User talk:Ktr101/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ktr101. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Coast Guard Air Station Cape Cod

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Coast Guard Air Station Cape Cod, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/cape-cod.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 01:39, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Cape cod afs

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cape cod afs, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.fas.org/spp/military/facility/cape-cod.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 01:52, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Please do not copy text from other websites

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- But|seriously|folks 05:59, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Coast Guard Air Station Cape Cod

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Coast Guard Air Station Cape Cod, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/cape-cod.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 01:34, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent copyright infringement. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. seriously

-- But|seriously|folks 06:01, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Please note that is it not sufficient to cite the source of copied text. DO NOT copy text from other websites. That's not writing, it's copying. Only post articles written in your own words. -- But|seriously|folks 06:03, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocked again

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continued posting of copyvios, prior warnings and block apparently had no effect. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. seriously

I'm quite shocked that you started posting copyvios again when your block expired. This was taken verbatim from here. Please do not do this again. -- But|seriously|folks 07:46, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

103d Airlift Wing

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 103d Airlift Wing, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: 103d Fighter Wing. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do not copy-paste articles. If the name of an article's subject has changed, the proper way to handle it is to move the page to its new title. Thank you. Someguy1221 (talk) 02:33, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Massachusetts Military Reservation

A tag has been placed on Massachusetts Military Reservation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. User Doe_☻T^☼C 19:04, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 6th Space Warning Squadron

A tag has been placed on 6th Space Warning Squadron requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. User Doe_☻T^☼C 19:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Cape Cod Air Force Station

A tag has been placed on Cape Cod Air Force Station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. User Doe_☻T^☼C 19:13, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Usgs cape-cod 950310-005-2-s.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Usgs cape-cod 950310-005-2-s.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oyster guitarist 20:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:6sws.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:6sws.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oyster guitarist 20:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Another Speedy deletion of Massachusetts Military Reservation

Please review Wikipedia:Copyrights. You will only be blocked again if you re-add copyrighted information. Ta. Pedro : Chat 20:52, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. User Doe_☻T^☼C 20:58, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Otis_ANGB.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Otis_ANGB.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 01:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of B-3 Long Range Strike Platform

An editor has nominated B-3 Long Range Strike Platform, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B-3 Long Range Strike Platform and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:29, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Maine Air National Guard

A tag has been placed on Maine Air National Guard, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Rhode Island Air National Guard

A tag has been placed on Rhode Island Air National Guard, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 01:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Vermont Air National Guard

A tag has been placed on Vermont Air National Guard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Closedmouth (talk) 02:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Long-Range Strike Bomber

I have deleted Long-Range Strike Bomber. Please don't create any kind of fork or merge article related to B-3 Long Range Strike Platform until this AfD is concluded. Thanks, Marasmusine (talk) 22:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Past and present air bases of New England

Air Bases

It dawned on me, after I left the message, that commercial airports are often used by the Air National Guard, in Burlington, VT, for example. So the designation "air base" may still be valid. I think I'd better withdraw my objection! :) A bit more complicated than I first thought! Student7 (talk) 13:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:WT-101.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:IWT-101.jpg. The copy called Image:IWT-101.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 22:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

SS James Longstreet

Hi, I'd like to help you with the image you just uploaded to the SS James Longstreet article. Can you tell me where you found it? Benea (talk) 23:39, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I see. I've changed the licensing from free use to fair use, as there is no evidence that it was ever under Crown Copyright, which specifically only applies to works created by employees of the British government. This picture could have been taken by anyone, and the National Maritime Museum's collection includes works not in the public domain. It's better to assume that the picture is still copyrighted, which would be the standard life of the author, plus 70 years, but we can make a reasonable claim of fair use in this instance I think. Benea (talk) 23:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Andrei Vladimirovich Bogdanov

Good morning, why do you delete this article ? Cordially. OccultuS (talk) 00:15, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

MacArthur article split

Please see the discussion page at Douglas MacArthur I placed after the move and before your tag, the article split was done in accordance with MOS and article size guidelines, sections and lead paragraphs have been added. I don't think it's necessary to merge that information back.Awotter (talk) 00:41, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem, I went ahead and added a lead paragraph and sections which I should have done when I moved the information. Normally I wouldn't have done that without discussing it first, but I was cleaning up the MacArthur article and I figured it was the best fix and was not going to alter the article drastically.Awotter (talk) 00:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Otis AFB F-94C Disappearance

A tag has been placed on Otis AFB F-94C Disappearance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jdchamp31 (talk) 02:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jdchamp31 (talk) 02:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

?

