Jump to content

User talk:Hodgdon's secret garden/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

*

Welcome to my watchlist ;) Jack Merridew 13:06, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lolicon, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 19:12, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Voting on Al Gore Talk Page

Hi Frances, Just wondering if you'd like to vote on the Al Gore issue. I have set up a little voting section here, and I am sending this note to everyone who participated on the talk page. --Regards KeptSouth (talk) 00:07, 5 July 2010 (UTC)


Thanks

Thank you, Frances.

--Zutam (talk) 23:06, 5 July 2010 (UTC)


Truth is I am not used to my work being summarily thrown out... it only happened to me once before, in first grade. I was on my way out, but because of your message...

On the other hand, I enjoy a challenge and a dialog with wise people, this attracts me.

--Zutam (talk) 14:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)


Other accounts

Your activities demonstrate knowledge of wikipedia far in advance of what a brand new editor would know. Please disclose any other accounts you have edited with and whether you have been subject to any restrictions or blocks in another account. If you would prefer to do this privately you can email me. Please note that it is not permitted to use a separate account to edit policy areas. Spartaz Humbug! 17:58, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Be careful Spartaz; calling someone a sockpuppet (as you did here) without having solid evidence could be considered a personal attack. If you have hard evidence that this person is a sockpuppet of a particular editor (rather than just "somebody") you can start a formal Sockpuppet Investigation. Otherwise, it's probably best just to not say anything. Saying, in effect, "I know you're a sock, but I don't know who you're a sock of" is generally frowned upon in Wikipedia, in my experience. Stonemason89 (talk) 20:48, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
I already finished this conversation and FHBTSG has provided an explanation. I'm happy, they are happy and I deleted the spi that someone started. So what is the point of this? Spartaz Humbug! 20:55, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Oh sorry; I didn't see the rest of the conversation (I didn't realize the conversation had ended, actually). Was it continued on some other page? I was merely perusing this talk page since FHBTSG had recently edited Beck University, which I started, so I wanted to see if he/she was a new user. That's when I saw your message, which struck me as a little odd. However, if the matter has been cleared as you say it has, I don't think we need to discuss it any further. Stonemason89 (talk) 20:57, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Username

Have you considered changing your username to something shorter? Your signature, when you make comments in various talk pages, is so long that it is rather distracting. Also, if someone happens to need to revert your edit or to revert back to your edit, your username fills out a large portion of the edit summary box. Nsk92 (talk) 20:34, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

At least edit your User page, that might help if it blended into the woodwork. Mlpearc powwow 21:16, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you :-) P.S. it's not that bad, lol. Mlpearc powwow 21:23, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not try to circumvent WP:BLP

An talkpage is not the place for your recent edits or link. Please do not introduce such items in a WP:BLP article. ----moreno oso (talk) 01:54, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

I am just curious why you changed the caption on this image from "1980-2010" to "1980 on"? Deseret Book has clearly changed their logo based on their website, catalog, and flagship store in Salt Lake City. I would think the logo's official life is over this year, not in the indefinite future when the last item with that logo is available. Based on the mindset of beginning of life "on," every logo would be some date "on." I'd appreciate your thoughts. —GreenwoodKL (t, c) 22:11, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Category Letter-word combinations as see also

It's one thing to create the category, it's another thing to add it as a "see also" to every article in the category. The category is insufficiently related to the subjects to be in see also. Please stop adding it to articles and remove it from the ones you've already put it on. Yworo (talk) 14:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disambiguation#New_templates_and_categories. Thanks. -- Quiddity (talk) 20:38, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Entries on disambiguation pages

When adding entries to a disambiguation page, please make sure the entry contains at least on blue-link. For example, your edits on Knowlton] or Moyer added a person's name but did not include a link. Cheers. older ≠ wiser 19:10, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Actually, looking into this a bit further, I see you had been creating pages for the persons' names as redirects to the disambiguation pages. That is really not appropriate. The disambiguation page should link a reader to an existing article with further information about the subject. That is, the disambiguation page should not be the only information about the topic in Wikipedia. older ≠ wiser 19:19, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Hosie Miller

I have nominated Hosie Miller, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hosie Miller. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SnottyWong gossip 19:25, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Restoring Honor rally

A tag has been placed on Restoring Honor rally, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ithizar (talk) 20:32, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Trigger happy mouse finger

