tags Glassheart and WeWantGlassheartVideo lol  — ₳aron 17:31, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

whats your twitter? I'll retweet! → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 20:04, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

It's not my personal one, but i created one called @BuyGlassheart I got quite a few retweets and favourites really quickly lol  — ₳aron 23:05, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

I just looked (being a talk page stalker) and it says the account was suspended. Were you spamming? ;-) –anemoneprojectors– 12:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Not anymoreeee! Can't believe I got suspended. All i did was RT people who had mentioned Glassheart and tweeting to them saying to spread the word of downloading it! It's unsuspended now! lol Btw, we really need to work on Glassheart.  — ₳aron 15:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Maybe they reported you for spam (even though you weren't) - I think suspension is automatic now if enough people do it because I'm always reporting spammers for spam and they disappear really quickly. –anemoneprojectors– 16:02, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

unfortunately if you hit a certain number of retweets, tweets containing a particular phrase or certain number of tweets a minute it goes down as spam! :( What a shame... → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 21:08, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

It's not suspended now lol  — ₳aron 23:38, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Christina Aguilera 'Hurt' - soft rock?

Hi, sorry for interrupt, Christina Aguilera's Hurt is a pop ballad, but suddenly added soft rock. But Pandora site (for North America only) says mellow rock instrumentation, I think which is element or influences, and doesn't means soft rock. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.176.151 (talk) 04:10, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

About.com

The fact that an article is from About.com does not make it reliable per se; the reliability of the individual writer must be looked into. Bill Lamb is not reliable. See here and WP:RSN archives for more. Adabow (talk) 00:34, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I see that...

you have problems too with User:IT'SPAIN.—Iknow23 (talk) 04:29, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Yup. He/she says that they work for Geffen Records and is subtly influencing Keyshia Cole articles. They wouldn't let me add reliably sourced stuff about when the album was first recorded etc because its not what Geffen said is true etc. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 21:14, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Katy Perry Prism cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Katy Perry Prism cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:05, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 September newsletter

In 30 days, we will know the identity of our 2013 WikiCup champion. Cwmhiraeth (submissions) currently leads; if that lead is held, she will become the first person to have won the WikiCup twice. Sasata (submissions), Hawkeye7 (submissions)—who has never participated in the competition before—and Casliber (submissions) follow. The majority of points in this round have come from a mix of good articles and bonus points. This final round is seeing contributions to a number of highly important topics; recent submissions include Phoenix (constellation) (FA by Casliber), Ernest Lawrence (GA by Hawkeye7), Pinniped, and red fox (both GAs by Sasata).

The did you know (DYK) eligibility criteria have recently changed, meaning that newly passed good articles are accepted as "new" for did you know purposes. However, in the interests of not changing the WikiCup rules mid-competition, please note that only articles eligible for DYK under the old system (that is, newly created articles or 5x expansions) will be eligible for points in this year's WikiCup. We do, however, have time to discuss how this new system will work for next year's competition; a discussion will be opened in due course. On that note, thoughts are welcome on changes you'd like to see for next year. What worked? What didn't work? What would you like to see more of? What would you like to see less of? All Wikipedians, new or old, are also warmly invited to sign up for the 2014 WikiCup.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 22:46, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Leona's Christmas album

I can't wait for it!  — ₳aron 22:36, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Don't Hold Your Breath.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Don't Hold Your Breath.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:42, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Hotel Cabana

Hi, I've noticed you undo many of my edits to the Hotel Cabana page. I have no problem with this because you've justified them. I'm just wondering two things:

• Is my last edit a good enough verification of the release date or does it require an official statement from Naughty Boy?
• If the "No One's Here To Sleep" artwork is irrelevant in the article then how come a picture of a venue isn't?

