User talk:Jno.skinner

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Jno.skinner! Thank you for your contributions. I am ThatMontrealIP and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:05, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome aboard!ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:06, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Edith Anna Ellis

On 25 March 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Edith Anna Ellis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1918, Edith A. Ellis advocated an all-female government with the slogan "Insist that no man shall occupy a position that a woman can fill"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Edith Anna Ellis. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Edith Anna Ellis), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

women and Nebraska

Thank you for quality articles such as Nebraska Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Civil Rights, Franc Roads, Maria Freeman Gray and Edith Anna Ellis, for your plans about more women from Woman's Who's who of 1914, - John, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2383 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:48, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you Gerda Arendt! I've never received anything like this before. It is very sweet! I feel that there's a lot to know about the Wikipedia editing community, and I know very little. Learning that there are people like you looking out for others is a good feeling! Jno.skinner (talk) 15:33, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! The looking also gives a good feeling, and after I skipped a few days, I should really look right now! I only do what great others did before me, beginning in 2007 which was well before I even joined. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:36, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nebraska State Capitol edits

About your recent reversions re: "Penis of the Plains" (sic), the purpose of my edits was not to censor the article due to offensive content (in spite of your claims to the contrary). The purpose was to remove non-notable trivia from the article, per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Even if the content itself were not offensive, objectionable, or controversial, its removal would still be justified. It's not a censorship issue, it's a notability issue. Perhaps you could visit the Talk page to discuss the notability of the content in question. Greggens (talk) 21:31, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You'll find that I did respond to you on the article's Talk page a little while ago Jno.skinner (talk) 22:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Lincoln Legion of Lesbians

Hello! Your submission of Lincoln Legion of Lesbians at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:58, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Hi I’m just reviewing Men's Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage. Thank you for writing such a well-sourced article. I hope you will create many more. All the best Mccapra (talk) 21:27, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lincoln Legion of Lesbians

On 2 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lincoln Legion of Lesbians, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Lincoln Legion of Lesbians, a lesbian separatist collective in Nebraska, tried to outlaw anti-gay discrimination in 1980? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lincoln Legion of Lesbians. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lincoln Legion of Lesbians), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting some help

Hi,

Recently initiated a new Draft:Sexual politics and looking for proactive help in updating and expanding the article. Since you have earlier worked on article Culture war please do see if contributing to Draft:Sexual politics would interest you.

Thanks and regards

Bookku (talk) 02:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can see some value in having an article of that title, Bookku. I'm sure that even defining the subject well enough that it can be written clearly about will be some work. I'm a little too busy now but may contribute later. Jno.skinner (talk) 17:29, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Misogynist terrorism

On 7 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Misogynist terrorism, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that misogynist terrorism is listed as a "rising threat" by counter-terrorism researchers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Misogynist terrorism. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Misogynist terrorism), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Bright Star (roller skater)

Hello! Your submission of Bright Star (roller skater) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Owning the libs

Would you like take a shot at convincing the reverter on Owning the libs? I find it interesting that the editor claims it is misleading but never removes the wikilink to the term that supposedly is misleading. -- Pemilligan (talk) 00:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Pemilligan: Thank you for your work! I must admit the reverting editor is correct that it was an unsourced statement. I have rectified this. Jno.skinner (talk) 16:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fred Murree

On 21 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fred Murree, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Pawnee professional roller skater Bright Star was called "the fastest man on wheels"? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Fred Murree), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alex DiBranco for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex DiBranco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex DiBranco until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Harley Davidson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Harley Davidson. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:13, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harley Davidson (skater) has been accepted

Harley Davidson (skater), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jno.skinner

Thank you for creating Terrell McKinney.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

there are two different birthdates mentioned. figure out which is right and add a reference. Also link to this article from Nebraska legislature.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:50, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Title IX Exemptions to University Article

Jno.skinner, I want to be sensitive in saying this- but is adding a line to university articles being exempt from Title IX really relevant to the article? I'm not sure if the list of https://www.campuspride.org/worstlist/ meets the criteria for a reliable source, nor do I think that application of a Title IX exemption meets factual notability requirements. If you have a substantive basis for it meeting notability/reliability I'd love to hear it. I would think generally, a listing on a LGBTQ advocacy group's website listing all universities who applied for Title IX exemptions isn't enough to justify adding it to the article. In circumstances that receive significant coverage or other public prominence, then I'd think it would have more merit. At the very least, adding lines about "made the worst list" has no substantive basis to be included in an article, but I'll discuss the idea of adding it as historical information.