Sorry bout that. Thanks for adding the under construction tag so I keep my trigger finger off of it. So much POV pushing on both sides going on there that I got a little too quick on the draw. Millahnna (talk) 08:05, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page a-ha worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. May Cause Dizziness (talk) 00:11, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Restoring Honor rally

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:04, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Just curious

I'm just curious about your recent addition of Category:Mormon studies to List of sects in the Latter Day Saint movement. To me this seems to fit very well and is a logical addition. However I noticed you put the list it the Category then removed it very quickly. I would have left it in, so I’m wondering what you know that I don’t?--ARTEST4ECHO talk 13:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Hodgdon's secret garden. You have new messages at ARTEST4ECHO's talk page.
Message added 18:26, 10 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Speedy deletion nomination of -word

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Gerardw (talk) 02:27, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Inés Sainz for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Inés Sainz, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inés Sainz until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Truthsort (talk) 15:24, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

ANI thread

Please see here. It isn't really about you so much as it is a request for help because of my self-acknowledged lack of tact. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 02:14, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Please reconsider

I dont think its appropriate that you as the major contributor to the article decide to close the afd. [1]. Active Banana ( bananaphone 21:00, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. I posted a request for a third party to review and they agreed with your closure. Active Banana ( bananaphone 21:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanx

Good Work The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 02:33, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Ines Sainz

Thanks for all your hard work in bringing sourced content to the article. Nice job! Active Banana (bananaphone 17:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Request for mediation of Restoring Honor rally

A request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to Restoring Honor rally was recently filed. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is entirely voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to mediation requests and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request welcome at the case talk page.

Thank you, AGK 21:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Will you be responding to the mediation request? AGK 10:16, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Just read your message on my talk page :). Don't worry, mediation can be confusing at times. If you read the initial post, you'll see that it says "Please review the request page"; click the 'request page' link, which takes you to the mediation request. Scroll down to the "Parties' agreement to mediation" section of that page, edit the section, and add # Agree. ~~~~ underneath the other parties' agreements. Then you'll have agreed and you need do nothing more. Hope this helps, AGK 14:18, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
I see you figured it out after my message, so you need do nothing more for now. Thanks, AGK 14:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Request for mediation accepted

The request for mediation concerning Restoring Honor rally, to which you were are a party, has been accepted. Please watchlist the case page (which is where the mediation will take place). For guidance on accepted cases, refer to this resource. A mediator should be assigned to this dispute within two weeks. If you have any queries, please contact a Committee member or the mediation mailing list.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK 19:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Message delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.

Restoring Honor Mediation

Greetings!

I have agreed to mediate the Restoring Honor case. I'm requesting that all parties start with opening statements, instructions are at the top of the page. Thanks for agreeing to go to mediation, I'm hopeful we can get this resolved to the satisfaction of all parties. Don't hesitate to contact me with any questions or issues. --WGFinley (talk) 00:52, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Jon Stewart quote

Hi. I agree that the quote box is a nice touch, however, MOS says to not include the quote marks. —UncleDouggie (talk) 01:29, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Anderson Cooper's t-shirt

The medal actually was presented to a t-shirt. I rather doubt it was really Cooper's, but Colbert acted as if it was, so it's not an in absentia award. Zuckerberg's medal is the only one that wasn't accepted, so far as I recall. —UncleDouggie (talk) 08:18, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Indefinite Block of BS24

BS24 is on indefinite block for abusing multiple accounts. [2] This editor has had many socks and is likely to return under a new account. The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous (talk) 17:49, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Diplomas

Yes, Exeter is 'old school' in some regards. I wasn't in classics so had never heard of this, but am checking with friends. It appears to be correct though. MarmadukePercy (talk) 02:19, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Just checked, and you are indeed correct about the classical diplomas. My error. MarmadukePercy (talk) 02:24, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Mitchell

Thanks for editing that Mitchell article, fixing mistakes etc, Wombat24 (talk) 07:35, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Zuckerberg and philanthropy

My god, Hodgson, a cataclysmic event has occured. I agree with your changes to the article. I just didn't want you to think I always disagree with you. :-) Well done.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:15, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

David Brian Mitchell

Why has the page gone into the Elizabeth Smart kidnapping page? If wikipedia has separate articles on the Lindbergh kidnap and Bruno Hauptmann (the criminal kidnapper) surely the same standard should apply to the Mitchell and the Elizabeth Smart Kidnapping? otherwise you'd also have to join the Bruno bio with the Lindbergh kidnapping. Or should this issue go to moderation? Wombat24 (talk) 01:48, 11 December 2010 (UTC)


