User talk:Johnalexwood

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Johnalexwood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Pilo t|guy ^{(roger that)} 22:26, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In Answer To Your Question

I've split off that page for you. What you'll need to do is create a page entitled John Coghlan (drummer) (just click that red link and start the page). If you need help let me know. Happy editing! --Pilo t|guy ^{(roger that)} 22:26, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Monty Python

I recently created this page: List of things referred to in the works of Monty Python and have a few questions about it:

I think a table format with 3 columns might be easier to read but I need it to be as simple as possible for people to add their contributions to it, and I think a table is more fiddly than bullet points, right? Any thoughts?

A: Try it on a sandbox and ask for comments. Xiner (talk, email) 01:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice if, whatever I chose, it automatically sorted itself A-Z by the first column. Can Wikipedia do that?

A: No, I'd also assert notability somehow b/c I've a feeling someone's gonna list this for deletion. Xiner (talk, email) 01:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to cross reference the articles that appear in the list with an infobox with coloured shading and maybe the foot-in-the-television image you see at the top of the table that appears at the bottom of Monty Python. It would appear along the bottom of each article, centred or left/right margin - and it would simply say "The subject of this article is mentioned in the works on Monty Python" with a clickable link back to my list page. But I don't know how to code such an infobox and don't you need new infoboxes such as this to be approved before use?

Use the template of that box that is at the bottom of the Monty Python article (can be found at Template:Monty_Python) and sort of redo it in the Sandbox and make it with the requirements you would like, then suggest it to the Template_talk:Monty_Python page where you can ask for suggestions and comments. Extranet ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 03:54, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am obviously keen to encourage others to add lines to this list. How do you suggest I do this within (and outside of) Wikipedia?

Recommend it on Talk:Monty Python under a new heading. You could possibly also ask for comments and suggestions on the new template there as well. Need any further help? Simply ask another question and add the {{helpme}} tag at the top. Extranet ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 03:54, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at what I ended up doing all on my own at the bottom of the article and discussion pages on Durer [[1]] Have I justified enough the existence of such an infobox at the bottom of the article on Durer, to hardened Durer fans do you think? Johnalexwood 10:08, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your reasoning but I personally don't think it's a good idea. There are a lot of places and people that were mentioned in all kinds of shows, and if this was done for every tv-series or movie, or even the best researched ones, it would get out of hand extremely fast. Also, in terms of esthetics, I think it looks too much like a userbox, more than an infobox in my view. But that point is, to me, not nearly as important as my first one. I think there have been discussions about this stuff in the past, but I've been away for quite a while and I can't remember where that was. --Joanne B 11:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of The Mike Sherman Show

A tag has been placed on The Mike Sherman Show, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 16:00, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interview on Wikinews with Mark Bunker

We are looking for someone, particularly someone pro-Scientology to ask some questions here: Wikinews:Story preparation/Wikinews interviews Mark Bunker, producer of anti-Scientology website 'XenuTV'. I know he is anti-scienrology, but we need some questions to balance out the interview. Any help is appreciated. DragonFire1024 (talk) 21:47, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of ShareNow

A tag has been placed on ShareNow, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TheMile (talk) 02:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gizmondo

{{help me}}I added a paragraph at the bottom of [2] a few hours ago. Now it's gone. No evidence it was ever there in history and nothing mentioned in the discussion page. How can that be and why was it deleted? And why isn't this wrapping?

Hi. I can help you.

First off;

In your help request, you started the line with a space. If you do this, it makes the text go all across the screen. For example;

This line starts with a space and is very long so it will go off the edge of the screen if it doesn't fit. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.

No problem with that; just trying to help.

Now, regarding your edit; The edits you made were reverted by another user. If you look in the history of the page, [3], you can see that other editors have reverted yours.

The reason given is; " Revert previous two changes, reference is self hosted forgery)"

Do you think this is incorrect? (I will look at the changes now)

-- Chzz ► 08:16, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, having looked at the edit you made, I'm not sure if it's appropriate for the page. So the best thing to do would be, post a message in the article discussion page - Talk:Gizmondo. Create a new section, explain what you waht to add and why, and then wait for responses there. I will also ask the person who reverted the change to explain their action here.

