User talk:Kungming2/Archives03

This is an archive of conversations, messages, and comments on my talk page from September 2006 to the present.

I'm back from wiki-vacation

You should seriously clean up your talk page, or archive them. And add a rule post at the top (refer to my talk page). It really helps against some stuff (like a legal disclaimer helps in stopping lawsuits) Typer525 ^Talk 18:53, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect requested

I feel that Bloggers should also be redirected to wikt:Blogger. Seems logical after the disambiguation page for blogger. Tried to do it myself, but somehow couldn't. Thanks --Sanat 09:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's not much of a way to have a Wikipedia article actually redirect to something outside of Wikipedia - even a MetaWiki project even. Imagine how it could be abused by vandals! Yeah, it's a very logical suggestion, and I think it's great! But, I lack the MetaWiki know-how to force a redirect =P. Thanks for your work! –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 05:31, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ristretto Page

I was adding information to the Ristretto page rather than playing around. I removed what I thought might be controversial to you. My qualifications are as a barista turned home barista and SERBC Judge. The method is referenced in the page's external links and is a common practice. Also, in the future, I'd appreciate an explination in why you removed the edit despite being an anonymous user. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.152.86.209 (talk • contribs)

Well-meaning edit, I accidentally mistook it because of a certain character that got inserted accidentally by 72.152.86.209. Apologies. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 04:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KD aubert deletion

Why was my entry to her page deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by WTMAN1903 (talk • contribs)

Your edit was well-meaning, but "African-American with a dash of Creole" is a phrase that is more suitable for a magazine than Wikipedia. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 04:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize my talk page.

~~What you did to my talk page was unneccessary. Please do not do it again. Those vandalism warnings were from months ago. You don't need to ressurect them.~~ --B&W Anime Fan 12:33, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Per WR3, and Gwernol has archived the multitude of warnings. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 04:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy happy joy joy

➨ **ЯEDVERS** awards this Barnstar to **Kungming2** for anti-vandalism stuff that benefits Wikipedia as a whole.

Thanks, Redvers! =) –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 06:01, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bad news for you.

A Willy on Wheels sockpuppet goes by the username Kungming2 on wheels.--B&W Anime Fan 14:34, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well there was one apparently his page got deleted.--B&W Anime Fan 22:34, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that seems weird... Thanks for telling me. =) –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 00:23, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Kungming2/Archives03

I award you the Daniel.Bryant Blue Star of Thanks for your kind support for my candiacy at the Esperanza elections of September 2006. Although I didn't make the council, I have every faith in the three wonderful new Councillors, and I again thank you for your support. Daniel .Bryant 10:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hey man, how's it going? --24.7.194.240 07:22, 17 October 2006 (UTC) <3[reply]

Vandals leaving messages with hearts? How interesting.... –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 05:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: External Linking

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Trademark. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites that you are affiliated with, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. using VP)

Hi KM,

I've just added a valid link which you've removed.

The link is www.surfip.gov.sg under "Trademark databases / searches" link section.

SurfIP is a public service provided for free by the Singapore Government, and in comparsion to the current 1st link which goes to 'http://www.kedem-law.co.il/index.files/relatede.htm' where it's a collection of links, rather than a public service for the users, there should be good reason why the SurfIP link is a valid link address "Trademark databases / searches".

For your further verification. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vision3001 (talk • contribs)

Pointless edit

User:84.230.191.214 - you may wish to see the rvv i did on North Mount Lyell - I'll leave it up to you - it was totally pointless SatuSuro 07:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Random message

Don't worry about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Didibobox (talk • contribs)

What's this about? (note: Didibobox has vandalized the Gunn High School article.) –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 05:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing

Sorry - User:84.230.191.214 had been warned - and had gone on to make a "stupid" edit - it thought perhaps that user was trying to keep going despite warning! Hope that might make sense! SatuSuro 07:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental Warning Reversion (Is reversion a word?!?)

Sorry about the warning revertion on that user's talk page. How do you prevent that from happening? Usually wiki warns me that someone took care of a vandalized article already. (It tells me this has already been reveted or something like that.) Once in a while though, it fails to tell me that. Is tehre another way of checking? O_o -WarthogDemon 17:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apple II survey

I'm conducting a survey about the Apple II -- any former users are invited to participate. I found you were active on Apple II related articles.