I think you are mistaken in your interpretation of wp:ONEVENT, ie "The general rule in many cases is to cover the event, not the person. However, as both the event and the individual's role grow larger, separate articles become justified" Surely now that Mitchell is convicted and covered extensively in the courts and media his role has grown larger and the event certainly has grown larger since 2003. Also as before the Lindburg case established a standard for wikipedia or precedent and it has 3 separate articles, for the crime, for the criminal, and the victim. Plus Ottis and many other criminals have separate articles although they are technically known for only one crime. Plus the bio in the Smart kidnapping article surely makes the article substandard and confusing to follow. What do you think? and maybe its better to get a third person involved to resolve this matter, what do you think? Wombat24 (talk) 03:06, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Re from my page:

Not sure if I follow your thinking here. All I want to see is, like the Lindbergh kidnapping which was the most famous one in the 20th century, this one as probably the most famous in the 21st century will likewise have 3 pages or 3 articles. As long as people who hear about Mitchell can google the name and go to his bio then it should be ok. The stats from yesterday before the verdict show that some 6.1k people read the Mitchell article when most days it was just a few hundred so they were specifically looking for him or an article on him, hence wikipedia is useful to them. But true, that linking only has low numbers going across pages but many will look for the names separately not by links, however the links should still be there as an option I believe. Wombat24 (talk) 08:49, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
on we:otherthingsexistI understand it to be that "When used correctly...comparisons are important as the encyclopedia should be consistent in the content that it provides or excludes" so hence if there are separate articles for the Lindbergh case and the criminal then the same standard should be a go for the smart kidnapping and Mitchell, as I see it Wombat24 (talk) 08:49, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

ps, one thing we do need to work out is how much information on the trials, competency and criminal, stays on the elizabeth smart kidnapping page and how much goes into the bio page for mitchell. Again i'd say the Lindbergh case should be the standard to follow, what do you think? (since very few others are involved in this editing) Wombat24 (talk) 08:57, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Delete page Mitchell

Please don't delete that page. They trial was US vs Mr Mitchell not Miss Smart. And, again, wikipedia is full of articles of single criminal know for one crime or one event but who are covered enough all in the media to justify a bio page, eg, Ottis Tool, Bruno Hauptmann, Curtis Alger and many more.But Mitchell has gone viral, articles on him are in many news media across the world plus the references have article on him only like "the making of Immanuel" and so on. But if you do manage to get this page deleted then you surely must delete the Bruno Hauptmann one too Wombat24 (talk) 09:08, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Maybe we should only be discussing the merge and not delete too, but both tags are up there. Can you please delete one of them, preferably leave it for discussion for a merge since you are arguing that point and not a deletion per say Wombat24 (talk) 10:00, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Jimmy Carter?

Didn't know he had any supporters. I prefer Silent Cal, Spotty Abe, we like Ike, and Washington. Since you believe in revealing political leanings, I'm Classical Liberal with strong beliefs in fiscal responsibility.--AerobicFox (talk) 23:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

I like Carter too, & FDR ;-) Liberal here too, with Pro-Life leanings. DocOfSoc (talk) 04:38, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
I am truly amazed that we have had no edit conflicts today, good teamwork! Does "Hodg" work for you? Better than Whatever or Hog! LOL! Have a great night, day? DocOfSoc (talk) 06:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Hodgdon's secret garden. You have new messages at DocOfSoc's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Would I mind if you post my criminal-crime schemata as a WP essay?

Thanks for the encouragement! I'd rather you didn't post it just yet. I do think it would be valuable (not to blow my own horn too much), but I also think it could be simplified. A good essay needs easily understandable and quotable messages at its core, which I don't think this has just yet.

