Jump to content

User talk:Hodgdon's secret garden/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

Main Page appearance

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of the article List of sects in the Latter Day Saint movement know that it will be appearing as the main page featured list on February 7, 2014. You can view the TFL blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured list/February 7, 2014. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured list directors Giants2008 (talk · contribs), Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) or SchroCat (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. Thanks! © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 02:43, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Brigham Young, prophet of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

The sects in the Latter Day Saint movement are sometimes collectively referred to as Mormonism, although some sects are opposed to the use of this term, as they consider it to be derogatory. Though a few minuscule factions broke with Joseph Smith, Jr.'s Latter Day Saint movement during his lifetime, he retained the allegiance of the vast majority of Latter Day Saints until his murder in June 1844. Following Smith's death, his movement experienced a profound leadership crisis which led to a schism within his church. The largest group, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, followed Brigham Young (pictured), settling in what would become the Utah Territory. The second-largest faction, the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, coalesced around Joseph Smith III, eldest son of Joseph Smith, Jr. Other would-be leaders included the senior surviving member of the First Presidency, Sidney Rigdon; the newly-baptized James Strang from Wisconsin; and Alpheus Cutler, one of the Council of Fifty. Each of these men still retains a following.

Main Page appearance: Mitt Romney

This is a note to let the main editors of Mitt Romney know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on March 12, 2014. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask Bencherlite (talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 12, 2014. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Mitt Romney in 2013

Mitt Romney (born 1947) is an American businessman who was Governor of Massachusetts from 2003 to 2007 and the Republican nominee for President of the United States in the 2012 election. He was raised in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, by his parents Lenore and George Romney, and spent two years in France as a Mormon missionary. He married Ann Davies in 1969, with whom he has had five children. After studying at Brigham Young and Harvard universities, he joined the management consultancy Bain & Company before co-founding the spin-off investment firm Bain Capital. He unsuccessfully ran as the Republican candidate in the 1994 Massachusetts election for Senate against Ted Kennedy. He relaunched his political career after successfully running the Salt Lake Organizing Committee for the 2002 Winter Olympics. Elected Governor of Massachusetts in 2002, he helped enact state health care reform legislation, the first of its kind in America. Romney won the 2012 Republican presidential nomination, becoming the first Mormon to be a major party presidential nominee, but lost the election to Barack Obama by a 332–206 electoral college margin and by 51–47 percent in the popular vote. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

I need some help. User:Beyond My Ken has just reverted 30 insistence where pages have incorrectly used the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints when "THE" is per MOS:LDS, "The" is part of the Name and capitalized. I could uses some help convincing him he is wrong.ARTEST4ECHO (talk)

Don't bother. The discussion on my talk page is closed. BMK (talk) 14:41, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
The discussion is now here--ARTEST4ECHO (talk) 14:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

G word listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect G word. Since you had some involvement with the G word redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 15:21, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

MediaMatter.com listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MediaMatter.com. Since you had some involvement with the MediaMatter.com redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Senator2029 “Talk” 10:38, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Dialogue article name

Hi there. I just posted some thoughts about the name for the article about Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought over at Talk:Dialogue (journal)#Article name. I thought I'd let you know in case you have any comments or concerns. Thanks! ——Rich jj (talk) 17:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EndersGamescreenshot.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EndersGamescreenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:25, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 17 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 16 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Template talk:LDS sects/Mormon fundamentalist

I've been thinking of doing a modification of Template talk:LDS sects/Mormon fundamentalis. However it being such a big change, I though I would seek some input before making the change. If your interested in commenting, I would love to here from you at Template_talk:LDS_sects/Mormon_fundamentalist#Unweildy--- ARTEST4ECHO(Talk) 21:52, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 3 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

-word listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect -word. Since you had some involvement with the -word redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 14:20, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

E word listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect E word. Since you had some involvement with the E word redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:46, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Q word listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Q word. Since you had some involvement with the Q word redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 19:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

T word listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect T word. Since you had some involvement with the T word redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 19:20, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

X word listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect X word. Since you had some involvement with the X word redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 19:26, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Z word listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Z word. Since you had some involvement with the Z word redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 19:39, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of E word

