User talk:Intothatdarkness/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Intothatdarkness. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 9 |
Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!
| World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Intothatdarkness! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 00:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC) |
The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:38, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Regarding Kiefer and {{retired}}
Regarding the template; My interpretation of {{retired}} and the sentence Editors should promptly remove this template from their user pages if they resume editing for any reason
indicates that anyone can remove the template if the person resumes activity. Off course my interpretation could be wrong. →AzaToth 14:26, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
- You may be right. But that doesn't mean it's the correct thing to do in all circumstances. I can think of a couple other editors with retired tags who are still editing and no one has pulled the tag. It might be better to prompt him on his talk first before taking unilateral action that might be seen as provoking or hostile. Just a thought. Intothatdarkness 14:40, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps you are right; But I think the retired tags should only be allowed to be used on user pages which are really retired. When people starts to use them as a statement, I think they should be removed. →AzaToth 16:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
- I tend to agree, honestly. But it's far too common to single out just one person, especially since he tends to be controversial and your action could be misunderstood. Just my take, of course. Intothatdarkness 17:43, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps you are right; But I think the retired tags should only be allowed to be used on user pages which are really retired. When people starts to use them as a statement, I think they should be removed. →AzaToth 16:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
I have put up two discussions of this article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Signal Hill Vietnamand at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Copyright Cleanup#Complicated issue with possible user-donated material. Your input is invited for both these discussions. Thank you. Mangoe (talk) 17:02, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. I raised a COI question about this editor on the MilHist talk page last week and have been slowly trying to correct some of his stuff. Intothatdarkness 17:03, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:13, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
My recent RfA
I should have said thanks for your support sooner. ```Buster Seven Talk 03:16, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
- No worries. Intothatdarkness 13:41, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Can you look at the lead? The reviewer wanted it expanded and I took a stab at it today. GAC is on the talk page. PumpkinSky talk 20:26, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
- Sure. Intothatdarkness 20:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
- She's GA now. Yea! PumpkinSky talk 22:12, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- Very nice! Intothatdarkness 13:39, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- She's GA now. Yea! PumpkinSky talk 22:12, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
New proposal regarding Wer900 at AN/I
In an effort to resolve the discussion at AN/I regarding Wer900, I have offered a new proposal at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Alternative proposal: Restriction on venues for complaints. Since you have weighed in on previous proposals regarding this user, I am notifying you of the new one in case you wish to opine. Regards, alanyst 19:06, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
- Replied there. Intothatdarkness 20:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 17:14, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:04, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
If interested
Article up for TFA, you may be interested in registering your opinion. Montanabw(talk) 18:24, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you
...for your supportive comments. They are truly appreciated. ```Buster Seven Talk 16:26, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- You're welcome! I see nothing wrong with EotW, and frankly get a bit pissed when people only pop up when someone they don't like happens to be recognized. The way I see it, EotW more or less recognizes a single, discrete, instance (or maybe more than one) when someone did something in the realm of article writing (which in theory is what this place is supposed to be about) that was appreciated by someone else. Why not recognize that? Intothatdarkness 16:30, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:34, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Investigative Project on Terrorism
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Investigative Project on Terrorism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Battle of Berlin
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Battle of Berlin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:10, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:35, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Precious again
support
Thank you for fighting silent battles in creating content, reviewing, defeating vandalism and supporting civility, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
Two years ago, you were the 107th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:45, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, Gerda! Good to see you still around. Intothatdarkness 17:06, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
8th Cavalry
I've attempted to further explain my edits on the article's talk page. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Ocalafla (talk) 21:45, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:25, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your participation
Intothatdarkness, I would like to take this moment and thank you for taking part in my RfA that happened a while ago. Although it didn't turn out as I had planned, I certainly appreciated all the comments and suggestions given by you and other people. I will learn from all of them and will hopefully run again someday when I'm fully ready. Thank you. TheGeneralUser (talk) 13:43, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
how about this
Wikipedia:List_of_policies --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:17, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Helpful, but is the originating link featured on the main page in a location where it can be easily found? Like, say, in the "navigation" box. It's good that something like this is out there, but right now the proliferation of policies (and the many essays that tend to be used or abused as policies) is something that makes it difficult for newcomers to really settle in, let alone thrive. Intothatdarkness 14:17, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:16, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Your comments on Talk Page of Standardbred
- The issue is that my contributions were reverted without any attempt at improving or adding to them, nor the issue first being discussed on the talk page. If you look at the editor who made the revert, she has made more deletions than additions in her 7 years of editing this article. Why? Why not add to and/or improve what others are attempting to contribute? As for Daniel R. Gernatt, Sr., adding a section about notable breeders, I believe, is relevant to the article. And, contrary to your comment, the section was not lengthy, but only two sentences. I didn't even have a chance to add more to it before it was deleted. Very sad, but not surprising. Daniellagreen (talk) 01:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- There isn't a compelling reason to add to or improve them when they really don't belong there in the first place. If you believe there's a need for a section on breeders, it's on YOU to add more than one...especially when it seems you have a COI with regard to that breeder. Intothatdarkness 13:53, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
FYI
Me and my big mouth: [1] If you want the basic saga, see here and to the end, and here and to the end (where I moved your comments too). Feel free to weigh in as you feel may be appropriate. Montanabw(talk) 01:26, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- Naw...this is clearly someone who's not used to being questioned in any way. Looks like it's already been closed in any case. Intothatdarkness 14:30, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- No worries, others seem to have attempted to apply cluebats, to no avail, but the waste of bandwidth continues. /snark. Montanabw(talk) 19:58, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- Yep...but that's what happens with an editor who's effectively a single topic person. I had a bit of a COI go-round with a guy and then just gave up on it. He couldn't understand that it was a conflict of interest to use his own books as sources in articles where they weren't appropriate. COI board wasn't much help, either, but again not surprising. I suspect they're more used to hunting down the "evil minions" of BP than they are dealing with historical COI and the perils of using a poorly-document memoir as a source. Intothatdarkness 20:04, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
PONY!