Would appreciate both of these being explained to me. Not that I object to your edits at all, after all you've turned it from start-class into B-class! Regards, DJUnBalanced (talk) 16:55, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

The Art of Letting Go

In Mariah Carey's the art of letting go article, in the singles section, can you add that on October 14, Carey announced that the second single will be have it's world premiere on November 11, 2013 on Facebook. and also add it in the Mariah Carey article, in the American Idol, return to film, and The Art of Letting Go section. source. 78.130.254.2 (talk) 19:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

I am semi-retired. You're best bet is to go to the article talkpage and ask somebody there to make the edits for you. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 21:51, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Looking for some advice...

Hi - I've noticed that you're an experienced user and you've managed to turn a lot of stubs into high-class articles. I was wondering what I could do to improve my articles Brand New Machine and Torus (album), as I'd love to get these from start class to at least a C-class but I'm not sure where to head. I wondered if you'd have any recommendations? Regards, DJUnBalanced (talk) 21:44, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 October newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our champion, for the second year running, is Cwmhiraeth (submissions). Our final nine were as follows:

1. Cwmhiraeth (submissions)
2. Hawkeye7 (submissions)
3. Sasata (submissions)
4. Sturmvogel_66 (submissions)
5. Casliber (submissions)
6. Adam Cuerden (submissions)
7. Miyagawa (submissions)
8. Piotrus (submissions)
9. Ealdgyth (submissions)

All those who reached the final win prizes, and prizes will also be going to the following participants:

• Casliber (submissions) wins the FA prize, for four featured articles in round 4, worth 400 points.
• Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) wins the GA prize, for 20 good articles in round 3, worth 600 points.
• Another Believer (submissions) wins the FL prize, for four featured lists in round 2, worth 180 points.
• Adam Cuerden (submissions) wins the FP prize, for 23 featured pictures in round 5, worth 805 point.
• Sven Manguard (submissions) wins the FPo prize, for 2 featured portals in round 3, worth 70 points.
• Hawkeye7 (submissions) wins the topic prize, for a 23-article featured topic in round 5, worth 230 points.
• Cwmhiraeth (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 79 did you know articles in round 5, worth 570 points.
• ThaddeusB (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 23 in the news articles in round 4, worth 270 points.
• Ed! (submissions) wins the GAR prize, for 24 good article reviews in round 1, worth 96 points.
• The judges are awarding the Oddball Barnstar to The C of E (submissions), for some curious contributions in earlier rounds.
• Finally, the judges are awarding Cwmhiraeth (submissions) the Geography Barnstar for her work on sea, now a featured article. This top-importance article was the highest-scoring this year; when it was promoted to FA status, Cwmhiraeth could claim 720 points.

Prizes will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition. While it has been an excellent year, errors have opened up the judges' eyes to the need for a third judge, and it is with pleasure that we announce that experienced WikiCup participant Miyagawa will be acting as a judge from now on. We hope you will all join us in welcoming him to the team.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. Brainstorming and discussion remains open for how next year's competition will work, and straw polls will be opened by the judges soon. Those interested in friendly competition may also like to keep an eye on the stub contest, being organised by Casliber. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Leona's Art on Ice Tour

Do you think an article should be made? It had twelve dates and went to Switzerland, Finland and Stockholm. The set list was similar to the Glassheart Tour.  — ₳aron 16:59, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Depends if there is enough information and reliable sources. If little beyond a setlist and dates can be listed then perhaps an article called Leona Lewis concert tours should be made, where a summary of The Labyrinth and Glassheart Tour can be listed as well as the information from Art on Ice? (i've only ever heard her refer to her EU performances as the glasshear tour???) → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 16:45, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Sun in California

Would you check this out if you have a minute? I nominated it for deletion. Szaboci (talk) 12:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Time to Say Goodbye

Hi All,

Thanks for all your support over the last five years. Together we've worked on some amazing articles and achieved some amazing things. Wikipedia will forever be the greatest "free" community of its kind on the web. It works because everyone is personally invested in their own topic area and works hard to make sure that their particular area of interest is edited to the best possible standard. I've met some amazing people on here and its so awesome to have known you. If anyone wants to keep in contact off here feel free to email me (i've activated emails on wikipedia). I'll occasionally check my talk page for messages too but I'm pretty much retiring. It just feels like there's no sense of community anymore. Keep up the good work people! → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 01:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Wish you all the best in your future endeavors. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

