User talk:I am aman goyal

Regarding test edits

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:28, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (M.A.D. (Indian TV Series)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating M.A.D. (Indian TV Series), I am aman goyal!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.-->

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 11:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

INRConvert template

Please don't use the INRConvert template in film infoboxes for the budget or collection information. There was a discussion at the Indian Cinema Task Force WikiProject talk page here and the consensus was not to use the {{INRConvert}} template in the infoboxes. Please respect that decision. If you disagree with it, please start a new discussion at WT:ICTF and see about getting the consensus changed. Ravensfire (talk) 18:16, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources

Since you've added it at least twice[1][2], Koimoi is not considered a reliable source for gross data. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:49, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Quantico

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Quantico, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Alex^TW 08:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Template:Quantico, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Alex^TW 08:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Try and understand instead of blindly reverting

I explained in my edit why I was redirecting. If you don't trust me, take a look at this Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhallala Deva. None of the characters are notable enough to merit their own pages, and I could have easily flagged your page for speedy deletion as WP:G4. I will now be redirecting the article to the list page, as it is a common spelling for the character's name. Do not revert it. Jupitus Smart 13:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bhallaladeva (character)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bhallaladeva (character), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Vensatry _(talk) 15:16, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bhallaladeva

Regarding the article you created, even if it has a reference, if you copy and paste content from any other website other than Wikipedia, it is a copyright violation. Articles with such violations are deleted. It is also a violation of law of Constitution. Hence I removed the content you took from bollywood life. Thapa 75 (talk) 19:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Alex^TW 08:27, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bhallaladeva (character). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not add copyrighted materials. You have been warned multiple times now. Jupitus Smart 19:45, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

film series templates

You said "film series templates don't carry actors or directors pages, but carry soundtrack and characters pages". Where is this defined? Bollyjeff | talk 14:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, though it would be better to cite a policy. Why not add the games? Bollyjeff | talk 23:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kaabil remake

What on earth is the point of this content? Nothing is confirmed, it's just "yeah, maybe there could be a remake". Wikpedia is not a crystal ball or a gossip site. Until there is something tangible in the works, no academic purpose is being served here, and anyone in the entertainment industry who is asked "Hey, would you be up for a sequel or a remake" would naturally say "Sure!", because what else are you going to say in a promo junket? That you had an awful time and the film you just worked on sucks? And in the future, if content you submit is reverted, the burden is on you to open a discussion about it, not to resubmit the content. See WP:BRD. You are currently in contravention of community editing practices, but I'm giving you an opportunity to justify the inclusion of this fluffy, promotional content. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:27, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CyphoidbombIt is not my wish and even I haven't watched the movie yet. I just added this info beacaus its an official approach not rumours. There are lot of movies where possible remakes or sequels are included. Thus, don't feel like I have misused wikipedia and don't feel annoyed only beacause I reverted your edit. I am aman goyal (talk) 18:55, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's no useful content beyond "maybe" being presented here, so even if "official", it's still vapour. If you're going to add content, it needs to serve a useful academic purpose as Wikipedia is not an extension of the film's marketing wing and we are not to be used to drum up hype. Also, if you read the source, you no doubt noticed "Even though the developments are too premature to talk about at this moment", which would suggest to me that Wikipedia including the information is "too premature". The crux of the article says that Hrithik was approached to talk about rights acquisition, not that anything was secured or set in ink. And yes, as noted, you did contravene an established Wikipedia principle by restoring the content without initiating discussion. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:20, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb why are you feeling like this content is hurting you ? It is not the only article to have this "possibility" content, there lots of movies where 'possible sequel' or 'possible remake' may be appear. And kindly don't tell me about wikipedia terms and conditions as I am known to them equal to them.

I am also adding the word "Possible" before "Remake". Kindly leave it as it is. I am aman goyal (talk) 11:28, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to show me the Featured or GA-status articles that contain vague statements about possible remakes. I'd be interested in seeing them. But note that "other stuff exists" is a flimsy rationale for including flimsy material. Lots of articles have typographical errors. That doesn't mean we should feel comfortable adding more. And I've already pointed you to WP:CRYSTAL, which is fairly clear on the matter. "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball ... Wikipedia does not predict the future ... Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place" So far, the content you've added isn't meeting any of that. If/when such a remake gets beyond the "yeah, maybe it could be a Hollywood remake one day" then surely it could be restored. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:12, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, re: this, you are now edit-warring, which contravenes Wikipedia community policy. This means that you are at risk of having your editing privileges suspended. When there is a content dispute, the status quo (the version before you made your change) should remain until a consensus is established. This was my point above. Your reinsertion of the problematic content without achieving consensus is not appropriate, and your repeated reinsertion of the content is simply disruptive. If you seek other opinions on the matter, you could always ask for feedback at WikiProject Film to see if other editors consider the vague content in dispute to be serving an academic purpose, or if they think it's just fluffy promotional content, or somewhere in between. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:03, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb, Sorry ! but according to Wikipedia's policies any content which is official and has reference can always be added. You, me and everyone know that it is a true news, not fake, thus, forget about other rules and regulations and leave it as it till the producers refuse to have a remake. I am aman goyal (talk) 16:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You clearly have no idea what you're talking about, since you're speaking in absolutes. The community decides (through discussion and consensus) what content does belong and what does not belong, not your completely fabricated rule. If you can point me to the "policy" you are speaking about, I'd be eager to read it, but I happen to know that WP:V says "verifiability does not guarantee inclusion", and the WP:CRYSTAL policy I linked to and quoted from above supersedes your incorrect understanding. I think it's also fair to mention that I have far more experience editing at Wikipedia than you do, and I am familiar with content guidelines as well as Wikipedia community policy. This edit, will very likely get you blocked. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kaabil remake edit-warring

