User talk:HurricaneEdgar/Archive 1

Backgroud information

Dear Mr HurricaneEdgar

Do you really think the background information i copied to the volcano article is not necessary, or did you just think it needed to be cited correctly? I think the background information about the location of the island and its geology is essential to understanding the volcanic eruption! Otherwise, why have any background section at all?

irishbugs--Irishbugs (talk) 13:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the background section is fist eruption of Hunga Tonga in year 2021, i rv your edit cause is unlesssary adding the article (copy the volcano article) see e.g (2020–2021 Taal Volcano eruptions, 2011 eruption of Grímsvötn) HurricaneEdgar 13:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Those two articles do not have special background sections. Also were probably not of similar global news / links from main page, which would bring a different type of user (like me!) to this page seeking that type of infomration. I continue to think this information is germane to this article. I added a section to the article's talk section, will see if others have opinions and i will abide by the consensus there. Irishbugs (talk) 13:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Volcanic Barnstar
		For significant contributions to 2022 Hunga Tonga eruption and tsunami. DJ Cane (talk) 08:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you HurricaneEdgar 08:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello.

What is the Volcanic Explosivity Index of the 2022 eruption of Hunga Tonga? From the satellite photos and ground photos, the explosion looks large and powerful. Can you add the VEI in the article, in case you find sources about it? I could not find one yet.

Yours sincerely, 31.200.15.32 (talk) 09:45, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank your message here fist of all there is no confimation on the VEI as now. see (https://volcano.si.edu/volcano.cfm?vn=243040). HurricaneEdgar 09:48, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information and source. An update and confirmation about the VEI from Smithsonian is necessary, if I am not mistaken.

One last request: In the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Haʻapai article, the island/s are referred to in the past tense, but according to sources, both islands still exist above sea level on a much reduced scale after the last big eruption. Can you check it and correct the article, in case that is the case? Of course being an ongoing event, the two reduced islands might disppear during another eruption or through erosion. Here is a source: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-60029815. --31.200.15.32 (talk) 10:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I need translate Tropical Storm Megi (2022) to Tagalog Wikipedia Haikou22 (talk) 09:21, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Archived reference does not work

Hi, I tried opening the link in your edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2022_Hunga_Tonga_eruption_and_tsunami&oldid=1066866313 . But when I open the link, the Internet Archive seems to have archived a 404 page: https://imgur.com/a/B9flZQj . Why would we have a reference like that? --189.217.80.30 (talk) 14:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

when i saw the URL is work but now archived reference does work HurricaneEdgar 14:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i removing VACC reference because archived is dead, oh god. HurricaneEdgar 14:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: archive is now active HurricaneEdgar 14:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good job for not using inflammatory language

Unlike @Dora the Axe-plorer:, it seems like you are receptive to feedback. That's great. You even manage to not call people names. I am impressed. Have a great day. --189.217.80.30 (talk) 14:40, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So about the 2021-22 Southwest Indian Ocean season

The Record Latest date (non 2021-22) i could find for a SWIO season is the 1997-98 SWIO Season, and it says that the first system in general Started January 16th, the first system listed is January 16th The First SWIO season for 2021-22 in general formed on January 20, 2021 so why doesnt that deserve the record latest tag if it was indeed the record latest based on the fact that this is the latest date I could find starting a SWIO Season. 17:43, 21 January 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarterStormTracking (talk • contribs)

Probably, there is no source/record in the MFR the MFR did not mention the season is record latest. HurricaneEdgar 17:51, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ana

MFR does have it as Ana on their webiste, the end — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarterStormTracking (talk • contribs) 00:26, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ana now has 46 deaths

MTS Ana now has 46 deaths, at the least. Is anyone able to change it on the 2021-2022 Southwest Indian Ocean Cyclone Season, because I can’t. Thanks! (IP Address would not like to be shown due to safety) 19:15, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