Note: Please do not try to add the changes again! Discuss it with other editors, and hopefully you'll reach a WP:consensus on whether the changes are OK.

I hope this has helped,

-- Chzz ► 08:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted your edit because Carl Freer has a history of forging documents that support false claims about himself and the companies he is involved in, and this has all the hallmarks of such a forgery. I won't list the details here, as it will assist Freer in improving his future forgeries. Colin Wilson of Begbies Traynor is on record to a Swedish national newspaper just two weeks ago, stating that no public comment will be made until the investigation is complete. I believe that you made the edit in good faith having been supplied the images by Freer, and would like to bring to your attention his past history so that you can make better judgements about what PR work you accept from him in future. The Wired and Financial Times references linked from the Gizmondo and Carl Freer articles give a good background. --Fugu Alienking (talk) 08:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful linking to external sites

Re. Atlas (anatomy), and you adding the link to "http://www.atlasprofilax.ch/eng/faits.php" on 19:38, 5 May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

-- Chzz ► 01:50, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

N o More Spam

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. -- Chzz ► 03:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hood Surgeon link

Recently, you added a link to title "Hood Surgeon" on the Dr. Dre article. Do you intend to create an article about Hood Surgeon? --Andrewlp1991 (talk) 00:38, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I was hoping someone else might want to do that as I had added the link to his new official site. http://www.sharenow.com/relations/profile/mrcurtisyoung/ Johnalexwood (talk) 00:59, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

British Scientologist cats

Hi, I just want to let you know that I've moved the CFD section that you started to the next day's CFD page. Please be sure to see the note that I left there for you. Thanks. Cgingold (talk) 01:28, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to be sure you know that I've replied to your questions. Cgingold (talk) 20:14, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say just use the lowest/narrowest subcat. Cirt (talk) 19:51, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was disappointed to find out that we were not talking about cats... JosiahHenderson (talk) 21:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Narconon. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 22:15, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to David Gaiman. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Please do not add unsourced info to articles, especially in a WP:BLP. Cirt (talk) 22:18, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that none of your edits added any cited sources at all to back up any of the information you added. That is why I removed that information from the article, especially in a WP:BLP article. Cirt (talk) 15:11, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

other entries don't have a reference for - This is not an excuse for not providing adequate sourcing for any individual article. Show me those "other entries" and those are also inadequately sourced as well and the unsourced info should be removed, immediately. Please read the links I have provided you with above regarding sourcing and citing sources. These pages are all also crucial with regard to considering appropriate sourcing: Wikipedia:Citing sources, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:Reliable sources, Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Cirt (talk) 19:08, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Robin frontpage.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Robin frontpage.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Robin frontpage.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cirt (talk) 19:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard

I have mentioned your contributions in a thread at this noticeboard. Cirt (talk) 19:18, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hossam Ramzy

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Hossam Ramzy. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cirt (talk) 19:22, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How can I be more clear? You added information to this article without backing it up to any sources whatsoever. Cirt (talk) 19:41, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but personal websites that you just added most certainly do not satisfy WP:RS. Cirt (talk) 20:35, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

a completely independent page I just found in Google and Scientology's own site - unfortunately these are not independent, secondary sources that satisfy WP:RS and WP:V. Cirt (talk) 20:45, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.adherents.com/ - appears to be some sort of a personal website that you admittedly found in a Google search. Does not satisfy WP:RS. Cirt (talk) 20:52, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so how about this encyclopedia site then? http://www.jazz.com/encyclopedia/corea-chick-armando-anthony Good enough? Johnalexwood (talk) 23:16, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, added it. A satisfactory independent secondary source that complies with WP:RS/WP:V. Cirt (talk) 23:24, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, but what does "Hossam Ramzy, who has been a Scientologist," mean? He still is. Johnalexwood (talk) 23:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I had restored your wording from the previous edit. Cirt (talk) 00:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only partially because it used to say "since 1977" but that data I got from his own Scientology page. Can that page be an external link by the way (same for Frank Laidlaw)? Johnalexwood (talk) 00:19, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to think those sorts of pages are equivalent to linkspamming, but I am not sure if that particular issue has been put to community consensus yet. Cirt (talk) 00:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you just say "is a Scientologist" then (as it confirms in the jazz.com ref) - it would be better grammatically too.Johnalexwood (talk) 00:33, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cirt (talk) 00:34, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great - thanks again.Johnalexwood (talk) 00:38, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Robin Hogarth. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 19:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Hogarth

