Jump to content

User talk:Kusma/Archive 24

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 20←Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24Archive 25Archive 26→Archive 30

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

Joel Simkhai

I see that you deleted the Joel Simkhai page but cannot find the reasoning and was looking to rebuild it. Could you please let me know? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christopher.dilley (talk • contribs) 19:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Sorry - forgot to sign --Christopher.dilley (talk) 19:18, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

The article was deleted by WP:CSD#A7 for failing to assert why its subject is important. The full article contents were "Joel Simkhai is the owner of MagsForLess.com a website that sells discounted magazine subscriptions", and ownership of a website is by itself no indication of importance. There were also no references, which is nowadays required by our policy about living people. Anyway, if you want to write a new article about the person that satisfies our inclusion standards, just be bold and do it. A previous speedy deletion years ago is not by itself a reason to delete the article again. Hope that helps, —Kusma (t·c) 20:24, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of cultural references to A Clockwork Orange for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cultural references to A Clockwork Orange is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cultural references to A Clockwork Orange (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anthem 07:53, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Guoguo12 2

I'm pleased to see you moving drama to the talk page. It should be done more often, but please be careful not to move the posts to above my signature - I don't want any come backs from Sandy ;) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:16, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Oh, I didn't move anything, I just commented on the drama. (I am the only person on Wikipedia who thinks that RfA discussions belong on the talk page). —Kusma (t·c) 18:41, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

Diacritics

The discussion has now been going on long enough that we are beginning to go around in circles. Before talk escalates to shouting, I think it is important to attempt a policy wording that would have the broadest appeal among the 'neutrals' that will also hopefully swing some of the opposers. Vejvančický (talk · contribs) and I have been trying to work out on my talk page what wording we would like to see in a new proposed statement. Your input would be appreciated. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 02:21, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

This discussion has gone around in circles for years now, and I have little hope that anything can really be done about it. Voßstraße says hi. —Kusma (t·c) 12:43, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2011


Walking the walk

Chortle, chortle! Little user hit nail on head as so often! For many occasions of supporting Bishzilla ever since Zilla RFA in early cretaceous period, little Kusma is solemnly awarded well-deserved and rarely seen "Walk of Fame" Bishzillastar! bishzilla ROARR!! 18:41, 3 July 2011 (UTC).

Little user thanks the mighty 'zilla and celebrates best star ever! —Kusma (t·c) 20:01, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 July 2011

The Signpost: 11 July 2011

The Signpost: 18 July 2011

oddity

I just had a look through Portal:Germany/New article announcements and found a number of recent sadly shortlived editors who tend to create perfectly attributed articles (translations from dewiki) culminating in announcing that article on the board. Time to catch the next one coming along and integrate. Could be very useful to the project :-) Agathoclea (talk) 20:47, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Experienced people from dewiki, maybe? But why do they have new accounts in the days of SUL? Hmm... —Kusma (t·c) 05:16, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
using a number of accounts seems to be a privacy thing on deWiki. This account appears to have been made just for the purpose of making a historic* edit attibuted to two editors. (*Last German municipality article created on deWiki) Agathoclea (talk) 11:22, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2011

Thank you kindly

Thank you for your support
Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. I shall endeavor to meet your and the community's expectations as an admin. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:38, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

Your day is coming...

Hey, I just wanted to remind you, it's getting to be that time of year. Your very own day is coming up, this Saturday! What will you do to celebrate? (And doesn't 2007 seem like just yesterday?) – Quadell (talk)

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

The Signpost: 15 August 2011

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

red harvest

Hello kusma I am here to thank you for letting me test my editing abilities on red harvest and glad you addressed it so quickly Thank you your friend Jmfs1701 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmfs1701 (talk • contribs) 17:33, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Georg Forster

Not sure if the article is still on your watchlist, so letting you know about a note I posted at Talk:Georg Forster. The note is here. I'll be checking that talk page, so feel free to reply there. I might also try and help tidy the article up, as I noticed a few typos and bare URLs, but its the ancestry and the name that brought me to the article, so I'd be interested in what some of the previous and current editors think of what I've posted there. Carcharoth (talk) 22:38, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

Title of article "Crid" should be changed to "CRID"

Hello Kusma,

the title of the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crid should be changed from "Crid" to "CRID" (all upper case). Can you help?