I'm not sure what you mean by your message on my talk page? As far as I recall, I haven't had any interaction with you on ANI. I'm happy to help if you have a question,though. - Philippe | Talk 23:35, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Eh, that clears it up. Based on the article in place right now, I don't think there are any problems, but if you need suggestions or help, feel free to contact me. I'm an administrator, which means that I don't particularly have any special status, but I have a lot of resources that I can call on to help you out. - Philippe | Talk 04:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Redirect of Category:Movie stubs

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Movie stubs, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Movie stubs is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Movie stubs, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

re: F22

Hello. The mere appearance of the F22 in a film isn't in and of itself notable, nor does it justify inclusion on the F22 page. You may want to read Talk:F-22_Raptor/Archive1#Popular_culture, a discussion from the archives about this. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 02:30, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Otis AFB F-94C Disappearance

An article that you have been involved in editing, Otis AFB F-94C Disappearance, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otis AFB F-94C Disappearance. Thank you. Roregan (talk) 22:56, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

You may want to ask User:Dhartung about it, he did express doubt over the validity of the soures used in the book. You may also want to talk with User:Roregan, the user who nominated the article for deletion, to see how he feels about it. I myself am not all that knowledgeable in this area. If you do reach the conclusion to recreate the article, I can provide the text of the deleted article to you. Parsecboy (talk) 20:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Bridge traffic

You added a daily traffic level of 70,500 to St. Anthony Falls (35W) Bridge. Everything I've read indicates that it should be twice that. The Annual average daily traffic article indicates that the number should represent total traffic in both directions. What did you base that on?--Appraiser (talk) 16:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Dover Air Force Base. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Ryou-kun16 (talk) 18:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Nav logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Nav logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Barnstable High School Marching Band

Wow, your message was just in time. I went to create the infobox and found one already there and tagged for speedy deletion as orphaned. It was set to be deleted today but an admin just hadn't gotten to it yet. I removed the tag since it'll now be used and added it to the article. →Wordbuilder (talk) 04:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Page merging

Hello. I notice that you transplanted material from the temporarily deleted article Centerville, Barnstable, Massachusetts to the article Centerville, Massachusetts and just wanted to point out to you that merging material is a little more complex and requires some specific steps. Wikipedia's contributors do not release their material to public domain, but retain authorship credit rights to it as set out under the GFDL license. That means that if we copy material from one article to another without crediting the original authors we are violating their copyright even though it is within Wikipedia space. As Help:Merging and moving pages sets out, this is dealt with by placing a direct link to the parent article in the edit summary of the new article. The source article may be turned into a redirect, but cannot be deleted since that authorship information must be preserved. Evidently, the administrator who deleted the article at your request did not realize that it was not a {{db-author}} but rather a page merge where process was not understood. Once the source page is restored, we'll make sure that this one is GFDL compliant. I'm leaving you this message primarily so that if you merge material in the future you will know how it's done. Please feel free to leave me a message now or then at my talk page if you need assistance with this. You can also ask at the help desk if I'm not available and you need a quick response. Thanks for your contributions. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:15, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi. I think perhaps I didn't make myself clear. :) A merge happens when you copy information from one article to another. In this case, the information was here. You moved it here. There's nothing wrong with doing that when you have good reason—and it seems like you did—it's just that for copyright reasons, we need to keep the article where the information came from (not delete it) and note what article it came from at the new place. You'll see that I placed a note in the history of the first article ([1]) pointing to the new home, and put a note in the history of the new home ([2]) noting where the merge came from. There was no minor stupidity involved; it's a common mistake to copy material without noting specifically what Wikipedia article it comes form. The GFDL policy is confusing even to many very experienced editors.

An alternative way to handle these situations is to request that an administrator blank the redirect article so that the other one can be moved on top of it. This is done by placing {{db-move|Page to be moved}} to the top of the redirect article and, obviously, putting the name of the source article in where it says "Page to be moved". It's a simple one-step operation for an administrator.