I totally don't mind you having a hand it it, though (this is a wiki after all). Would you might if I took a short while, posted a draft and then you can critique it and knock it about? --FormerIP (talk) 01:59, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Looking into this, but I must tell you upfront that I prefer to see a separate bio page for any well known criminal. I think the extent and horror of their crimes need to be known by others Wombat24 (talk) 08:39, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

I guess the main thing with "death of..." v "murder of..." v "homicide of..." etc is establishing the legal status of the event, which would just be a matter for talkpage consensus. Why not "Murder of John F Kennedy" I can't say, although I expect it has been debated. For recent events as with Michael Jackson, perhaps the title will change as and when a definitive picture develops. --FormerIP (talk) 01:29, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
I did a userpage draft: User:FormerIP/Crime. Please do take a look and leave comments. Negative ones included. --FormerIP (talk) 16:42, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi again. It was pointed out elsewhere that there is actually a guideline covering some of this. Because of that, I've posted here, just in case you want to look: Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)#Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Perpetrators --FormerIP (talk) 23:48, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. I haven't so much proposed contents from my essay as invited discussion about two things. Firstly, it seems to me that there's a loophole in the current guideline that should be closed, whatever else is or isn't done. It reads as if there is a higher-than-normal WP:N standard for criminals, but when you scratch the surface, the guidance actually allows criminals to be judged by the same notability standards as anyone else.
Secondly, looking at the pattern of how crime-related pages are actually named it seems clear that WP:N isn't the main deciding factor (ie very famous criminals often don't get their own article, whereas marginally notable ones often do). The pattern seems instead to reflect the operation of WP:N working together with WP:CFORK and the latter having the leading role. My proposition would be that that appears to be how the community likes it and it works, so the guidance should be changed to reflect that. --FormerIP (talk) 19:34, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

WP:DERM:MA

We are always looking for more help with the dermatology task force, particularly with the ongoing Bolognia push in which we are making sure Wikipedia has an article on every cutaneous condition. With that being said, I wanted to know if you would be willing to help with the Bolognia push? I can e-mail you the login information if you like? There is still a lot of potential for new articles and redirects. ---My Core Competency is Competency (talk) 23:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Mitchell

C'mon Hodgson?? why are you doing this to the Mitchell article. Now it looks dumb with two biographies, a timeline of the kidnapping that should be in the kidnapping article, things like Ricci's death which wasn't related to Mitchell at all, and PLUS we have been through this argument of joining the kidnapping article with the Mitchell bio article and the result was to keep them separate. So can you, please, fix this up and put the kidnapping things back where they belong? please? We have already settle this argument, or rather an administrator did after we all discussed the matter. Redirecting the kidnapping article to this Mitchell bio one doesn't fool anyone.Wombat24 (talk) 13:08, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Udall, Udall, & Reid

I think the count is three. #17 Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid D-NV, #72 Mark Udall D-CO, & #73 Tom Udall D-NM. But good Riposte. :D Dru of Id (talk) 21:22, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

TLC

Sorry for my overlapping editing on "the chart" at WP:MOSLDS. I just wanted to tell you that TLC members may also be called "fundamentalist Mormons", so we may want to move them up the chart to place them under AUB members. I would probably just mess up the chart if I tried to do it, so I thought I would just let you know here. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:17, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

We are on the same wavelength I think. I was making this edit at approximately the same time you were, and when I saved it I got an edit conflict. Ha! Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:58, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

EXCELLENT JOB!!!

Congrats on the superior job you did in creating and posting the "table of denominations" in the List of denominations in the Latter Day Saint movement article. That was really sharp-looking, informative, and first-class, all the way. It really enhances the article; thanks again for your contribution!! - Ecjmartin (talk) 11:58, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

The Modest Barnstar
Thanks for your recent contributions! -129.49.72.78 (talk) 19:08, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Request for comment

This message is being sent to you because you have previously edited the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) page. There is currently a discussion that may result in a significant change to Wikipedia policy. Specifically, a consensus is being sought on if the policies of WP:UCN and WP:EN continues to be working policies for naming biographical articles, or if such policies have been replaced by a new status quo. This discussion is on-going at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (use English), and your comments would be appreciated. Dolovis (talk) 17:38, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Anthony Weiner, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 23:26, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Visible penis line

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Visible penis line, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Baseball Watcher 23:29, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Hodgdon's secret garden. You have new messages at Baseball Watcher's talk page.
Message added 23:45, 3 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Baseball Watcher 23:45, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

(!)

05:50, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Visible penis line

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Visible penis line, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Epeefleche (talk) 19:22, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Visible penis line for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Visible penis line is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visible penis line until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 19:59, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Moose knuckle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moose knuckle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moose knuckle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:18, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

User:Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden/Visible penis line

 Done Spartaz Humbug! 17:50, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

vandalism?

