User talk:Jimmy3d0
Hi: I noticed that you have responded to a reversion (in Percival Vega Gull) by creating an article. Well done. It's worth noting that (despite the perceived tone of the comment) there is absolutely no objection to creating redlinks, and they are not normally deleted. Indeed it's encouraged, for someone may see an article needs writing. But thanks for the C.W.A. Scott page.TSRL (talk) 23:09, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Good luck, and have fun. FWIW, Bzuk (talk) 08:26, 14 January 2010 (UTC).
Only just found your message lol Bzuk but thankyou, I may need some help with something soon as it goes, cheers Jimmy3d0 (talk) 00:52, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Charles Kennedy Scott
[edit]Hi, Thanks for you message about your distinguished forbear! He was obviously a candidate and I had had him in mind for some time: after reading the London Philharmonic Choir article, which has been very substantially improved recently, I saw the one visible page from Jstor from the 1951 article on CKS and realised I could add it to what I already knew, and make something of it. Hence what you see. I'm very grateful for your note of appreciation. As you know, there is 'No OWNERSHIP' in wikipedia articles, but it's very nice to know I made a 'good start'. Thankyou. Every good wish, Eebahgum (talk) 23:49, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Infobox at C.W.A. Scott
[edit]Hi, I've fixed up the infobox in this article, tidied it up a bit and added a few details; feel free to modify anything as you feel appropriate. The width of the signature is fixed at 180px, but I'll see if I can get that changed.
Just wanted to query a few things that I spotted while skimming over the article:
- The "Personal life" section states that he was married three times, but there doesn't seem to be any mention of his last wife, nor is a third wife mentioned in the quote from the "Later years" section.
- The birth and death dates as given in the article would mean that he was aged 43 at the time of his death, but the quote in the "Later years" section says that he was 42.
Regards, and let me know if you need any further assistance. PC78 (talk) 16:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- About the size of the signature, it will require a change to the actual infobox template in order for it to display any bigger. I've made a proposal at Template talk:Infobox person, so if there are no objections then this change can be made. Regards. PC78 (talk) 17:28, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
You have an initial review there with some points to be addressed. Let me know if oyu need anything, otherwise I'll check back in a few days to see how it's going. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:52, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Well Done.
[edit]I would just like to say well done to Jimmy3d0. I had been for some time wanting to rectify the lack of an entry for Scotty on Wikipedia. Unfortunately, it's much, much easier to correct errors than start an entry from scratch, and I knew that my skills were not up to the job. Wikipedia can very very frustrating at times. Interesting people like yourself have much to contribute. The slant to U.S. English is very frustrating, but in all fairness, it is a U.S. website...! There are also some very frustrating anoraks on here who will insist upon trashing perfectly good English and throw a childish hissy-fit if you revert it to what was originally perfectly good, correct and concise. As a user of Wikipedia, I never take anything as gospel on here, but it is often a very good place to start research. Personally, Scotty has been a lifelong hero of mine, - what a character..! Incidentally, one thing I have never been able to track-down...where was he actually buried..? Snoopy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.197.240.167 (talk) 13:39, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks User(snoopy) thats really good of you to say, its nice to know that the artical is appreciated, and yes it can be very tough trying to please people on here!! he was buried in Germany in a place called Mengeringhausen near the UNRRA head quarters in berlin, I have a photograph of his grave taken 1950's by the woman who used to tend his grave who sent the photo to our family, Thanks again for your comments! Jimmy3d0 (talk) 20:52, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 25
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark McGowan (performance artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Degree (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Reference errors on 13 November
[edit]
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Wales Green Party page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
ANI notice
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Stephen Crabb article
[edit]Hi, I noticed that you edited Stephen Crabb after I wrote on the talk page there discussing an edit you made so I assume you missed it in all the flurry of edits that have gone on since he was promoted this morning. Could you respond on there so that we can reach a consensus as I don't want to edit war with you. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 13:08, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
OK I will do later, I'm right in the middle of something now Jimmy3d0 (talk) 13:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Jimmy3d0. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Jimmy3d0. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Jimmy3d0. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Jimmy3d0. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The WikiEagle - January 2022
[edit] |
| The WikiEagle |
| The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter |
| Volume I — Issue 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Announcements
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Members
New Members
Number of active members: 386.
Total number of members: 921.
Closed Discussions
|
Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New/Ongoing Discussions
On The Main Page Did you know...
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Pembrokeshire Against Radar Campaign (disambiguation)
[edit]Hello, Jimmy3d0,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Iwaqarhashmi, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Pembrokeshire Against Radar Campaign (disambiguation) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Iwaqarhashmi}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Waqar💬 19:59, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Iwaqarhashmi: Yes it was an accident. I set it up mistakenly when I was setting up the actual redirect page. thanks Jimmy3d0 (talk) 20:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyright and Wikipedia
[edit]
Hello Jimmy3d0! Your additions to PARC Against DARC have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
- Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
- Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
- Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
- Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Significa liberdade: I have been given permision freely by the authors of the website to reuse the text. Any chance you can revert the edit while I work out how to demonstrate that on here ? Jimmy3d0 (talk) 21:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- We need to have documentation that shows the copyright holders have given permission for the material to be copied to this website, and are prepared to release the material under license. Wikipedia has procedures in place for this purpose. Please see WP:Donating copyrighted materials for an explanation of how to do it. There's a sample permission email at WP:Consent. — Diannaa (talk) 22:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
[edit]
Your edit to Charles Kennedy Scott has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)