Do please let me know if I haven't explained this well enough. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:18, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. :) I'm happy to help. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

ANG Pages

Thanks for de-stubbing the ANG pages - I believe I was the creator (I was wrong about the previous point- but I put them in a *standardized template* form) for most, but with my busy job, I don't have time to include *all* relevant information. You're doing a great job, and keep it up! TDRSS (talk) 21:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC) P.S. I'm working on ANG Combat Communication Squadrons/Groups too - I'll try not to leave them too empty...

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:48, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Otis UFO

I have no way to judge if the book you mention is a reputable source that would convince others that this so-called incident meets the verifiability requirement. Is this not the same one that was listed as having been self-published on a "vanity press"?

Given the relative importance of all of the other issues you have been dealing with, I wonder if it's not a good idea to let this one rest for a while. Roregan (talk) 23:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

147th Fighter Wing

The 147th isn't scheduled to change missions until this summer, just a bit premature there. Although they have already turned over the air sovereignty mission to the Oaklahoma Guard. --Colputt (talk) 00:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I believe the stand-down and stand-up ceremonies are scheduled for the June Drill Weekend. --Colputt (talk) 00:08, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Answered your question...

...on the Talk:KC-10 Extender page. Feel free to ask any additional related questions on my talk page or at the reference desk. The talk page is intended to be a place to discuss how to improve the article. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Military Barnstar

It looks like you've put a lot of time into a number of USAF units and instalations. In recognition I'd like to award you a Military Barstar. Ndunruh (talk) 18:37, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:BBTV KC767T F22.jpg

Hi Ktr101 - thanks for uploading the KC767 image. Because the image is the property of Boeing and has not been released under a free licence, there are some extra steps we need to take so that it can be used on Wikipedia. Specifically, you need to read and understand the policy here and here and then supply a rationale for why you think our use of the image qualifies as "fair use" under US law. There's a template that you can add to the image to help you: {{Non-free use rationale}}, and the policy page I linked to earlier will help you understand how to use it. If you need any help, please don't hesitate to ask.

Another problem is that the Boeing site terms that you linked to expressly forbid any modification of Boeing's intellectual property (see the "Copyright" section); it looks to me as if you may have cropped the image before uploading it, in order to remove its rounded corners. If we're going to use this image at all, we have to use it in a way that's consistent with its owner's wishes, which means you need to replace the image that you cropped with the original image you downloaded from the Boeing site.

All of this, of course, amounts to one of the reasons why Wikipedia prefers to work with images that are unencumbered if at all possible! :) Cheers --Rlandmann (talk) 03:46, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

On further reflection, I think this image fails the "replacability" test, in that anyone with the time and skills to do their own computer render of the aircraft could do so; there's nothing unique about Boeing's render that makes it imperative that we use theirs. You are, of course, free to disagree and argue the point along the lines I suggested above. --Rlandmann (talk) 03:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

OK - point taken about the "square corner version" - for future reference, it's important to link to exactly where you took the photo from. It still doesn't get us out of the problem of it being a replacable image though... --Rlandmann (talk) 03:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Whoops - looks like we're tripping over each other's feet in this conversation! :)

Just to clarify what "replaceable" means in this context: To start with an obvious example, we couldn't download and use this picture to illustrate our article on the Statue of Liberty, because the image hasn't been released under a free licence by its owner. It's replaceable because anyone could go to New York City and take their own photo of the statue and upload it themselves. For me, that would involve a trip half-way around the world at tremendous cost and inconvenience, but that doesn't alter the fact that (at least in theory) I could do it; it also means that I cannot use the photo from the Statue of Liberty website that I linked to above; if no-one else had already supplied an unencumbered picture, I would have to wait until someone else supplied such a photo. In this case, just because you (or I for that matter!!!) couldn't replace Boeing's image with our own work doesn't mean that we can use theirs here.