Could you look at this edit of mine [3] which was reverted as "vandalism" and let me know if you think my sourced additions actual were vandalism? I am coming to dout someone's sanity here. Thanks. μηδείς (talk) 05:46, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Moose Knuckle

You are not going to get anywhere trying to rename cameltoe. I suggest a section under cameltoe with the header moose knuckle which explains that this is an alternative term and that it is used for men as well. Moose knuckle should redirect to that section under cameltoe. μηδείς (talk) 18:52, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

User:DMacks speedily deleted your redirect, even though the vote was tied on the AfD between delete (4) and keep (2) / merge (2). Second, the term existed on the Cameltoe page before Moose knuckle existed. This deletion of the redirect is improper since if anything it should go to wiktionary if not cameltoe. I suggest you appeal this somewhere. I complained to User:DMack myself, maybe he'll say where to take it up. μηδείς (talk) 21:00, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Yes, none of the criteria for deleting a redirect applies, and the fact that an article of the same name had been deleted does not apply. I found a scholar source for moose knuckle = camel toe, see http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1529-8019.2010.01348.x/full will try to get pdf. Please discuss here, will watch here. μηδείς (talk) 02:03, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

You might considering notifying the people who voted on the AfD to comment on the RfD.

I can't get access to the article I posted above through my current institutional affiliation, but may be able to some time in the future from my alma mater. But the snippet does give camel toe and moose knuckle as synonyms for vulva. See the sources I listed at the RfD. μηδείς (talk) 03:29, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for contributions. I would suggest that appropriate link for one row in the table of English translations of Homer is a wikilink rather than a 'see also' or a direction for further info. These are used for an whole relevant articles. Thank you Span (talk) 23:30, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Mark Meckler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Meckler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Meckler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Travis Thurston+ 17:45, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Jenny Beth Martin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jenny Beth Martin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Beth Martin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Travis Thurston+ 17:48, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Mark Meckler

Mark Meckler, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Mark Meckler and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Mark Meckler during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Travis Thurston+ 17:52, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Jenny Beth Martin

Jenny Beth Martin, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Jenny Beth Martin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Jenny Beth Martin during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Travis Thurston+ 17:53, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Jenny Beth Martin listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jenny Beth Martin. Since you had some involvement with the Jenny Beth Martin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). —KuyaBriBriTalk 18:13, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Mark Meckler listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mark Meckler. Since you had some involvement with the Mark Meckler redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). —KuyaBriBriTalk 18:13, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Mormons

Just a note. . . I reverted your changes to the infobox. I don't know if it was intentional, but on my browser the pictures no longer showed up in a 3x3 matrix. Some carried over into a 4th row, so that it was 3 in the top row, then 2, then 1, then 3 again or something like that. -- Adjwilley (talk) 23:48, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pajamasmedia.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pajamasmedia.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

3RR

Please consider yourself notified of having reached the WP:3RR limit on Marco Rubio. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 18:56, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Plyg

The article Plyg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary, ie Wikipedia is not a dictionary or a slang, jargon or usage guide.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 17:27, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Public image of Mitt Romney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Spelling of new user name

Is "Hodgdon's secret garden" OK, when it appears to have been previously based on Frances Hodgson Burnett?--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 06:00, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

FAC withdrawn

I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if featured articles are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the nomination may continue until opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the article is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the Mitt Romney article is of reasonable quality, it is not yet of featured quality, and principal contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the featured article candidate instructions.

Please consult with WastedTimeR and AnythingYouWant before nomming. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:51, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


Mormons Good Article review

The Mormon article is undergoing a GA review, and has been put on hold to deal with concerns. More details at Talk:Mormons/GA1. Your input would be valued. SilkTork ✔Tea time 14:48, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Romney family (US), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jon Huntsman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

George Romney polling table

Hi. What are you trying to accomplish with this change? It looks awful in my browser (Firefox) with ugly word wrap everywhere. Before it looked fine. Wasted Time R (talk) 11:47, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

The wrap problem is fixed now. But why the asterisk on the table title that links to the caption right below it? It's obvious that the caption explains the table, adding this is just unnecessary visual clutter. Wasted Time R (talk) 12:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

George Romney new images licensing

I've doubt my doubts about your licensing for File:George and Lenore Romney in 1962.gif. How do you know this was published without a copyright notice? Maybe it was taken by a professional photographer who was a friend of theirs or who worked for AMC. Photos can be copyrighted without having a "©" visible anywhere.

