User talk:Hughpugh

Welcome!

Hello, Hughpugh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! —Recurring dreams 07:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David Bennett (announcer)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David Bennett (announcer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ziggy Saw dust 19:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Torrance

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David Torrance, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stormbay (talk) 16:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

June 2008

Your edits to Hannah Shellswell

You have changed the reference format in contradiction of the guideline, removed WP:Persondata, removed reference handling code and added unreferenced material - [1]. Why ? Please reply here. -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 10:33, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I was not necessarily aware that I had added what could be considered as unsourced or original research. Some of the research carried out for the article was made using archived pages (to which I've included a reference). Apologies for any inconvenience. User:Hughpugh (talk) 23:23, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply - moved here to keep the conversation in one place. It was unsourced because you ommitted a reference; hence it contravened Wikipedia:Verifiability. The reference via archive.org that you have since added does not work [2] which is strange. Please answer my other questions. Thanks -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 09:24, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 17:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 17:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rae Stewart

I have nominated Rae Stewart, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rae Stewart. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 23:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Cyw

Dear Hugh, Thanks for your assistance and the edits to the new article on Cyw. I have an interest in Welsh language and media, and I am looking for someone from the Welsh wiki to do a translation or build an article on cy.wikipedia.org about this channel. if you know of anyone who has Welsh language skills or if you indeed could assist, please let me know. Thanks again, and I hope we can collaborate on some other Wales related articles. Regards, Thor Malmjursson (talk) 10:34, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to BBC Radio Solent, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ~ Troy (talk) 01:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Keith D (talk) 22:43, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flagging Leusa Mererid for further review

Hello, Hughpugh … I recently encountered the article about Leusa Mererid and in my opinion, it either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Biographies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

Be sure to read Ownership of articles, and remember that Some Other Editors (including at least one administrator) may not share your opinion about the notability of the article's subject.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read Your first article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. — triwbe (talk) 13:06, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hi Hughpugh, I've just come across the great work you're doing on our coverage of British TV and I'm glad you're here. Looking through your contributions I can see why you might have run into some problems with your material being deleted. Please remember as you add material that it must be verifiable and you must cite your sources for every bit of information you contribute. I know it can be a pain to get the footnotes right, but Wikipedia has plenty of pages explaining how to do this well and you need to remember that if you don't cite your sources everything you add will end up being deleted sooner or later. Since you must have got your information from somewhere it shouldn't be too much trouble to make a note of where, and this way your contributions will stay in the encyclopaedia for ever, you won't get "unreferenced" tags slapped on your articles and the editors who've contacted you above will leave you to get on with it. It's also very helpful to other editors, saves time in the long run and is less annoying to the community if you provide an edit summary when doing anything. Thanks for all your work! 85.189.221.65 (talk) 11:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of David Torrance

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on David Torrance, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because David Torrance seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting David Torrance, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:10, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 212.84.102.163 (talk) 22:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Marsland

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David Marsland, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

It is unclear how this person meets Wikipedia's notability criteria

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:45, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jess Dunsdon

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jess Dunsdon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non notable journalist

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nuttah (talk) 12:47, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nina Warhurst

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nina Warhurst, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non notable journalist.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nuttah (talk) 13:12, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jess Dunsdon

I have nominated Jess Dunsdon, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jess Dunsdon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Nuttah (talk) 09:20, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jess Dunsdon

I have nominated Jess Dunsdon, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jess Dunsdon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Nuttah (talk) 09:23, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lynda Fulford

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lynda Fulford, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

fail to meet general notability guidelines at WP:BIO

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jmundo (talk) 18:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clare Fallon

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Clare Fallon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Fail to meet general notability guidelines at WP:BIO; article has no references.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jmundo (talk) 18:54, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your hard work is about to be deleted from Wikipedia

The article you created, Jess Dunsdon is about to be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jess Dunsdon. The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.