The matter is slightly more complicated because (as you've correctly pointed out), Boeing says they have no problem with their gallery images being used by others for purely informational purposes (a right which US law grants anyway as "fair use"). However, this is contrary to Wikipedia's mission to create a truly free encyclopedia. To achieve this, all of the content we provide needs to be re-usable by anyone for any purpose. By uploading a photo here, we're effectively saying to the world "come and get it - and do what you like with it". This includes modifying the photo, or using it for commercial purposes. If someone wanted to upload a photo here that they took themselves but put conditions on it like "use it on Wikipedia, but no-one's allowed to crop it or use it to make money" we couldn't and wouldn't accept their conditions; and we won't accept those sorts of conditions from Boeing either. If someone wants to download a photo from Wikipedia to print on a T-shirt and sell at airshows, they need to have that right. That's one of the things that makes Wikipedia so revolutionary. --Rlandmann (talk) 04:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

We don't need to do anything more. Another user has added the fair use rationale that was missing, and I've added a message as to why I feel that rationale is insufficient. In a week or so, one of the admins who deals with these issues will take a look and make a decision. --Rlandmann (talk) 19:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Naval Outlying Fields

Category:Naval Outlying Fields, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 22:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 01:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive or hard to read formatting, as you did in 166th Air Refueling Squadron, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 00:08, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I gotta ask - what was so "disruptive" or "hard-to-read" about the 166th's formatting? This page follows almost every other USAF wing/squadron page on Wikipedia. TDRSS (talk) 15:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

The template was mistakenly given. Actually the "Mission" and "History" section were blank, this is why I gave him the template. However the templating was inappropriate. I am sorry for that. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

194th RSW

No info yet on 194th RSW - besides the Washington ANG, it seems as if the org doesn't exist... will keep digging. FYI - your ANG squadron pages are good. ANG squadron logos can be found at http://www.ang.af.mil/history/emblems/squadrons.asp I've been converting them to PNG and uploading to Wikimedia Commons - might want to include thumbnails of squadron logos on any "Lists of ANG -----" pages to spruce them up a bit. TDRSS (talk) 20:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I use a "poor-man's method" of conversion - hold ALT-PRNT SCR and then paste the result into MSPAINT (provided with WinXP), crop the image and then save into a PNG file - upload to Wiki... I'll work my way through them, but it may be awhile.TDRSS (talk) 00:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

185th Air Refueling Squadron

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 185th Air Refueling Squadron, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: 137th Air Refueling Wing. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:24, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:13920.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:13920.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [3], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:13920.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 22:25, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Ktr101. If I recall correctly (which is very possibly not the case), the problem with the image wasn't that it was incorrectly tagged, but that it was licensed by its owner "for educational use only", so unfortunately we can't accept it. If you have any questions about it, though, feel free to ask. :) Cheers! – Clockwork Soul 23:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

No problem, and I'm sorry that it had to be deleted. By the way, when you leave messages on talk pages, you might find it convenient to sign your name by typing four tilde characters (~~~~). That will automatically insert a timestamp, your name, and a link to your talk page. – Clockwork Soul 23:50, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Mashpee Commons.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Mashpee Commons.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Mashpee Commons.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 22:27, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Loring-afb-map1.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Loring-afb-map1.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:28, 19 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 22:28, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Request to move article New Jersey National Guard incomplete

You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page New Jersey National Guard to a different title - however your proposal is either incomplete or has been contested as being controversial. As a result, it has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:

Added {{move|NewName}} at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article. This creates the required template for you there.
Added {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} to the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved, to automatically create a discussion section there.
Added {{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 00:37, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Changes you made to Oregon National Guard

Should have been discussed on the talk pages or at the Oregon State Wikiproject, as it is the moves you made have broken links and talk pages on the articles you arbitrarily moved.Awotter (talk) 21:05, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, I regret this sounded harsher than I meant it too, I missed the fact that another editor had recently merged the two articles, it was discussed earlier to separate them again (which I saw but forgot). My apologies, all corrected now.Awotter (talk) 18:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

133rd Air Refueling Squadron

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 133rd Air Refueling Squadron, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: 157th Air Refueling Wing. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

186th Air Refueling Wing

Hi, Ktr101. Thanks for your edits on the 186th Air Refueling Wing article. I have it on my watchlist as I do most articles around Meridian, Mississippi. I've noticed over the past few days that you've been adding to the article; I've also noticed that the History/Mission sections are blank.