(talk page watcher), Do you have a source for the 46 deaths? Elijahandskip (talk) 19:53, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do. Multiple news sources have tell us this. (IP Address would not like to be shown due to safety) 20:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Well, it looks like it’s changed a lot. It’s very sad that it happened… (IP Address would not like to be shown due to safety) 19:23, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for removing vandalism and updating the articles. Keep working... Dam222 🌋 (talk) 14:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorting for season effects

It is better to edit the sorting of season effects by yourself when you update. I really do not want to fix your updates every time. 🐱💬 12:56, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Cyclone Batsirai

On 7 February 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Cyclone Batsirai, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 22:53, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suckpuppet Investigations for 71.203.118.241

Hello, can you investigate this IP user to block that maybe this Account has a previous account so he used the IP to not be noticed?

I am not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.203.118.241 (talk) 02:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fezile

Hi! Thanks for confirming about that. Which source did you use to find that as I've only been updating with the MFR website? Typhoon2013 (talk) 02:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

in the sub regional in mauritius the article already mention in storm names http://metservice.intnet.mu/current-cyclone.php -- HurricaneEdgar 01:10, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution reminder

I saw that your edit summary for this edit did not contain a link to the original page. Remember that a link to the original content is required (according to the CC BY-SA 3.0 License), not just a mention of the original page. Since the content in that diff consisted only of facts and no sufficiently creative content, no action has been done. However, please be mindful of future intra-wiki splits of pages. Chlod (say hi!) 13:34, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for your efforts

		The Current Events Barnstar
		Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		Awarded for being the top contributor to an article related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 16:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Awarded for efforts in expanding multiple articles to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2022 Turkmenistan presidential election

On 16 March 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 Turkmenistan presidential election, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 00:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha'apai

Greetings, I wanted to ask if you ever had the idea of rewriting Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha'apai so that it becomes less reliant on newspaper articles. I had in mind to write something about that volcano based on academic sources and send it to GAN, but I see that there is already substantial material there. I am initially asking you because you seem to be the main recent editor of the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Cyclone Gombe

On 19 March 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Cyclone Gombe, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 01:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taal Updates

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Taal_volcano_2020_eruption_captured_using_IP_camera.gif https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Taal_volcano_2020_eruption_captured_using_IP_camera.webm https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Taal_volcano_2020_eruption_captured_using_IP_camera.webm

All have wrong dates too. It needed change. The description file said January 12 which is probably a mistake. How to verify? --Likhasik (talk) 12:21, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi dear Edgar I changed our informatin in Hayways aero (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayways_(airline), because we have any information changes. I'm marketing and pr manager in this company, Please don't update after my changes. Tank you very much — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edgar1990Kh (talk • contribs) 08:45, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Tropical Storm Megi (2022)

On 14 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tropical Storm Megi (2022), which you created and nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 04:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please support me

Brother please support me to pacific typhoon category in season page iam add the whole category of pacific typhoon category used by jma WP:WPTC. The infobox hurricane season reverted it I need support to add whole category please brother support me. Jupiter50 (talk) 20:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not election also WP: Canvassing, I suggest you should have to wait until the consensus agree it. HurricaneEdgar 22:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok my brother we will discuss this later❤️❤️❤️ Jupiter50 (talk) 11:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

VEI 6?

Hi I see you deleted my edit recently on the Hunga Tonga for largest volcanoes I have proof that it is possibly a VEI-6 I put 6? 6 although a question mark as it is hot confirmed however you can watch this to see what I mean https://youtube.com/watch/aW3d0rAAnRg - GlendermanGaming

Pls see WP:RSPYT according to them Most videos on YouTube are anonymous, self-published, and unverifiable, and should not be used at all. HurricaneEdgar 07:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just sent a thanks regarding information about the Eruption in Tonga - Nic Nic292022 (talk) 15:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it´s confirmed that the volume of the ejected material is between 6 and 7 km³ by the New Zealand’s National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), thereby it is for sure a VEI 5 - eruption. The other edits by me are just minor edits of the numbers, because the comma is not processed correctly in the numbering. If you omit it, the eruptions are classified correctly. - Flocolumbo Flocolumbo (talk) 05:50, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some reliable source say but unless GVP confirmed we can add it. see for more information Global Volcanism Program HurricaneEdgar 06:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Join Wikimedia Community and WikiProject Tropical Cyclones on Discord (Software)

