User talk:Lakshmijourno

This is Lakshmijourno's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sohan Pappu (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anachronist was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references provide a stronger case of notability for the organizaton "Our Youth Social Community" but the references do not suggest that Sohan Pappu himself is notable. Notability is not inherited. The organization can be notable but not the founder, or vice-versa. Perhaps this draft could be recast about Our Youth Social Community. Get rid of non-independent sources. Also, the English is badly written with poor grammar that would not be acceptable for publication in article space.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sohan Pappu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Anachronist (talk) 18:43, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Panchumarthi Anuradha has been accepted

Panchumarthi Anuradha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 01:04, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you for reviewing & accepting the article. Its so interesting for me…my first article to get published in an prominent place Lakshmijourno (talk) 03:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Penmetsa Varaha Venkata Suryanarayana Raju has been accepted

Penmetsa Varaha Venkata Suryanarayana Raju, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 09:53, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks & good luck Lakshmijourno (talk) 10:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hi @Lakshmijourno, I hope you are doing good. One of your recent contribution on Nara Lokesh has been reverted assuming good faith as the edit did not generate any grammer rectification as mentioned in your edit summary. If you want to try/test editing, kindly use your sandbox. For any more queries please contact on Wikipedia:Teahouse for assistance. Thank you.456legend(talk) 18:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page మా యువజన సామాజిక సంఘం to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 21:46, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have mistakenly written in English's Wikipedia which is already existing but not approved by reviewer [[Our Youth Social Community]]

If you have reviewer rights, please do the needful [[Our Youth Social Community]] and also request you to delete this article మా యువజన సామాజిక సంఘం

Thank You Lakshmijourno (talk) 21:50, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lakshmijourno (talk) 20:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please re check my draft on OYSC

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kondapalli Lakshminarasimha Rao has been accepted

Kondapalli Lakshminarasimha Rao, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 08:08, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of C K Kumaravel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on C K Kumaravel, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. // Timothy :: talk 06:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Our Youth Social Community (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Our Youth Social Community instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Our Youth Social Community and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please continue with article Our Youth Social Community in article space & thank you. Lakshmijourno (talk) 16:03, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lakshmijourno! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sohan Pappu has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sohan Pappu. Thanks! Valereee (talk) 19:44, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have replied Lakshmijourno (talk) 19:09, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sohan Pappu (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Sohan Pappu instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sohan Pappu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you approve Sohan Pappu which is in Article space. I will not be editing Draft:Sohan Pappu anymore. I will be considering Sohan Pappu only.

Thank you Lakshmijourno (talk) 03:06, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do you mean "approve"? Deb (talk) 17:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request for review of article Sohan Pappu Lakshmijourno (talk) 22:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SexIs article

Hello Lakshmijourno. Thank you for reviewing the article. Could you please provide details on your decision to recommend the article for deletion? The magazine is alive and doing well. Its circulation has reached over 15,000 copies and it serves a multiple minority communities in Midwest US. Thank you and looking forward to your answer. Regards, PaleAda (talk) 16:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please add more references to it

Thanks Lakshmijourno (talk) 16:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please add more references to it

Thanks Lakshmijourno (talk) 16:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ramavarappadu Ring

The page Ramavarappadu Ring has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Our Youth Social Community moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Our Youth Social Community, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:11, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sohan Pappu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sohan Pappu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:12, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I will change and get back to you. Thank you Lakshmijourno (talk) 14:24, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sohan Pappu has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sohan Pappu. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:43, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove current discussions

The information at Draft:Sohan Pappu is important to other assessors. Valereee (talk) 21:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Project Suraksha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Project Suraksha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:53, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete Draft project Suraksha. Lakshmijourno (talk) 12:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sohan Pappu (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

UPE/COI concerns have not been addressed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sohan Pappu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:54, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles written by me are of my own interest only. There's no COI or known to me. It was all my research on the topics or persons. If I have been found to be COI, please tell me where I can change the article space.

I would be great if you could believe me on this. All the articles are my own but not COI and Paid Lakshmijourno (talk) 12:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Our Youth Social Community (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

UPE/COI issues have not been addressed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Our Youth Social Community and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have written articles based on my own interests, and I claim that there is no conflict of interest (COI) or any known bias in my work. I state that I have conducted my own research on the topics or individuals covered in the articles, and that they were not paid for.

If there are concerns about potential COI in my article, please provide information on where I can make changes to the article space.

