User talk:Lazman321/Archive 2020
Do not edit this page. This is the archive of User talk:Lazman321 for the year 2020. (Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page.) See the annual archives for 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024. |
Welcome
Hello, Lazman123, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! ‐‐1997kB (talk) 05:05, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Attention needed at username change request
Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 05:05, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Levels
1. I am a major contributor to the article. Look at the past revisions of this article if you don't believe me.
- Not true, you did in fact expanded the article. But you are far from it
2. The live performances section and the composition section aren't in bullet point format, they are in prose format.
- "Levels" is a progressive house[1] song produced in the key of C♯ minor and a tempo of 126 BPM
- It has simple but recognizable synth hook[5] with background instruments that rise up and ...
- I'm sorry but this is not prose, these are bullet points.
3. If you have any recommendations to improve the article, put them in the nomination page. Do not undo the nomination in the talk page ever!
- I'm trying to help you, I even said what you could do what to improve
4. Wait for a consensus to be reached, then the first reviewer who responded will close it and decide if it should be promoted.
- Fine, have fun with a failed article. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 22:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Levels (Avicii song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Levels (Avicii song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 14:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Levels (Avicii song)
The article Levels (Avicii song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Levels (Avicii song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 14:41, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:United States/GA5
A tag has been placed on Talk:United States/GA5 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
In proper review. No third-party involved. Started and reviewed by new editor not aware of proper process
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Moxy 🍁 04:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Too soon...
Pls review Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions.
Hi, thanks for trying to help out by reviewing the GA nomination here, but I'm afraid something like that needs to be done by a more experienced editor. GA reviewers need to have substantial experience of Wikipedia's content policies, and you're still very new. This is particularly true for an article like this which is very high profile and which has been delisted before. I suggest you try to get some more general experience of Wikipedia before you try reviewing GA nominations. Hut 8.5 09:18, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ChilledCow icon.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ChilledCow icon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
GAN for Albert Kesselring
G'day Lazman321, just a word to the wise about this article. I strongly suggest you look at the FAR and talk page archives for the reasons this article was downgraded and compare those comments with the article as it stands. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:27, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Okay. I will keep that in mind. Thanks. Lazman321 (talk) 22:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- The issue of Kesselring is very complicated and, although Wikipedia stupidly allows anyone to review, this sort of article is likely beyond the competence your very limited editing would imply. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Peacemaker67: @Chris troutman: I would personally say that I do have some competence when it comes to Wikipedia, but then again, I have done only 250 edits while you guys have done thousands of edits. If you guys are willing to review the article, then I will speedy delete my review as it is and let you guys review the article. But if not, I will review the article and try to see if the problems raised in the review have been taken with enough consideration. I will let you guys decide. Lazman321 (talk) 16:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- It's not for me to say if you can or can't do the GA review. The article was removed from the FA list because some editors think Wikipedia needs to do more to denounce Nazis. I don't have access to the source material so I can't perform a proper review. A new editor with the proper academic background might be ok but I would otherwise caution against it. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not assuming you don't have the ability to do a proper review, I would just caution against doing the review if you don't have access to the books mentioned in the FAR. A proper review will require looking at the queries raised there and deciding if the article properly represents the sources and whether all the required sources are being used. There are some other issues of due/undue detail which also need deciding on, and an understanding of the sources is needed in order to do some of that as well, although some of it is a philosophical matter about what level of detail is appropriate in a Wikipedia article, on which there are a spectrum of views. I would add that even though I understand German at schoolboy level, I do not have access to all the sources, which is why I have not and will not review the article. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- It's not for me to say if you can or can't do the GA review. The article was removed from the FA list because some editors think Wikipedia needs to do more to denounce Nazis. I don't have access to the source material so I can't perform a proper review. A new editor with the proper academic background might be ok but I would otherwise caution against it. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Peacemaker67: @Chris troutman: I would personally say that I do have some competence when it comes to Wikipedia, but then again, I have done only 250 edits while you guys have done thousands of edits. If you guys are willing to review the article, then I will speedy delete my review as it is and let you guys review the article. But if not, I will review the article and try to see if the problems raised in the review have been taken with enough consideration. I will let you guys decide. Lazman321 (talk) 16:12, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- The issue of Kesselring is very complicated and, although Wikipedia stupidly allows anyone to review, this sort of article is likely beyond the competence your very limited editing would imply. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: ChilledCow has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