Hi, HurricaneEdgar, thanks for my talk page about the Australian region cyclone, since 35U and 36U formed in Western Australia yesterday, and also I'm looking for 35U and 36U at talk page in ARCS, as needed to be citation it. Since 36U was moved into South-West Indian Basin, we observe some cyclone may be formed. I'm sorry for added content about two tropical lows formed yesterday.

If you want to join the Discord Channel, using two links to join. Here's the link to join:

https://discord.gg/esYkNJzGwu https://discord.gg/7PGm4ng

I hope that you'll understand this question and thank you for message me as my talk page. HurricaneErl 2022 (talk) 23:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About this edit

Dude IMD haven't even said that it has intenstified into a cyclonic storm. That was the forecast and that's just a blatant WP:CRYSTAL. Check the Tropical Weather Outlook and the National Bulletin. Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 03:41, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So IMD state is wrong?

♦ Deep Depression over Southwest Bay of Bengal near latitude 10.8°N and longitude 90.1°E, about 300 km west-southwest of Port Blair (Andaman Islands). To move northwestwards and intensify into a Cyclonic Storm over southeast Bay of Bengal in the morning of 8th May HurricaneEdgar 03:45, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a forecast, IMD haven't stated whether it had become a cyclonic storm or not. Can't we just wait for 03z for the new update to arrive ? Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 03:47, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed the track say that is now asani 00:00 UTC May 8. DDGMUI -- HurricaneEdgar 03:54, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You know DDGMUI is confusing. You guys used this site and told that "IMD has declared it a depression" but after seeing the official update at 06z, which stated "LPA has intenstified into a WML". So plsssss can't we wait for the 03Z update? What's wrong in waiting bruh ? Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 03:57, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok fine Beraniladri19 🌀🌀 04:01, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Explain your revert please

Here you reverted an edit by a user who wasn't even autoconfirmed yet. That isn't good for editor retention. Furthermore, you checked the "vandalism" Twinkle box. How is an edit adding that a storm intensified rapidly vandalism? 🇺🇦 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 10:51, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My bad thank for reminder Chicdat that is misread. HurricaneEdgar 11:22, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Totalitarianism Lenin

Please assist in continuing to revert the vandal sock puppet that keeps removing the sourced contentFoorgood (talk) 04:29, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An apology.

Hello, I am Glenderman, I would like to apologise for my actions, what I did was wrong, I know now not to vandalise, also I will start to discuss normally about stuff rather than just changing it every time like on the volcano eruptions.

Also I have emailed GVP to take a look for the VEI for Tonga.

"Typhoon Vongfong (2020)." listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Typhoon Vongfong (2020). and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 31#Typhoon Vongfong (2020). until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 21:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Featured picture scheduled for POTD

Hi HurricaneEdgar,

This is to let you know that File:Tonga Volcano Eruption 2022-01-15 0320Z to 0610Z Himawari-8 visible.gif, a featured picture you nominated, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 9, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-12-09. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! HurricaneEdgar 06:36, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Divine Comedy is an Italian narrative poem by Dante Alighieri, begun around 1308 and completed in around 1321, shortly before the author's death. The poem's imaginative vision of the afterlife is representative of the medieval worldview as it existed in the Western Church by the 14th century. It helped establish the Tuscan dialect, in which it is written, as the standardized Italian language. It is divided into three parts: Inferno, Purgatorio and Paradiso. The subject of the narrative is the state of the soul after death and presents an image of divine justice meted out as due punishment or reward. In the poem, Dante travels through Hell, Purgatory and Heaven, and is accompanied by three guides: the Roman poet Virgil (who accompanies him for all of Hell and most of Purgatory), Dante's muse Beatrice (at the end of Purgatory and for most of Heaven) and Saint Bernard of Clairvaux (who guides him in the final cantos of Heaven).