Hello Hodgdon's secret garden,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged E word for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Josu4u (talk) 19:51, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Z word

Hello Hodgdon's secret garden,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Z word for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Josu4u (talk) 19:52, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

M word listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect M word. Since you had some involvement with the M word redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 11:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Facebook.com/pages/Facebook.com/pages/Meridian-Magazine-Expand/836728753016501?sk listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Facebook.com/pages/Facebook.com/pages/Meridian-Magazine-Expand/836728753016501?sk. Since you had some involvement with the Facebook.com/pages/Facebook.com/pages/Meridian-Magazine-Expand/836728753016501?sk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 02:37, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Le Baron group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chihuahua. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited LeBaron order, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Los Molinos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited LeBaron order, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chihuahua, Mexico. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Fourth Hour with Stu and Pat listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fourth Hour with Stu and Pat. Since you had some involvement with the Fourth Hour with Stu and Pat redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 15:39, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Markdown.com listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Markdown.com. Since you had some involvement with the Markdown.com redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 15:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Insider Extreme listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Insider Extreme. Since you had some involvement with the Insider Extreme redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 15:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hodgdon's secret garden. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Benjamin E. Park

Hello Hodgdon's secret garden,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Benjamin E. Park for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sadads (talk) 16:13, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Frances G. Wickes) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Frances G. Wickes, Hodgdon's secret garden!

Wikipedia editor Robvanvee just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment on Robvanvee's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Robvanvee 16:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Benjamin E. Park

The article Benjamin E. Park has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Assistant professor with h-index of 3 fails WP:PROF.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 03:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Opioid and Drug Abuse Commission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Price. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Notability

Hi. I see that you have a differing interpretation of our notability criteria. I don't think it helps the wiki for you to create articles that will be deleted because it's more clean-up work for the community. Please re-read our criteria and think more carefully about the subjects upon which you want to write. I know how much fun it is to create a new entry but it's all for naught if we have to take time to reverse all your editing. I recommend, instead, that you work on improving existing entries. Wikipedia looks far batter with more FAs and GAs than it does marginal stubs. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Be advised, re-creating an article about Benjamin Park is prohibited by WP:G4 unless the new version is substantially different than the old one. This returns to my above comment that it makes far more sense to work smarter than harder. Wikipedia might benefit from an article about Park in 100 years time once there has been more study on the subject. Being a partisan about it will only cloud your judgement and ruin your editing experience. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
About Park: Looking at the AfD, I consider the evidence borderline. By our usual interpretation, he would meet WP:PROF if he were editor in chief of Mormon Studies Review, orDialogue, not "associate editor. Using h index in the humanities is of course utterly absurd, but I have never been able to convince the people who keep using it. The question of whether his reviews are sufficiently influential can not be answered by cherry-picked quotations. My advice is to wait till he publishes a widely reviewed book--it's the only thing that really countsi n the humanities.
You may disagree, but I have consistently argued that for notability as an academic, only WP:PROF applies. The provision for the GNG is for notability in other aspects of a career. But my preference is to use the GNG as little as possible. I only use it in arguments because other people rely on it, and an argument is meant to convince other people. DGG ( talk ) 04:35, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

United Express Flight 3411 incident

Can I ask why you moved this page to United Express Flight 3411 scandal without prior discussion on the article talk page? It had already been moved a number of times and consensus had coalesced around appending "incident" as a suffix to the airline name and flight number. Someone has un-done the move - please don't do it again without prior discussion on talk. inkstalk 23:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nathan Oman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anti-Muslim. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC).