On the other hand, I think File:Romney in 68.jpg can more safely be licensed as {{PD-textlogo}}, which I've seen done for other campaign logos of this form. I've gone ahead and done that on Commons. Wasted Time R (talk) 13:15, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Seamus (dog)

Thanks you for providing me with these discussion results. When we were having the AfD for Seamus, I became increasingly concerned about merger that editors would never agree how to merge the Seamus article in the Mitt Romney article. I'm not sure if I want another review, but how do you do a merger review?? Is it the same as a deletion review? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwainwr123 (talk • contribs) 04:34, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your input on this issue. I think that the decision to merge may be a case of trying to split the baby, where possibly Merge is seen as a midway point between Keep and Delete. At least in my opinion, there was no consensus on the Seamus AfD page -- 7 votes to Keep, 6 votes to Merge, and 6 votes to Delete, with many in each group having varying opinions on why the article should be kept, merged, or deleted. I think that if we are going to merge the Seamus article into the Mitt Romney article, then we have to include all of the article per WP:AFD/AI. If some of the editors of the Romney article resist that, then I will go to some form of review, since to delete most of the content of the Seamus article would violate the AfD decision.Debbie W. 05:01, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

I added the following to the Biography of Living Persons Noticeboard: "Several weeks ago, an article was created about Seamus, a dog owned by US Presidential candidate Mitt Romney. The dog was part of a controversial 1983 road trip, and has been in the news extensively. The article on Seamus (dog) was proposed for deletion. There was a long and contentious discussion at the Afd for Seamus. The AfD was closed with a decision to merge the Seamus article into the Mitt Romney article, which an editor did. Some of the frequent editors of the Mitt Romney article have deleted the information about Seamus, citing undue weight. This has led to an edit war between those who want to merge the Seamus article into to Mitt Romney article as decided by AfD, and those who don't want to change the Mitt Romney article."Debbie W. 05:29, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Recreation of Seamus article

The Seamus (dog) article has been restored. I copied the following info from the closing admin.Debbie W. 18:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for contacting me. I have reviewed the arguments and closed it as no consensus - although as I am about to leave for work, I cannot move the article back, etc (although I have update the AfD result on the article's talk page). Regards, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 16:08, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pjtv.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pjtv.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:44, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gaskell Romney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Chihuahua, Mexico and Jon Huntsman
Romney family (US) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Chihuahua, Mexico and Galeana
Claims to be the fastest-growing religion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Trinity College
Pratt family (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Huntsman
Republican Party presidential debates, 2012 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Jorge Ramos

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 6 February 2012 (UTC)


George W. Romney photo licensing redux

If this newspaper press photo of him marching is fair use, then every photo ever taken of him is. So why do you think every Wikipedia article avoids these? Look at Nelson Rockefeller or Richard Nixon, just to pick two examples from the same era. Why is every photo there one taken by federal government personnel and thus public domain? Why aren't there a dozen NY Times press photos and AP press photos and so forth in those articles? What is it that you know that every other Wikipedia editor doesn't know? Wasted Time R (talk) 21:10, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Since you are convinced of your case, I request that you add all the photos of George Romney that anybody ever took to the article now. That way we can get the FAC reviewers, which often include fair use experts, to pass judgement on them as a group. In other words, I'm concerned that they are reviewing an article which is going to undergo significant changes and aren't seeing the final product right now. Wasted Time R (talk) 21:32, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

My point is, if every photo ever taken of George Romney can be viewed as fair use, regardless of who took it (which is what you said in this edit summary), then this article needs a wholesale replacement of images. This one could be the new top image. This one would be better of him and Nixon. The one in here with the car would be great for the AMC section. This one would be great for the presidential campaign section. (Marked as "© Bettmann/CORBIS" - who cares! It's fair use.) This one conveys his personality, surely it should be used. This one of him playing golf with a young Mitt gazing in adoration - priceless! So why not go ahead and do this, and then I will alert all the FAC reviewers to rejudge the article given the new images. Wasted Time R (talk) 13:30, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

I get your point about fair use and "historical importance", but that seems to invite many debates. Is a photo of Romney next to one of his cars a transient piece of marketing, or a historically relevant image that represents the start of the long conflict Detroit would have about making smaller, more fuel-efficient cars? Cases can be made both ways. Wasted Time R (talk) 03:00, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Mormons

This user helped promote Mormons to good article status.