This oil-on-canvas painting, titled Dante and Virgil and completed by the French artist William-Adolphe Bouguereau in 1850, depicts Dante with Virgil observing two damned souls in eternal combat in Hell. Capocchio, an alchemist and heretic, is being bitten on the neck by the trickster Gianni Schicchi, who had used fraud to claim another man's inheritance. The painting now hangs in the Musée d'Orsay in Paris.

Painting credit: William-Adolphe Bouguereau

Recently featured:

Speedy deletion declined: Hurricane Julia (2022)

Hello HurricaneEdgar. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Hurricane Julia (2022), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This does not meet the WP:G3 speedy deletion criterion. The National Hurricane Center has predicted that 2022 Atlantic hurricane season#Tropical Storm Julia will reach hurricane status. No prejudice to deletion of this WP:REDIRECT for any other reeason. Thank you. User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Weather: Map Dot & Template/Infobox Colors

Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. Noah^Talk 03:50, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer.

Hello, I am not trying to be mean but, what in the world is "enclyopedia writing"? I don't know what it even means, I tried to search it but none showed up. Where's the guide for it? Noru111344 (talk) 12:11, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are a new user of Wikipedia. Please read of MOS of tropical cyclone WP:WPTC/S or WP:MOS HurricaneEdgar 12:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mindy

Good day! I have noticed recent edits for citations on Tropical Storm Mindy (2021). These edits were reversed initially because they were different events, thus different sources. I’m trying to understand why you are replacing it with the first source using this database. Thanks! IrishSurfer21 (talk) 13:14, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Repeated_citations HurricaneEdgar 13:16, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve read that before and that makes sense, however, these sources differentiate slightly and I’ve seen from other articles each event is given its own citation? I’m not fully sure of policies about that since I’m new here.IrishSurfer21 (talk) 13:32, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hurricane Agatha

On 17 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hurricane Agatha, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hurricane Agatha was the strongest Pacific hurricane to make landfall in Mexico in May since records began in 1949? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hurricane Agatha. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hurricane Agatha), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Potential Tropical Cyclone Three (2021)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Potential Tropical Cyclone Three (2021) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 2#Potential Tropical Cyclone Three (2021) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.23.40.14 (talk) 23:14, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonnie's image

Hi Hurricane Edgar, I suggest we use the image taken at 20:00 UTC on July 5, 2022 instead the one taken at 20:20 UTC on July 4, 2022, because at the time Bonnie had winds at 85 knots that image was taken according to the Best Track data and if Bonnie is currently peaking that isn't within 5 percent that more like 15 percent so we can't use "near peak intensity", just giving you a heads up man, cheers. Cyclonetracker7586 (talk) 01:04, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cyclonetracker7586, In the best track they are currently discussing regarding the best track, see Talk:2022_Atlantic_hurricane_season#Bonnie_peak_intensity HurricaneEdgar 01:08, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

oh ok Cyclonetracker7586 (talk) 01:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also a Barnstar for you

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Hello HurricaneEdgar, Also I'm giving you this barnstar because you work hard to keep these weather articles and geology articles updated, I respect you for that man. Cyclonetracker7586 (talk) 01:49, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TD Eight-E

Sorry about the edit on 2022 Pacific Hurricane Season. I was working on Creating Eight-E at the same time you were.

GDFilbert (talk) 16:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2022 Luzon earthquake

On 30 July 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 Luzon earthquake, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Anarchyte (talk) 09:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revert Edits. 2022 Luzon quake

Hi I would like to feedback regarding your revert edits on my edits to the page 2022 Luzon quake. Please don't easily revert edits. I suggest that: 1.) You can ask for it to be improved rather using ^{[better source needed]} template if you don't agree with the current source. 2.) Or better, if in doubt, you can verify or look for other sources yourself. 3.) Be considerate since other editors just might be having problems editing in their mobiles.