There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:

1. You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.

2. You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
3. When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. travb (talk) 01:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leusa Mererid

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Leusa Mererid, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article lacks Attribution to Verify WP:BIO or WP:BLP notability criteria.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 138.88.32.143 (talk) 19:31, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Real MacKay

I have nominated The Real MacKay, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Real MacKay. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 06:59, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Northern Exposure (video blog)

I have nominated Northern Exposure (video blog), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Exposure (video blog). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 08:07, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of The Real MacKay episodes

I have nominated List of The Real MacKay episodes, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Real MacKay episodes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 08:23, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kenny Toal

Hi, I see you have removed Kenny Toal from the news correspondents section of North East Tonight, could you please explain in my talk as to why you have done this?

Thanks, Drew. This is Drew (talk) 18:53, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

–Signalhead ^< T > 20:38, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see above.–Signalhead ^< T > 20:35, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BBC Radio Sheffeild

Hello am wondering why you re did the bbc radio sheffeild schdule and what was wrong with it please thanks miniwillde 20:01, 14 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willde1 (talk • contribs)

Edit summaries

Hi Hughpugh. Your improvements to Wyvern FM are much appreciated, however, if you could please remember to fulfil the Wikipedia requirement of completing an edit summary each time - it would make the work of other editors much easier when checking for vandalism and spam. Thanks.--Kudpung (talk) 03:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Hughpugh! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 14 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Susan Nicholson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Cameron McKenna (announcer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
David Bennett (announcer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Shauna Willis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
David McKeith - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ross Govans - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Alison MacGregor - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Becky Hunter - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Alan Saunby - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Louise Cowie - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Lynne Rankin 12. Anne Smith (journalist) 13. Jamie Livingstone (broadcaster) 14. Rachael Solomon

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shauna Willis

The article Shauna Willis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

2 year old unsourced BLP - I could find no significant independent coverage that would satisfy general notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezebel'sPonyo ^shhh 16:50, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page 97.4 Rock FM worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. xd Rat 20:37, 27 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratinator (talk • contribs)

Tudno FM

Hello Hughpugh. Can I suggest you give WP:NOTDIR a read? It sets out Wikipedia policy, and specifically says "Wikipedia articles are not... (4) Directories, directory entries, electronic program guide, or a resource for conducting business. For example, an article on a radio station should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, et cetera, although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant programme lists and schedules may be acceptable". I would think that a list of what news bulletins are broadcast and when and in which language falls foul of NOTDIR. Bencherlite ^Talk 23:34, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jamie Livingstone (broadcaster)

The article Jamie Livingstone (broadcaster) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Although there are hundreds of hits on google news, all are either (a) written by, and not about him, or; (b) about another Jamie Livingstone. WP:Notability requires significant coverage about the subject, not merely many news articles written by the subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Joshua Scott (formerly LiberalFascist) 00:53, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Hughpugh. You have new messages at Talk:Heart West Country.
Message added 05:20, 17 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Articles for deletion nomination of Cameron McKenna (announcer)

I have nominated Cameron McKenna (announcer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron McKenna (announcer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. j⚛e decker ^talk 21:09, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hi. I don't know why you undid my edit. The impression you gave was that you were undoing vandalism. I'm sure that was not the case, but that is the impression you give if you do an undo without using the edit summary to explain your reasons.

I see from elsewhere on your talk page that you have a lot of people telling you to use edit summaries. It only adds a few seconds more, and it saves on a lot of bad will. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a line. Stephen! ^Coming... 12:06, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Sorry for not including an edit summary - I made the edit on the grounds that Ten 17 (now Heart) was being merged with two other Heart stations (in Chelmsford & Southend and Colchester). Rather than there being a separate 'Heart Harlow' (apart from some advertising), there is now just the one station for Essex ('Heart Essex'), hence the edit. Apologies for any confusion. Hughpugh 13:54, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

I moved your message here to keep the conversation in one place. If Heart Harlow is no longer a station, you may wish to have a look at the article I originally added to the list of Heart stations, and make appropriate changes. Stephen! ^Coming... 14:35, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITV News: Reply