Come to User:Applephreak/survey

Applephreak 18:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... I haven't actually used an Apple II before, so I'm afraid I can't really take part in the survey. Thanks for letting me know though. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 06:33, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deon555's RfA

Thank you for your support on my RFA, which closed successfully yesterday with a result of (18/16/8). I'd like to let you know that I won't be running for adminship again, until I am nominated, rather than nominating myself again. Thanks for your support, Deon. — D e on555 ^talk_Review 22:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar, I do what I can. :) --Daniel Olsen 06:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Malaysia

Cool! Malaysia is the best country in the world and because being at the ass end of the world I rarely meet people from Malaysia - so I ask you which city is better? JB or KL? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Citikiwi (talk • contribs)

Don Cherry Edits

RE: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Don_Cherry_%28hockey%29&diff=prev&oldid=86678741

I disagree with your edit on the Don Cherry page. (You changed some improvements I had made to the page.) The page I had edited had missed the main story of the Don Cherry visit to the Visitors' Gallery of the House of Commons, i.e., the mixed reaction of the Members of Parliament, so I added that aspect to the article.

Perhaps you would like to check this and then reinstate my edit so it would read once more: "On November 7, 2006, after appearing in the Canadian House of Commons' Visitors Gallery, and receiving both wild cheers and raucous boos from the Members of Parliament ...,"

BTW, someone has already partially corrected your edit to include the full quote. Previously the quote was out of context and did not mention the Canadian troops.

Ian Hunter Canada

My apologies - it wasn't vandalism, Thanks for telling me about the mistake! –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 09:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Germany :Church in Bremen

I come from Germany and live here; so i know excactly that this church i liberal.GLGerman 00:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So and on the german Wikipedia is a struggle with User:Hansele/Benutzer:Hansele since many month over Religion and Sexuality...and Hansele works often without his name under different IP-Adresses.GLGerman 02:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Careful with popups

Not all bad edits are vandalism, this one just lacked coherence/grammar, so you might want to leave a better edit summary next time. 66.231.130.70 02:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I chose not to give the guy a warning, since he/she meant well. I apologize for the hastiness of my revert, but after monitoring numerous articles over time, I prefer to keep articles relevant and to the point - random outtakes add over time and cause massive article "bloating." Thanks for helping me improve! –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 02:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Message

hey sry i didn;t mean to frogive me —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hello my name is al (talk • contribs)

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar! Being my first, it is very much appreciated. -- AuburnPilot ^talk 03:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Hula Popper

Hey, why the strong delete for Hula Popper? I've heard of this before...it may be a really poorly written article, but seems like its in the vernacular. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.134.227.10 (talk • contribs)

I've run a simple Google search on the term, and even an urban dictionary (devoted to slang) described it thus. Not exactly what the article says it means, though I'm pretty sure there are some people who do use that term, it's not that widely used. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 07:57, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh...well possibly worthy of an article...at least one for the lure. haha.

Adding prod2 tags...

Is it OK to add prod2 tags to speedy deletion tagged articles? See my talk page...

--wj32 ^{talk | contribs} 09:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

She's a no-good Nazi Troll

--PinkPup 17:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Even so, let's all try to be courteous, it'll make everyone's life easier. =) –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 17:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the oc

the edit i made toward the oc was not vandalism it was simply the truth and i think its very homophobic to delete my edit just because of the word homosexuality. I know for a fact that my edit was 100% the truth and i srtongly believe u should not have deleted it. Please my edit back or open it up to me for editing so i can fix it.

                                                    thank if u will  ~Bolrog~

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.202.124.37 (talk • contribs)

Message from 24.201.116.242

sorry bro ill stop i promise ok?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.201.116.242 (talk • contribs)

Unfortunately, you did not stop vandalizing, and thus have been blocked from editing. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 20:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the oc again

when say lets keep it neutral u mean hetrosexual. well marissa stared that she was a homosexual in a episode and had a relation with a woman. i think u should consider putting my edit back or let me do it because i will not rest until this website exepts homosexuals —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.202.124.37 (talk • contribs) how do i consult the others? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.202.124.37 (talk • contribs)

He just seems to be trolling. Matthew Fenton (talk · contribs · count · email) 18:35, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Haggard

You are not authorised to remove material that disagrees with your religious sentiments. This is a warning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.7.67.96 (talk • contribs)

Please stop distributing false vandalism warnings. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 20:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly every vandal claims to be "falsely accused." Merely removing the warning (it was only a warning) as you did, is considered in and of itself a violation of Wikipedia policy.

Regarding your vandalism: You deleted someone else's edit because the information "was already mentioned below." Are you familiar with the concept of an introduction paragraph? 68.7.67.96 20:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CVU members must see this kind of "le-se" quite often. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 20:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:68.83.220.51

I've replied on my talk page. --nkayesmith 12:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert

I'm sorry to say that this revert was not a fair decision.

As far as Polish Real Madrid fansites are concerned, realmadrid.info is the third or maybe event fourth as far as popularity is concerned, whereas RealMadrid.pl is the unquestionable leader.

