User talk:HiddenFace101

Welcome!

Hello, HiddenFace101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 20:13, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Years?

Thanks for your work on the Vietnam-China relations page, but I was frustrated by the lack of years cited in the history article. Can you add years to events you mention? 216.115.243.121 (talk) 15:58, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Oman women's national football team has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Oman women's national football team. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:28, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oman women's national football team (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Women's football in Oman instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article is entitled Women's football in Oman. This draft contains more information than the article and should be folded into the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oman women's national football team and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oman women's national football team, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HiddenFace101! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Per WP:CRYSTAL, I removed your assertion that Denmark will win Group E. Until an official announcement is made, we do not speculate in articles. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 15:32, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2019 FIFA Women's World Cup

Please remember to write in the appropriate encyclopedic tone rather than trying to imitate reports from sports websites and newspapers. Better examples can be found at GA and FA articles from the Football WikiProject. For now, I will have to remove your summaries, as they are inappropriate and hard to salvage. Sounder Bruce 20:45, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Please note information at WP:MINOR. You are marking tons of edits as minor when they are not minor at all, with many of them being unreferenced facts. Seany91 (talk) 06:38, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HiddenFace101! I also noticed that you recently have marked several edits as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. I wanted to stress and clarify this. Thank you. --Mango från yttre rymden (talk) 19:24, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Earth Derby

The derby although is lopsided in terms of results it is still a derby that was born out due to other reasons such as border disputes. However, the Indian media never called it as "Earth Derby" infact it was the Chinese media first that named it so. Plus, reading the Chinese news cited in the article would give an idea of how the Chinese media portrays India as a growing nation in football and how it can overtake the Chinese football provided constant growth. Indian football is also the third if not thr second most viewed sport in India and it is definitely serious if you look at the recent viewership for Indian football. Some Chinese media outlets had even named it "Dragon vs Elephant" battle, more such Chinese media articles can be added to support the article. Footy2000 (talk) 15:34, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a derby and can't be qualified as a derby. If you insist this as a derby, then you have to state the same between China and Taiwan, even when the latter has never been known as a football nation. Define back the meaning of "derby" in sports before you suggest such a lopsided derby. HiddenFace101 (talk) 15:56, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't England vs Scotland a lopsided derby as well? Or how about Barcelona derby? The China-India match was named as a 'derby' by media outlets, but the article is actually more about a rivalry than a derby similar to other international rivalries mentioned in the list of football rivalries page. Footy2000 (talk) 19:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Define derby in sports.

1. Derby will be applied when two rivalling forces share a similar ambition to win, and none wants the other to be better. This is necessarily true to the case of Boca Juniors-River Plate, or Manchester United-Manchester City. This is also applied to the cases like China-Japan, United States-Mexico. This is also true to the case in basketball or volleyball, though I don't know much about these sports.

2. Derby must at least gain the importance with the two rivals must have at least achievements in the same kind of sports. For example, Thailand and Vietnam share a football (soccer) rivalry because both Thais and Vietnamese want themselves better and they have achieved some international recognition. Japan and South Korea have a strong rivalry because neither accept to be behind.

3. Derby must not be interrupted, which means it has continuously run and run for decades. An example is the El Clasico of Spain as Barcelona and Real Madrid vie for domination since mid-20th century and has never been interrupted.

China and India's rivalry as you consistently insisted qualified for none of them. China has the ambition to win and to dominate in football (though pathetically managed), whereas India has no such an ambition and has a great lack in exploiting football. In term of achievement, India's last achievement has been a century ago and the sport has renegaded to secondary in favour of cricket; China, meanwhile, has more successful achievements and has built up a strong football record. Moreover, while China and India have unstable relations, their football derby doesn't exist because it is interrupted by the decline of India, rise of China, and Indian disinterest in football. HiddenFace101 (talk) 17:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Right, now I understand. Thank you for taking your time and making it clear. The main intention behind writing this article was to showcase the regional economic and cultural powers with a footballing angle and 'Earth Derby' as mentioned by several Chinese media outlets boosted the motive to write this article. I hoped that this would help in raising interest levels across these two countries and in this region in general when it comes to football which is the not the most popular sport, but as you mentioned this article did not follow the abstract criterias and any such articles shall be tagged for deletion.Footy2000 (talk) 19:34, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FIFAWWC results summary tables

Hi! Please stop editing FIFA Women's World Cup results summary tables on individual national teams' articles. Future events that have not taken place yet should not be reflected in these results summaries. Thanks. Seany91 (talk) 19:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus, no one is "editing". The CAF has already announced the group stage phase of the AWCON 2022. Go figure before deleting. HiddenFace101 (talk) 17:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Template:2023 FIFA Women's World Cup qualification – UEFA group tables. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. This warning also includes the edits you made at 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup qualification. Unless you can cite a source stating that FIFA have actually disqualified or expelled Russia, we do not state that in articles. As of today, FIFA have only suspended Russia. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 19:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then the UEFA has already done so.

