User talk:Brian R Hunter

This is Brian R Hunter's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1

Archives

Hi, if you want to leave me a message please do...

Truth

Some of the people I introduce to wikipedia have difficulty with factual information being changed. Here is my take on Truth.

Observable Truth

An idea or concept which can be independently verified. e.g. The number three.

The word three is an invention but the number concept of an integer one bigger than two is an observable truth.

Agreeable Truth

An idea or concept that a group of people agree to be The Truth. Other groups may have a different view.

The symbol for three i.e. 3 (a line with three end points) is the commonly used symbol in modern times. In the past (and today?) other symbols have been used.

In wikipedia we have a combination of Observable Truths and Agreeable Truths. --Brian R Hunter (talk) 10:41, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Accusations

Thanks for your support, how can one tell between a bot and an actual user, I would think that human administrators are capable of distinguishing between vandalism and cleaning up. I noticed that when I logged in, and stopped editing under an anonymous IP, the accusations stopped; is there a bias against people without accounts?Storms991 (talk) 01:17, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some editors have noted that most vandalism is done by anonymous users so they habitually check those edits. Sometimes they get it wrong. Vandalism is a big problem but it does not excuse the false positives that careless editors make which can cause a lot of ill feeling. Good bots like ClueBot (talk · contribs) have details on how they are used and seem to make few mistakes. Real people sometimes use tools to help them like Huggle; indiscriminate use can lead to mistakes. --Brian R Hunter (talk) 06:52, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Brian R Hunter. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:53, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zachary LL.

Hi Brian R Hunter! I'm just leaving you a message in response to the AIV report you filed for this user account. First, I'll start by saying that the user's edits were definitely vandalism and the report you filed at AIV was a good one - I've blocked the user as a vandalism-only account. I just wanted to let you know about this section of Wikipedia's policies on user pages. Specifically, users are allowed to remove messages, notes, warnings, and notices from their own user talk pages. There are some notices and tags that they cannot remove from their own user talk pages (they are listed at the section I linked you to), but these weren't present on the user's talk page. No worries, though... I didn't know about this policy until someone messaged me about it after seeing me do the exact same thing that you did. ;-) Anyways, if you have any questions, just let me know and I'll be happy to answer them. Just ping me in your responses here so that I'm notified. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:45, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah: Thanks for the heads up, I must admit I was unsure about undoing the owners deletion on a user's talk page. Brian R Hunter (talk) 19:11, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Message that you removed my edit

Hi Brian, I have just received a message that you removed my edit on LGBT in Africa. I am confused because I don't ever remember reading this page, let alone doing an edit. As far as I know I have never made an edit on Wiki. Can you explain? Gary — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.202.241.5 (talk) 10:37, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@41.202.241.5: Hi Gary, I left a message on the talk page of an IP user, that is an unregistered user at the IP address 41.202.241.5

is probably a shared IP address so is not necessarily you, just someone using the same IP. To avoid problems like this, please create yourself a registered user. They are free and it ensures the posts you make do not get confused with someone else.

Also, note that your message was unsigned by you (there is more than one Gary on here). You can sign any comments automatically by adding ~~~~ at the end of your message.

By the way, this edit to the LGBT rights in Africa page is the only edit made by your IP address since 2017. Brian R Hunter (talk) 11:37, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Caerphilly

Hi

You reverted my edit on Caerphilly. I removed long detailed descriptions of local transport which provides too much information for an encyclopedia and is liable to change anyway. Why do you think this should be retained? Regards Murgatroyd49 (talk) 18:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, while there maybe some excess detail; I felt it not warrant an 'undo'. If you want to refactor the page by changing some of the additional information, I would see it as a better way forward. The edit you undid was the third by the editor that was clearly some useful good faith work. Brian R Hunter (talk) 18:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, just felt it was to much detail. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 19:08, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Daniels

Is this the talk page? Just asking, I'm not exactly sure.

Anyways, If wondering about that minor change in Anthony Daniels, it was something that needed to be fixed up. As A Star Wars, and a C-3P0 fan, I know for any factor he did in fact NOT appeared in a Lilo and Stitch cartoon. I've checked the episode and nether was he or his character appeared in it.

I really wasn't finding the appeal for that to be untrue to other who read it, so it really had to be changed.

Sorry for the inconvenience. unsigned content was by User_talk:216.164.25.70

Bro

U play baseball lol Dreadfulwindandrain (talk) 22:45, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

no but there is a player with the same name as me Brian R Hunter (talk) 22:50, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Count Binface (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jonathan Harvey

Lord Buckethead (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Labour

Todd Durham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jonathan Harvey

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello,

Thank you for creating Count Binface.

User:MJL, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

You're a hero for writing this.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MJL}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:08, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MJL: Thank you for the recognition. Two issues. Firstly, my name is Brian not Mortee (he/she/they created the initial redirect page to Lord Buckethead), though I did add the initial page content and picture. Secondly, hero is a bit strong a term, so I looked up alternative words for you. Thesaurus.com says a hero is a submarine sandwich; I think their site has been hacked!. -- Brian R Hunter (talk) 09:40, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[Thank you for the ping] Woops, I kinda copied over this message from Mortee's page because it was originally intended for you and PotentPotables. You're both heros to me!! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 15:03, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for @User name: help

24.64.172.44 (talk) 20:14, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please help with usability testing

Hello! The mw:Anti-Harassment Tools team is running a usability test to find out how and where IP addresses are used when patrolling wikis, particularly when patrolling RecentChanges. This could include New Pages or RecentChanges patrol. We want to see your patrolling process and get your views on some prototypes. Getting your perspective would be really helpful to us at this stage of the process. If you’d like to help, and have 30 minutes to spare, please fill out this Google form with your details: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfjYyRNGMkO4_TdNOgG4qmK9cp9YOKzM4GFO5pTd_bEcu23YQ/viewform

For the purpose of the tests we’ll be using Google Forms for recruitment, and UserTesting.com to conduct the actual tests. Please review the privacy statement and release form in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ijmwrIoNO0W1p_zfFU1LBf3_6mFF53kUUFy1L_DCUKc (Google docs link)

Thank you,

NKohli (WMF) (talk) and PSaxena (WMF) (talk) 03:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

reverting a short description?

I have absolutely no idea why you reverted my addition of a Wikipedia:Short description to ICL VME. It's not the slightest bit controversial. Every article should have a short description of less than 40 characters. Secretlondon (talk) 19:48, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your short description replaced the one in wikidata (almost identical). Adding local short description: "Mainframe operating system by ICL", overriding Wikidata description "Mainframe operating system developed by ICL" Brian R Hunter (talk) 00:48, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But mine was under 40 characters. The wikidata one was too long. Secretlondon (talk) 20:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the wikidata one is wrong then it would be better to correct that one, rather than to create a second one. Brian R Hunter (talk) 12:50, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata descriptions serve a different purpose, and do not have the size limitation. Secretlondon (talk) 19:51, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The wikidata description is one additional word and only a few characters over the 40 'limit' (which is allowed) but I have reverted back to your revision after re-reading Wikipedia:Short_description. My view is that wikipedia would benefit from alignment with wikidata, the maintenance category [1] shows it would be a lot of work. Brian R Hunter (talk) 23:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elizabeth Spender

The article Elizabeth Spender has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:10, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Why did you undo my edits Izaan Iqbal (talk) 07:11, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Battle_of_Phillora messed up the info box as you deleted part of a citation template. It was easier to undo your changes than to try and work out what you meant to change. Brian R Hunter (talk) 12:12, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]