Especially in Biographies of living persons, no information in the article should be unsourced. As far as the image, it is clear it is a blatant copyright violation. If you have permission to use the image it should be deleted from English Wikipedia, uploaded instead to the sister project Wikimedia Commons, and then appropriate permission should be emailed and confirmed by Hogarth to Commons:Commons:OTRS. Cirt (talk) 19:49, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will remove the notice. Someone's official site is generally not the best source for the article about them - best to have an independent, secondary source that satisfies WP:RS and WP:V. Cirt (talk) 20:10, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK - fair enough, thanks. Johnalexwood (talk) 20:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Due to your repeated ignorance of the rules on reliable sources and the strict biographical article policy you have been blocked for 24 hours to stop the abuse. Please do not continue to add these links to these articles in the future. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 21:07, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

that is SO harsh! Johnalexwood (talk) 21:49, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Nigelrobertson.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nigelrobertson.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 21:33, 28 August 2008 (UTC) --Cirt (talk) 21:33, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, will make sure all the admin is done correctly here asap. Incidentally, in order to reply to you, should I put this on my Talk page or yours? You only get the yellow bar alert when I put it on your page, right? So you may not see this unless you make a point of checking back? Johnalexwood (talk) 21:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know what you mean by make sure all the admin is done correctly here asap. But yes, I will watch this page. Cirt (talk) 21:53, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I mean get proof of the copyright ownership and submit it to the right place as I also have to do for Robin Hogarth's image - never done it before either, help! Sounds like it's difficult! Johnalexwood (talk) 22:00, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Steps

Contact the individuals that are the copyright owners of the media and inform them of your intentions of how their images will be used and released. Wikimedia Commons (the ideal place for free-use images) requires certain types of license.
Create an account at Wikimedia Commons.
Go to Commons:OTRS and go through the permissions steps there.

Cirt (talk) 22:07, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you very much for that.Johnalexwood (talk) 22:11, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Laidlaw

Do you think this is a good enough reference to prove that Frank Laidlaw is a Scientologist? http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4156/is_20021110/ai_n12580494/pg_2 It's an article in a newspaper so it must be true, right? ;) Johnalexwood (talk) 22:45, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, added it. A satisfactory independent secondary source that complies with WP:RS/WP:V. Cirt (talk) 22:50, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks! So can you pls put the cats back in too? As for other citations that the entry says are needed, how are these?:

Johnalexwood (talk) 23:34, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done - added back the categories as they are now backed up by a WP:RS/WP:V secondary sourced cite.

Horay - many thanks.Johnalexwood (talk) 00:36, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As for those new sources - 1, 2, and 6 look okay to me, the others are dubious at best. Cirt (talk) 00:32, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so when my ban is lifted, I will add the good ones in the right places.Johnalexwood (talk) 00:36, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to take a look at Wikipedia:Citation templates - helps with formatting cites. Cirt (talk) 00:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would these links also mean the notability notice could be removed? Johnalexwood (talk) 00:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, the notability of the article's subject is dependent on if notability is asserted in the article text itself, which should of course be backed up by sources. Cirt (talk) 01:08, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David Gaiman

Can his British scn cat be added back in? And what ref is needed for the fact that he has another daughter not listed, and for his date and place of birth? His birth certificate? Johnalexwood (talk) 00:42, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the edit summary by the anon-IP user that removed those cats, here for an explanation. And as for the 2nd part - secondary sources are much preferred over primary. Cirt (talk) 00:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The thing about English/British is that WP doesn't automatically make someone cat British if he is cat English. You have to add both manually, otherwise, when you click the summary pages, it looks as if David is English but not British! Johnalexwood (talk) 00:59, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You'd have to take that one up with 65.78.13.238 (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 01:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mick Woodmansey