This site has a brief history of the 186th itself, and this site has some interesting information about how the unit was started. Al and Fred Key flew above Key Field (where the unit is stationed) in the early 1930s and developed a new method of air to air refueling. If I'm not mistaken, the 186th (and pretty much all Air Refueling Wings) began with that innovation. I think that would be a great addition to the history part of the article. --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 21:14, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 154th Training Squadron

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 154th Training Squadron, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? DGG (talk) 04:46, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

102d Intelligence Wing

I failed the good article nomination for 102d Intelligence Wing, as I felt that the article had too many flaws for even an "on hold" placement. Among these flaws are the one-sentence intro; lack of citation templates such as {{cite web}}; too many one-sentence sections; and too many lists. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:16, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I see you expanded the intro a bit. I still think it's a little too short, though, but I'm not sure of what more could be said in the intro. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Also, you might want to fix your signature, so that it has links to your talk page at least; it makes it much easier for others to talk to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Please put the references in the text of the articles, not in the headers. Also, I highly recommend using {{cite web}} templates for the website sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:03, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't think using "Section source" like that works. I haven't seen that in any other articles. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Westover Air Reserve Base

No deletion is called for there. You already know how to edit the page - so simply erase the redirect and add the content. If you are only moving part of the page you can't use the move page function anyway. You will have to copy/paste and include a link to the original source to preserve the traceability of the edit histories. Rmhermen (talk) 00:27, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Alright. I deleted and moved it for you. It should be all correct. Rmhermen (talk) 00:48, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted non-existent category

Hi. I noticed you deleted Category:Fighter units of the United States Air Force in World War II from the 162nd squadron that I recently expanded. Do you disagree this category should exist?--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 22:45, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi Kevin. The story is that I do not have a lot of knowledge in USAAF units, but intercepted the article someone else created, and expanded the empty sections. This was due to my initiative here to which you are invited to contribute. Please make your suggestions there, although the current discussion has not reached the area of categorisation concerned with specific units of national armed force branches--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 00:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Loved how you helped with a page I put a lot of information on with the 150th FW

I just wanted talk about regards to an Operational Security issue. Posting of Squadron Strengths, although not classified, are sensitive materials. Not to say you can't post if you feel inclined, but it is frowned upon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Srafitzpatrick (talk • contribs) 10:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

New With the Projects and Editing

I was just really interested in updating and keeping the 150th Fighter Wing page current and accurate. A lot of it is actually passed through what we learn about our unit, since the 150th is a part of our Unit. Some of the information is first hand from Deployments I was a part of. I have seen a lot of your work and it is very impressive. I was wondering what inspired this passion, especially for ANG pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Srafitzpatrick (talk • contribs) 00:24, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

111th Squadron

I am wondering what prompted you to eliminate the two-pane table in favor of a long list of aircraft. The whole reason I came up with the table in the first place was to separate the utility aircraft from the mission aircraft. --Colputt (talk) 02:35, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Alright yeah, that will work since that is the usual format. At least the separation is there again.--Colputt (talk) 23:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Silver Line

Why did you change the number of new (i.e. previous unconstructed) stations? --Golbez (talk) 20:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't quite understand. It said 30 stations (12 new), meaning there will be 12 stations added to the network, and it will use 18 existing stations (all on the blue and orange lines). Where do you get this "25 new" station figure from? --Golbez (talk) 20:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Re 102(n)d IW

Thanks for the feedback! Regarding the names, WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME, Wikipedia:Naming conventions (numbers and dates), and WP:MOSNUM all suggest that '102nd' is preferred, and nowhere in either the good or featured articles is the alternative used. To be honest, what the military does or doesn't do is largely irrelevant; it's not 'their' article, and Wikipedia articles should follow our in-house style, which you have quite rightly tried to adopt ;) The disambiguator after the unit name is entirely optional, and if nothing else exists that could be confused with "Intelligence Wing" (including translations of foreign unit names), then I agree it can be left off. The end-of-sentence citations are mandatory for GA, but only for (from the criteria) "direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons". Unfortunately the article has quite a lot of these, and I think citing it is likely to be a pretty big job. Regarding the subsections, I think separate articles may be a little way off yet contentwise, but certainly many of the sub-sub-headings could be cut down and the subsections merged together under broader headings. All the best with the article, and I'll look forward to seeing it at GA again sometime. EyeSerene^talk 23:05, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Quahog

Joy

Aramgar (talk) has given you a Quahog! Quahogs promote Wikilove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Share the WikiLove and civility with everyone and keep up the excellent editing!

