User talk:Jasonfitz

Speedy deletion of Acapulco Mexican Restaurant

A tag has been placed on Acapulco Mexican Restaurant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 08:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hush (song), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. FCSundae ∨^☃ (talk) 10:55, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Seventysomething (term)

I have nominated Seventysomething (term), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seventysomething (term). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bit Lordy (talk) 09:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to J, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in List of sex symbols

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on List of sex symbols, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because List of sex symbols is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting List of sex symbols, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:02, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of number articles.

Greetings Jasonfitz, I notice you have recently created a number of articles, such as 5999 and 6000. Can you advise any reason for doing so? Currently they have no content other than a nav-box, and I cannot forsee a valid reason for them to exist. Thanks. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 09:39, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Time. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Satu Suro 06:25, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Helvetica. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —Vossanova ^o< 14:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Futura (typeface). If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Brian R Hunter (talk) 14:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your vandalism to Low flush toilet has been reverted. Jeepday (talk) 20:18, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Jeepday (talk) 20:19, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I need to delete the page for OAT

Dear Wikipedians, can you please help me find a thing to delete the article for OAT. It will be in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OAT. It will be in deletion page soon, OK. Thank you, Wikipedians.

I think I can help you out here. I've placed a speedy deletion tag on the redirect. In the meantime, unless someone else has done it already, I'll fix up your AfD discussion. I'll also perform a non-admin closure on it, since that really should have gone to "Redirects for deletion" rather than "Articles for deletion." In short, OAT should be gone soon.

If you have any questions or problems, please feel free to ask me on my talkpage. AnturiaethwrTalk 14:10, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox road/CA/abbrev SR

Please don't do this again [1], unless you have a good reason to do so. --Mgillfr (talk) 19:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 4444

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 4444, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Nothing happened on "4444" (yet); the year hasn't (and won't for another several thousand years) occurred yet

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 14:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Delete of 3333

Hello User:Jasonfitz
Welcome to Wikipedia. I proposed to delete an article you created called 3333. It appeared to be an experiment in creating pages, and perhaps adding templates. If I am wrong in this assessment, please accept my apologies, and feel free to add the {{hangon}} tag to this page. I wish you well in your future editing efforts here, and please feel free to contact me on my talk page if you have any questions. I am new at "editing" here as well, but have read through quite a bit of the Wikipedia policies, and may be able to point you in the right direction if you are looking for answers. Best of Luck Ched (talk) 14:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personal info

Just so you know, it is a very bad idea to post your personal information on the internet - there have been stories such as that of User:H. Even if you delete it, it will still remain in the page history. However, WP:RFO can remove it permanently. Please ask me if you have any further questions. --Rschen7754 (T C) 21:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:10 establishments

I notice that this category you created is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Wikipedia pages belong to (are members of) it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted, without discussion, in accordance with Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#C1. I'm notifying you in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding [[Category:10 establishments]] to articles/categories that belong in it.

I have also blanked the category page. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of blanking and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to revert the blanking if you wish. However, doing so will not prevent deletion if the category remains empty.

If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with {{db-author}}.

--Stepheng3 (talk) 20:55, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Same with Category:1 disestablishments. --Stepheng3 (talk) 21:16, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And also with Category:1 establishments. --Stepheng3 (talk) 21:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And with Category:20 establishments. --Stepheng3 (talk) 21:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And Category:22 establishments. --Stepheng3 (talk) 21:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And Category:23 establishments and Category:24 establishments and Category:25 establishments. --Stepheng3 (talk) 21:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Business routes of Interstate 5

A tag has been placed on Business routes of Interstate 5 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Colds7ream (talk) 17:58, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Business routes of Interstate 5‎

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Business routes of Interstate 5‎, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

October 2009

Please do not create malicious redirects. They are disruptive and are considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Creating all the number pages and redirecting them to years is wasting space and stealing the page from something that might actually put the page to better use. Do you have that little else to do? Nezzadar (speak) 02:06, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of 2785