Pony!
Congratulations! For your support of sanity on wikipedia and assistance on equine articles such as Morgan horse, you have received a pony! Ponies are cute, intelligent, cuddly, friendly (most of the time, though with notable exceptions), promote good will, encourage patience, and enjoy carrots. Treat your pony with respect and he will be your faithful friend! Montanabw(talk) 20:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
To send a pony or a treat to other wonderful and responsible editors, click here.
Thanks! One thing I have found interesting about that little spat is the number of times people have tried to turn it into some sort of gender conflict. Anything to divert attention from a possible competency issue, I guess... Intothatdarkness 20:11, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- I have a saying from some of my RL work: assholes are not a protected class. More to the point, though: Have you ever noticed that a trait of almost all bullies is that when confronted and challenged, they are the first ones to claim they are the victim? Montanabw(talk) 23:18, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- I notice that all the time...especially here. Intothatdarkness 14:40, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- I see it a lot IRL too. Scary as it may sound, wiki is a microosm of the world. Montanabw(talk) 21:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Like most things on the webz, it's an amplified microcosm of the world. One that's amplified many times over. Too much fun...Intothatdarkness 21:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- I see it a lot IRL too. Scary as it may sound, wiki is a microosm of the world. Montanabw(talk) 21:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- I notice that all the time...especially here. Intothatdarkness 14:40, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Great power
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Great power. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Here we go again
Yet another RM request at Talk:Mustang horse. Will this stick ever drop? Montanabw(talk) 22:17, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Likely not. OWN is far more powerful on the bureaucratic levels (MOS, for example) than it ever could be at the article level. Intothatdarkness 22:20, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:1950–51 Baghdad bombings
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:1950–51 Baghdad bombings. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Pariah state
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pariah state. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Media Viewer RfC arbitration case - extension of closure dates
Hello, you are receiving this message because you have commented on the Media Viewer RfC arbitration case. This is a courtesy message to inform you that the closure date for the submission of evidence has been extended to 17 August 2014 and the closure date for workshop proposals has been extended to 22 August 2014, as has the expected date of the proposed decision being posted. The closure dates have been changed to allow for recent developments to be included in the case. If you wish to comment, please review the evidence guidance. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:00, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Media Viewer RfC arbitration case - motion to suspend case
You are receiving this message as you have either commented on a case page or are named as a party to the case. A motion has been proposed to suspend the Media Viewer RfC arbitration case for a maximum of 60 days due to recent developments. If you wish to comment regarding the motion there is a section on the proposed decision talk page for this. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs). Message delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 02:33, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Passengers of the RMS Titanic
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Passengers of the RMS Titanic. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:September 11 attacks
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:September 11 attacks. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:25, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux
|
NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou!
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Indo-Canadians
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Indo-Canadians. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:2014 Winter Olympics opening ceremony
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2014 Winter Olympics opening ceremony. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Evacuation of East Prussia
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Evacuation of East Prussia. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Please comment on Talk:Axis powers
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Axis powers. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!
Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CV, December 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:2014 hostage rescue operations in Yemen
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2014 hostage rescue operations in Yemen. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Women's rights in 2014
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Women's rights in 2014. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Ryukyu Kingdom
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ryukyu Kingdom. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of Turkic dynasties and countries
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Turkic dynasties and countries. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)