I feel the same. It's really changed in the past three years.  — ₳aron 13:57, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to hear that. Hope you're enjoying your time outside Wikipedia and thank you for some brilliant contributions! --DJUnBalanced (talk) 17:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

User:GTH25

I've noticed this user keeps insisting that "Michael" was a studio album even though consensus determined that it was a compilation album. I could be wrong, but it seems like the user is trying to WP:OWN articles or perhaps WP:WIN. Do you have any comments? The user also said "We could have a consensus that the moon landing was fake but that doesn't mean it's right. Michael is a studio album of new music." Can you help explain how new music ≠ studio album on the Talk page for Xscape and or on the user's talk page? XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 07:02, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Song by Year

This is copied from an very old comment on talk page. "A song is a piece of music that anybody can sing. A single is a format which nobody can sing! The two are not interchangeable. Song by date and single by date are two different concepts. The song by year relates to the date first published, made available, so song by year will only appear once, whereas a song can be issued as a single many times. Originally one was a sub-cat other the other which is patently absurd. Why should a song be omitted from the song by year category because it was also released as a single?" Most editors now agree with this. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 13:38, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Bridges

Re this edit, I understand the removal of 2014 songs, but why the label cats? Adabow (talk) 00:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

@@Adabow: artists are signed to one label and then affiliated labels release the song elsewhere. Capitol and polydor recurds have nothing do with each other or with artists signed to Island Records. Considering neither capitol nor polydor are mentioned in the inboxes I removed the categories. For example Mariah Carey is signed to Island Records in the US, in the UK Mercury releases her stuff. However, ww only use the category for Island records as that is the one she is signed to. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 01:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Overdose by Ciara

Overdose was NEVER added to Rhythmic radio, only Urban radio. Fix that. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Collynx (talk • contribs) 02:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Flatlist consensus

You mentioned in an edit summary that there's a consensus regarding the usage of flatlists. Could you point me to it? I can only find a short discussion here, which to me doesn't seem to be to the extent that a consensus would be.

The album infobox makes it clear that commas are to be used to delimit genres, and makes no mention of interpuncts as a flatlist uses. I can't find anything on WP:ACCESS that goes against this (only that the template is available), nor on WP:Manual of Style/Lists. Thanks!

Evanderxn (talk) 03:22, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Returned?

I know your page says "no longer active" and that you might make occasional "tweaks", but it seems you've done more than that lately. If this is the case, welcome back! XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 23:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

yeah there was a few bits that needed seriously changing. I'll just check in whenever I can but its gonna be NOWHERE as near involved as I used to be! → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 18:01, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

You might not be as active, but it's great that you're still editing. :) Acalamari 08:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

@Acalamari:, thank you for the kind comments. Its not what it used to be, I'll see how long I last... :P → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 01:12, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	For knowing when to withdraw your AFD nomination on Original Hits, and then improving it. A lesser person would have just walked away or let the AFD play out. Instead, you made Wikipedia a better place. That shows grace and civility and it has been noticed. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 21:55, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Dennis Brown many thanks for this! Its a pleasant surprise as I've felt very disillusioned with Wiki recently. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 22:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

We all get that way, down about the place sometimes (one reason I started WER in my signature). Glad to see you decided to improve the place instead of just complain about the flaws. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 22:03, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Enrique

You deleted the Mexican edition tracking. Enrique sells the most in Mexico it's like the biggest market for him. The Mexican track-listing is a special one and with a DVD included. But you can still see it as a indiscriminate list. ==

(cur | prev) 23:10, 11 April 2014‎ Lil-unique1 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (32,270 bytes) (-4,951)‎ . . (fixes. we do not need to list every single track listing ever published (particularly for smaller markets), not an indiscriminate list, also cleaning up, tagging and templating) (undo | thank) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enriquelin7 (talk • contribs)

Enriquelin7 do you have proof that Enrique Sells the most in Mexica compared to any other country. We should only include the most widespread tracklisting, not single market ones that are for relatively small music markets. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 21:33, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Do you see the Certifications session of Sex and Love? Besides, South America is another big market and lately its track-list reveals and it's the same as the Mexico one, both physical and digital. Digital link here: https://itunes.apple.com/cl/album/sex-and-love-deluxe-edition/id833580178. physical link search yourself.