I have added a template for semi-protection for both ITV News at 5:30 and ITV News at 1:30 articles in the discussion section. I hope this may help. This is Drew (talk) 12:11, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And this failed. This is Drew (talk) 19:02, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Craig Miller

The article Craig Miller has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page without a primary blue-linked article to direct things to, of the two primary "try this articles", one has been deleted at AfD, one has never been written.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. j⚛e decker ^talk 17:59, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:02, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Susan Nicholson

The article Susan Nicholson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long time unreferenced WP:BLP fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pburka (talk) 16:56, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lynne Rankin

The article Lynne Rankin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:N Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which evidence the notability of this journalist under the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe decker ^{talk to me} 17:10, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anne Smith (journalist)

The article Anne Smith (journalist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The only sources I could find for her were from a PR firm (and thus not independent) and here about her being a breast cancer survivor, which has nothing to do with her journalism career. There seems to be no notable coverage of this individual, thereby failing WP:N and warranting deletion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zoeydahling (talk) 04:27, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Louise Cowie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louise Cowie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Cowie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Whpq (talk) 18:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

how can I contact you re Jo Russell

you appear to be undoing my edits when I REPRESENT HER AND THEREFORE KNOW MORE ABOUT WHAT SHE IS DOING AND HAS DONE THAT YOU - I have lodged this as a dispute as you appear to not be contactable and are now threatening my to take away my editing rights. Please lets sort this. Why are YOU editing her page in the first place. Who are you — Preceding unsigned comment added by FoxyB (talk • contribs)

(talk page stalker)This page is how you contact User:Hughpugh. Your edits represent a severe conflict of interest; see the message I've left on your talk page for further information. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:50, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You deleting everything I do on JO RUSSELL with no explanation

I represent her and cannot see why you have taken it upon yourself to edit her page CONSTANTLY.. you have false information on there and you are DELETING FACTS!!! Please tell me what your problem is with our original page. As I represent her it stands to reason that I actually know what she is doing and has done. It is unfair of you to do this with ZERO explanation EVER and then suddenly threaten me with taking away MY editing rights on a client I represent. Please let me know and if not, let me know how I escalate this complaint higher. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FoxyB (talk • contribs) 16:52, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CBBC Presentation Table

Hi, There is no need to keep removing the CBBC presentation table(s) as it has more detail and information that your alternative, it has been there for longer, it is much clearer. Tompty! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 55tompty55 (talk • contribs) 07:34, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	We may not see eye to eye on some thing, but you have managed to keep a lot of pages up to-date, and manage to rewrite alot new details I try and found. Crazyseiko (talk) 19:11, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit

I Wish to ask if you can do a CopyEdit Entertainment Rights page, I just about finished with the page, which has seen major well Not "clean up" more like a major input for new information and details which seems to have been left out, especial the history of where the company come from., and sources of course.

Cheers

September 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 03:15, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Midlands Today, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BBC Midlands (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited 97.4 Rock FM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your invitation to participate in a Wikimedia-approved survey in online behavior.

Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis [3][4], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.

I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.

Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)

To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=99892475 (HTTPS).

Best Regards, --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 12:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.

UPDATE: This is the second and final notification for participating in this study. Your help is essential for having concrete results and knowledge that we all can share. I would like to thank you for your time and as always for any questions, comments or ideas do not hesitate to contact me. PS: As a thank you for your efforts and participation in Wikipedia Research you will receive a Research Participation Barnstar after the end of the study. --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 19:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. When you recently edited Peter Rowell, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Keswick and Sunderland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Research Participation Barnstar
		For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 13:56, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Andover Sound (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Andover

Newbury Sound (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Andover

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Seven News, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 23:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Kaddy Lee-Preston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadcaster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:08, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Karratha, Western Australia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bunbury

Trent FM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Peak FM

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

BBC Radio Merseyside (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Salford

Bro Radio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Barry

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:13, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scene South East, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coast to Coast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:06, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ten News, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ron Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leighton Jones

The article Leighton Jones has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Elongated shorty (talk) 23:46, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wales Tonight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BBC Radio Merseyside, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Billy Butler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Christa Ackroyd