Julie M. Smith

I would support sleeping an article on Julie M. Smith if created. I am not sure I feel up to spending the energy to create one. Another person who clearly needs an article is Grant Hardy. The article on him was deleted about 5 years ago. Since then his "undersranding the Book of Mormon" has had mutiole articles approaching it in multiple ways in one edition of the Maxwell Institute Book of Mormon journal. MichaelvamAustin in the 2015 edition of the Mormon Studies Review in his article "The Beief History and Perpetually Exciting Future of Mormon Literary Studies" does mention hardy in one paragraph as well as Paul C. Gutjahr. However he still gives more space to [[[Terryl Givens]] work. I have to admit right now I am more focused on creating an aeticle on Taniela B. Wokolo the new general authority from Fiji but and waiting until I have the time to coalesce all the sources on him.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:51, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarah Ruben

Hello Hodgdon's secret garden,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sarah Ruben for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Reb1981 (talk) 00:27, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Sarah Ruben, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Reb1981 (talk) 01:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

I decided to take back my recommendation of speedy deletion after reviewing sources and realized the name was misspelled which was why I had an issue finding sources. I see you noticed that as well. Reb1981 (talk) 01:30, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Jessie L. Embry listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jessie L. Embry. Since you had some involvement with the Jessie L. Embry redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:49, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (The Deuce) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Deuce, Hodgdon's secret garden!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this useful disambiguation page!

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 19:18, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew Brunson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evangelical Presbyterian Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of U.S. mission

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, U.S. mission, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 01:49, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew Brunson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American embassy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hodgdon's secret garden. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doctrine of Christ fellowships (Latter Day Saint), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apostolic succession (LDS Church), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States Senate election in Utah, 2018, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Assault weapons ban and George Romney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Benjamin E. Park for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benjamin E. Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin E. Park (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:44, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

I warned you almost a year ago about this behavior. Wikipedia needs constructive, good-faith contributors. Re-creating deleted articles because you like to push a narrative is not helpful. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:48, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for this, too. I'm hoping they can tell me if I should take you to WP:AN about this. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Mandatory warnings, sorry. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:17, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Dana Loesch. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:33, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Dana Loesch. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 22:21, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Dana Loesch shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 22:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi. I know tensions are high, but I hope we can continue to work together productively. Are you familiar with how the BRD process works? One editor makes a bold edit, the other editor reverts, and then both editors discuss--without further reverts, excepting clear BLP violations (and vandalism etc.). What I've been seeing from you is that although you're willing to discuss, which is certainly appreciated, you are constantly re-reverting, as you did mostly recently today. This is explicitly not following BRD. ("If your bold edit was reverted, then do not re-revert to your version. ... If you re-revert, then you are no longer following BRD.") Your edit summary suggested that you misunderstood WP:BOLD. WP:BOLD is about the first edit, not about subsequent reverts. Can you please respect BRD from now on? It would go a long way toward reducing the tension. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:25, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

You did it again. stop Please stop. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 02:08, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

The main Picture of Inter-Korean Peace House

Hi Hodgdon's secret garden Thank you for your valuable contribution on Inter-Korean Peace House.
I tried to make the picture about 1.5 times bigger than now as it would be easier to see the building. (example: the same size of the Map of the Panmunjom Truce Village on the bottom) However, it was unavailable for my correction. Would you please be able to upscale the picture if possible?Goodtiming8871 (talk) 06:19, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your prompt response via mobile phone. Please take time and try it when you are an entirely convenient time and in front of the computer. I think that it might be the historical place in the world, and we could be one of the parts of contributions. :) Goodtiming8871 (talk) 06:32, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

My edit comment

Thank you for your work on Great Mills High School, and your many other contributions to Wikipedia. I apologize for my edit comment, "get the facts straight." The facts were correct; it was only a matter of punctuation and my quick reading, where I initially read, "one shot fired by Gaskill and a 14-year old male student," to mean the 14-year old was also shooting. Thanks again for your work on this article. Comfr (talk) 17:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Good job expanding Joseph Bishop. Very unexpected when I reviewed that page. Legacypac (talk) 05:59, 22 March 2018 (UTC)


Ok you seem to be a little obsessed with tweaking that section. The allegation section is too big compared to his life history. I suggest moving on to another topic. Legacypac (talk) 20:14, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Joseph Bishop sexual abuse allegations

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Joseph Bishop sexual abuse allegations. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Joseph Bishop. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Joseph Bishop. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Dorsetonian (talk) 20:41, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of 2018 allegations of 1984 LDS missionary-trainees' abuse for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 allegations of 1984 LDS missionary-trainees' abuse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 allegations of 1984 LDS missionary-trainees' abuse until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dorsetonian (talk) 20:30, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