So technically based on the Certifications session, Mexico and South America is the largest selling market for Enrique, especially for Sex And Love. The track-list for Mexico and South America is the same with 21 tracks, but difference is Mexico has a bonus DVD, which you just simply deleted as you thought it for and single minor market without investigation.

If you agrees above facts pls kindly re-edit/re-do the track-list

I disagree based on the facts above. Its not a case of me deleting the Mexican edition of the album because of it being a single market. United States, Japan, UK and Germany are the four biggest music markets by sales revenue. The certificates given in for Sex and Love are based on shipments and are therefore insignificant. Shipments are the number of copies that a label has physically produced and sent to retailers in that particular region. As a compromise, if you insist on adding the information, the first 11 songs on the album are the same as the US track listing. Add the remaining tracks as a collapsed track listing of bonus tracks as done with the other bonus tracks. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 16:25, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

"Different from..." vs "Different to..."

Hi. Just to let you know I have reverted your reversion of my original edit to 3 Words (song). In accordance with WP:COMMONALITY our aim is to use language that is commonly used by all our readers. The phrasing "different from" is used and understood world-wide, whilst "different to" has more local usage. Thanks. RomanSpa (talk) 10:41, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

RomanSpa, definitely did not know that there was an issue with different from and different to. I've certainly never come across it before and I don't think on reflection that anyone would have any difficult understanding the terms. Also, I didnt see it as commonality issue but I guess it doesn't change the article that much. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 11:01, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. RomanSpa (talk) 12:14, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Mariah singles

Get ready to see people changing Mariah's singles to promo singles or songs now that JD has said they weren't singles (even though they obviously are). — Status (talk · contribs) 17:46, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Status its a direct contradiction of what Carey says in her new Billboard interviews where she acknowledges her failed singles. that famous proverb if it walks like a duck... applies here. It just reinforces the need to move away from direct sources like labels and artists because theyre a massive contradiction. These songs are always classified as singles even if they're not included on the new album. Rumours have it that the album is called My Heart or The Inner Voice. I dont think its gonna reach 100k first week tbh.

Ljiljana Raičević

Hello. Why did you revert my DYK nomination (Template:Did you know nominations/Ljiljana Raičević) here?

I do apologise. I was editing via a mobile device and I hit undo accidently. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 19:35, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Xscape listening parties

There was one in New York (where most of the first reviews originate) and Los Angeles (for a small set of fans. Also, one negative review does not mean "mixed reviews." The large census leans towards, at best, cautious positivity. MaJic (comments go here) 00:40, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Breakin' My Heart (Pretty Brown Eyes)". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 06:16, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	thank you Ahmedunbreakabletato (talk) 20:42, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/177.227.61.198

Can you undo him with that incorrect genre on Turn Me On (David Guetta song)? I know he's playing around. 180.73.230.72 (talk) 12:05, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

reliable sources

re [3] Press releases are NOT reliable in any sense of the matter. their sole purpose is to promote the subject and they have zero reputation for fact checking, accuracy and editorial oversight. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:55, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

I did consider the value and reliability and found it to be unworthy and unacceptable. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom

Love Never Felt So Good

Seems the duet version is the one being sent to radio. — Status (talk · contribs) 18:14, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Then that's fair enough but one version or the other needs to go in the infobox. Its too messy to read and understand with both versions being listed. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 20:30, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Infobox album

Hi Lil, I'm sorry I was away for a few days (real life can be a drain on my wikitime!), but thank you for the heads-up on that discussion, and thank you again for the work you do in improving accessibility on the wiki. I've outlined how I feel about the issues and made a couple of suggestions that might be able to attract a broader consensus, hopefully without diluting the desired outcomes too much. See what you think. Cheers --RexxS (talk) 18:18, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