Thank you. Jp2593 (talk) 09:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jp259, 1.) I've reverted because Wikipedia does consider Youtube a reliable source see Wikipedia:RSPYT 2.) I don't see on google in your add claim. such as Iglesia Filipina Independiente Church, were also affected. 3.) Wikipedia is not a newspaper see WP:NOTNEWS HurricaneEdgar 09:11, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.Jp2593 (talk) 13:17, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thyphoon Ma-on 2022

I think Ma-on already dissipated, the weather as of today is sunny (on some areas in Luzon maybe). SeanJ 2007 (talk) 08:17, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the weastern pacific (monitor by the JMA) we are use JMA estimeted whether were formed or disspated. Take note: the JMA continue monitor this system as a tropical depression. (see weather maps) HurricaneEdgar 08:39, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tropical Storm Ma-on (2022), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dong Son.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't use your sandbox as attribution

Linking pages as a form of attribution is done since it's expected that an article will remain in mainspace for a long period of time. This does not apply to user sandboxes. Unless you plan on freezing your sandbox and make no further removals from it (which I doubt), you are highly recommended not to link to your sandbox as a form of attribution (especially without providing a permanent link, as you did here) as the content there is expected to be moved, replaced, or deleted. As an alternative, you can instead insert content with a list of authors or link to the original season page and waive attribution entirely (but this only applies if you are the sole editor of the newly-added content, like in this edit). Chlod (say hi!) 02:16, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Thank Chlod! HurricaneEdgar 02:17, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hello - your signature has an "invisible" link to the non-existent page HurricaneEdgar in it. Would you mind fixing that? Thanks! firefly ( t · c ) 14:17, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will fix later, sorry for late respose due to Typhoon Noru (Karding). HurricaneEdgar 23:07, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About this edit

Hello. As I have seen, you deleted this text block.

}}</ref> In western Thailand, Typhoon Noru is expected to weaken before ending its reign of heavy storms and flash floods.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Herdman (MetDesk) |first=James Parrish and Lauren |date=2022-09-30 |title=Weather tracker: Typhoon Noru wreaks havoc across south-east Asia |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/sep/30/weather-tracker-typhoon-noru-wreaks-havoc-across-south-east-asia |access-date=2022-09-30 |website=the Guardian |language=en

May you restore it, just in another heading? It’s okay to say no. Noru111344 (talk) 12:50, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orlene edit

I see you reverted my edit on Hurricane Orlene. I did not copy-paste this information. I typed it. Hurricane Chandler (talk) 00:39, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-retired

I see that you are semi-retired. However, I took a sample of 500 edits, and they have all come from a mere four days. Are you sure you are semi-retired following an increase in editing over the past week? Sarrail (talk) 22:29, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Draft:Tropical Storm Yamaneko (2022)

Hello HurricaneEdgar. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Draft:Tropical Storm Yamaneko (2022), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: If it is a hoax, it's not unambiguous enough to fall under G3. Thank you. BangJan1999 14:49, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving at Talk:2022 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha'apai eruption and tsunami

Can I ask why you have been so aggressive in archiving the threads at Talk:2022 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha'apai eruption and tsunami? — HTGS (talk) 01:22, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I’ve seen you left a message on my talk page, but I don’t understand what I did wrong. DENBRO1995 (talk) 14:45, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because you are using talk page on the 2022 Atlantic hurricane season as a forum. see WP:NOTFORUM. HurricaneEdgar 15:14, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then where is the forum? DENBRO1995 (talk) 16:26, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And also, I don’t think you understand how the talk page works. The talk page allows users to write what is correct and what’s not and also what they believe will happen. You do not have to be so strict on Wikipedia. DENBRO1995 (talk) 18:57, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NOTFORUM state Please try to stay on the task of creating an encyclopedia. You can chat with people about Wikipedia-related topics on their user talk pages, and should resolve problems with articles on the relevant talk pages, but please do not take discussion into articles. HurricaneEdgar 04:29, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We do not have to be so strict