How's this as a ref about him being a Scientologist? http://www.5years.com/woody.htm Johnalexwood (talk) 01:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, nope. Appears to be a personal website. Cirt (talk) 02:08, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. Generally NNDB is not a source that satisfies WP:RS. (Unless corroborated with another source, perhaps.) Cirt (talk) 02:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, here are two more sites that just might corroberate enough. http://wireimage.com/itemlistings.aspx?igi=294631&cl=1 (photos 12 and 23), http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=299631167 (search for 'woody' and 'scientology' on that page). What do you think? Johnalexwood (talk) 03:37, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a moment to look at WP:RS. Neither of those sources are appropriate whatsoever. Think more in terms of published secondary sources independent of the article's subject (along the lines of the "nutshell" at WP:NOTE). Cirt (talk) 03:42, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks, I'll keep looking. Johnalexwood (talk) 04:24, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reliance on links to references

Regarding your email, if there is a question about reliance on a particular source for an article, you can bring in input from a wider chunk of the community by starting a Request for Comment on the talk page of that particular article. Alternatively, you could also start a new subsection at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard about usage of a specific source in Wikipedia, in general. If the article is a biography of a living person, you could ask at the Biography of Living Persons Noticeboard. Hope that answers your question, Cirt (talk) 19:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kenton Gray

Actually, it is sourced to a WP:RS source. Cirt (talk) 19:39, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is most certainly appropriate and relevant information. Cirt (talk) 19:52, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would be a good idea and encouraged to add some additional biographical material about the individual himself, but one sentence about this particular issue is appropriate. Cirt (talk) 20:12, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is not simply informative information about Dianetics - but the decoration chosen by Gray for his car. Cirt (talk) 20:23, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008 - conflict of interest at article ShareNow

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article ShareNow, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 20:22, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see WP:COIN. Cirt (talk) 20:34, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Answers to my questions

You could post a notice about it on the relevant WikiProjects' talk pages. Cirt (talk) 21:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Jive Aces

See discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jive Aces. Cirt (talk) 17:53, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[4] looks sort of like a blog, not the best reference, but you could always bring it up at WP:RSN for wider community input. Cirt (talk) 00:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to discuss this further with the admin that closed the AfD, which was Coren (talk · contribs), subsequent to that, the venue where deletion discussions are reviewed is outlined at WP:DRV. Cirt (talk) 07:55, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

flaming lawye r^c is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Replies

I have replies to your queries on my talk page. Aleta ^Sing 15:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Koska

Seems poorly structured like a resume. Cirt (talk) 23:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cirt, you mean just the Recognition section? (The rest seems fine to me.) If so, then why did you add a "This article may not meet the notability guideline for biographies." box to it? He's an OBE, won countless awards, been written about in many newspapers including the Sunday Times, changed the law in India and has saved millions of lives with his invention. How much more notable does he need to be?? Johnalexwood (talk) 10:20, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to also add {{likeresume}}. Feel free to read up at WP:NOTE to see how to satisfy this. WP:CIT is helpful for proper formatting of citations instead of one big external link. I also note a majority of this article is uncited. Cirt (talk) 23:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Jive Aces

The article The Jive Aces has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Previously deleted at AFD. No significant coverage in reliable sources - references are generally only inclusion of the band in lists of artists playing at various minor festivals.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 05:32, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Jive Aces

I have nominated The Jive Aces, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jive Aces (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Michig (talk) 11:11, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have withdrawn the nomination as I have found some coverage that may help the article with regards to establishing notability. I'll try and add these to the article's talk page later today. Regards. --Michig (talk) 11:47, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding 'genuine sources', the ones I added actually gave meaningful coverage to the band rather than just the briefest of mentions. Events listings and articles about festivals etc. that simply mention the band once are not really useful as references, especially when there are several that are basically doing the same thing, and articles that lack references that demonstrate that the subject has received significant coverage in reliable sources tend to get deleted. The article should be sourced well enough to stay now, but could still benefit from expansion and further sources that discuss the band in detail. Hope that answers your question. Regards.--Michig (talk) 05:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: British/English Scientologts cat