4 Minutes (Madonna song)

Can you figure it out the song's genre, check 'Composition' and 'Critical reception' section, except Billboard. 183.171.178.27 (talk) 14:23, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Dance-pop is the correct genre. The sources say "a dance song with influences of hip-hop". Well dance music is not actually a genre, its a subset of genres encompassing everything from dance-pop to house music and electronica. Dance-pop is the closest relation. Hip-hop is not classified as a genre for this song because its only a subtle influence. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 16:10, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

UK releases

Hey, just wondering if you could clear something up for me. The OCC lists the new releases of the week, but the BBC Radio 1 playlist is often cited for radio impact dates in the UK. These two lists are very different (with the OCC lagging behind BBCR1). Which one do we go by? In my opinion it seems silly to take one station playing a song as a radio impact, but I might be missing something... Adabow (talk) 03:18, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, as far as I'm aware - the OCC's list comes from the labels. They inform the OCC of the impact date forpa single - the date at which the song is promoted to as its date to impact charts. The promotion and impact date can include the digital download which often comes after the radio impact date. The thing with the BBC is when they update the playlist, they choose to add songs from a long list. Not all songs released that week would be playlisted by the BBC - though capital FM (another national broadcaster) offered another alternative playlist. The occ's list of release dates is a combination of digital downloads, radio add dates and impact dates. Occasionally, where an album has already been released - the label uses a impact date instead of a sepearate digital download listing (the album track download is promoted by radio add dates and live performances). → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 09:32, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm particularly looking at "Tennis Court" by Lorde; its release was announced a month ago as 12 May, which is consistent with the OCC page. However, Radio 1 has been playing it for weeks. There is no physical or digital release (as far as I can find) in the UK in the past week, so this must be the radio impact date, surely. End of Time (song)#Release history is another example, with BBC1 listing the song about a month before the OCC. I am completely confused as to why we (and alarmed that we do) take the playlist of a single radio station or network to mean a radio impact date, and I've seen this with several Wikipedia articles. Adabow (talk) 09:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker). I have nothing to add regarding digital release, but I can recap from way back in the pre-digital age. Record Labels would often send "promo, not for resale" copies to radio stations to get radio plays before the actual release. The reason for this was to build up market response so the record charted in the week of release, thereby going further up the charts and getting more radio plays and therefore more sales. A pure marketing ploy and no relation to issue date. Although it was not unknown for record companies to send to store too late when all the radio plays are forgotten. The different dates noted above seem to be a variant of this, but I couldn't confirm. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 10:30, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

The UK works differently from the US because there is no Official Airplay chart. Therefore airplay NEVER counts towards chart positions. Radio airtime for songs is 100% dependent on whether a radio station chooses to play list the song. Its highly unlikely that the song would get played unless any station playlists the song. Now I'm going to throw a curve ball into the discussion ... "Take Care" by Drake & Rihanna was playlisted by BBC Radio 1 upon release of Drake's album. The station was playing the song for 3 weeks solid, pushing the album track download on iTunes and turning it into a UK top-ten hit. The label did not officially send the single out for airplay. This is a common thing in the UK that often the label gives permission for a handful of songs to be played and radio stations ultimately end up influencing what becomes a single. Back to the Lordes situation.... being serviced to radio or playlisted in the UK does NOT make a song a single in this market UNLESS there is confirmation from a reliable source that the song is being promoted as a single. Therefore I would always go with the digital download date as the official single release date. As for its actual release, its June 7 according to the EP listing on iTunes here so I would roll with that. The May 12 listing is the single track download, which is listed on Amazon.co.uk (though I cannot prove this as the page does not explicitly state this but that was my observation). See an article such as Forever and a Day (Kelly Rowland song) as a good example of how to handle radio releases for the UK. i would add that in no circumstances should being added to any UK radio station ever be considered "releasing a song as a single" unless it is accompanied by some kind of confirmation from the label, artist or critics review. If in doubt, a good website to use is something like Digital Spy - for example in its review for "I Will Never Let You Down" it explicitly says in the subtitle "Released May 11, 2014", as seen here → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 16:07, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