Cease and Desist

Please stop creating redirect pages from four digit numbers to the centuries they correspond to. The matter is currently under review at the RfD discussion for 2785. Until it is resolved, what you are doing is blatant vandalism. Nezzadar (speak) 04:55, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of 3333

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 05:41, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Streets of San Francisco was on for five seasons

Here's the confirmation from Internet Movie Database

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068135/

Any further reversions to the page will be reported as vandalism.William 18:23, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Please do NOT remove photos from the Gallery

Please do NOT remove photos from the Black Hair gallery. Gallery photos have been established through discussion and are protected--CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 18:10, 9 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

That's nonsense. They aren't protected (that goes directly against the spirit, if not the letter, of the wiki) and there was no discussion on the talk page except for your remarks. But Jason, why on earth would you restore one photo and then remove three? And you give no explanation whatsoever--that is not good. Drmies (talk) 18:20, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I never said I protected the photos on this page. The article page was protected by an administrator (I think) because people kept adding nonsense photos that didn't fit with the article. There are other people who started the discussion before me, and it was established by a consensus what photos to throw out. CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 13:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Black hair. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedians for the page:"Black hair"

Wikipedians, is it OK for me to add or delete pictures on the gallery for Black hair.--Jasonfitz (talk) 04:53, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not, considering that, of your 29 mainspace edits today, only 6 had a shred of appropriateness — and one of those was reverting another one of yours. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:13, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Minor/major edits

Hey, Jasonfitz, can you stop marking every single edit that you make as minor? Marking major changes as minor constitutes poor etiquette, looks deceptive on the history pages of articles, and marking edits as minor affects how some users view items in their watchlists.

According to WP:MINOR, edits are only minor when they constitute:

Spelling and grammatical corrections
Simple formatting (e.g., capitalization, punctuation, or properly adding italics to non-English words, like folie des grandeurs)
Formatting that does not change the meaning of the page (e.g., moving a picture, splitting one paragraph into two — where this is not contentious)
Obvious factual errors (e.g., changing "Nixon resigned in 1874" to "Nixon resigned in 1974")
Fixing layout errors
Adding or correcting wikilinks, or fixing broken references already present in the article
Removing vandalism and graffiti

Please don't mark it as a minor edit when you add significant information to an article, as you did for And The Address. Also, don't mark it as minor when you delete someone else's work, especially as you did for CSI: Miami last month. Posts on talk pages should not be marked as minor either, such as what you did for User talk:Jasonfitz, since that could make editors less likely to notice your comment. --Apollo1758 (talk) 19:41, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Errotica-archives

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Errotica-archives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. OSborn^arf_{contributionatoration} 05:26, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sunnyside (1979 film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sunnyside (1979 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:30, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Links to dab pages on dab pages

Please read Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links and Wikipedia:WikiProject Disambiguation/Fixing a page; both detail why the link should be I-295 (dab) and not I-295. If you have an issue with the practice, I suggest bringing it up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Disambiguation. – T M F 12:37, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also see Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Links to disambiguation pages, which describes the practice in greater detail. – T M F 12:46, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your edit again since the guideline I linked to clearly says that the "(disambiguation)" is both correct and necessary. From that page: "To link to a disambiguation page (rather than to a page whose topic is a specific meaning), link to the title that includes the text "(disambiguation)", even if that's a redirect" (emphasis mine). Further removal of the "(disambiguation)" will be considered vandalism and may lead to blocks. – T M F 10:07, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hey Joe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~ Elitropia (talk) 09:24, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Meadow Soprano. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cresix (talk) 02:39, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hey Joe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 14:59, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gigi Stone