2018 allegations of 1984 LDS missionary-trainees' abuse listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2018 allegations of 1984 LDS missionary-trainees' abuse. Since you had some involvement with the 2018 allegations of 1984 LDS missionary-trainees' abuse redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Dorsetonian (talk) 07:12, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Article moves

You need to stop moving articles in the case of titles that are likely to be contentious/disputed. WP:Requested moves is clear about this. That is the proper channel to go through. In addition to your Mormon sex in chains case move, I will be reverting you on other moves if I see an issue or possible issue. We go by what WP:Article titles states. If you continue to move articles in this way, this is something I will address at WP:ANI. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:08, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joseph Bishop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gülen movement, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Master and Ottoman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

biography of Brigham Young by Grow

I was wondering what your sourcing for Grow (I assume Matthew J. Grow, also known as Matthew Grow and Matt Grow) working on a biography of Brigham Young. I do not doubt that such as work is in progress (although considering that Ron Walker never produced a biography of Heber J. Grant, his work culminating in a BYU studies issue that was his work on Grant, even though back in 1985 the book Supporting Saints in its lead explaining Ronald W. Walker and his work his article on Rachel R. Grant (written for that volume, but first published in 1982 in Dialogue, an article related to Grant was published in the Ensign authored by Walker at least as early as 1979), in that intro it says "For several years he has been at work on a major biographical study of Heber J. Grant." Walker lived until 2016, but nothing that quite lived up to that billing was ever produced. So like Patrick Q. Mason's advertised biography of Ezra Taft Benson, and a true scholarly biography of David O. McKay (Prince's work still amounts to an at times overly focused set of essays, and they are basically about his life, Mary Jane Woodger has produced some significant scholarship on his education thought, and her biography of David O. McKay is a good writing especially for insight into his personal life, but not as comprehensive or scholarly as one would hope), I am very excited about the prospect of Grow producing a biography of Brigham Young, but not holding my breath either. Quality biogrpahies especially of figures who were so impactful on so much as was Brigham Young take a very long time. Both in the research phase and in the phase between first submission to a publisher, even submission of the final text and publication.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Degrees of glory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Clayton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Grant Hardy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Grant Hardy. Thanks! startTerminal {haha wow talk page | startTerminal on irc} 00:10, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Grant Hardy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Grant Hardy. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Grant Hardy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Grant Hardy. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 04:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

notability

Brigham D. Madsen seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:PROF. Please explain. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:15, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Brigham D. Madsen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brigham D. Madsen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigham D. Madsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:26, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Orson Scott Card's views on homosexuality listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orson Scott Card's views on homosexuality. Since you had some involvement with the Orson Scott Card's views on homosexuality redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. StAnselm (talk) 22:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Inter-Korean House of freedom

Please check the page : user:Goodtiming8871/Inter-Korean House of freedom if possible. I think that it is beneficial page on Wikipedia before Trump-Kim summit, but I am currently occupied with other tasks. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 12:16, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 North Korea–United States summit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunan Airport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Loesch image

Dude - you can't change the choices and parameters as drastically as you did after people have already made their choices. I have reverted your changes.[1] You may add other images to the choices, but when you do, make sure they correspond with how people have already !voted. You will obviously want to re-indicate your support for whatever image since that was also reverted. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 22:11, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Seriously - please stop with your changes at the Loesch talk page. Add photos if you want for more choices, but you have to make them correspond with the responses that are already present. Please fix it - what you've done is complicate and confuse things. In short, your changes are disruptive. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 22:29, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Trevor Engelson, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Natureium (talk) 21:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Mos:lds listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mos:lds. Since you had some involvement with the Mos:lds redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 00:35, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:K O Paper Products.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:K O Paper Products.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Peace Treaty on Korean Peninsula

Thank you for your previous kind improvement about Peace House. I created another article: Draft:Peace Treaty on Korean Peninsula. Please review the article and let me know whether there is any improvement of the article contents or reference if possible. 05:21, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

deepfake?