(another talk page stalker here, apologies for butting in!) Thanks for this clarification; I figured that one of my recent edits instigated this conversation; I had added dates to release history sections of some song articles, but wasn't quite sure how to handle it myself and ended up filling in the "Format" fields with a replacement "n/a" template (with the exception of "End of Time", which I had forgotten to go back to). From what I've pieced together the OCC list is, as previously mentioned, indeed a combination of airplay, digital and physical single release dates (I've seen some of the Red Hot Chili Peppers' vinyl-only singles included in the list, for example). Generally if I can find no evidence of a physical or digital release having occurred on the date listed by the OCC I conclude that it's a radio impact date (some UK promotional CD singles have labels at the back which mention impact dates, and—though this may border on original research—from the few examples I've gathered they're generally consistent with OCC release dates), though I've currently been refraining from adding that to articles (just want to get some clarification beforehand). If we were to use the OCC lists as sources for impact dates, what would we add as format? Unlike the US, I don't believe the UK has specific radio formats (CHR, urban, rhythmic, etc.). Thanks! Holiday56 (talk) 17:14, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

best example of this I can find is Lovebird (song), where the whole impact day thing is extremely visible. In the UK there's not really different radio format. The stations have rock programmes, dance programmes etc as opposed to separate radio formats. The possible exception is urban radio (hip-hop/r&b) where there is actually an urban radio station. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 18:12, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Shut Up and Drive (Rihanna song)

Hey Lil, can you weight your opinion on this discussion? Thanks! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 22:07, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of First Access Entertainment

The article First Access Entertainment you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:First Access Entertainment for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 17:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Will you begin to respond today by any chance? --K. Peake 07:30, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Apologies Kyle Peake, I haven't really been very active the last few days. I'll take a look later today and make a start (I'm in the UK at its around midday atm). ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 11:50, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes try your best to do that, we share the native country! 🇬🇧 --K. Peake 12:04, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

I will do this evening after work :) ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 12:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of First Access Entertainment

The article First Access Entertainment you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:First Access Entertainment for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Positions genre dispute

Hey! We have already discussed the genre classification of Positions in the album's talk page (here), however, I have opened the new section since our previous consensus seems to be questioned. Let's discuss it once again. --Lukas (talk page) 12:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

AFD needing comments

Hi, Lil-unique1. An AFD discussion has started for Serious (Gwen Stefani song). I hope you could leave some comments if you are interested. Thank you. HĐ (talk) 03:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Bang (Rita Ora and Imanbek EP)

Hello! Your submission of Bang (Rita Ora and Imanbek EP) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Grk1011 (talk) 16:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

I.C.U.

Re this edit, "I.C.U." has been confirmed as the third track. Entertainment Weekly says: "The album's third track, "I.C.U.," is particularly emotional...". I see that SNUGGUMS has already added it back, and I just wanted to let you know why. Thanks! D☘️ggy54321 ^{(just shamrockin')} 23:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Not sure why the Apple Music page doesn't show that yet, but Doggy54321 is correct here, and that Entertainment Weekly article is already used within the album page to support its inclusion. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Cheers both. I've just added a few more sources about the different versions SNUGGUMS and Doggy54321. There's going to be a UK exclusive bonus track (probably "I'm Ready" with Sam Smith) and two bonus tracks for target (apparently one is "Still Have Me" but don't quote me on that just yet...) ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 23:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for doing that. As well, your new signature looks great! I believe you lightened the blue, but you also have a blue talk page background so it could just be my eyes. Looks great either way! D☘️ggy54321 ^{(just shamrockin')} 23:58, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Doggy54321, I changed both signature and background colours to an accessible set. Apparently the contrasts were better than teal. It's nice to mix things up sometimes. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 16:58, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

That makes sense! You’re welcome! Have a great rest of your day! D☘️ggy54321 ^{(just shamrockin')} 20:33, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Notification of Dispute Resolution