Please stop edit-warring over the possible Kaabil remake. Multiple editors have reverted you. You need to get WP:CONCENSUS for your edit, which you clearly do not. While the WP:3RR is a bright-line edit-warring, so is reverts day after day with multiple people disagreeing. If you add the information back in without consensus, I will report you to the edit war noticeboard. Ravensfire (talk) 17:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Priyanka Chopra. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Alex^TW 08:53, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Betty Logan. Your recent edit to the page List of highest-grossing films in the United Kingdom appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 18:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, I am aman goyal. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jethalal Gada

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jethalal Gada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 17:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laila Main Laila, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raees (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free text in List of Sumit Sambhal Lega episodes

Your addition to List of Sumit Sambhal Lega episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summaries can be paraphrased when supported by independent reliable sources, but copying directly from sources such as IMDb (user-generated) and Hotstar (primary source) should be strictly avoided.
Thanks, MT Train^Discuss 08:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi I am aman goyal, please read WP:PLAG before you add the content any further. Wikipedia doesn't allow plagiarism from copyrighted and non-free sources. Hotstar, an associate of Star Plus on which the program is telecast, is the primary source in this case, and should be avoided as well. MT Train^Discuss 09:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Nice Work. I was impressed by your previous article List of TED Talks India Nayi Soch episodes. Keep Going. Siddiq Sazzad (Chat) 14:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Sumit Sambhal Lega episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kabhie Kabhie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of most-viewed Indian videos on YouTube for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-viewed Indian videos on YouTube is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-viewed Indian videos on YouTube until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Primefac (talk) 20:55, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Nett Gross" is gross

Since I have been on Wikipedia, we have used "Nett Gross" as the correct figure for gross in Indian cinema articles. Therefore I reverted your change to Sholay. Bollyjeff | talk 19:50, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nadaan Parindey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Anchorvale ^{T@lk | Contributions} 08:48, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nadaan Parindey, you may be blocked from editing. Anchorvale ^{T@lk | Contributions} 08:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

...and I'll add to that the recent recreations of articles redirected after deletion discussions, like Aisa Des Hai Mera. You have been warned several times now. Next time I will propose to have you blocked for disruptive editing. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:11, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Akshay Kumar filmography

Hi Aman, I just saw your edits on the above page. During the filmography's 2nd FLC it was decided that since Kumar has a separate page for his awards and nominations there was no need to mention them in the notes column. I see that you have added the original names on whom his characters were based to the table. Well, this is the first time I'm seeing such info in the filmography tables. Important inspirations are ideally covered in the lead section and for biographical films we provide link to the original person. Thanks, --Skr15081997 (talk) 15:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 17:52, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with G.One (character). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Do not remove AFD tags as you did here. You may express your view on the AFD page, but it MUST stay until the process is done. Ravensfire (talk) 19:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TVCAST

Please read this comment it will be helpful you to . Sid95Q (talk) 04:57, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, I am aman goyal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! AshLin (talk) 19:30, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G.one

Rather than trying to write an entire article on this character, perhaps you could write a one to two-paragraph summary about the character, and include that in a new "Characters" section of Ra.One? If you're not sure how to include the content so it won't be removed, feel free to ping me for help. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. Please don't restore the G.one page in disagreement with community consensus again. power~enwiki (π, ν) 08:02, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Since I'm not 100% sure you're aware of it, there is consensus to make the G.One (character) article a redirect. Do not restore the article again or you could be blocked for disruption. SkyWarrior 08:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, they are quite aware of it, the participated in the discussion. From various edit summaries, they just don't care. Ravensfire (talk) 15:37, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. caknuck _° needs to be running more often 10:44, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ra.One (character)

This was probably the second most disruptive edit you could have made. The consensus was extremely clear based on the G.One AFD discussion, this should be handled the same way given it's the same movie. I should be shocked that you would do something so blantantly against Wikipedia policy, but you've left multiple comments prior to this making it clear you don't care about such minor things as what anyone else thinks. That doesn't work on Wikipedia - I hope you take some time to reconsider your editing style before you end up blocked indefinitely. Ravensfire (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced changes