The link to RealMadrid.pl was deleted here and substituted with a link to rm.info. Since then this change has not been reverted. I don't look at the Real Madrid article too often (I've got no need to :) ), but I do sometimes and since I've noticed that the link to RM.pl has been deleted, I looked up when the change took place and reverted it.

As far as my POV might be concerned, be aware that the 83.x.x.x IPs are IPs of the Polish Neostrada provider, thus that editor was at least as unobjective as me, but my argument is that RealMadrid.pl is the most popular Real Madrid fansite in Poland (ah, one of the most popular football sites in Poland a all), just as realmadridfans or realmadrid.hu are in their countries.

Regards, Sir Wolf of Poland 15:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely apologize. I have restored the previously added links. Thanks for notifying me of my error! –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 17:34, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

However, next time consider leaving a note on the talk page detailing the addition of the new external links, especially since the article already has a huge amount. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 17:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. And next time I promise to remember, because I agree that it could look like spamming. Sir Wolf of Poland 17:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, now this is strange. Leuko has deleted all the external links, event though according to WP:EL if there are many fansites for the topic covered by the article, then providing a link to one major fansite (and marking the link as such) may be appropriate. The problem is that no big sports club (at least no big European football/soccer club) has one major fansite - usually there is one per country. And so Poland has RealMadrid.pl, Hungary - realmadrid.hu, Spain - realmadridfans.org, Denmark - realmadrid.dk and so on. I agree that links to blogs (!!) are a bit too much, but since Wikipedia encourages users to add links to most significant fansites, the ones I've mentioned definitely deserve a link.

I'm going to speak about it with Leuko in a moment; if you'd like to add anything, feel welcome ;) Sir Wolf of Poland 18:45, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I hereby award you the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your dedication and persistence to fighting vandals on Wikipedia. Thanks for helping Wikipedia stay strong. Nishkid 64 19:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal!

That IPvandal that I reported and you have warned has vandalised many times. He has about 10 final warnings. It is times like these I wish I were an Administrator.--^ॐ S e adog ^ॐ 22:15, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely look at the amount of damage that guy did before you reported him, and his continuation of havoc even after five+ test4 warnings. It was like screaming "Block me!" through and through. Aagh. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 01:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you but...

Thank you but the comment on my talk page was unnecessary. If you had bothered to look at the edit, you would see there is no way they could be called vandalism. I refer you to WP:Vandalism. Specifically the section titled “New User Test,” and “Learning Wiki Markup and Manual of Style.” Under this section a new user can make edits to improve their ability as a wikipedian without it being considered vandalism. If you had bothered to take the time before wasting your time and calling my edit vandalism you would have seen (1) that my edit in no way could be considered vandalism since I reverted it a minute later, and (2) was implementing a wikipedia test image, and (3) the change was a revert of another poster mainly out of curiosity for what was on the page. Next time, try following WP:AGF a bit more closely. Specifically that “we must assume that most people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it.” Not to mention “Newcomers unaware of Wikipedia's unique culture and the mechanics of Wikipedia editing often make mistakes or fail to respect community norms.” Lest we forget “Assuming good faith is about intentions, not actions. Well-meaning people make mistakes, and you should correct them when they do. You should not act like their mistake was deliberate. Correct, but don't scold.” Following the policy will save you, and I time. Don't get me wrong. It is appreciated that you look out for vandalism ... but, seriously, why send a warning when it is a practice image that was unilaterally reverted? Wouldn’t it better aid wikipedia to spend the time editing actual vandalism? I think it would. Thanks. CraigMonroe 22:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for any trouble I may have caused you. However, Wikipedia policy also states that "please use the sandbox" for any test you might want to do. I suggest using the sandbox next time to avoid any confusion of intention. Putting random text in an article link is easily viewed as vandalism, even if it's well-intentioned. I also thank you for reverting your own test edit, and I look forward to working with you in the future. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 23:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I appreciate the forwardness. CraigMonroe 00:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars

Thank you for the Barnstar yesterday. ^_^ Though I've just noticed that your barnstar is the same as my first barnstar I received last month. o.O;;; Is it okay to have more than one of the same kind of barnstar? ^_^; -WarthogDemon 02:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing warnings

I noticed that you recently warned a troublesome user for removing warnings from his talk page. Unfortunately, following the recent discussion at WP:AN, consensus is that it is no longer appropriate to warn users for this breach of etiquette. The "Wr" templates have even been removed from the list of usertalk-space templates. I just felt I'd warn you, seeing as I have had disputes with administrators over the reversion of user talk pages. yandman 13:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for informing me! =) –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 00:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-Friend

Hello Kungming, I noticed you added your name on my wikifriends list. I accept your token of friendship. I also noticed you are a Buddhist and a Vegetarian. I am a Hindu but incorporates a lot of the Buddhas teachings into my philosophy, and I too a vegetarian. Cheers, if you need me feel free to drop by.--Seadog 00:40, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message.

thanks for the positive support. this was one of the first times i've really tackled any sort of vandalism, so i'm still learning. in fact, i've never sent a message before either, so i hope i'm doing this right as well. i'm just sort of fed up with all the childish activity that has increased lately (or just that i've recently noticed more). Doctor yellow 02:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. - you're user page is quite in depth, i'll have to learn this html some so i could make one half as vivid as yours.

