User talk:Krutika Samnani

Welcome!

Hello, Krutika Samnani, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! NiciVampireHeart 09:26, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

Krutika Samnani (talk) 12:08, 8 April 2019 (UTC) I have given an article to publish, in what time will I get the revert?[reply]

While there is no timeline for review as reviews are conducted by volunteers, I have declined your draft, as it has no independent reliable sources to support its content. I gather that you are associated with this business; please note that Wikipedia is not for merely telling the world about a business. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, where article subjects must be shown with independent reliable sources to meet Wikipedia's special definition of notability, for businesses that is written at WP:ORG. Wikipedia is not interested in what a business wants to say about itself, only in what third parties state about one. Please review conflict of interest and paid editing(you are required by Wikipedia's Terms of Use to comply with the paid editing policy if you are a paid editor). 331dot (talk) 12:34, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crave Eatables (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pythoncoder were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crave Eatables and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Crave Eatables, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 12:18, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Krutika Samnani! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 12:18, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Krutika Samnani. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 12:28, 9 April 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Declare any connection

Hello Krutika Samnani. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Crave Eatables, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Krutika Samnani. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Krutika Samnani|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:44, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just learnt that I need to disclose my connection with the organiztion for whom I am editing the draft. Kindly note that I am employee of this organisation i.e Crave Eatables Private Limited, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India. Kindly guide where else I need to discose this as I respect all the terms of use of Wikipedia and would prefer to remain transparent rather than making things complicated. My previous messages disclosed this too hence making clear my intenetions. I learnt that indirect payment is also considered as my payment; so ofcourse I am paid whereas in my previous message I mentioned that I wasn't paid specifically for writing wikipedia article. But after I learnt its terms of use, I have disclosed everything I found to be disclosed.Kindly revert and tell me what else am I suppose to be disclose— Preceding unsigned comment added by Krutika Samnani (talk • contribs)

Please follow the instructions written at WP:PAID. You should also read conflict of interest. Please note that Wikipedia is not for merely telling about a business. This is an encyclopedia, that is only interested in what independent reliable sources state about article subjects shown to meet Wikipedia's special definition of notability(for businesses, that is written at WP:ORG, please review). Wikipedia has no interest in what an article subject wants to say about itself. Your draft currently has no independent reliable sources at all, meaning that at this time it would not merit an article. Not every business merits a Wikipedia article, even within the same field. Any independent sources must have chosen on their own to give significant coverage to your business; press releases, basic business transaction announcements, staff interviews, or other routine coverage does not establish notability per WP:ORG. 331dot (talk) 13:17, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crave Eatables (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crave Eatables and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Crave Eatables, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Crave Eatables.png

Thanks for uploading File:Crave Eatables.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crave Eatables (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Declining; subject seems to be a clear WP:NCORP failure, as the sources cited do not provide the in-depth, independent information required to establish the notability of the company. This can be remedied by adding new, third-party sources, and by removing the WP:PRIMARY sources (like the company's website).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crave Eatables and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Crave Eatables, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 13:57, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Krutika Samnani! You created a thread called Revert at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crave Eatables (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phospheros was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Crave Eatables, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Krutika Samnani/sandbox/Crave Eatables and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Krutika Samnani/sandbox/Crave Eatables, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Phospheros (talk) 08:40, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

Krutika Samnani (talk) 10:09, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I have given my draft for re-review, once more and this time my content supports the independent sources as required. So please accept this!!

Your draft will be reviewed, but I think it unlikely to be accepted. The one source in the article consists of an interview with company staff; per the business notability guidelines at WP:ORG such sources do not establish notability. I regret to say that I truly feel that the sources are not there for your company to merit an article at this time. Feel free to show this to your boss or superiors to help them understand if you wish. If you haven't already, I would suggest that you read Your First Article and perhaps use the new user tutorial which will help you understand what is being looked for in new articles. 331dot (talk) 10:23, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crave Eatables (April 13)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:55, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Krutika Samnani! You created a thread called Reply to Worldbruce at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Krutika Samnani! You created a thread called Disclosure at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Krutika Samnani! You created a thread called Follow-up to DisclosureBook at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Krutika Samnani! You created a thread called Source Of Book at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 10:06, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Crave Eatables

Hello, Krutika Samnani. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Crave Eatables".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

≈≈≈≈Bkissin I am blocked, please help me to get unblocked.