- RichT|C|E-Mail 11:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)Your GA nomination of Levels (Avicii song)
The article Levels (Avicii song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Levels (Avicii song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Footlessmouse -- Footlessmouse (talk) 01:03, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
DYK for ChilledCow
On 31 October 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article ChilledCow, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that ChilledCow has one of the longest videos on YouTube, totaling over 13,000 hours? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/ChilledCow. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ChilledCow), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MCMXC a.D., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Back to Life. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Levels (Avicii song)
Hello! Your submission of Levels (Avicii song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:40, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 19:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MCMXC a.D., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ambient.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Levels (Avicii song)
On 15 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Levels (Avicii song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Levels" samples the intro from the Etta James song "Something's Got a Hold on Me"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Levels (Avicii song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Levels (Avicii song)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Avicii - Levels - MusicVideo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The businessman dancing in front of his colleagues and boss can be easily described in words and already well understood without this screenshot. Image insufficiently supported by sourced critical commentary. Article subject is the song, not the music video. May fail compliance with WP:NFCC#8.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. George Ho (talk) 01:12, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:36, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
October 2020 GAN Backlog drive
The Invisible Barnstar | ||
Thank you for conducting 4 reviews in the October 2020 GAN Backlog drive. Your work helped us to reduce the backlog by over 48%. Regards, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Fixing information on Nirvana (Band)
The band members stated multiple times, both before and after the dissolution of the band, that Pat Smear was a permanent member of the band. He was meant to contribute his guitar parts to You Know You're Right, and he appeared in photoshoots. The band referred to him as, "Our newest member" and "Our new guitar player" when he was added. During Kurt's eulogy speech Krist says "behalf of me, Dave and Pat". Grohl even said, "What Pat added more than anything was an injection of life and happiness to those last months of Nirvana. We’d talked about getting a second guitar player: we talked about Steve Turner, we talked about Buzz Osbourne, but of course we didn’t want to break up Mudhoney or the Melvins. Kurt had been in Los Angeles and walked into the SST Superstore where Pat was working, and they hit it off. One of the first rehearsals, we were trying to figure out The Man Who Sold The World and the three of us just couldn’t do it. Pat said, "Actually, it goes like this." I thought: 'There’s a musician in the band now!’ Having Pat changed things dramatically". I believe he should be added.
- I am not the person to bring this up to. If you want to bring this up, bring it up on the Nirvana talk page. The consensus if you look into the archives is that Pat was just a touring member. If there is an interview where one of the members of Nirvana says that Pat is a full-time member(not they wanted him to be a full-time member or any vagueness around it), or a reliable source that says that Pat is a full-time member, then this can be added along with the citation backing it up. And don't add him to the infobox. The consensus is that only three members be added, not four, and especially if you can't find sources backing up Pat being a full-time member. Also, you added other information that could not be verified by the accompanying source, that information being the violent incident and the replacing of names that Nirvana initially went through. Lazman321 (talk) 04:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Hey there. I listed File:Avicii - Levels - MusicVideo.png at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 December 14. --George Ho (talk) 02:52, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Copy edit of MCMXC a.D. article
Hello, Lazman321. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for MCMXC a.D. at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Dhtwiki (talk) 00:25, 19 December 2020 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of MCMXC a.D.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article MCMXC a.D. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:40, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of MCMXC a.D.
The article MCMXC a.D. you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:MCMXC a.D. for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 22:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)