Please note I have now taken the discussion at RuPaul's Drag Race UK (series 2) to Dispute resolution. Spa-Franks (talk) 01:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Boomerang (Nicole Scherzinger song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Boomerang (Nicole Scherzinger song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 21:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Kyle Peake, hey buddy thanks for picking this up. Look forward to working with you on this. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

No problem whatsoever; I have worked on your articles many times in the past but did not feel like it would be overkill to pick this one up, as it is not violating any rules to review articles over a split period of time from a user. This applies especially when I am doing them for a wide variety of users, plus there is no bribing from you that could present bias in reviews. --K. Peake 21:16, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Boomerang (Nicole Scherzinger song)

The article Boomerang (Nicole Scherzinger song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Boomerang (Nicole Scherzinger song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 16:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

List of Nicole songs

Hello! We've never spoke, but I see you around editing Nicole / PCD articles, so I "know" you. I just saw you nominated List of songs recorded by Nicole Scherzinger and my reaction was "DAMMIT" :D, I was vying to that, but you beat me to it! Anyways, good luck on your nomination! Although, If you need any help, I could gladly assist you, wherever possible! MrHyacinth (talk) 17:34, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you @MrHyacinth:. It would be good to collaborate on future similar articles? Like Nicole Scherzinger's discography? I've done a lot of work at the time of release on Killer Love, it probably needs a going over and copy editing. I've just nominated "Boomerang" for GA. It would be nice to get a good article series with Nicole. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 20:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello @Lil-unique1: It would be nice to collaborate to you, although I have to admit, I'm a bit rusty with WP guidelines and etc. Speaking of discography, I was quite surprised she never took off, after Killer Love. I always assumed that she would be massive post PCD. I also began doing some work of her albums and songs in my sandbox, but I just left them there for years. Maybe you would like to check them out. "Boomerang" is my least favorites song of hers, but I'll never forget the edits of the song's producer, and you're back and forth with him. --MrHyacinth (talk) 18:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Boomerang (Nicole Scherzinger song)

The article Boomerang (Nicole Scherzinger song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Boomerang (Nicole Scherzinger song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:41, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

That annoying talk page

I suggest letting the dead horse be beaten without getting drawn into it again; there's clearly nothing that'll be achieved even if it is explained in 50 different ways. Frankly, I'm at the point where I couldn't care less about the whole dispute and just want it to be over (i.e. to quote the ineffably effective John Bercow: [4]). RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 20:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for that suggestion RandomCanadian. You're right - the burden isn't on us to prove the necessity for accessibility. The burden is on others prove WHY their suggested changes meet the MOS. I guess I let my guard down momentarily. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }-

DYK for Bang (Rita Ora and Imanbek EP)

On 31 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bang (Rita Ora and Imanbek EP), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that British singer Rita Ora and Kazakh DJ Imanbek collaborated with translators over videotelephony software Zoom to record their collaborative EP Bang? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bang (Rita Ora and Imanbek EP). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bang (Rita Ora and Imanbek EP)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

MOS:MUSICCAPS

I tried implementing the MOS policy above to Artpop, however, it was reverted because there was nothing at the MOS "stating we can't mention how something has been stylized, actually there's a line saying 'then the article title may follow the artist's choice'." What are your views on this? livelikemusic (TALK!) 00:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

livelikemusic I think MOS:MUSICCAPS is pretty clear, it says The first letter in the first and last words in English-language titles of works and releases is capitalized. Stylisation is not encylopedic - its not always clear if its the style of font or the specific style the designer has chosen i.e. to exclude capital letters. Whether something is written in all capitals is WP:FANCRUFT unless it has received coverage i.e. someone commented on it. That's IMO. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 11:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

@Lil-unique1: Thanks for your explanation and response; if a user/users feel it so important and necessary to include the stylization—which I've never understood—then so be it. However, like you, I do believe the MOS states otherwise, and do believe is qualifies as fan-cruft. livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Responded under my talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slayanawtacct (talk • contribs) 19:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of B7 (album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article B7 (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of VersaceSpace -- VersaceSpace (talk) 21:41, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bang (Nicole Scherzinger song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bang (Nicole Scherzinger song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 13:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of B7 (album)