109.192.58.119 (talk) 06:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject China/NNU Class Project

I mentioned your name at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject China/NNU Class Project#Request as someone who had the expertise to assist. But it seems you are on a break at the moment. Agathoclea (talk) 12:54, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2011


The Signpost: 3 October 2011

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

The Signpost: 17 October 2011

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

The Signpost: 31 October 2011

The Signpost: 7 November2011

The Signpost: 14 November 2011

The Signpost: 21 November 2011

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

MSU Interview

Dear Kusma,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.


So a few things about the interviews:

  • Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
  • Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
  • All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
  • All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
  • The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.


Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck (talk • contribs) 03:52, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2012

The Signpost: 27 February 2012

The Signpost: 05 March 2012

The Signpost: 12 March 2012

The Signpost: 19 March 2012

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

Happy Adminship Anniversary

Wishing Kusma a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 23:53, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Wow, six years already? Time sure does fly. —Kusma (t·c) 07:26, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for your support at my RfA. I will do my best to live up to people's confidence in me. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:02, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

New tool

missing bumping into you :-) Agathoclea (talk) 06:27, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Nice tool :) No estimate yet on when I'll be more active again here, sorry :( Too much going on in work and family life... —Kusma (t·c) 07:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

Chinese townships

Hi. I actually agree that the sheer amount of work needed to get them all up to a decent level and fixing the existing errors is a mammoth task and one which is unlikely to be accomplished so it might be better starting from scratch one at a time. And I actually agree that sub stubbing is problematic because of the amount of work needed to expand them and its best creating meatier stubs. I don't view the project as I used to and you should have noticed that my editing in 2012 has been significantly different. But I continue to be treated with animosity and treated as if I am still an adherent of creating useless stubs which I cannot escape from. I am actually of the opinion now, given that so much information is becoming available that it is more constructive to add a sourced fact or two to new articles and detest sub stubs as much as anybody else does. I never "liked" creating short stubs but due to the sheer amount missing at times it seemed plausible to try to get people working on content towards them. Many of my stubs have been expanded but many haven't, but that's wikipedia. If we could have an article on every Chinese townships like Anxiang Township this would go a massive way towards addressing systematic bias. But placeholder stubs in a way still reveal the systematic bias as few are expanding them. Above all I want to see information dramatically expand and wikipedia flourish and do a great deal towards trying to achieve it which I rarely get credit for. i think it was completely unnecessary what happened at ANI and we could have at least talked about the articles in a more constructive, more amicable manner elsewhere. Just show me some respect and I'll reciprocate it. I should be able to add sourced population to Jaguar's Spanish municipality stubs anyway..♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:07, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

I don't think I have shown you disrespect (I certainly didn't mean to). I certainly know that you are one of the few people we have that are willing to write articles about almost any topic, and it is plain to see that you write lots and lots of good articles. I just believe that placeholder stubs hide some of our problems of systemic bias, and that they actually slow down content creation. I love red links and do not like stubs. Of course, I have also created stubs, but nowadays I prefer to write proper articles right away. (When I do actually write, which is too rare these days). —Kusma (t·c) 07:56, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Me too, I much prefer writing articles for DYK/GA or at least meatier stubs. Since I got my widescreen monitor in December I saw how the short stubs look even worse and how much better wikipedia is when the articles contain content and references!! But I was trying to cover too much and jeopardized the quality of content. Also it comes down to how you view the project. If you think of wikipedia as a long term project which will be around for tens even hundreds of years you see it from the perspective of trying to identify as many notable topics as possible which wikipedia should be working towards but if you view it as a solid encyclopedia then temporarily it is far below expected standard, after all an encyclopedia is here to provide information! If I had the time I would of course created all those thousands of articles with full content.. A lot of them though were stubs to be transwikied where the information is already in another language and simply needs copying over and sourcing. At times it seemed productive to route out notable articles and encourage people to expand and help given limited time and the sheer number of missing articles but the reality is that most people ignore them and I agreed with Aymatth2 and DGG a while ago that all new articles should really contain one sourced fact bare minimum and that unsourced sub stubs create a bigger problem than them missing. The German wikipedia deficit is the worst I think we have tens of thousands of missing articles which have full content on German wiki and few translating on here, Internet trouble again. may be slow progressing with sourcing Jaguar's Spanish stubs today.. Take care.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:42, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Making good progress with sourcing and adding data to the Spanish stubs. Will take time to expand all further but I believe it would be wrong to delete them.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:29, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kusma/Archive_24&oldid=1190141858"