Thanks Superdadsuper for approaching me politely about this. Indeed, I have discussed this topic with a couple other editors and collectively we came to a similar conclusion as you, namely, that the Campus Pride "absolute worst" listing does not meet notability/reliability guidelines (unless perhaps the listing were covered by another source). So, I have removed it from many/most of the articles to which I previously added it, or found alternative sources in some cases. But I guess I missed Missouri Baptist University during my removals; thank you for addressing it. I do think there is a stronger case for the notability of Title IX status, though I would prefer a better source for that as well. Jno.skinner (talk) 22:54, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and question

Thanks for your recent creation of Seeing Red Nebraska - I was planning on creating it sooner or later, so good to have a bit of work off my plate ;). I wanted to ask if you ever have the appetite to work toward good article status for your creations? I am very interested in Lincoln Legion of Lesbians (had some email correspondence re the Proseminar in Homophile Studies which pointed to that article, good job!), and wonder if you'd like to work together to bring it there? If not, no worries - it should be up to the major contributors of an article where it goes, so I won't touch it if you're not interested. Thanks, Urve (talk) 07:43, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Urve! I don't know the process for bringing something to good article status, but I would like to. Yes, collaborating on it sounds fun! BTW, nice work on Proseminar in Homophile Studies; that article is an engaging read! Jno.skinner (talk) 15:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and thank you. I'll be in touch. I can also show you the actual process for nominating something to GA once it's at that stage - it's a bit confusing, but with your content track record, I think much of your writing is worthy of that process, and it feels good to be recognized in that way. It's already been in DYK so sadly we can't do that after GA, but still worth the time. And BTW, if you have future projects you want eyes and hands on, I'm just a talk page message away. Nebraska is worthy of representation. Urve (talk) 02:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Urve! I am in Lincoln (where I assume you are) for the next couple of months. Are you interested in meeting up and working on articles together? (If you are a Twitter user, you can find me at @jskilesskinner and send me a direct message.)

Proposed deletion of Seeing Red Nebraska

The article Seeing Red Nebraska has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Gets some mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage from reliable sources to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:36, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sad. I read your piece in Seeing Red Nebraska. A well-written account of despicable policy and hatred. It's beautiful in the same way corpses smell sweet. Take care. Urve (talk) 11:54, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Glass flute

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Glass flute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/180013281, https://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2022/09/its-about-danged-time-lizzo-at-the-library/, and And other sentences and sentence parts left and right.. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 10:57, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Crisis of faith

Hello, Jno.skinner, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Arthistorian1977, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Crisis of faith, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crisis of faith (2nd nomination).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Arthistorian1977}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:17, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Arthistorian1977: may I ask if there are particular parts of the article you object to because they are unsupported by sources or are otherwise in violation of WP:NOR? Jno.skinner (talk) 23:50, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Tate

Just saw that you corrected the Andre Tate claims on the misogyny page. Good job 👍 91.141.63.115 (talk) 14:43, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I do believe Tate rates a mention in the article as he is a prominent misogynist. I myself have added a bit about Tate to that page and have seen my change rolled back. But he doesn't belong in the lead paragraphs! Jno.skinner (talk) 14:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting

Wikipedia users in the United States Mountain West and High Plains will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, articles, or photographs of our region is encouraged to attend.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rilzy Adams moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rilzy Adams, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, or a link to an official government source showing it is a legally recognized populated place. This article has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting 05/09/2023

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 9, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, geography, articles, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on James Dobson

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page James Dobson, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Dobson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Indians.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting 08/08/2023

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, August 8, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in articles, history, geography, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. We may try to organize one or more Wiknics. Guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rilzy Adams

Hello, Jno.skinner. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rilzy Adams, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Julie Fennell

The article Julie Fennell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Academic notability per February 2023 concern; no improvements to the article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 72.66.19.13 (talk) 20:41, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Crisis of faith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crisis of faith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crisis of faith (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 20:11, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

US Mountain West online meeting November 14

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

-MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Mountain West Online Meeting

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 13, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rilzy Adams

Hello, Jno.skinner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rilzy Adams".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia U.S. Mountain West Online Meeting

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 14, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wide Awakes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rail Splitter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:33, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]