User talk:Kaithehedgefox

Welcome!

Hello, Kaithehedgefox, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Wario (disambiguation), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ... discospinster _talk 00:02, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wario (disambiguation)

The article Wario (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary, only one Wario has an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 00:02, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wario (given name)

The article Wario (given name) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Name fails WP:APONOTE as there aren't at least two notable people with the name.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Waluigi (given name)

The article Waluigi (given name) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Name fails WP:APONOTE as there aren't at least two notable people with the name.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wario (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wario (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wario (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 14:09, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Waluigi (disambiguation)

Hello, Kaithehedgefox. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Waluigi (disambiguation), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:07, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sonic (given name)

The article Sonic (given name) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"Sonic Man" is not mentioned in List of Mega Man characters, and the first word sounds like an adjective rather than a name. Without that entry, there is only one character with this name, which does not justify having this page at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic London 21:50, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sonic (given name)

A tag has been placed on Sonic (given name) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 01:17, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sonic (given name) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sonic (given name) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonic (given name) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:59, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested articles

Hi Kai, if you like creating new pages but could use some help on what topics are needed, look for ideas at WP:Requested articles. Hope this helps! – Fayenatic London 07:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weegee (character) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Weegee (character). Since you had some involvement with the Weegee (character) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Walleo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Walleo. Since you had some involvement with the Walleo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ToThAc (talk) 20:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Weegee (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bootleg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juliana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unreferenced material to articles

Please stop. I note that your entire edit history involves adding questionable, unreferenced content with zero communication from yourself. —Xezbeth (talk) 09:44, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Caillou (new media character) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Caillou (new media character). Since you had some involvement with the Caillou (new media character) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:53, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ericko listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ericko. Since you had some involvement with the Ericko redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 22:56, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kids Fattening Center listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kids Fattening Center. Since you had some involvement with the Kids Fattening Center redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 23:00, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

V-guy listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect V-guy. Since you had some involvement with the V-guy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 23:07, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One Crapnificent Morning listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect One Crapnificent Morning. Since you had some involvement with the One Crapnificent Morning redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 23:10, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Frivolous/potentially offensive redirects

Hey there, as you can see from the messages on your talk page, I have nominated several of the redirects you created for deletion. I'd like to take a moment to invite you to have a look over Wikipedia:Redirect, our guideline on why and how we create redirects, especially WP:RPURPOSE, the section on reasons to create a redirect. I noticed a lot of the redirects you created aren't really consistent with our guidelines. "Kid Fattening Center" isn't an appropriate, alternate, widely-used nickname for KFC, and doesn't really fit with the encyclopedic tone we try to set with Wikipedia. Same with "V-guy" redirecting to Voldemort—that is not a widely-recognized name for him. "One Crapnificent Morning" redirecting to One Magnificent Morning is another example; I couldn't find any instances of that term outside of Wikipedia, and Wikipedia is not for things that have just been made up. I'd really urge you to take a look at the guidelines and essays I linked in this message to get a better sense of what does and doesn't belong on the Wikipedia project. If you have any questions, feel free to type {{ping|Cymru.lass}} in front of your reply below so I'll get a notification. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 23:20, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It covers the torso and crotch listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect It covers the torso and crotch. Since you had some involvement with the It covers the torso and crotch redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 23:52, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kaithehedgefox. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm Ferret. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Robot Master, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Forums are unreliable sources because they are generated by users with no editorial oversight. For this to be significant and notable for inclusion, it must be covered by a reliable secondary source. -- ferret (talk) 22:55, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bowsette. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop. This is non-notable, and hardly a comparable topic. -- ferret (talk) 22:58, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marico (given name) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marico (given name) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marico (given name) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 08:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Do not advertise your deviantart, please. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:02, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Dead meat rank

Hello, Kaithehedgefox,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Elmidae and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Dead meat rank should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead meat rank .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Elmidae}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:54, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Skin-tight full-body jumpsuit

A tag has been placed on Skin-tight full-body jumpsuit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nate • (chatter) 21:07, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dead meat rank, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rank and Rating (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"She appears to be Caucasian (Metroid)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect She appears to be Caucasian (Metroid). Since you had some involvement with the She appears to be Caucasian (Metroid) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Rorshacma (talk) 23:48, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of She appears to be Caucasian (Metroid)

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as She appears to be Caucasian (Metroid), to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 02:04, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Mrs. Momomiya" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mrs. Momomiya. Since you had some involvement with the Mrs. Momomiya redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Rorshacma (talk) 02:20, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create a malicious redirect, as you did at Mrs. Momomiya. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:31, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Big Ariana" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Big Ariana. Since you had some involvement with the Big Ariana redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Cut Man V" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cut Man V. Since you had some involvement with the Cut Man V redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Rorshacma (talk) 16:00, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Tailsko" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tailsko. Since you had some involvement with the Tailsko redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Rorshacma (talk) 16:06, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:53, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kaithehedgefox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for my vandalism that I did this year. I regret creating all those useless redirects. However, I understand why I merit to be blocked. But I swear to never repeat my vandalism ever again. I originally came to wikipedia to make minor improvements, such as fixing spelling errors. Kaithehedgefox (talk) 00:59, 20 September 2019 (UTC)kaithehedgefoxKaithehedgefox (talk) 00:59, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
  - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:46, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Naruko Uzumaki

A tag has been placed on Naruko Uzumaki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:G5 by User:Kaithehedgefox, and arguably also WP:R3

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:08, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Cell (Villain)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cell (Villain). Since you had some involvement with the Cell (Villain) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:13, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Piccolo (Hero)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Piccolo (Hero). Since you had some involvement with the Piccolo (Hero) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:15, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Buttons for Eyes (film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Buttons for Eyes (film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 19#Buttons for Eyes (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dominicmgm (talk) 22:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Buttons for Eyes" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Buttons for Eyes. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 19#Buttons for Eyes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dominicmgm (talk) 22:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Ms. Momomiya" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ms. Momomiya. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 18#Ms. Momomiya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 02:05, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

I declined this user's unblock request at UTRS appeal #60278, simply because they should be making their unblock request here. However, please note that there's been Confirmed block evasion via logged out editing in late June. As such, they should probably not be unblocked until they've gone at least six months with zero edits (as per WP:SO). Even then, they need to follow the above directions offered them by NinjaRobotPirate. -- Yamla (talk) 22:04, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kaithehedgefox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It has been at least 2 and a half years since I got blocked for vandalism by making useless redirects. However, I have now learned from my mistakes, and now have no desire to cause any more trouble. To contribute to Wikipedia, I want to add a character section for the article about the popular indie game Friday Night Funkin', along with more detailed info about the mods for the game. Kaithehedgefox (talk) 22:20, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Six months from 2022-07-02 is 2023-01-02; that's the soonest you can apply under WP:SO. Nor have you addressed your block evasion nor followed the instructions provided by NinjaRobotPirate. Yamla (talk) 22:23, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.