Jessica93.

I did not intend to vandalize the article in question. I was not aware that this was continued vandalism. --Jessica93 23:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Message from User:68.127.91.37

Why not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.127.91.37 (talk • contribs)

Replied on user's talk page. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 08:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why was my change reverted?

I don't understand why my change was reverted! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.166.54.117 (talk • contribs)

Editors have spent lots of work crafting articles, and blanking them is not the correct thing to do, even if you don't believe that magic secrets should be revealed. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 00:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For you :)

		Glen's Anti-Vandalism Barnstar!
		Glen is thrilled to award Kungming2 with this small token of appreciation and acknowledgement for exceptional performance in the art of troll extermination, cruft elimination and for ensuring Wikipedia is safe for public consumption... You are a legend, please keep up the great work! Glen 10:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!! :) –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 08:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for the barnstar. =) Quite unexpected. I'm honored. =) -- Gogo Dodo 23:23, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Thanks

Thank you for the Support

I'd like to express my huge thanks to you, Kungming2, for your support in my recent RfA, which closed with 100% support at 71/0/1. Needless to say, I am very suprised at the huge levels of support I've seen on my RfA, and at the fact that I only had give three answers, unlike many other nominees who have had many, many more questions! I'll be careful with my use of the tools, and invite you to tell me off if I do something wrong! Thanks, M a rtinp23 14:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks

Thank-you for the message. I actually do have an account, but I don't always log on unless I need to use member-only priviledges. I sometimes forget to say why I am editing pages, but I hope that in this case it was apparent. I was making the stub types for the Kings of Sumer more specific, so that they can sorted in the right category so that the people with knowledge on that subject can help expand them. But do not worry, I will attempt to be more communicative with regards to my editing. And good luck on those college applications. I'm trying to write essays for my own applications right now.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.151.238.66 (talk • contribs) November 19, 2006.

Thanks! Best of luck to you, too. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 08:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

non admin rollback and warning tools

With all the great work you do I thought I'd make like a lot easier for ya - so, I have added non admin rollback and warning tools for you. They really rock!

So, can you please clear your cache (hit CTRL-R) and then when you see some vandalism use the RED rollback link. This should rollback the edit but also open the vandals talk page (turn your popup blocker off if it doesnt) and, whats best is there you should see an extra tab at the top next to history and one press and they are warned! (you still get to choose the warning) - see if that works :) Let me know if you like! Glen 09:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS: If not your thing just say the word and Ill remove immediately... but that'll definitely not happen! :)' Enjoy!

You're very very welcome my good friend! Thanks for the barnstar too! ;) Glen 00:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

O^O

Thanks for noticing that, when I first signed up for an account, I tried ALF and A.L.F. and they both got blocked, guess the admins on 'duty' at that moment thought I was Animal Liberation Front (or worse) :) --Alf ^melmac 17:37, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Smiley Award

Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward

User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward1

Barnstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For a kind greeting for a new IP user, 128.118.113.19, yesterday. 146.186.44.234 00:48, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the barnstar! –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 06:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re. 谢谢

You're welcome. :-) Keep up the good work! Regards.--Hús ö nd 02:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hi Kungming2, thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Much appreciated! Robotman1974 10:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And for reverting mine too!!! :) Glen 05:19, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glen has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Talk Page Messages

Ack, sorry. I really haven't figured it out yet. I won't do it again (see?). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.74.127.87 (talk • contribs) –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 06:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

keep up the good work

Nice job reverting vandalism!

Keep it up! =) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Madjohnflint (talk • contribs)

Thanks! –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) | Review 05:53, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk: Aerith Gainsborough page

Hi, I'm Eileen. I deleted some stuff on the Aerith page because I think it shouldn't be there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.130.11 (talk • contribs)

Hmm... It was a tag detailing the fact that the article had been moved. It's useful for Wikipedians. Please explain to me why it shouldn't be there? –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 08:40, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing

Are you allowed to blank your own talk page?

Edits to Maple Syrup

Stop reverting me, you ass!! 74.12.230.58

I won't stop reverting your vandalism, until you yourself choose to stop vandalizing articles. Please consider helping rather than destroying the hard work of others. –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 17:18, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed 74.12.230.58 17:59, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How can a professional review link be spam??

