User talk:Kevinaitch

This is Kevinaitch's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace. Thanks! SiliconRed (he/him • talk) 15:19, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Kopp moved to draftspace. The article is undersourced.

An article you recently created, Sharon Kopp, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Modussiccandi (talk) 08:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: Thanks for reaching out. I'm just starting out as a Wiki contributor, so I definitely appreciate any and all guidance and feedback. I deleted the reference to her car collector father, but I thought the rest of the entry was pretty much a straight-ahead listing of her career without embellishments. It would be a huge help if you could point out the assertions that prompted the decision to delete the page. I'll do my best to remedy those transgressions so this doesn't happen again down the road. I look forward to hearing from you.

Again, thanks for the feedback.

Regards,

Kevin Kevinaitch (talk) 09:22, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you have copypasted the existing Draft:Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace and published it in the main article space, AfC tags and all. Why did you do that? Anyway, I've moved it to drafts, and declined it as a duplicate. Please don't create more copies of the same. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:32, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: I'm really sorry. I'm a new contributor and I was just trying to update the entry, not create a new one. Definitely my mistake, but please know I wasn't trying to pull a fast one. Today, I updated the original draft (I hope). Please let me know if I did it the right way. Again, I apologize for the error and thank you for your input, guidance and patience. I really appreciate it. -- Kevinaitch (talk) 04:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sharon Kopp (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Twenty-five per cent of the cited sources do not even contain the name "Sharon Kopp" – therefore, they cannot be indicative of the subject's Wikipedia notability. The remaining sources that mention Kopp are either not independent of the subject, or do not cover the suject significantly. The "Early life and education" section also does not cite any sources related to Kopp, which is contrary to Wikipedia's policy regarding biographies of living persons (WP:BLP). Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sharon Kopp and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sharon Kopp, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kevinaitch! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:25, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Flipper's NYC.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Flipper's NYC.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Draft-Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace.pdf

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Draft-Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace.pdf. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: Thanks for helping a newbie navigate Wiki's protocol. The pic I uploaded is a promotional photo from Flipper's website (flippers.world). My understanding is that it complies with fair-use guidelines. Please advise! Thanks again for your guidance and patience. I really appreciate it. ---- Kevinaitch (talk) 21:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's WP:non-free content policy is stricter than fair use. Non-free images need to meet all of the WP:non-free content criteria. Note WP:NFCC#9 allows non-free content only in article space. You are working on a draft which is in draft space and so this non-free images is not allowed for your draft. Even if your draft is moved to article space I see the following issues. WP:NFCC#10c requires that you provide a non-free usage rationale which this image currently is missing. Looking at your draft, it appears that the intent is to use the image in the infobox just to show what it looks like. That would not satisfy WP:NFCC#1. You cannot use a non-free image if a free image could be made as somebody could take a photo of the Flipper's under a free license. -- Whpq (talk) 02:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Flipper's NYC.pdf

A tag has been placed on File:Flipper's NYC.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 03:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Draft-Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace.pdf

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Draft-Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace.pdf. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:00, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 10:09, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to review this submission. Not sure why there's still an objection. The article doesn't read like a press release, nearly every sentence is linked to reputable sources like Vogue and NY Times. I would really appreciate it if you could point out specific sentences/claims that are troubling. This has been a frustrating experience, fast approaching six months since the original submission.

Thanks again for your time and consideration. I sincerely appreciate it. Kevinaitch (talk) 21:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: Still hoping for guidance to make this article acceptable for publication. The review process is supposed to take 4 months. It's now been 6 months. As I've noted previously, nearly every sentence is linked to reputable sources like The NY Times and Vogue. Anything that might be interpreted as promotional has been culled. Please help. Thank you. Kevinaitch (talk) 22:55, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sharon Kopp (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sharon Kopp and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 20:47, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for taking the time to review this article. Can you please explain why it has yet to be published? Virtually every sentence is backed up by a citation from a verifiable source. So far, the review process has dragged on for 5 months. Please help. Thank you. Kevinaitch (talk) 22:50, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace has been accepted

Flipper's Roller Boogie Palace, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for approving this article for publication. It took longer than expected, but I'm glad to finally be part of the Wiki community. Again, thank you! Kevinaitch (talk) 17:42, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sharon Kopp

Hello, Kevinaitch. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sharon Kopp, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sharon Kopp

Hello, Kevinaitch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sharon Kopp".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:50, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]