Did you read my new message from earlier today? Don’t be so strict on Wikipedia. DENBRO1995 (talk) 02:09, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why wikipedia so many rules? Wikipedia's policies and guidelines are developed by the community 'to describe best practices, clarify principles, resolve conflicts, and otherwise further our goal of creating a free, reliable encyclopedia. HurricaneEdgar 04:32, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DENBRO1995:, we sometimes can chit-chat and hang out and drink some Coca-Cola, (and maybe if the party gets too wild, Wikipedia will turn into a "Funopedia") but the main purpose of Wikipedia is to create articles and make an encyclopedia. If you want to chat about other stuff further, go to Wikipedia's WP:DISCORD chat if you want more of this crazy, out-of-this-world stuff. Sarrail (talk) 03:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Christmas present for contributions at 2022 Atlantic hurricane season

		The Tropical Cyclone Barnstar
		Thank you for your contributions at this season's article. ✶Mitch 199811✶ 00:44, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"BoM's"

The possessive is not appropriate here. I have had to remove your additions of this multiple times now. Please stop writing "BoM's" instead of simply "BoM" as you did here. Protip: if expanding an abbreviation or acronym results in bad grammar for a given sentence, that sentence's grammar is not correct with the abbreviation in either. Jasper Deng (talk) 07:30, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries to describe your edits.

Thank you for your work on the 2022 eruption of Mauna Loa article. When editing that article myself, I noticed that you often don't provide an edit summary to describe your edits. While there are some situations where an edit summary might not be necessary, in general they are a good tool to allow other editors to better understand your changes. Due to this, I would ask that you take advantage of this feature more often, including on the above article. Thanks. Rainclaw7 (talk) 12:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Stifle

You are invited to rejoin the discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 November 27. Stifle (talk) 11:04, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re your participation in the Nazi's (information and disinformation group).

Just the type of thing my headline alludes to and done in humour... Have you and the team seen;

The first published RS was [1] and this deeper analyses on one of the subjects [2]both of which reference this tweet from Russia [3] and both determine it is Russian propaganda re Crimea and JT's opposition to their illegal act in 2014, both determine it is deliberate and diversionary, they also add some background, then list the statues involved in this deceptive and misleading style of undue weight on the Nazi activities of these persons, subsequent these memorials were vandalised, however for completeness and truth it must be mentioned, but not without some balance to avoid UNDUE etc. I have bookmarked and will return, if at a later date under a different (somewhat similar though) IP. Thanks in advance2404:4408:638C:5E00:7527:D2E8:A117:F6A (talk) 01:00, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you update Weather of 2023 when adding new death tolls

Hello! I know you work extensively on ongoing tropical cyclone sections/articles, like Cyclone Cheneso. I wanted to ask if you could update Weather of 2023 and Template:Deadliest meteorological events in 2023 if/when new tropical cyclone deaths come out. Have a good day and keep up the good work! Elijahandskip (talk) 21:47, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Cyclone Gabrielle

On 15 February 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Cyclone Gabrielle, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 00:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Storm Danny (2021)

Hey there, HurricaneEdgar! I am hoping to nominate this for a possible GA very soon. However, per WP:GAN/I#N1, I must secure the assents of the significant contributors of the article before nominating. It looks like you are a significant contributor to the article per XTools, so I brought this topic to you for the securing of your assent in order to nominate. It also states If you are not a significant contributor to the article, you must secure the assent of the significant contributors before nominating. Technically, I am not a significant contributor as you have nearly twice the amount of edits I have (26–12). So, I figured I would bring this to your attention. Thanks! Tails Wx 03:14, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Freddy

Just a heads up that John 1994's record could be on the line here if the forecast pans out. "Hurricane John, also known as Typhoon John, was both the longest-lasting and the farthest-traveling tropical cyclone ever observed." from Hurricane John (1994). Noah^Talk 01:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