Whilst I understand some quibbles you might have regarding the posting of links, how can a link to a professional review (by a paid UK music journlist and DJ) placed under the professional review column be classed as spam? It has as much right as the thousands of others of its kind to be posted,surely??

Resolved. –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 18:15, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk: Aerith page

I assumed that the everyone figured that out because I'm actually the one that made the corrected the incorrect spelling but I linked it back to Aerith's page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.130.38 (talk • contribs)

Hmm... So it does redirect... But please consider keeping it on just as a notice so that others were aware of the change. For example, a user may go on the talk to say that it's misspelled, but might reconsider that because of the notice. If you do remove the notice, please note the reasoning in the dit summary. And don't forget to sign! =) –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) | Review 05:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted my dicussion with Kuba

Why did you revert my comment I left on User talk:Kuba01? Stuart says: Heweyeweyeweyeweyeweyewey... The Duke of Kungming2, Bow before me! ^{You can't control me!} _{I'm a P. I.!} 07:27, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted it back. Sorry about that! (seemed like a pretty interesting message....) =) –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) | Review 07:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

heh damn edit conflicts. I realized almost as soon as I sent that message to you that you'd reverted it... unfortunately you were already posting here by the time I got to. Stuart says: Heweyeweyeweyeweyeweyewey... The Duke of Kungming2, Bow before me! ^{You can't control me!} _{I'm a P. I.!} 07:35, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks re test score comment. Stuart says: Heweyeweyeweyeweyeweyewey... The Duke of Kungming2, Bow before me! ^{You can't control me!} _{I'm a P. I.!} 07:36, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Would you please consider removing vandalism warning on my talk page? Please see comments/explanation there. Thanks. --213.170.65.38 08:30, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - done. Thanks for notifying me! –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) | Review 18:45, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whitney

Thanks for reverting those edits. Its nice to see someone other than Whitney students protecting the page. Typer525 ^Talk 22:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ummmmm.....

Regarding your response to my post on the Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mandarin_Emperor_style_dildo page: "Eww.... What is a Mandarin-flavored anything, anyway? Perhaps Mandarin Oranges Now there's a thought... :P? –- kungming·2 (Talk) | Review 07:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)", I don't really think I'm the one to tell you. Maybe Wikipedia has an article on it.... Have a nice day. Spawn Man 04:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, I didn't mean it like that. I wasn't offended at all. It's just that a dildo is a girl thing & I didn't wanto offend you by explaining it to you lol. Now I know you didn't want an answer lol. Have a great day. :) Spawn Man 06:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

my edit

I'm terribly sorry about the problem I caused with Fred Barnes wiki. I'll be more careful in the future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.174.177.126 (talk • contribs)

No problem. Just be careful. –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 00:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image problem - thank you!

Hello,

Thank you for sorting out the image for me with reference to my post on the help desk.

The article concerned is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thin_film

The image in question is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Linearschematic.jpg

When you say overwriting tags could be a problem, do you mean that in the future I need to completely delete the old entry and make a new one in order for it to work.

All the images I ever use belong to me, so the licence factor should not be an issue.

Thank you again and I look forward to your comments.

Best wishes, Antony

[email removed for privacy]

Personally, I think it might me a bug with the image tags, but just to be prudent, use the "Preview" button before saving just to make sure. And thank you for your image contributions! –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 06:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Stegosaurus

Mei guan xi! (I can't produce characters right now, sorry!) I'll check up on Stegosaurus now and then. I know it can be hard to stay on top of the vandalism! --Fang Aili ^talk 19:23, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for all your excellent work keeping the vandals at bay with the Stegosaurus article. I'm hoping they'll go away once Stegosaurus leaves the main page! All the best Mark t young 22:02, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Mark! And yes, it does seem to have died down now, since it is no longer the main featured article. Thank you too, for watching out for it! –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 06:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New vandalism tools....

How they doing??? Glen 21:59, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They're really nice! However, there seems to be a bit of incompatibility with VandalProof. But it's still great! –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 06:12, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh really?! Well let me know if you'd like me to remove, sorry 'bout that! Glen 12:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ken

Would you care to do the honour of reporting it at AN/I (or blocking him if you're an admin). I'd rather not be the one to block him, even though block evasion is a pretty non-controversial reason for blocking (it isn't nice to block someone after you've made fun of them). Guettarda 05:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I did [1]. But given the number of people weighing in at the RFC, and the admission that it's Ken, I went ahead and reblocked. Guettarda 05:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a note on the matter at AN/I. Guettarda 06:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome!