It is important to maintain objectivity and transparency in my published work, particularly in journalism and academic writing. Therefore, it is to ensure the integrity of the work. Lakshmijourno (talk) 12:09, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing tags

The tags are part of how we communicate our concerns to other editors. Please don't remove them unless you've fixed the problem. Valereee (talk) 12:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Our Youth Social Community (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Our Youth Social Community and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 17:20, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sohan Pappu (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Immediately resubmitted after previous decline, so those issues are also still relevant.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sohan Pappu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 17:20, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pathuri Nagabhushanam moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pathuri Nagabhushanam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It does not show how the subject is notable according to Wikipedia's definition of notability.

To show notability, the draft needs citations from reliable, independent sources with an in-depth discussion of Nagabhushanam – not only mentions of his name in articles that are primarily about other topics. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 17:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vishal Gunni moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vishal Gunni, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:34, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kavya Kalyanram moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kavya Kalyanram, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:52, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Our Youth Social Community for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Our Youth Social Community is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Youth Social Community until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Valereee (talk) 19:03, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because you reverted yourself quickly and moved it back to draft space, the deletion nomination has been deleted also. The title in article space is now protected to prevent such mistakes from occurring again. If your draft is going to become a published article on Wikipedia, it needs to be reviewed and approved by an editor without a conflict of interest. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:54, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saurabh Khamar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saurabh Khamar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Valereee (talk) 16:59, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello Lakshmijourno. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lakshmijourno. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lakshmijourno|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Abecedare (talk) 16:59, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If I choose any topic, I will do deep research and write about it. But there is no personal interest in being paid. All I am writing about is personal skill improvement. Lakshmijourno (talk) 17:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lakshmijourno, what in the world made you think Saurabh Khamar was notable? Literally every source was a copy of one of two other sources, and none of them represented reliable sources. The man is a mid-level political appointee, an Officer on Special Duty, something between a secretary and an undersecretary. There must be literally hundreds in India and tens of thousands across the globe. Why would you think this particular Officer on Special Duty was notable? Valereee (talk) 17:46, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mainspace block

You have been blocked from editing wikipedia mainspace for a period of 3 months for promotional editing that has repeatedly raised WP:UPE concerns (most recently at Saurabh Khamar). And while you have denied any conflict of interest, and I take you at your word, it is clear that your current understanding of notability, neutral point of view and reliable sourcing is not good enough to prevent violation of these core policies. You are still free to edit in draftspace and to discuss changes on talkpages and on noticeboards, while ensuring that the edits are adequately reviewed.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Abecedare (talk) 22:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pathuri Nagabhushanam (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DreamRimmer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NPOL.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pathuri Nagabhushanam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DreamRimmer (talk) 11:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:C K Kumaravel

Hello, Lakshmijourno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:C K Kumaravel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:CK Kumaravel

Hello, Lakshmijourno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:CK Kumaravel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yuva Galam Padayatra

Hello, Lakshmijourno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yuva Galam Padayatra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Project Suraksha

Hello, Lakshmijourno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Project Suraksha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vishal Gunni

Hello, Lakshmijourno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vishal Gunni, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sohan Pappu (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I just don't think this meets the threshold with WP:NPERSON with the current sources, which are mostly interviews so not independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sohan Pappu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 09:59, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:C K Kumaravel

Hello, Lakshmijourno. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "C K Kumaravel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:53, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:CK Kumaravel

Hello, Lakshmijourno. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CK Kumaravel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:55, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yuva Galam Padayatra

Hello, Lakshmijourno. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yuva Galam Padayatra".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vishal Gunni

Hello, Lakshmijourno. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vishal Gunni".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:32, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Pathuri Nagabhushanam

Hello Lakshmijourno, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Pathuri Nagabhushanam, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pathuri Nagabhushanam.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|LordVoldemort728}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 08:49, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sohan Pappu

Hello, Lakshmijourno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sohan Pappu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sohan Pappu (April 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Xkalponik was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Repeated attempts have been made to establish notability, but unfortunately, all of the inserted sources lack in-depth independent, significant coverage. I've done my own research and I can take responsibility for saying that the subject does not meet notability guidelines, at least for now. Since the draft has been declined already several times over a long period, it's only fair to reject this. If the subject receives sufficient coverage in the future, those sources can be shared on the talk page, and if the draft gets deleted for inactivity, a new one can be submitted.

X (talk) 18:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sohan Pappu

Hello, Lakshmijourno. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sohan Pappu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:51, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]