Please do not re-add unreferenced material about a living person, you appear to have been around long enough to know that. Giant Snowman 09:14, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Christa Ackroyd may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'''Christa Ackroyd''' (born 4 May 1957, [[Eccleshill]]]]<ref>[http://www.bbc.co.uk/looknorthyorkslincs/content/articles/2006/09/27/christa_ackroyd_feature.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:07, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ITV News Meridian may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

be reintroduced, consisting of a ten-minute opt out within the 6pm programme for the South.<ref>[ref>[http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2013/07/23/ofcom-sets-out-licence-terms-for-itv-stv-utv-and-channel-5/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:22, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ITV News Central may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

programme, in addition to separate lunchtime and weekend bulletins for the two sub-regions.<ref>[ref>[http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2013/07/23/ofcom-sets-out-licence-terms-for-itv-stv-utv-and-channel-5/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:29, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ITV West Country may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

during the 6pm programme, in addition to separate weekend bulletins for the two sub-regions.<ref>[ref>[http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2013/07/23/ofcom-sets-out-licence-terms-for-itv-stv-utv-and-channel-5/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:39, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ITV Central may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

London and merged with the [[London News Network]]'s operations to form [[ITV Sport]] Productions). In its home region, Central also provided extensive live coverage of Football League matches

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:13, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tots TV may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

who speaks in basic French (changed to Spanish in US broadcasts and English in French broadcasts)), '''Tom''', a blue haired boy with glasses, and '''Tiny''', the youngest Tot, who is smaller than

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:10, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ITV Border, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Selkirk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Southern Cross News, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITQ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Free Radio Shropshire & Black Country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oldbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:13, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Midlands Today, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BBC Midlands (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not Vandalism

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Heart (radio network), are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Please be extra careful if you choose to accuse a specific editor (e.g. me) of vandalism in your edit summary, as these are a permanent record. Nobody likes being accused of something they haven't done! --DrFrench (talk • contribs) 14:15, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ITV Tyne Tees & Border, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freeview (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Continuity announcers in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sharon Donaldson

The article Sharon Donaldson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no notability, two dead links and a twitter account as refs, no coverage in RS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kraxler (talk) 17:48, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Real Radio/Heart merger

Hi Hughpugh, If Heart Scotland is to merge into Real Radio Scotland, then would it still be possilble to move the article back on May 6th? For example like this: (Specialdude57 moved page Real Radio Scotland to Heart Scotland (station rebrand))Specialdude57 (talk) 19:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plus I will not be able to do that myself yet because I need to edit 5 more times.Specialdude57 (talk) 19:18, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Real Radio Scotland/Heart merger

Hang on a minute, if Real Radio is to be rebrand as Heart Scotland in May, then should that be Real Radio Scotland to merged into Heart Scotland rather than the other way round? On the 6th of May you'll want to keep Heart Scotland, with Real to become as a redirect. You may want have look at it again and see what you did. I haven't changed it, I just you to see what I mean? Because the Real Radio Wales into Heart South Wales you have appeared to have done correctly. You do want the article name on 6 of May to appear as Heart Scotland don't you, and not Real?

Real Radio Scotland/Heart merger

Hang on a minute, if Real Radio is to be rebrand as Heart Scotland in May, then should that be Real Radio Scotland to merged into Heart Scotland rather than the other way round? On the 6th of May you'll want to keep Heart Scotland, with Real to become as a redirect. You may want have look at it again and see what you did. I haven't changed it, I just you to see what I mean? Because the Real Radio Wales into Heart South Wales you have appeared to have done correctly. You do want the article name on 6 of May to appear as Heart Scotland don't you, and not Real?Specialdude57 (talk) 05:57, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Real Radio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Original 106 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New pages