I really appreciate it and hope to contribute. Thanks again Guyzero | Talk 01:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That'd be great! =) The reason I'm seeking adoption is that I know I'll definitely need help with a) technical markup questions which I cannot find the answers within Help, b) content reviews of any larger edits until I feel some confidence, and c) perhaps some guidance on where I should start. If this sounds OK with you, then lets do the adoption paperwork! ;-) Kind regards, Guyzero | Talk 02:22, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK done deal! Thank you very much =)Guyzero | Talk 03:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Emma Watson doctored picture

I appreciate the note, thank you. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 13:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

American -> English spelling conversions

Heya! I noticed that a couple of edits[2] that have been made to convert American English spellings to UK English spellings. The case I linked there has already been reverted by someone else, but I was wondering whether to make similar reverts if I see other cases.. or should I just leave them alone? Is there any official guidance in the style guides that addresses this? Cheers! guyzero | talk 22:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, someone is vanadlising the page for American INternational School-Abu Dhabi wiki. and I think that the best solution is to lock the article, because there are clearly two users who are currently doing that.

Things

I am the writer of "True History" There are several sources i would like to show you. I currently do not have a wikipedia account, so I will get my sources to you by 2007. I will post them on your pages.

Thank you

Thank you for your support with my RfA. My nomination succeeded. I appreciate your support. Thanks again for the barnstar, too. See you around! =) -- Gogo Dodo 05:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Collateral Damage due to Block

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 69.107.81.45 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Netsnipe ► 07:17, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

piling pictures on top of others

Hi Kungming2, This is probably long since outdated, but I just thought I'd let you know that you uploaded a picture over another user's picture back in September 2006. I've noticed that by accident and have uploaded the picture to Commons to make it available to the wider public again. I assume this was just a mishap from your part; just if it wasn't, I'd kindly ask you to respect the work of other users and not upload onto their works. Thanks, Ibn Battuta 04:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, but at that time I felt so as not to duplicate images that had the same subject matter - otherwise, the end result would be an orphaned image notice for the other user as well. Don't worry, it won't happen again. Thanks for the info. –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 14:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize--as I wrote, I didn't expect this to be still an on-going practice... And yes, you're right of course - before the Commons (and its possibility to categorize images or arrange them on extra pages), such images did really get lost easily. So I guess your upload actually saved this one! :o) --Ibn Battuta 00:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Melt the clouds of sin and sadness,drive thedark of doubt away!

Joy

Marlith ^T/C hopes that you are joyful! Joy promotes WikiLove and hopefully this little bit has helped make your day better. Spread the Wikilove by melting the clouds of sin and sadness that weigh down someone else. Try to brighten the day of as many people as you can! Keep up the great editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Marlith ^T/C 04:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 06:49, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

omnomonomnomnomnomnomnom

ur destroyin mah rites of free speechs--Leetmans 22:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have a right to free speech, but there is no right to vandalize articles. –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 22:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

to editor of wikipedia

Hello, I was wondering why every time I write something very important that will help children gain knowledge in words, why you keep deleting it? Please reply. -Mystery editor (blondeychck7)

Because your edits aren't actually helpful, and please help Wikipedia professional, rather than having childish edits to articles. Thanks! –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 23:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, Kungming!

Been awhile since I've checked in. How are you doing? How is school? RL and Wikilife both going fine here. Getting close to my first 1,000 edits, I think. =) I've mostly turned into a wikignome, but I have enjoyed protecting a wide range of pages from POV-creep and have even significantly c/e'd a few! Still yet to create page, but I'm sure I'll get around to it someday soon. =) Take care! --guyzero | talk 21:49, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I finally hit 1,000 edits (including talk pages, etc), and just passed 1 year editing wikipedia two days ago. =) Thought if I should share the news with anyone, it should be with the guy that adopted me, heh. Take care! --guyzero | talk 00:59, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ostrich

Your edit to the Ostrich article was pure vandalism. You edited a simple fact and you denied the public from seeing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Westvoja (talk • contribs) 22:03, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

.... I really am tired of self-righteous vandals. Ask other people on the talk page if you want. –- kungming·2 02:22, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday

from the Birthday Committee

Wishing Kungming2/Archives03 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!

Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!

--Nadir D Steinmetz 00:11, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Super Bowl

This edit was probably not appropriate. The changes you reverted were not all vandalism. Superm401 - Talk 03:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There was so much vandalism going on at the time, some edits were bound to have been accidentally reverted. In the end though, that's better than having "GIANTS RULE!!" as the article, right? –- kungming·2 03:53, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Google logo

An article that you have been involved in editing, Google logo, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google logo. Thank you. LightSpeed3 (talk) 17:24, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page was kept. –- kungming·2 18:17, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

got a message that i changed something

hey I'm a frequent user of wiki but haven't signed up or anything but i just got a message that i vandalized the New Zealand page by replacing words with OZZY. I never did this, I've never even changed anything on wikipedia. I have no idea what this is about, you sent me a message that said i could be blocked from wiki so I'm kind of worried. I'm sorry but you must have made a mistake.