This edit "Baaghi 2 netted 2nd highest opening weekend of the year by collecting 73.10 crore surpassing that of Padman and Raid" is not supported by the existing source as far as I can tell. Please don't make changes without providing new references and adjusting old ones as necessary. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:45, 4 April 2018 (UTC) Cyphoidbomb, I just did correct silly grammatical mistakes and the further information that I added is already there in the references already present there. Kindly, first revert those edits which are insult to the name of English as was this. I am aman goyal (talk) 14:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dhoom 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jethalal Gada for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jethalal Gada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jethalal Gada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nizil (talk) 06:26, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jethalal Gada

Hi, I invite you to take part and vote in this discussion .. thanks, --Adamstraw99 (talk) 14:36, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Jethalal Gada. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:03, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 3 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Jethalal Gada, you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:29, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, I'm TedEdwards. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Game of Thrones (season 8), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ted Edwards 16:21, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jethalal Gada, you may be blocked from editing. This was closed at AfD as a redirect. Do not revert this close. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:16, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some important guidelines

Hi Based on your recent edits I think these links will be helpful to you. Please read them carefully.

MOS:TV - Manual of Style for Television
Template:Infobox television - Information about the parameters to be used in the television article infobox
WP:ICTFSOURCES - WikiProject task force Guidelines on sources
WP:NOTTVGUIDE - Wikipedia is not TV guide so we don't add information like Time slots and other airing history
WP:CRYSTAL- Wikipedia is Not Crystal ball so we don't add scheduled or expected future events like adding end date of the series before the actual date and updating episodes in advance.
WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Avoid the use of Indic scripts in the lead sections or infoboxes. Instead, use International Phonetic Alphabet pronunciation guides, which are more international.

Thanks. Sid95Q (talk) 20:46, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, I am aman goyal. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tenali Rama has been nominated for discussion

Category:Tenali Rama, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah characters (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sid95Q (talk) 05:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at List of Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah characters. Praxidicae (talk) 13:13, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussions

Please don't add your view in the middle of the discussion like you did here - [3]. That's considered disruptive and your edit was rightly reverted. Out of courtesy, I restored your comment and put it where you should have made it - at the end of the list. If you're responding to a particular comment, yes, you should put it after that comment but yours was a general remark. You probably should read Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, your argument is basically WP:ILIKEIT without offering any policy based opinions. Ravensfire (talk) 15:15, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India

WikiProject India

Namaste, I am aman goyal. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.

Subscribe

Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Music videos featuring Deepika Padukone has been nominated for deletion

Category:Music videos featuring Deepika Padukone, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:04, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge

Hello I am aman goyal. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing!
If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by:

{{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}}

Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creating more articles

Hello, I read the article you created on Bhallaladeva. It is quite a nice article and is quite impressive. Bahubali movie was a great success and the characters are memorable. So as you created article for the antagonist Bhallaladeva, I think you should create articles for Mahendra Bahubali and Amrendra Bahubali. Thanks. Pritam Shaw (talk • contribs) 04:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Los Angeles Knight Riders moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Los Angeles Knight Riders, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fabulous 4

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fabulous 4 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 07:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fabulous 4 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fabulous 4 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabulous 4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Blue Square Thing (talk) 13:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Fabulous 4. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 22:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Fabulous 4. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 09:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Fab four (cricket), you may be blocked from editing. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 11:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wjemather, I don't think this is very helpful. See Death by template. I haven't made a decision on what to do with the Fab Four article yet, because I want to see if I can improve it significantly first. However, when this user says "So every one-time Star Wars character could have it's own separate article, but a tv show with hundreds of millions of daily active audience and over 3,000 episodes cannot have a list page???", I personally think, "Hmm, very good point". I certainly think we could redirect every Simpsons episode article to a list and the encyclopedia's quality would not suffer one jot. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 20:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Ritchie333, I'm not sure what your point is here. Warnings were duly issued for disruptive removal of the AFD notice from the top of an article. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 21:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wjemather, My point is, try and write to users in your own words using a more conciliatory and tactful approach. As it is, we've now got an editor who's pissed off and doesn't want to use Wikipedia again. That didn't need to happen. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333: I choose to use the templates whenever possible, unless there is a good reason not to, so as to avoid confusion/misunderstanding. After all, there are only so many ways to say "don't remove AFD notice templates from articles". I also note many previous warnings for the same thing, so starting with a Level-1 warning in this instance was probably rather generous. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 21:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 06:01, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Los Angeles Knight Riders

Hello, I am aman goyal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Los Angeles Knight Riders, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Los Angeles Knight Riders

Hello, I am aman goyal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Los Angeles Knight Riders".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:TMKOC

Template:TMKOC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Did Q28 make a mess today? 08:43, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from the Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members list.

Hi I am aman goyal! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, I'm Nemov. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Greta Gerwig have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Nemov (talk) 13:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Emma_Watson.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:09, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sachin Tendulkar

Template:Sachin Tendulkar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Batagur baska (talk) 16:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]