Please fix the inaccuracy you inserted here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jim_Acosta&diff=prev&oldid=867966686 Nobody alleged *this* video is a deepfake (until you did). That forbes article compares it to one, but says it obviously isn't one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:5A8:0:1:0:0:0:40B (talk) 13:07, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hodgdon's secret garden. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Mormonism and other faiths listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mormonism and other faiths. Since you had some involvement with the Mormonism and other faiths redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:21, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Retail politics listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Retail politics. Since you had some involvement with the Retail politics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 21:55, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blaze Media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CRTV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Fethullah Gülen

Thank you for helping to improve Fethullah Gülen, it definitely needs some work. However I noted that you used 4 tildes "~" in your recent edit to the article. Please only sign talk pages, tildes and signatures do not belong in Articles. Additionally, when adding references, please try to add full references when possible, especially if you have a book: add the ISBN, page number, etc. or use the Visual Editor's automatic citation tool to help make better citations. Thanks, and happy editing! Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 22:30, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Journal of The Book of Book of Mormon and Other Restoration Scripture listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Journal of The Book of Book of Mormon and Other Restoration Scripture. Since you had some involvement with the Journal of The Book of Book of Mormon and Other Restoration Scripture redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ~ GB fan 18:24, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:FGulenEditorialUse.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:FGulenEditorialUse.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:00, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FGulenEditorialUse.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FGulenEditorialUse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clarice E. Phelps has been accepted

Clarice E. Phelps, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 05:54, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Nuriye Akman

Seems to have a couple of dead links, reference 5, and the official website. I looked around a bit, and this seems to be a nice, long article, but I don't speak Turkish. --GRuban (talk) 22:39, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

Information icon Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Clarice_E._Phelps. A repetition will lead to revocation of your editing privileges. ∯WBGconverse 14:49, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Rama Arbitration Case

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rama. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rama/Evidence. Please add your evidence by May 10, 2019, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rama/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, -- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Previous listing as a party

My apologies for the above section stating that you are a party. You are not, I made a mistake with the template. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:51, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Keepapitchinin

Hello, Hodgdon's secret garden,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Crystallizedcarbon and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Keepapitchinin for deletion, because it seems to be an article that has been already decided by a consensus decision to be unsuitable for inclusion.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Crystallizedcarbon}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:51, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Bare URLs

Hey, I just wanted to let you know there's a tool here: [2] that fixes bare URLs (somewhat) automatically. It works pretty well for the most part, though some sites (like the New York Times) might require some manual tweaking. David O. Johnson (talk) 23:23, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

"K word" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect K word. Since you had some involvement with the K word redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Impeached?

Be careful on that page, there is a small group of editors weaponizing policy arguments to drown out and oppose the numerous requests to reword the article so it reflects both the "impeached" and "not technically impeached" views in a NPOV manner. They tried taking me to admin and calling me disruptive, but I called their bluff by highlighting the hypocrisy in their arguments. They were fully engaged in the debate, using media headlines to claim the "impeached" view is official and any other view is "fringe"...except they ignore the other policy that media headlines are not reliable sources. If you bring that up, they'll lose their minds.

I support your proposal of "WP ought give more weight to both interpretations than currently". While FL or OK law doesn't have any bearing on federal procedure, those judicial rulings and historical precedent (House of Commons procedure) cited by Feldman do have bearing on defining the procedural steps of an impeachment process, because the Constitution does not do that. A simple search will reveal dozens of reliable source articles which cite the "not technically impeached" viewpoint and many more that support it.

Since reliable sources mean nothing to them, in order to overturn that gang of biased editors, you'll probably need to rally support from others to out number them. If you can get the several editors who have already voiced this concern on-board, as well as some others, let me know and I will join in supporting your rfc. Best wishes!Rotaryenginepete (talk) 04:21, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Lol. David O. Johnson (talk) 05:17, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bob White (business executive)

Notice

The article Bob White (business executive) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing WP:GNG/WP:NBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:38, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

"Lazy S" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lazy S. Since you had some involvement with the Lazy S redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. D.Lazard (talk) 11:29, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

"Z word" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Z word. Since you had some involvement with the Z word redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:50, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

American politics discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:54, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hodgdon%27s_secret_garden/Archive_2&oldid=1141531558"