Hello. It's best to go for the most specific category. If the members are all English, then I would use English Scientologists. If some are from other parts of Britain or if you're not sure whether they're all English, I would go for the parent category - British Scientologists. It isn't necessary for any article to be in both categories as one is the parent category of the other. Cheers. --Michig (talk) 10:15, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well actually John Fordham, the sax player, is Maori, born in New Zealand but has lived here since a child (according to their press pack) so I assume has dual nationality, so I'll just use the English cat. I think it would be great if there was hierarchical intelligence built into categories so if 'English' was used, WP would automatically include 'British' as well, because, when someone is English, they are also British. Johnalexwood (talk) 10:25, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Wall

Hello, Johnalexwood. You have new messages at Michig's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Michig (talk) 19:05, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Marc Koska

We don't really like to indefinitely protect articles when blocks would serve the same purpose. Lets wait a bit and block a few users, and perhaps have a checkuser look into it once we have a few more recent accounts. If it does get really bad, WP:RFPP. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:10, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are already autoconfirmed, you will be able to edit it like normal. - Rjd0060 (talk) 03:15, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Advance Centre for The Scotson Technique

A tag has been placed on Advance Centre for The Scotson Technique requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Glenfarclas (talk) 11:37, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Safepoint Trust

A tag has been placed on The Safepoint Trust, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ _―Œ^{♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣} 05:34, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Safepoint Trust

The article has been userfied at User:Johnalexwood/The Safepoint Trust for you to work on. Good luck. -- Alexf^(talk) 13:33, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re Jive Aces

Best to go through the WP:OTRS process, for confirmation of free-use status and permission. Cirt (talk) 02:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WPimage.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WPimage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:07, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice regarding Arbitration Enforcement

Please see WP:AE. -- Cirt (talk) 02:30, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Be warned that, per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Scientology#Discretionary topic ban, you may be topic-banned from Scientology-related articles if you continue to fail to observe our policy about biographies of living persons, as you did in the instances reported here. Sandstein 06:11, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Advance Centre for The Scotson Technique

The article Advance Centre for The Scotson Technique has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable alt-med organisation (the sources are generally newspaper fluff pieces which only mention the organisation in passing)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bobrayner (talk) 14:19, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some articles that mention the Advance Centre for The Scotson Technique

- in the Reader's Digest http://advancecentres.blogspot.com/search?q=readers&x=0&y=0 - in The Times http://advancecentres.blogspot.com/2009/02/linda-scotson-mentioned-in-times.html - in a Hungarian newspaper "Hope for brain damaged children" http://ujszo.com/napilap/regio/2008/08/01/remeny-az-agykarosodott-gyerekeknek?mini=calendar/2008/09/all& - on Radio 4 http://advancecentres.blogspot.com/2009/10/linda-scotson-is-guest-on-bbc-radio-4s.html - on BBC TV and radio http://advancecentres.blogspot.com/2009/06/marathon-test.html - on ITV http://advancecentres.blogspot.com/2010/09/itv-have-two-reports-on-advance-centre.html - in The Autism File magazine, an authority on Autism http://advancecentres.blogspot.com/2011/02/linda-scotson-writes-article-for-autism.html

Are any of these articles good enough to allow the entry to be reinstated? Johnalexwood (talk) 10:31, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

I have mentioned issues with some of your recent Scientology-related edits here. You may wish to participate in the discussion. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 19:33, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I went to that link but found only 1 Scientology-related mention which didn't seem to have anything to do with me, and no mention of my username. I must be looking in the wrong place... Johnalexwood (talk) 17:11, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Johnalexwood. You have new messages at Koavf's talk page.
Message added 19:24, 21 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:24, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Album Artists for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Album Artists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Album Artists until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —SMALL JIM 10:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Caborn-Waterfield

Hi. I'm curious to know why you created Michael Caborn-Waterfield. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:35, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because he attended the same school as me (Cranleigh) and I noticed that somehow, he didn't have a WP entry yet. Johnalexwood (talk) 00:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Johnalexwood. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Leonard Berney

Not a problem! Giant Snowman 07:56, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nancy Valentine (actress), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Small Town Girl. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scientology and racism