JTWC pressure

We will be including JTWC pressure in infoboxes from now on along with winds and pressures given by other agencies. This is to show the different perspectives that agencies may have. Noah^Talk 11:13, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hurricane Noah: No, we need consensus for that. Please start a discussion project-wide.--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jasper Deng: We already got consensus to use the infobox which had that set up for that purpose. It was always part of the design for these values to be used. I see no reason for a separate consensus to be required to use a part of an infobox that was pre-existing when it was approved for usage via RfC. Noah^Talk 22:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hurricane Noah: In this case, unless the consensus explicitly supports it, this is a WP:CONLEVEL change on the use of RSMC data and requires another discussion.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no consensus on using the JTWC pressure. it will cause confuse the reader as to whether this is true the estimated. HurricaneEdgar 04:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, HurricaneEdgar. Thank you for your work on Humanitarian response to Cyclone Freddy. User:Tails Wx, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tails Wx}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tails Wx 15:27, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!! HurricaneEdgar 15:34, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mocha

I reverted your requested deletion and moved that redirect to my userspace, but you beat me to finishing out the round robin move. Noah^Talk 02:41, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cyclone Mocha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rakhine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese nationalist editor - Please help

I was RC patrolling and found a bunch of pretty explicit Japanese Nationalist and Yamato Supremacist content on Soh Ohba and tried to remove it but an IP just put it back up. Its not strict vandalism so I can't just take it back down without violating 3rr. I am still relatively new to wikipedia and am not very well versed in the nuances of WP:DUE, WP:NPOV, etc and honestly I don't have the emotional energy to deal with this properly, but just ignoring it would damage the integrity of the project. I am reaching out to you because of your presence on the Nazi Affiliation task force, and as its subject area is tangential to these issues I am hoping that you are more knowledgeable and better equipped (and willing) to deal with this.— FenrisAureus ▼ (she/they) (talk) 04:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The situation has been dealt with— FenrisAureus ▼ (she/they) (talk) 04:54, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Typhoon Doksuri (2023), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shidu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023–24 South Pacific cyclone season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Torba.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Otis 12hour record

The 12-hour enhancement record was never mentioned in the article! Are you sure you read it all when you want to delete it? Vệ Thần^{- Talk} 06:35, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Final-Fantasy-HH The 24 hour rapid record from TS to CAT 5 hurricane has been mentioned in the article; it would be unnecessary into the article. HurricaneEdgar 07:01, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a huge difference between 12hour and 24hour, because Otis is slower than Patricia at 24hour, but at 12hour, Otis is the record holder. Philip Klotzbach made this assessment on Twitter. Vệ Thần^{- Talk} 10:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited December 2023 Mindanao earthquake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ishigaki.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jelawat (Kabayan) article

Has someone made an article about Jelawat (Kabayan) yet, since it's going to bring severe impacts to the Philippines? 🎩Incognito Fedora🎩 (talk) 03:28, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Project I'm working on

I'm currently working on a project which you can see here. Could you help me find some of the sources? ''Flux55'' (talk) 15:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undid edit

You undid one of my edits i did on Cyclone Peter previously. It has since been reinstated, but i am confused, because you said the sources didnt say that jasper caused more rainfall, but both say how much rainfall they caused, so if you put them together, and use common sense, you can deduce that jasper had higher rainfall. SquishyWikii (talk) 08:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i shouldnt be doing this cause this is clearly not reddit, twitter, or youtube comments, but im just confused. SquishyWikii (talk) 08:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merges

When proposing merges, could you please use "merge from" instead of "merge" on the pages that are receiving the content? Using "merge" messes up the article alerts page and says there are three articles being merged when it's actually just one. I adjusted the templates on the season pages. Noah, AA^Talk 12:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone Freddy