Aramgar (talk) 23:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes. Keep up the good work. Aramgar (talk) 23:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Milhist edits

Hi Ktr101, thanks for your edits, and especially for helping out with assessing the articles at MILHIST. Just a little note to say that the {{WPMILHIST}} template does not take the |importance= parameter for a variety of reasons. Please also note that, where possible, could you add the B-class criteria found at the MILHIST documentation page. See the B-class FAQ for more information about them. If you don't feel comfortable, you can simply add the blank tags and someone else will get around to it eventually. If you have any questions, just ask at my talkpage. Regards, Woody (talk) 20:00, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I can understand that, it is a common issue. Milhist doesn't use them primarily because it is impossible to judge the importance of articles within different task forces as it is so subjective, and specific to each task force. If you ever have any questions, my talkpage is always there. Thanks again for helping out. Regards. Woody (talk) 20:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

New Cape Cod stub types

Hi - several stub templates which you created have been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub types, which were not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, do not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding these stub types, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 02:25, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

S'alright - though perhaps it makes a little more sense now why these things are usually proposed first. I still think overall you'd probably be far better off with a talk-page template (like the {{Project Massachusetts}} one used by the MASS Project). Grutness...wha? 06:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, Image:Cape Cod Landsat 7.jpg is the image. I still find it hard to see the image of Cape Cod even when it's enlarged. Ed (talk) 12:32, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Fy2009spendingbycategory2.png

Hi, I deleted your original copy of this image. Next time, you can upload a new version over the original by clicking the Upload a new version link on the image page. Kevin (talk) 01:44, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons

Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! There is, however, another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!--O sama K 07:40, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Plymouth Rock Studios

"Gonna be famous someday" is not enough. To get an article, a subject must already be notable. This company fails our standards of notability. Wikipedia is not a tool for publicizing something; it is a collection of already-published information about already-notable topics. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:35, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Never Forget

I truncated the ship's motto. You had "Never Forget, Strength Through Sacrifice". The ship's crest bears only the words, "NEVER FORGET". Yarri Zemph (talk) 21:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

USS New York (LPD-21)

The USS New York (LPD-21). You upset the Randroids. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yarri Zemph (talk • contribs) 21:39, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

102nd IW

That's not really my field of expertise, but I'll see if I can do anything. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:22, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Hmm. Could you link me to the article again please? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 15:07, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

That's odd, there doesn't seem to be a specific Wikiproject for the armed forces. I'm sure the GAN might attract the attention of a good copy-editor though. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 15:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Might be worth a try. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 15:28, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm having a hard time with this sentence in the new version: Two F-15s piloted by Colonel Anthony Schiavi and Major Daniel Nash flew acrambled to fly to New York. Neither is it grammatically correct, nor do I understand what you want to say. Wandalstouring (talk) 12:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

I need two more sources. Then it can pass GA. Wandalstouring (talk) 08:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

111th Fighter Squadron

Why did you replace the official squadron logo with a light blue and orange thing that just approximates the design? I think the original design should be on the page. That is why I went through all the trouble of digging it out of the Squadron's archives. --Colputt (talk) 22:09, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Aviation WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to aviation.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPAVIATION Announcements}} there.
Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, and project-wide collaboration.
We have a number of child projects and task forces that focus on specific topics and aircraft types.
We're developing a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the experienced project members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! - Canglesea (talk) 14:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Your RfA

I've added a question. Rudget (logs) 18:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:RfA

