User talk:Hurricane Chandler

November 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hurricane Linda (2021) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hurricane Linda (2021) was changed by Hurricane Chandler (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889871 on 2021-11-13T01:49:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:49, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2021 Pacific hurricane season into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 06:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Typhoon Muifa (2022) has been accepted

Typhoon Muifa (2022), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I put some effort into that so it was worth it. Hurricane Chandler (talk) 00:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hurricane Earl (2022) has been accepted

Hurricane Earl (2022), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:43, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hurricane Orlene (2022) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hurricane Orlene (2022). Thanks! Greenman (talk) 09:06, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hurricane Danielle (2022) has been accepted

Hurricane Danielle (2022), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. HurricaneEdgar 06:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! I'm not entirely sure if I did it right but you can check: Draft:Hurricane Polo (2014) Hurricane Chandler (talk) 21:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

if you copying the content on wikipedia then, it should be add on edit summary at the page into which you've copied content (copied content from page name; see that page's history for attribution) For more information see WP:Copying within Wikipedia HurricaneEdgar 02:26, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hurricane Kay (2022) has been accepted

Hurricane Kay (2022), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:50, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Storm Javier (2022) has been accepted

Tropical Storm Javier (2022), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:50, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hurricane Polo (2014) has been accepted

Hurricane Polo (2014), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:39, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hurricane Danielle (2022) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hurricane Danielle (2022) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hurricane Danielle (2022) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:59, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Storm Andres (2021) (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at 2021 Pacific hurricane season. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not appear to contain significantly more information than the season article. The information that is here can be merged into the season article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tropical Storm Andres (2021) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hurricane Chandler! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	thank you for helping with articles mostly such as Tropical Storm Colin (2022) and Hurricane Earl (2022) Rainbow Galaxy POC (talk) 01:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime! Ever need help you can come to me Hurricane Chandler (talk) 02:01, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Wos (November 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joe Wos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 06:38, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Earl image

You may be interested in this discussion: Talk:2022 Atlantic hurricane season#Earl's peak image. Sarrail (talk) 22:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Thanks for letting me know! I have replied to it. Hurricane Chandler (talk) 02:02, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Colin being requested to be delete

people have been saying that colin did no damages and isnt notable and its being requested to be deleting the article if you would like to join you can Talk:Tropical Storm Colin (2022) Rainbow Galaxy POC (talk) 20:47, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think the colin article would last for more longer, unless if we actually provide good enough reasons to save the article from deletion just like Earl Rainbow Galaxy POC (talk) 20:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion was moved here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tropical Storm Colin (2022) Rainbow Galaxy POC (talk) 22:00, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for letting me know. I am going to vote Keep, and we may have to do what we did with Earl and Danielle. Again, thanks. Hurricane Chandler (talk) 23:16, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyclone Tiffany has been accepted

Cyclone Tiffany, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cabrils (talk) 22:42, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hurricane Chandler. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:28, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hurricane Chandler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

They are not my "sockpuppets," and they are not my accounts. Granted, Hurricane Su used to be a close friend of mine, but I have no idea who the rest are! They are not my accounts, and I haven't spoken to Su in real life in a LONG time. If someone has a similar opinion to me, that doesn't mean they are me!

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool confirms that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 13:44, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hurricane Chandler (talk) 13:28, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What?

W-What just happened? How could you use sock puppets to consider adding more keep votes? And now you’re blocked? I don’t understand. Sarrail (talk) 13:04, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Me either. I don't understand. None of them are me. Why is it that I'll get reported if someone has a similar opinion to me? I can't control that! Hurricane Chandler (talk) 13:30, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have you used any of the sock puppets listed on the investigation? Sarrail (talk) 13:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same here, i dont understand. I was busy with school and when I came back I was like what??? after I came to check ur profile and User:Hurricane Su. Rainbow Galaxy POC (talk) 00:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, there’s nothing to do here unless they want to take the standard offer, and it is about the nick of time to move on. Sarrail (talk) 00:25, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I first didnt knew what was a sockpuppet but I understand now and I also agree that other accounts like User:Hurricane Su isnt you. I support to unblock your account Rainbow Galaxy POC (talk) 00:26, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hrm? They were a sock. They added way too much keep votes. I don’t think this is allowed. Read WP:SOCKPUPPET. Sarrail (talk) 00:27, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tropical Storm Javier (2022) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tropical Storm Javier (2022) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tropical Storm Javier (2022) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Drdpw (talk) 15:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cyclone Tiffany for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cyclone Tiffany is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyclone Tiffany until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Drdpw (talk) 19:57, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyclone Seth (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at 2021–22 Australian region cyclone season. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is a draft on a subtopic of an existing article, 2021–22 Australian region cyclone season. Discussion as to whether a separate article for the subtopic is warranted should be on the talk page of the parent article, Talk:2021–22 Australian region cyclone season. Please discuss the suitability of creating a separate subtopic article on the talk page of the parent article. Please resubmit this draft if there is rough consensus at the parent talk page to create the child article, or with an explanation that the child draft satisfies either general notability on its own or a special notability guide.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cyclone Seth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:40, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Typhoon Fred (1991) (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at 1991 Pacific typhoon season. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is a draft on a subtopic of an existing article, 1991 Pacific typhoon season. Discussion as to whether a separate article for the subtopic is warranted should be on the talk page of the parent article, Talk:1991 Pacific typhoon season. Please discuss the suitability of creating a separate subtopic article on the talk page of the parent article. Please resubmit this draft if there is rough consensus at the parent talk page to create the child article, or with an explanation that the child draft satisfies either general notability on its own or a special notability guide.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Typhoon Fred (1991) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:49, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joe Wos

Hello, Hurricane Chandler. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joe Wos, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:03, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joe Wos

Hello, Hurricane Chandler. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joe Wos".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:04, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]