I've not done a WP:BEFORE to see if there are any other sources out there, but certainly looks to be a good candidate for WP:AFD... Giant Snowman 17:42, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tks - done. By the way, any idea why WP's category links are not available on the WP mobile phone app? Johnalexwood (talk) 23:50, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that "Dead ref links" is not a valid reason for deletion since the availability of references is not relevant, only their existence. Unless you provide a valid reason for deletion, the AFD will probably be closed as speedy keep. Regards So Why 14:19, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Scientology activities

Hi, just wanted to give you a heads up about anti-Scientology spammers talking about you and others on this forum: https://whyweprotest.net/threads/wikipedia-articles-for-deletion-mary-demoss.132539/. There's also a lot of chatter in private forum areas there and elsewhere about plans to "re-take control" of Scientology articles on Wikipedia. Wikipedia articles are already in terrible enough shape and these types of pseudo-activist schemes aren't helpful to the project or to critics of Scientology. One of the articles they are apparently obsessed about that is triggering this campaign is R2-45. Per my own research, I know for a fact that at least some, if not all of the alleged documents presented as valid on the above linked forum are false or doctored and thus impossible to verify, but there are more than a few very aggressive anti-Scientology activists who will push for their inclusion even though being primary sources they cannot be used on Wikipedia, regardless of whether or not they are legit. I'm a fact-checker for a major media network and discovered these issues as part of my recent assignments, and so I won't get involved with any editing or dispute on Wikipedia. But I think it only fair to alert anyone who is being vilified and attacked by their legal name in outside forums as part of a wider effort to reassert "ownership" of articles on what is supposed to be a neutral and unbiased community resource as Wikipedia. SavageReason (talk) 00:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for that Johnalexwood (talk) 01:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Email

You can do so by using the 'email this user' function. Thanks, Giant Snowman 08:27, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Johnalexwood. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Companies based in Havant has been nominated for discussion

Category:Companies based in Havant, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:19, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May, 2018

Hello Johnalexwood. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Raoof Haghighi, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Johnalexwood. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Johnalexwood|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Paid editing apparent from OTRS ticket #2018042810000068. JGHowes ^talk 12:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Raoof Haghighi

You need to demonstrate that he meets the requirements of WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 07:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I feel it is satisfied by the results you get when you click on the News and Books links within the Notability box. This should also help: https://www.pledgemusic.com/projects/nicky-hopkins Johnalexwood (talk) 00:34, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Overleg:Klas van Anne Frank

Dear Johnalexwood,

An IP user, claiming to be you, wrote a message in Overleg:Klas van Anne Frank. If you did indeed write that message, please note that I wrote a reply to it. If you didn't, please ignore this message.

Kind regards, Magere Hein (talk) 19:20, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Johnalexwood. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond

Hi Johnalexwood. I'm concerned that you may be involved in paid editing without any disclosure or other compliance with the relevant policies. I see others have had the same concerns. Could you please respond? --Ronz (talk) 18:49, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ronz - no I am not being paid for the Wikipedia work I am doing --Johnalexwood (talk) 18:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding. So you're not editing any articles even remotely related to your business? --Ronz (talk) 19:04, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Sherman has been a client of mine, on and off, for over 10 years but I'm not charging him for creating his WP entry because I know it is against WP policy --Johnalexwood (talk) 19:10, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Please declare such conflicts and be very cautious in what editing you do in such situations. When in doubt, use an edit request. --Ronz (talk) 19:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK tks --Johnalexwood (talk) 19:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Group Member notice

Your name is listed as a participant of the WikiProject Countering system bias in religion.
I would like to know if you agree with this edit: DIFF.
24.78.228.96 (talk) 11:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Valentine Palmer

The article Valentine Palmer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG/WP:ENT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KH-1 (talk) 01:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just added more references and details about Valentine Johnalexwood (talk) 15:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Epoch Times reference at Valentine Palmer

Hi. Please do not use the Epoch Times as you did at Valentine Palmer. It is not a reliable source. See WP:EPOCHTIMES. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 08:47, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I fail to understand your reasons for removing that reference. It is merely a report of harmless comments on the cultural show by Falun Gong dancers and musicians before a 3,000-head audience at The London Coliseum. Johnalexwood (talk) 13:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Dolan (musician) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Terry Dolan (musician), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude talk 19:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marigold (rubber gloves)