Hey Kt. Wanted to let you know that my oppose vote and suggestion for withdrawal weren't meant to be overly harsh. I can see from reviewing your contribs that you are a helpful editor, but that being said, there are many things that go into being qualified to pass an RfA. This is not from some elitist standpoint... I am not an admin myself, nor have I run a RfA. I hope you take my advice and withdraw the RfA and then start an editor review to get some good feedback. Let me know if you have any questions.Gwynand | Talk•Contribs 18:58, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey, wanted to get back to you. I'm not personally a fan of admin coaching, but others think it is helpful to editors and the community. It'll be up to you if you ever want to go down that path. Although, my advice would be to currently avoid the whole how-do-I-become an admin route. Start off with an editor review to see how people feel about your contributions if you'd like. If you still have adminship as something in your mind for the future (you should probably wait at least 6 months before considering another run), start participating in areas like AN, ANI, AIV, UAA etc. Though, I really would like to just recommend to you that you do what makes you happy on the project, do what you came to do here in the first place, which I was doubt becoming an admin. If in the future, you build up community confidence to have a shot at passing an RfA, another editor will surely nominate you and you can try then. If that happens, great, if not, it really doesn't matter. Let me know if you have another other questions. Gwynand | Talk•Contribs 11:34, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

RFA

Hello. I'm sorry to inform you that I have closed your RFA early per WP:NOTNOW. There were many suggestions brought up during the course of the request, mostly involving experience. If you address these concerns and those brought up in your first RFA, you will likely gain more support the next time around. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Useight (talk) 20:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

refactoring

On the subject of RFA please do not explicitly modify other users' comments as you did here. We do not know that America69 intended to support the candidate. –xenocidic (talk) 02:02, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

If they messed up the numbering - repair the numbering (though Tiptoety had already done this). Don't change what they wrote, it's a major faux pas. –xenocidic (talk) 02:10, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Anyhow, I know it was in good faith - so don't sweat it - but just keep that in mind for the future. –xenocidic (talk) 02:12, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: RFA Fix

What sentence you were on about? D.M.N. (talk) 07:04, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

I doubt people will forget as it was an indef block and legal threats. D.M.N. (talk) 17:49, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Jung-Ho Pak

This article has been lifted entirely from the PriceRubin page cited as a general reference. If not a copyvio (which is doubtful) it has enough NPOV, OR, style and tone issues to require a re-write. I don't want to start slapping Templates on it without first giving you a good chance to do the necessary, as I'm sure you're aware of the requisite WP policies. All the best. Plutonium27 (talk) 17:35, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Cape Cod Wiki Project

Hello! Thank you for the invitation. I will join the Wiki Project. If you have an opportunity and if the subject is of any interest to you, please take a moment to examine and copy-edit my new article on Mayflower Pilgrim Peter Browne. Also, let me know about any project goings-on on my talk page. Thanks! Quissett (talk) 15:55, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Old Time Base Ball Task Force

Hey, I wanted you to know that I reverted your edits to the Old-time Base Ball task force pages. The name of that task force is intentionally spelled that way, to reflect the original spelling of the name of the game. It's also per the talk page of that task force. Thanks! KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 21:26, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

New York

To undo it would be wheel-warring, I left a message for the admin who performed the move. –xeno (talk) 20:26, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

It looks like he'll probably undo it, I agree that a move like this probably requires deeper discussion. –xeno (talk) 20:31, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

It's undone now, so I guess all that is necessary is cleanup, and further discussion regarding the utility of this move. Let me know if I can be of any further assistance. –xeno (talk) 20:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Talk:18th Financial Management Center

Your thoughts would be appreciated at my move proposal here. Kind regards Buckshot06(prof) 12:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:52, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: 102nd IW

I'm not quite sure why you're asking me, in particular; the article lies well outside the areas in which I can comment with any degree of competence, and I virtually never participate in A-Class reviews directly anyways.

(In any case, we are currently revising the review procedure to minimize the chance of articles getting "overlooked".) Kirill ^(prof) 23:25, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Hey Kevin. Would you mind if I did a test reorganisation of the article in accordance with mine and Woody's comments? This would be intended to test a version of the page that would pass A-Class Review, and if you felt strongly it was a bad move, we could always revert it back. What do you think? Cheers Buckshot06(prof) 18:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

¡ORANGE!

Kevin, I do not wish to be censorious, but that orange bar at the top of your talkpage has got to go. Every time I look at your page, I get a shock. To me, and most other editors, orange means "you have a message" not "leave me a message". Please reconsider the semiotics of Wikipedia orange. Also, have a good summer. Your colleague on the sand bar, Aramgar (talk) 04:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Post scriptum: I must ask you about how to get to the abandoned base in Truro once the slowpokes leave.