Hi Jason, why do you feel this Gigi stone article needs 2 headshots for such a small article? She's the only journalist I see on Wikipedia that has two headshots. Don't you agree that one headshot is a proper standard for this sort of short biography? I think it makes the article look cheesy and commercial. Thoughts?--Kaysorin (talk) 15:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Your recent edit to the page Time appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 12:47, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this was not the first time you entered these errors in the article: see this, which was reverted here. Please stop introducing faulty information into the article. DVdm (talk) 13:14, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ozzy Osbourne

I have reverted your edit here. 1968-Present is the established time frame. Changes of this type will need to be discussed on the talk page before it will be allowed to stand. Mlpearc powwow 14:54, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 1, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 16:30, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 3999

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 3999 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AKS (talk) 10:17, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Retirement age, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 14:09, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of William Lanier Washington

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on William Lanier Washington requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Greenmaven (talk) 07:53, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of James Barroll Washington

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on James Barroll Washington requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Greenmaven (talk) 08:00, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just being descended from a notable person does not make someone notable. See WP:NOTDIRECTORY #4 Genealogical entries, and WP:NOTINHERITED. JohnCD (talk) 11:12, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 03:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for making a hurtful incident--Jasonfitz (talk) 03:17, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 9900

A tag has been placed on 9900 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FunkyCanute (talk) 17:47, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 3596

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 3596 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:13, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block

I have blocked you briefly to remind you that we do not need year number redirects. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:12, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate user pages

You have three user pages which contain inappropriate material per WP:UP#NOT. The pages are: User:Jasonfitz/Sandbox/Pictures containing nudity (the images are stored on Commons so do not need to be kept in a group on a subpage); User:Jasonfitz/Sandbox/Miscellaneous items (links to YouTube videos that may be copyright violations); and User:Jasonfitz/Sandbox/List of Errotica-archives models (links to soft-porn galleries). Please blank these pages and/or mark them with {{db-u1}} for deletion. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 20:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted User:Jasonfitz/Sandbox/List of Errotica-archives models as that consisted solely of links to a softporn website, and so was Spam. You may store such links in your browser as bookmarks. I am pleased to see you have removed the YouTube links from User:Jasonfitz/Sandbox/Miscellaneous items. There is still User:Jasonfitz/Sandbox/Pictures containing nudity to be dealt with. I suggest you bookmark the links, eg [2], in your browser in a folder you name Pictures containing nudity (or whatever you feel comfortable with), and then remove them from that page. The images would still be available to you either for your own use, or to be used in a Wikipedia article as needed, but stored in your browser they would not be infringing on Wikipedia guidelines. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 10:38, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love Help Me

I note that you have undone redirects of Love Help Me several times. As it stands the article does not meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. There is no assertion of notability, the article is unsourced, and it largely consists of opinion - most of which is about the Shades of Deep Purple article rather than Love Help Me. I do not wish to restore the redirect only to have you revert it a month later if you disagree, so I feel it would be appropriate for us to discuss the matter, and if we cannot agree, to open up the discussion to others. Firstly though, to save us time, do you have an objection to Love Help Me being redirected to Shades of Deep Purple? SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 21:09, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Thanksgiving food

Category:Thanksgiving food, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 05:16, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Ninn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Two Sisters (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wikipedia:Sandbox without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.. --Nasrussian (talk) 14:25, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TheNude

Hello Jasonfitz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged TheNude for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Fbdave (talk) 14:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to TV Parental Guidelines. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. I notice that you changed "2-6" to "0-6" even though it conflicts with the source, among a number of other unexplained edits. EricEnfermero (Talk) 07:00, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

Hello Jasonfitz. It seems you have a long history of posting porn links to the Wikipedia sandbox. Please stop doing this, or else you'll be blocked from editing. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 12:29, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry for posting porn links to the Wikipedia sandbox. I promise the pledge not to do it anymore. -- Jasonfitz (talk) 13:26, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jasonfitz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"2598" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2598. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 6#2598 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"3101" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 3101 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 8 § 3101 until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 22:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"3601" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 3601 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 8 § 3601 until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 22:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]