Thank you for your comments, just to point out I've only created TWO new pages, Heart Scotland and Capital north Wales. This goes back to my main point nearly all the pages are in an utter mess, which information placed over a few pages. Also when it comes to the new heart north Wales it going also get rather confusing. Im not sure who has created the other new pages but there were not me. Hopeful this rebrand will finally resolve these pages . --Crazyseiko (talk) 22:19, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reporting Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holyrood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nine News may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

hour-long 6:00pm state bulletin, produced by Nine's owned-and-operated stations in [[TCN9|Sydney]]), [[GTV9|Melbourne]], [[QTQ9|Brisbane]], [[NTD|Darwin]], [[NWS9|Adelaide]] and [[STW9|Perth]].<ref

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:53, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited STV Glasgow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central FM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for LBC 97.3

An article that you have been involved in editing, LBC 97.3, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Khairul Islam 00:54, 3 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khairul Islam (talk • contribs)

Nomination of The Real MacKay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Real MacKay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Real MacKay (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:49, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Diana Speed

The article Diana Speed has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable continuity announcer - fails WP:BIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ukexpat (talk) 19:04, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Bennett (announcer)

The article David Bennett (announcer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable TV announcer, fails WP:BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ukexpat (talk) 19:09, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Heart (radio network) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[[Jason King (radio)|Jason King)]] (''Heart Breakfast'' Saturday)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:05, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to South East Today may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[[Georgina Burnett]] ([[Freelancer|freelance]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ten Eyewitness News may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[File:Ch10 Cameraman filming Vic Lorusso, Sydney, NSW, jjron, 01.12.2010.jpg|thumb|[[Network Ten]] [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:10, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to BBC Radio Humberside may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* Liz Meech (later Education Correspondent, [[BBC Look North]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:42, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

As per WP:SIGLINK could you add a link to your signature. Thanks. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 03:43, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Becky Hunter

The article Becky Hunter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 16:42, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alan Saunby

The article Alan Saunby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:10, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Downtown Radio may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{col-end]}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to BBC Radio Lancashire may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*John Clayton (''F.N.A.T''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:25, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bauer City 1 (radio network), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TFM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Clyde 1

added a link pointing to Newcastle

Forth 1

added a link pointing to Newcastle

Metro Radio

added a link pointing to TFM

Moray Firth Radio

added a link pointing to Newcastle

Northsound 1

added a link pointing to Newcastle

Radio Borders

added a link pointing to Newcastle

Tay FM

added a link pointing to Newcastle

West FM

added a link pointing to Newcastle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juice FM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital FM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heart Cheshire and North East Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shotton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kelly (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page News at Ten. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ITV Central may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

demolished during the spring of 2015 to make way for the new 'Arena Central' development.">{{cite web|last=Buxton|first=Roddy|title=A trip to Broad Street|url=http://www.transdiffusion.org/
*''[[The Moomins (TV series)|The Moomins]]'' (1983–85, co-produced with [[Filmfair]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:25, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ruth Wignall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadcaster. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GTFM for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GTFM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GTFM until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010^Talk 21:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Point FM for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Point FM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Point FM until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010^Talk 13:26, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clyde 1

Hi Hughpugh. I was not advertising only informing people of Clyde 1's schedule.

Proposed deletion of Weather Blether

The article Weather Blether has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability: significant RS coverage cannot be found. An article on an unremarkable local blog cited to primary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:42, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Northern Exposure (video blog) episodes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Northern Exposure (video blog) episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Northern Exposure (video blog) episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:59, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 17 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the UTV (TV channel) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:43, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hughpugh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 28 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the BBC Radio Cymru page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Century Radio, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cork and Declan Meehan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hughpugh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pat Hutchins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Cunliffe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Capital (radio network), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Global (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alison MacGregor

The article Alison MacGregor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A passing mention in an article about household cleaning is not sufficient to demonstrate biographical notability; nor are searches finding better.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 14:42, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hughpugh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jim Symon

The article Jim Symon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Snowycats (talk) 18:55, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alma Cadzow for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alma Cadzow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alma Cadzow until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 22:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jill Mowat

The article Jill Mowat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Jill Mowat – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability. Please see the plain-language summary of our notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bernanke's Crossbow (talk) 06:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of North Wales TV for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North Wales TV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Wales TV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sionk (talk) 13:41, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Midlands Today for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midlands Today, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midlands Today until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]