Thanks for the directions to the North Truro Air Force Station. I will wait until at least September before braving the traffic. As for the orange: my note to you was rather rude and I am sorry. I found an alternate which might be of use to you: {{message|Ktr101}}. Regards, Aramgar (talk) 01:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate Image:DSC00772.JPG

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:DSC00772.JPG, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:DSC00772.JPG is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:DSC00772.JPG, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:42, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:Olympic Medal Count

There are 40 other medal count pages, and every one of them ranks the nations by gold medals, which is how the IOC does it. So we're just following a tradition. If you would like to change it, as it effects dozens of articles, I suggest bringing it up at WP:OLYMPICS. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 23:54, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

The list you brought up DOES sort by gold medals as seen in the column on the left. The column on the right also keeps track of total medals, but the default is gold. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 23:56, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Disambiguators

Hello. You reverted my move on the 102nd Intelligence Wing to remove the "(United States)" disambiguator I added. I wasn't fully sure why you did this, as I've been told many times to include that disambiguator on all numbered military units, per WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME. I was just wondering where the discussion was about not including this on Air Force units, as you mentioned in the revert. I wanted to correct any errors I potentially made in adding the disambiguator to unit pages that didn't need it. -Ed!^(talk)_{(Hall of Fame)} 03:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Good work

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for your improvements to WikiProject Marching band. →Wordbuilder (talk) 01:19, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Paul McCartney

Forgive my ignorance, but regarding this edit, what does the Paul McCartney article have to do with the Wiki Project Cape Cod and the Islands? Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 19:43, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

And sorry for reverting - Twinkle's been really temperamental over the last few days and sometimes reverts without me wanting it to Dendodge|Talk^Contribs 20:25, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Nobska assessment?

Hello Ktr101, can you explain the assessment for the Nobska page? If I have it right, you assessed it as stub class for the Cape and Islands. Stub class is defined as: "The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible." Do you feel it is too short, or is the material irrelevant or incomprehensible? DId you disagree with the 16 citation sources? Did you feel it was "a rough collection", whatever that means exactly? Did you disagree with the temporal flow of the article? If you could make some suggestions, that would help improve the article and Wikipedia as a whole. Thanks!--Wmjames (talk) 13:45, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:43, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:33, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Pine Hill

Hi. I reverted your removal of the mountain project box from Talk:Pine Hill (Barnstable County, Massachusetts) since there is no minimum elevation cutoff for inclusion in that project (perhaps it should be renamed "WikiProject Mountains and hills" because it includes a lot of British hills as well). Daniel Case (talk) 20:12, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

October Mountain State Forest

You tagged October Mountain State Forest for speedy deletion. I started a proper article there. You may want to expand it. --Eastmain (talk) 03:00, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:34, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

AFSPC Squadron Pages

Any chance I could convince you to help with Air Force Space Command squadron pages? I don't have the time to add in the templates anymore - I usually have a couple minutes here and there to update facts and references... and I'm tired of blank templates being deleted before I enter any data. BTW - Great job on the ANG pages! I'm glad that template has served some use for the AF History pages TDRSS (talk) 13:02, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Provincetown Harbor

Thank you for adding the Provincetown Harbor page to WikiProject Cape Cod. I created the page and am interested in moving it up from stub status and would appreciate any suggestions you have. Please reply. Peter (talk) 15:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Talk page note

Hi you added a note to my talk page which i don't understand. Can you please clarify what other discussion you were referring to, or explain what is the topic of your note? Thanks, doncram (talk) 01:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for following up. I just left a followup note, myself, at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Massachusetts#feedback on mass-editing of Talk pages, mostly to say i did edit all the Cape Cod and islands NRHP talk pages already. Thanks! doncram (talk) 02:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Foster Cass

You asked on my talk page what I thought of the article and its sources. The sources are not so great, being a bio page from a company the man works for, and a blog. On the other hand, the external links are both good sources. Move them into references and cite them for the specific claims, and the article would probably be fine. (Feel free to continue the conversation here, if you have more to say.) gnfnrf (talk) 15:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Branson Airport

Thanks for adding the infobox on Branson Airport. However some things don't seem right: BBG is the IATA the code for Butaritari Airport. From the all the pictures and articles I've seen there is only one runway. Thanks. Americasroof (talk) 15:59, 28 September 2008 (UTC)