The article B7 (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:B7 (album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of VersaceSpace -- VersaceSpace (talk) 13:41, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

VersaceSpace I'm taking a two day break from Wiki. Just FYI ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 09:27, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Tokio Hot 100 deletion

Hi I was reading what you had concluded as grounds for deletion. But I did find a few links that show that billboard sort of used this as Billboard Japan before they added that chart. In the 90s the Tokio hot 100 was added to their magazine weekly. While it is difficult to find citations and even notability as of late. I think it is still important to keep for historical purposes or as a chart for older music. Kanyfug (talk) 09:52, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Tokio Hot 100 is a WP:SINGLEVENDOR chart based on a limited scope. So even if it was used/published by Billboard Japan, as it is regional/based based on only J-Wave stations. I have removed it from song articles because it is not an accurate reflection of a song's performance in Japan. If you oppose the deletion it can be discussed as the deletion discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tokio Hot 100 but I am clear, that per WP:SINGLEVENDOR it should not be included on a song article page, regardless of whether or not the article gets deleted. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 10:01, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bang (Nicole Scherzinger song)

The article Bang (Nicole Scherzinger song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bang (Nicole Scherzinger song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Kyle Peake I'm taking a two day break from Wiki. Just FYI ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 09:27, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know; the break will coincide with some of my working days, so the period is quite efficient! --K. Peake 11:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of B7 (album)

The article B7 (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:B7 (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of VersaceSpace -- VersaceSpace (talk) 02:21, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bang (Nicole Scherzinger song)

The article Bang (Nicole Scherzinger song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bang (Nicole Scherzinger song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:01, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kelly Rowland - Forever and a Day.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kelly Rowland - Forever and a Day.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).

Drag Race / MOS / Table stuff

Might want to look at that person's contribs, they've been doing that across all DR pages. And I don't have the expertise to fix tables. Daundelin❁ 19:40, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Cry About It Later (Katy Perry song)

You are claiming "Cry About It Later" is a single etc. Can you send a source confirming it being a single. Otherwise don't say it is. Thank you! Smile is a visual album, every track got a music video. Are they all singles?-No. Remix however doesn't make it a single. It got a cover and lyric video which but no radio promotion. Therefore it is a promotional single. End of the story. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielmusiclover (talk • contribs) 17:13, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Technically Rolling Stone called it a single, but since both The Music Network and TopHit are unreliable sources to back-up the radio release, I'm not sure if we can still call this song a single. Even the fact that it got a remix doesn't make it a full single, because then we'd have to change "Ressilient" status as well. infsai (talkie? UwU) 22:13, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

I'm not sure I care enough either way Infsai ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 15:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

If you don't care then why you even bother changing the song's status? Make up your mind. infsai (talkie? UwU) 16:08, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Infsai, it does say at Template:Infobox album, WP:SINGLE and WP:ALBUM that each case, where ambiguous should be discussed on its own merits. The fact that an independent source (RS) called it a single, and it got a music video for me is good enough. Music video release isn't necessarily a single release on its own, however it does count towards chart listings so in a way it is a form of release. I'm trying to maintain some sense of consistency across the project. Cry About It Later and Not the End of the World both received a lot more coverage than Resilient. A remix of Cry About It Later was also released - this counts as an independent release from the album. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 18:33, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Everything I Didn't Say

Hello! Your submission of Everything I Didn't Say at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 03:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Risk It All (song)

The article Risk It All (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Risk It All (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ippantekina -- Ippantekina (talk) 17:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Would you consider becoming a New Page Reviewer?

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. () Hi Lil-unique1, I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join the new page reviewing team, and after reviewing your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; the new page reviewing team needs help from experienced users like yourself. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, most pages are easy to review, and habits are quick to develop). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR. If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message on my talk page or at the reviewer's discussion board. Cheers, and hope to see you around, (t · c) buidhe 22:18, 2 June 2022 (UTC)