Hello Johnalexwood,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Marigold (rubber gloves) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hey man im josh (talk) 14:06, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Marigold is so well known, it's sometimes used instead of the word "gloves", as in, "Put your Marigolds on." It's a very well known brand name like all the other well known brand names in WP, so why shouldn't it be included? Johnalexwood (talk) 14:52, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Terry Dolan (musician)

Hello, Johnalexwood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Terry Dolan (musician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Terry Dolan (musician)

Hello, Johnalexwood. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Terry Dolan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:16, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks fo letting me know Johnalexwood (talk) 02:11, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sant Tukaram (2023) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sant Tukaram (2023). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 12:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought 3 references would be enough. Plenty more to choose from https://www.google.com/search?q="sant+tukaram"+"Subodh+Bhave"&newwindow=1&client=opera&hs=OP&sxsrf=AJOqlzVcfifPfGSqRzcPEgNn8IIAza-85w:1675946623378&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjZnZjZu4j9AhWOg1wKHWCoAk8Q_AUoAnoECAEQBA&biw=1560&bih=720&dpr=1 How many more should I add for it to be considered notable? Johnalexwood (talk) 13:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ExMates moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, ExMates, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:43, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sant Tukaram (2023)

Hello, Johnalexwood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sant Tukaram (2023), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TopFoto

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on TopFoto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Oaktree b (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:ExMates

Hello, Johnalexwood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ExMates, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Mayor moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Keith Mayor. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please find here the many sites that mention Keith Mayor, not all of them newspaper articles but they still may prove his notability: 1) BBC - Archive interviews and stories by BBC Radio Lancashire http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/lancashire/hi/people_and_places/history/newsid_8498000/8498181.stm 2) BBC - Lancashire - Radio Lancashire - Play It Again... My Brother, My Friend https://www.bbc.co.uk/lancashire/content/articles/2009/03/05/play_it_again_belson_feature.shtml 3) Nazi persecution claim: [name withheld - in closed extracts] for Keith Mayor (deceased) | The National Archives https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C15667271 4) Able Seaman Keith Mayor | War Casualty Details 2463774 | CWGC https://www.cwgc.org/find-records/find-war-dead/casualty-details/2463774/keith-mayor/ 5) Remembering the ‘sailor of Belsen’ on Holocaust Memorial Day https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-latest-activity/news/2021/january/27/20210127-holocaust-memorial 6) Supplement to the London Gazette, 22 April 1947 - Posthumous mention in Despatches - Able Seaman Keith Mayor https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/37937/supplement/1774/data.pdf 7) Preston's Military Heritage - Keith Johnson - Google Books - Keith Mayor who died at Belsen: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=KZOSDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT106&lpg=PT106&dq=%22Keith+Mayor%22+belsen&source=bl&ots=98-r3PbhDy&sig=ACfU3U2oTiQLdQ1WmOI992E2c7ZMlKGnjw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjOq9y3gKuGAxWMXUEAHY1SAdY4HhDoAXoECAcQAw#v=onepage&q=%22Keith%20Mayor%22%20belsen&f=false 8) Distance from the Belsen Heap: Allied Forces and the Liberation of a Nazi ... - Mark Celinscak - Google Books - Able Seaman Keith Mayor: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=3LnwCgAAQBAJ&pg=PR14&lpg=PR14&dq=%22Keith+Mayor%22+belsen&source=bl&ots=LCJQKDw89_&sig=ACfU3U1NdDANLJdvDpbHyH8OSt-fyOsf7w&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjOq9y3gKuGAxWMXUEAHY1SAdY4HhDoAXoECAgQAw#v=onepage&q=%22Keith%20Mayor%22%20belsen&f=false The problem is, I only know how to give newspaper articles as references. If any of the above links that are not newspaper articles would serve as valid references, could you please let me know how to add them correctly? Many thanks. Johnalexwood (talk) 09:40, 26 May 2024 (UTC) Johnalexwood (talk) 09:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Keith Mayor

Hello, Johnalexwood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Keith Mayor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keith Mayor (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not sure there is enough here to establish notability?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Keith Mayor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:23, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnalexwood! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:23, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]