User talk:Lepke99

This is Lepke99's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hi Lepke99! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lepke99/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lepke99! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unfinished, unreferenced, please do not submit work unless you believe it is ready Please read HELP:YFA and WP:REFB

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lepke99/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You very much for Your messages and advices. I am sorry for having submitted the clumsy and unreferenced article. I was actually not quite sure what 'submitting' and 'publishing' mean in the world of wikipedia. Now I understand...

I keep on improving the article with adding content and references and hope to be able to submit it sometime soon, hopefully before the end of the year at least...

Thank you again for the feedback and for all! Lepke99 (talk) 13:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Maylingoed. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Bairin-ji (Kurume) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~~mAyLiNgOeEd (Talk to me!🗣️) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜) 03:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Maylingoed,

Thank you for having reviewed my additions to the Bairin-ji page and for your kind feedback.

Last year I stayed at that temple for several months and that is when the youtube videos were made that I felt could be useful to include at the external link section as they show angles of the temple from points that can be very rarely visited, perhaps one time a month, for the open public.

As for the short paragraph that was included under the history section I would like to provide the below explanation:

The current content of the wikikpedia article shows the temple more from the aspect of the building itself and its surroundings. However from the zen Buddhist point of view there is very little mention. I believe that including the names of the famous people who have lived and trained there including their stories would be a useful addition that people who would like to go there and try experiencing meditation there would find it useful and informative.

The content that I have added as a second paragraph is supported by facts. I was in the process of adding a reference to it. It may be my mistake that I have clicked publish before adding the reference. I would kindly ask you to read a few pages or even just one page (starting from page 99 or 100) from book Living and Dying in Zazen by Arhur Braverman (he also has a wiki page) at https://terebess.hu/zen/mesterek/living.pdf where there is detailed and very factual record of the harshness of the zen training at Bairinji temple. There also the word violence is used several times. In fact here and also in the paragraph that was removed the word violence is not used in a negative way as the monk writes in his records that it has helped him.

I feel that the parts that were deleted are based on fact and they can also be regarded as neutral.

The violence many monks in training experienced there and other temples is a historical facts that are supported by several records such as the one I have referred to and what I was about to include as a reference.

It is widely known that at the beginning of the 20th century there were a lot of harshness in Japan and the zen temples were also places that were not exempt from this.

I would kindly ask you to take the points I have mentioned into consideration and take a few minutes to read a few pages of the book to which the link is included.

It is possible I need also take some consideration how and what to ad to that article, but I very much feel that there is much information to be added there. Just to mention that the former abbot of the famous Kenninji temple in Kyoto used to train at Bairinji would also be something important to share I belive (this was also mentioned with a link to a wikipage to Kenninji in the short paragraph that was deleted).

Thank you very much for your kind consideration!

Kind regards,

lepke99 Lepke99 (talk) 04:57, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Maylingoed,

Thank You again for your feedback.

Would you be as kind as to provide some explanation why all the additions to the Bairin-ji page were deleted.

I understand your concern about neutrality, however in this case the added information was not a personal opinion. At the same time I understand that there was no reference included so there was no way to check where that information came from and it was a natural assumption from your side that it is someone's personal somewhat biased opinion.

It would be useful for me to know in more detail what your concerns were when deleting the added paragraph as well as the three videos that are sights of the garden of Bairin Temple.

Buddhist Temples like Bairinji are educational institutions and for this reason I believe that including information on people who have been part of this unique and traditional form of spiritual education would be a useful addition to the current page.

The videos are also more lively, perhaps more human than the pictures and they can give the viewer a feeling that they are there in the garden and looking around.

The wikipages of temples like Bairinji were most likely created by the local tourist office This means someone was given as a payed job to create the pages where the cultural assets and other things that are believed to enhance tourism needed to be inclued. However there are much more aspects to these cultural and spiritual places. My contribution is a wish to provide a balance by including these aspects.

I am looking forward to exchange messages with you.

Kind Regards,

Have a nice day, Lepke99 (talk) 22:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gou Ru (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gou Ru and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 21:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fukuoka Prefecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shofuku-ji. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

i have fixed the issue by with an exact link Lepke99 (talk) 18:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fukuoka Prefecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dazaifu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed that link, thank you for your kind notigication Lepke99 (talk) 15:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sakamoto Hanjiro

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sakamoto Hanjiro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 21:47, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would very much like to create the page for Hanjiro Sakamoto, I am sorry I was to early submitting it. But would very much like to do it again with more referenced and reliable content. Can you please advise?

thank you in advance and sorry about the trouble…

He is definitely a notable painter of Kurume city, I believe there could be no issues raised regarding notability.

Thank You

it would be a great help if the deleted info could be retrieved. Within a day I would add enough info so that it would be acceptable.

thank you for your consideration…

🙏 Lepke99 (talk) 03:37, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sakamoto Hanjiro

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sakamoto Hanjiro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://pages.uoregon.edu/jsmacollections/home/artists/sakamoto-hanjiro-1882-1969.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the quick response and explanation why the page got nominated for quick deletion. I would like to make change the text using my own words and other sources as well. I only meant this page as a bases for further work.

Not sure if this way the page could escape being deleted. (?) Lepke99 (talk) 19:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying text and then altering the words results in a derivative work which is still a copyright violation. You need to write the article in your own words, and not copy the words from a source and change it. -- Whpq (talk) 20:40, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Lepke99! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. Read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on ”text”. Additionally, Help:Referencing for beginners offers guidance on how to cite sources.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words and structure it properly, adhering to the principles of paraphrasing. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources to verify the information and demonstrate that it is not original research.
Image use guidelines: We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. Any other images used on Wikipedia must be available under a free and open copyright license that permits commercial and derivative reuse.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. However, unlike many other sites that allow content licensing for site use while retaining non-free ownership, Wikipedia requires that content release be irrevocable, worldwide, and either into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without proper attribution. If you want to copy or translate content from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps outlined at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Your edit to Shigeru Aoki has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 01:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I belive I have used my own words with the added part in question. Did not even look at the article for two days just wrote what I could remember about how that artwork in particular was created. Thank you for having drawn my attention to the importance of copyrighted materials. I am wondering if this time the part that was added is only in its essence similar to the article in the reference. Thank You for your work on this and have a nice day 🙏 Lepke99 (talk) 03:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]