User talk:Its Guddu Chauhan

Welcome!

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Chauhan, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 08:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Chauhan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Chauhan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 08:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beldariya (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beldariya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:28, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:28, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chauhan (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chauhan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:38, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Renewal6. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nonia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Renewal6 (talk) 12:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But there is a caste named Nonia in Bihar Its Guddu Chauhan (talk) 12:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Chauhan Dynasty, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 07:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Please work on improving Draft:Chauhan (caste) instead of dumping draft-type material in article space. refs should be in-line and shouldn't be bare urls Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:49, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me sir Its Guddu Chauhan (talk) 08:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Its Guddu Chauhan! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 09:27, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ramgarh Chowk moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ramgarh Chowk. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because the article does not follow Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 17:41, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 09:07, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what is problem Its Guddu Chauhan (talk) 09:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ariari

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ariari, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:33, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. Thank you for your work on Beldariya. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please add the population with a ref from the official indian census site

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:52, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Ok sir Its Guddu Chauhan (talk) 16:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Nonia Chauhan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Nonia Chauhan. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Lonia. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Lonia. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Admantine123 (talk) 18:26, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ramgarh Chowk

The article Ramgarh Chowk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Improperly Sourced, Needs more sources to establish notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Seawolf35 (talk) 15:47, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chauhan Bihar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chauhan Bihar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 17:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of EBC Caste Bihar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on EBC Caste Bihar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://indianexpress.com/article/political-pulse/bihar-caste-survey-the-importance-of-being-ebc-in-state-8965283/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 18:05, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because clear violation of WP:NPOV. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GPL93 (talk) 15:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Beldari Language"

Beldari Language, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a test page. Use the sandbox for testing.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 16:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly notice

Hello, I'm QuicoleJR. I noticed you have had a hard time making pages. Just so you know, Wikipedia and other wikis are not allowed as sources, so you should try to find other sources to use. This page has more information on which sources are good or bad to use. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:18, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks Its Guddu Chauhan (talk) 16:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Economically Backward Classes

Hello Its Guddu Chauhan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Economically Backward Classes for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Justi yaya 17:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Beldari Language moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Beldari Language, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 18:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, I'm Admantine123. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Beldar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Admantine123 (talk) 04:21, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Beldar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Admantine123 (talk) 05:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Admantine123 (talk) 08:39, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Several problems with your editing are documented above, including persistent editing for promotional purposes and persistently adding unsourced (and in some cases highly questionable) material to articles, but a further concern is your repeatedly posting totally irrelevant material into articles. An example of that is your editing of the article Nonia which, as you know, is about a species of moth, but where you have posted material about an Indian caste. A review of your editing history removes any possibility of thinking that edits of that kind are merely careless errors: you clearly know full well what you are doing. I regard posting spam into an article on an unrelated topic like that as close to vandalism, and taking it in conjunction with your previous editing removes the need for "close to" in that description. Since blocking your account from editing for a short time failed to lead to any change in your approach, this time the block is for a longer period. If you persist in the same way you may well be blocked indefinitely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 10:02, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you decide to return to editing after the block is over, please provide edit summaries which give an indication of what your edits do. Giving no edit summary is unhelpful, and a vague edit summary such as "Small edit" is at best uninformative, and at worst grossly misleading, as for example in one case where you gave that summary for an edit which added more than 1700 characters to an article. JBW (talk) 10:09, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unblock me please, this won't happen from now on. Its Guddu Chauhan (talk) 14:32, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Its Guddu Chauhan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Will not make such mistake from now on

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:49, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Its Guddu Chauhan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry

Decline reason:

Apology accepted, but that's not a reason for unblock. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:33, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock me Its Guddu Chauhan (talk) 01:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Janwadi Party (Socialist)

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Janwadi Party (Socialist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Beldariya

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beldariya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chauhan Bihar

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chauhan Bihar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan (draft 2)

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan (draft 2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Beldari Language

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beldari Language, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Beldariya (2)

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beldariya (2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chauhan Bihar

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chauhan Bihar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:20, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Account unblock please

Madam ji my account is blocked please unblock it please Itz Guddu Chauhan (talk) 00:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan (draft 2)

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Beldari Language

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beldari Language".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Beldariya (2)

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beldariya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:04, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mukutdhari Prasad Chauhan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shringi Rishi Dham

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shringi Rishi Dham for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Charlie (talk) 03:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLAR of Ramgarh Chowk

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Ramgarh Chowk, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected to Lakhisarai_district#Divisions. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:31, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maa Vatsala Bhavani

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Dclemens1971, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Maa Vatsala Bhavani, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:12, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Beldariya

Hello, Its Guddu Chauhan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Beldariya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:37, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]