Ryan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.86.110.56 (talk) 03:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Message left on user's talk page. No response. –- kungming·2 18:17, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism from 128.112.200.59

The Vandalism in question is [3], this is a local High School in Enid, Oklahoma(Where I live). Yagikaru.(talk) 21:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request Lock on Jin Dynasty (1115-1234) page to prevent vandalism

From the last discussion and a poll by participating members have decided it is wrong to say the origin of the Jin Dynasty rulers are koreans. However, nationalist koreans have once again added the section that Jin Dynasty rulers are from Korea. This is unreasonable and unethnical. And this have been ongoing for some time now which will end up as an edit war sooner or later.

Reading from your contributions i trust that you are a responsible, fair and capable member of wikipedia. I would be greatful if protection can be initiated on the Jin Dynasty page.

Regards

Hi

I noticed that you've commented on the talk page for Han Dynasty in the past. I recently rewrote the entire article. Since you've showed interest in the past, would you mind leaving a comment on the talk page about its current state? I'm trying to build further consensus on how to improve the article.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 19:15, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Betty Brown

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mblumber (talk) 01:44, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Left a note on your page. It certainly is a page worth keeping. –- kungming·2 02:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page kept. –- kungming·2 13:03, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Fellow Princetonian

Hello, sorry for the late response; I took a well-needed break from editing for a few months and never bothered to check my talk page in the process. I suppose I'm starting again because reading period hijinks got me bored enough to come back. Anyhow, I'm currently class of '12. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 02:16, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for not lapsing into sarcasm or mockery in your comment as many of the other contributors to this {{afd}} did.

I've requested userification of this article. The nominator failed to observe the courtesy recommended in the deletion policies of informing the contributor who started the article (me) that the article was being considered for deletion.

I trust your judgment that being a deputy director of personnel is not an important post. You suggested that if he had been deputy director of personnel at Guantanamo it might be a different story. His actual post at Guantanamo was, I believe, more significant than that. He was listed as the "OIC CSRT". A Rear Admiral J.M. McGarrah was the director of the Office for the Administrative Review of Detained Enemy Combatants. "OIC CSRT" would be "Officer In Charge Combatant Status Review Tribunals" -- ie the most senior deputy of this agency.

I think it was a serious mistake on the part of the nominator to fail to advise me that they had nominated the article for deletion. My thanks again for keeping your comments substantive and collegial. Geo Swan (talk) 18:29, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Macintosh Revival

Hello, Kungming2! You've listed yourself as an active member of WikiProject Macintosh, which is currently seeing very little activity. We are trying to revive the project and your help would be appreciated. To see who is active and who is not, we will be listing all active members under "status pending" in the project's participant list. Please move your name to either the "former members" section or "active" section. Hope to see you in the "active" column! For more information on how to help the project, visit the How to help section at our project page! · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:34, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Macintosh Role Call

Hello, Kungming2! You've listed yourself as an active member of WikiProject Macintosh, which is currently being revived. Your help would be appreciated! To see who is active and who is not, we will be listing all active members under "status pending" in the project's participant list. Please move your name to either the "former members" section or "active" section. The role call will end May 31; please move your name now if you are still interested. For more information on how to help the project, visit the How to help section at our project page! &middot MonoBot04:18, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting Vandalism

I had archived our discussion because I thought it wouldn't be followed up. I saw that you replied after I had archived, and you had to start a new section. I brought the old thread out of archive and added your comments onto the end of it. I thought that it would help clarity. If you disagree, then do please feel free to revert the edits. If you do then you might like to restore the left hand version of this diff. Hopefully you don't mind. — Fly by Night (talk) 22:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

German Bowdoin College article

Hi, can you place the Bowdoin College seal: File:Bowdoin College Seal.png right next to the table of contents of the German (Deutsch) Bowdoin College article - it says that the file has a copyright and I saw that you placed it somehow in the English Bowdoin article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.66.26.69 (talk) 11:48, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User Travel Template

Shouldn't there be a template to show where you've traveled before? QM400032 (talk) 11:04, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Cristin milioti 120913.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Cristin milioti 120913.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [4], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Amherst College Seal.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Amherst College Seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Williams College Seal.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Williams College Seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Claremont McKenna College logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Claremont McKenna College logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Scripps College Seal.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scripps College Seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:01, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Oberlin College Seal.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oberlin College Seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nitendo Wii listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nitendo Wii. Since you had some involvement with the Nitendo Wii redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. sst ✈ 15:35, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wyvern may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

9 June 2015 }}</ref>, and [[George R. R. Martin]]'s ''[[A Song of Ice and Fire]]'' series<ref>{{cite web |author=George R. R. Martin|title=Dany and the Dragons|url=http://grrm.livejournal.com/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bowdoin College Seal.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bowdoin College Seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:CTY LMU Casino Night Auction.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CTY LMU Casino Night Auction.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:48, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vassar College Seal.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vassar College Seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kungming2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to the Wikipedia Selangor Meetup 1

The 3rd Wikipedia Malaysia Meetup had now arrived on Selangor! Pack your bags and your laptop, and meet some fellow Malaysia Wikipedians in the meetup!