Well done. SilkTork ✔Tea time 15:39, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Good Article Barnstar
Thanks Hodgdon's secret garden for helping to promote Mormons to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give someone a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 09:23, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

New Jared Pratt Family Association article

The Hard Worker's Barnstar
Thanks for helping to improve Wikipedia's content in your creation of the new Jared Pratt Family Association article. Your efforts are appreciated! Northamerica1000(talk) 11:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

PROD

Placed on the Pratt family tree list as unsourced. Cheers. Collect (talk) 18:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: Congrats!

Thanks very much for the barnstar!

I was also twelve during the Summer of Love. But our family was on a camping trip to Yellowstone, Glacier, Grand Canyon, etc., so no San Francisco or other big cities for us and no hippies. Most I remember is some older guys at a gas station grumbling about 'those kids today' when they heard "Light My Fire" over a radio. Wasted Time R (talk) 02:03, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Exceptional Newcomer

The Exceptional Newcomer Award
Ok, so this is a little unorthodox for an editor that's been around as long as you have; but the fact that an SPI was opened because of how great you were when you started; belated, but deserved. Achowat (talk) 18:58, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Romney family (US), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scribner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of After-birth abortion

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as After-birth abortion, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

After-birth abortion listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect After-birth abortion. Since you had some involvement with the After-birth abortion redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:George W. Romney - NCAA antisegregation march.jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:George W. Romney - NCAA antisegregation march.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:16, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Ender's Game (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Development (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

TfD

The unsourced OR "family tree" is now listed at [4] Cheers. Collect (talk) 12:49, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

AfD

Jared Pratt Family Association nominated at AfD as being "non-notable" Collect (talk) 13:35, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Collection indices

Hi. Please don't cite to collection indices unless the materials are available online; in that case, cite to the individual materials. See WP:V and WP:SPAM. -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:40, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite

Hello Hodgdon's secret garden. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 23:17, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

I apologize for my previous comments on the Talk:Seamus (dog) page about Jason Sudeikis' Saturday Night Live sketch of Mitt Romney and Seamus. My comments were in response to another editor who had deleted all the external links on the page. After doing some research, I think that the SNL parody is an appropriate external link for the Seamus page. I had never read Wikipedia's 'in popular culture' guidelines before. Additionally, I did a search of political scandals and political gaffes on Wikipedia, and although they are not common, there are some examples of parodies being used as external links. For example, there is an external link for the infamous Howard Dean scream on his Wikipedia page, and in the Dan Quayle Wikipedia article, there is an external link to his foot-in-mouth quotations. I have revised my comments on the Talk:Seamus (dog) page. Debbie W. 15:20, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding abusive editing of Seamus (dog) article by Arzel. The thread is Seamus (dog) article & User:Arzel. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwainwr123 (talk • contribs) 06:00, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Seamus (dog)

I noticed that you have made edits to the Seamus (dog) article. There is a survey to determine whether the Seamus article should be kept, renamed, merged, or deleted. Thank you. HHIAdm (talk) 16:49, 24 April 2012 (UTC) Talk:Seamus (dog)#Consolidated survey

Hey, I saw your name at the Seamus talkpage in earlier threads, but i see that you have not voted in the current (2nd) AfD [5]. Just thought I would mention that here in case you'd like to weigh in there. El duderino (abides) 22:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

I saw your proposal to change the name of Seamus (dog) to Mitt Romney pet dog controversy. We recently had a very similiar proposal, and there was no consensus. Merger proposal (result = no consensus) Debbie W. 02:12, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Media references

I saw that you had added the Daily Caller article to the Talk:Seamus incident page noting a media organization which discussed the Seamus article. I added two more references. Do you know how to combine three press references into one block. I cannot figure out how to do it. Debbie W. 03:56, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for merging these three references, and updating to the article to reflect that the focus is now the incident. I made a couples of modifications to the first infobox. Debbie W. 02:45, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Article about you

There was an article about the Wiki editors who most edited the Mitt Romney article, and it mentions you. Congrats. http://mashable.com/2012/04/20/race-for-white-house-wikipedia/ Debbie W. 01:46, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

thanks very much for note. it says that as well editing santorum and gingrich, i edit georgetown university and.....Adolf Hitler.... which makes me look a bit weird! Tom B (talk) 10:43, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
i wouldn't have thought so Tom B (talk) 10:56, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out that Yahoo article, Hodgdon's. I saw it a few weeks back. Good to know someone outside WP is watching the process. Dezastru (talk) 15:51, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Oops

Sorry about this edit. I must've clicked "revert" by mistake. I had no intention of doing that. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:57, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matthew Grow‎

The article Matthew Grow‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

I can find no notability guideline saying the "publications director" for a church is "notable" by Wikipedia standards. Collect (talk) 20:00, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

"eponymous" usage

One can speak of a suspense film being a "Hitchcock" -- that is "eponymous."