Hey there, I see you're working on Cyclone Freddy. You're adding a lot to the meteorological history, but that's not necessary, since there's already an article specifically for the meteorological history. I hate to ask, but would you mind reverting your recent edits to the met history? All of that said, I really do appreciate you working on Freddy, since that was one of the most important storms of the year last year. I just read through the article, and I was surprised how good of shape it is in. That being said, the most likely thing that's missing is more longterm aftermath, which basically only goes up to March 2023. Have you heard of the website ReliefWeb? You'll be able to find a ton of information there (which, forewarning, is more going to be information overload). It's a little tricky parsing through all of the sources and figuring out what's actually important versus what's a really minor update that's barely even worth mentioning. I hate to presume, but are you trying to get Freddy to good or featured article status? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahaha, I have no plan to nominate the article. I've 'added the met history to clarify that before he became category 5, it was weak and made landfall, but Freddy is an important system due to its records. Sorry for being late in replying. I'm currently at school STI College. HurricaneEdgar 13:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've heard I was using that website way back last year. when I am still updating on the aftermath of the storm, and yes, there is hundred-tone information on that website. HurricaneEdgar 13:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aww that's too bad, since Freddy is one of the most important storms of the decade, and it would be great if it was featured eventually. But my point remains about Freddy, I think there's a bit too much met history, since there is already a met history article. The bit about Freddy in AUS is especially bloated, which I realize now you didn't do, but since you're already working on the article, I figured I'd ask your thoughts. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone Djoungou

FYI in their final advisory the JTWC placed Djoungou's final position at 29.8S 92.0E which is inside the Aus Region and stated that it had become a subtropical cyclone. As a result, we have to mention Djoungou in the Aus region even though AFAIK the BoM did not classify it as 08U.Jason Rees (talk) 01:58, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have the boundaries for the Australian region changed for some reason since I last checked? As the final advisory from the JTWC placed Djoungou at 29.8S 92.0E, which is inside the Australian Region and means that it had to stay as a part of the season even though the BoM did not assign a number.Jason Rees (talk) 16:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Upon the cyclone entering the region, I realized that it should stay since the JTWC placed Djoungou. Apologize for the quick removal. HurricaneEdgar 16:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bongbong Marcos

My apologies for the edit conflict. How timely (haha). _signed,Pat ^talk 14:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay heheheh HurricaneEdgar 14:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2024 Pacific typhoon season

A tag has been placed on Category:2024 Pacific typhoon season indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Meteorological history of Cyclone Freddy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Meteorological history of Cyclone Freddy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 03:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone Freddy

Thanks for working on such an important article! I saw your edits, and thought they were generally productive. The only thing I thought might warrant changing is moving the retirement to the beginning of the aftermath, and moving records to the met history, since all records have to do with the storm's track/intensity (and not record damage). Other than that, I'm curious what you think the article needs before GAN? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:00, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply. I was just working on the meteorological history of Cyclone Freddy. I have no idea what a GAN is. HurricaneEdgar 06:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, good article nomination. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:13, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, I just nominated the article for GAN as I have finished writing it. HurricaneEdgar 10:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing the article. I will be fixing it today or tomorrow. HurricaneEdgar 06:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GAN: Typhoon Ewiniar (2024)

Since you did 50% of the work on the article, I wanted to tell you that I nominated Typhoon Ewiniar (2024) for a GAN, are you okay with it or not? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 23:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a bit more to explain the question: it's usual to get consensus on the talk page from main contributors before nominating, and you're a main contributor. Also, in case you care (some don't), whoever nominates the article will get credit for the GA in the statistics. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing?

what are you doing exactly on the Typhoon Gaemi (2024) section on the 2024 Pacific typhoon season? ITS not a "hurricane area east of Germany" It's a low-pressure area east of Palau. SomeoneWiki04 (talk) 10:37, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SomeoneWiki04 Sorry for reverting your edit; that was my mistake due to an edit conflict. Best regards." HurricaneEdgar 10:45, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Congrats on all of the hard work getting Meteorological history of Cyclone Freddy to good article status! Thanks for all of the fixes and research. If you intend to take it further, be sure to research for journal articles, and continue fleshing out the article where you can, but I'm happy to call it "good" :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]