Date: Sunday, 11 December 2016
Time: 12:00 - 2:00 pm
Venue: Sudo Brew, 7 Jalan SS 22/11, Damansara Jaya, Petaling Jaya, Selangor (3°7′54.1″N 101°37′16.4″E / 3.131694°N 101.621222°E / 3.131694; 101.621222)
Medium of communication:
- English language - for the general overall meetup
- Malay language - for a special session to discuss ms.wikipedia.org (subject to enough number of participants)

This meetup was initiated by Chongkian and the invitation was written and sent by NgYShung. For more information, see the meetup page. If there is any enquires, feel free to discuss at the talk page or at the Facebook event page. (Delivered: 07:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC))

Invitation to the Wikipedia Selangor Meetup 2

The 4th Wikipedia Malaysia Meetup will be held for the second time on Selangor, and you are invited!

Date: Saturday, 25 February 2017
Time: 11:00 am - 1:00 pm (Malaysia Standard Time, UTC+8:00)
Venue: Menara Sunway (check page for venue/room update), Bandar Sunway, Petaling Jaya, Selangor (3°4′8.4″N 101°36′36.6″E / 3.069000°N 101.610167°E / 3.069000; 101.610167)
Medium of communication:
- English language - for the general overall meetup
- Malay language - for Malay Wikipedia section (subject to request)

→ To collaborate between Wikipedia Malaysia User Group and Sunway Group, a large corporation in Malaysia.
→ To create Wikipedia (and other Wikimedia projects)'s articles and edit/improve articles on the spot.

This meetup was initiated by Chongkian and the invitation was written and sent by NgYShung. For more information and updates, see the meetup page. If there is any enquires, feel free to discuss at the talk page. If you wish to opt-out of any future Malaysia meetup invitation, please add your name here. (Delivered: 11:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC))

Nomination of Shenzhou 12 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shenzhou 12 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shenzhou 12 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to the Wikipedia Johor Meetup 2

The 5th Wikipedia Malaysia Meetup will be held for the second time in Johor. Since it is at holiday, check it out if you have time!

Date: Saturday, 18 March 2017
Time: 1:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. (Malaysia Standard Time, UTC+8:00)
Venue: Al-Haji Grand Restaurant, Jalan Austin Heights 8/2, Taman Mount Austin, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia (1°33′43.2″N 103°46′34.6″E / 1.562000°N 103.776278°E / 1.562000; 103.776278)
Medium of communication:
- English language - for the general overall meetup
- Malay language - for Malay Wikipedia section (subject to request)

This meetup was initiated by Chongkian and the invitation was written and sent by NgYShung. For more information and updates, see the meetup page. If there is any enquirers, feel free to discuss at the talk page. If you wish to opt-out of any future Malaysia meetup invitation, please add your name here. (Delivered: 03:54, 17 March 2017 (UTC))

Invitation to the Wikipedia Kuala Lumpur Meetup 2

The 5th Wikipedia Malaysia Meetup will be held for the second time on Kuala Lumpur!

Date: Saturday, 22 April 2017
Time: 6:00 - 8:00pm (Malaysia Standard Time, UTC+8:00)
Venue: FEEKA Coffee Roasters, Jalan Mesui, Bukit Bintang, Kuala Lumpur (3°08′55″N 101°42′30″E / 3.1487°N 101.7084°E / 3.1487; 101.7084)
Medium of communication:
- English language - for the general overall meetup
- Malay language - for Malay Wikipedia section (subject to request)

→ To talk about the past Wikimedia Conference 2017 in Germany, Creative Commons, Malay Wikipedia and the upcoming Wikipedia East, Southeast Asia & Pacific Conference 2018 in Indonesia.
→ Forming a Wikipedia Malaysia User Group, coordinating East Malaysia-related affairs and training newcomer Wikipedia editors.
→ And a lot more!

This meetup was initiated by Chongkian and the invitation was written and sent by QianCheng. For more information and updates, see the meetup page. If there is any enquires, feel free to discuss at the talk page. If you wish to opt-out of any future Malaysia meetup invitation, please remove your name here. (Delivered: 06:01, 14 April 2017 (UTC))

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kungming2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday

Wishing Kungming2 a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 20:34, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]