One can speak of an art masterpiece being a "Rembrandt" or a "Picasso."

One does not speak of a biography being a "Parley Pratt."

See [6].

Really. Collect (talk) 22:33, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mercuryradioarts.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Mercuryradioarts.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 06:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I hope that this message finds you well! I noticed your edits to the article Miles Romney, and adding references that he is related to English painter George Romney. There have been a number of edits and counter-edits re Romeny's relationship to English painter George Romney. According to this edit he is not. Until we have something solid, I suggest that we remove it. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 22:01, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Edward Roderick Davies.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Edward Roderick Davies.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:05, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

The Cycle (TV series)

Hey, I'd just like to let you know that I redirected The Cycle (TV series) to The Cycle (TV program) (which was created about 12 hrs earlier) on the account that the latter contains more information and has more citations. If you have any objections, don't hesitate to discuss with me or make changes to the article yourself. — Yk Yk Yk talk ~ contrib 05:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ann Romney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Equestrian
Romney family (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Smith family

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:11, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Campaign material

The poster of George Romney and the button of Lenore Romney seem to fit well in the article about their son. Thanks for uploading those two images. I used to be an active registered Wikipedian but am now retired, though I came back for a few days without signing in. Cheers.198.228.201.155 (talk) 21:22, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Polygamy czar

I would appreciate your input on this talk thread, Talk:Polygamy_czar#Out_of_Date as someone who knows alot about Mormonism and as someone who has edited Mormon fundamentalism.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 18:25, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Non-free images of Mitt Romney

Category:Non-free images of Mitt Romney, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Legoktm (talk) 07:27, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Request to move Adolf Hitler's vegetarianism to Adolf Hitler's diet

Your comments would be appreciated at Talk:Adolf_Hitler's_vegetarianism#Requested_move. Nirvana2013 (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Checkers Nixon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Checkers Nixon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

TheBlaze

I understand the reason behind your addition of the infobox for TheBlaze's website and I saw Huffington Post's infobox. The infobox you placed was on TheBlaze's page previous to my edits. However, TheBlaze has grown into a national cable news network over the past 12 months. It is no longer on the level of Huffington Post. CNN, Fox News, msnbc, etc. do not have separate infoboxes for their websites. Also, the "main" page link you placed redirected right back to the very section under TheBlaze's page. I just wanted to share these thoughts with you and get your feedback. LibertarianGuy (talk) 23:03, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

TheBlaze website

Thank you for creating the new page! If you don't mind, I edited the spelling to reflect the correct company name. I also added a link to the Navbox for TheBlaze company. Are you a Glenn Beck fan? I would LOVE to collaborate with people (are you interested) in all TheBlaze/Mercury Radio Arts pages! It's a daunting task! LibertarianGuy (talk) 23:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mormon Studies Review, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Thankyou for your contibutions

I noticed you created the article on Matthew J. Grow and would like to thank you for that helpful contribution to the project.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:27, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mormon Stories Podcast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Peterson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mormon Times may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • - The Salt Lake Tribune |publisher=Sltrib.com |date=2013-04-30 |accessdate=2013-08-07}}</ref>). The ''Times'' is not an official publication of the LDS Church, and is separate from the weekly

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:21, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interpreter: A Journal of Mormon Scripture until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 15:34, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mormon studies may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Since 2012 the principal academic journal of LDS apologetics has been [[Interpreter (journal)|''Interpreter'' journal; prior to 2012 it had been [[FARMS Review]].<ref>{{
  • Utah Lighthouse Ministry]] — independent, Evangelical Christian "[[anti-Mormon]]" research ministry)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:50, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:IJMS cover.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:IJMS cover.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blurred Lines 20:28, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mormon Stories Podcast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kate Kelly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 18 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hodgdon%27s_secret_garden/Archive_1&oldid=1142537373"