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/05/02/football/uefa-bans-russian-football-clubs-spt-intl/index.html

The current phase of the Women's World Cup in Europe is run by UEFA, within UEFA's authorities. FIFA works as coordinator, not influencer. HiddenFace101 (talk) 19:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA show 3 UEFA teams qualified, not 4. Only FIFA can expel or disqualify teams from World Cup qualifying. See Talk:2022 FIFA World Cup#Map for a parallel discussion regarding the men's team. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 19:14, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HiddenFace101: I must apologize. I was looking for FIFA to have made the announcement and did not think about UEFA making the announcement. In the future please try to cite a source, even if it is pasting the URL in your edit summary. That will avoid any sort of misunderstanding or jumping to conclusions on the part of other editors. Please consider the warning struck, and you may remove this section from your talk page if you wish.

There is more work to do here than simply moving RUS to the bottom of their group since UEFA also declared all their previous matches null and void. I am working on the templates as we speak. Again, I am very sorry for rushing to the incorrect conclusion. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 19:43, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at North Korea women's national football team, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sounder Bruce 09:22, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of Léa Khelifi

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Léa Khelifi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.29.246.159 (talk) 09:48, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of Jada Mathyssen-Whyman

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jada Mathyssen-Whyman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.29.246.159 (talk) 09:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits to Sino-Vietnamese War

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Sino-Vietnamese War, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

The reasons given for reverting were: "WP:OR - rm original research. cnbc source doesn't even mention Vietnam, let alone ASEAN; lexology source never mentioned Vietnam or ASEAN; CSIS is a thinktank making policy recommendations, and never mentions the Sino-Vietnamese war, they mention Vietnam war (US vs. Vietnam)"

and "WP:NPOV linked articles refer to the [border] conflict as either conflicts or skirmishes. unless sourced, don't use bombastic language, as it violates guidelines." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:4408:44D1:E500:C98:88E0:A1C7:952E (talk) 06:58, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits to Chinese expansionism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chinese expansionism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.

Your edit was erroneously marked "m" (minor) when it was not. You were warned earlier to avoid this but continue to make this error very regularly.

Your edit said that (after the Sino-Vietnamese War 1979), "China and Vietnam later entered a decade of [[Sino-Vietnamese conflicts (1979–1991)|border war]]"

The reason for reverting was: "Those are not minor edits, and the Sino-Vietnamese conflicts (1979–1991) are specifically NOT referred to as a "war". You were already warned about this in the other article, Sino-Vietnamese War." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:4408:44D1:E500:F881:B149:3467:EE9D (talk) 21:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rowspanning

Hi there. Thanks for updating the Zubayr Amiri stats. One nitpick: Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players states that "venues, opponents and competitions should not be rowspanned across different matches. Whereas, they should be rowspanned within the same match." I've reverted that change at Zubayr Amiri. Going forward, please stick to the standard layout and formatting as outlined at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 15:45, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hi HiddenFace101! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 16:41, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:STUBSPACING

Hi there. Thanks for updating Katharina Schiechtl. Please be aware of WP:STUBSPACING which states: "Leave two blank lines between the first stub template and whatever precedes it." I've restored it at Katharina Schiechtl. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:11, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating articles for the 2023 Africa Cup of Nations. When adding categories, please keep WP:STUBSPACING in mind. Robby.is.on (talk) 23:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Switzerland at the FIFA Women's World Cup (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by VersaceSpace was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Switzerland women's national football team. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is adequately covered at the aforementioned article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Switzerland at the FIFA Women's World Cup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Switzerland at the FIFA Women's World Cup, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--VersaceSpace 🌃 17:58, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's so ridiculous when you stated it "does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own". What about the article of Chile at the FIFA Women's World Cup, for example? It does not even have the same level of sufficient content for such an article yet it is still passed out to be a separate article. If you are saying this does not qualify to be an article then why don't remove the articles of Chile or Thailand to make it fair? HiddenFace101 (talk) 18:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I would be okay with those being redirected as well. --VersaceSpace 🌃 18:55, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then I suggest you should not. Look at several articles referring men's teams in men's World Cup, before suggesting change. Your proposal is even less impressive and extremely disrespectful toward women's teams. HiddenFace101 (talk) 05:25, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:List of FIFA Women's World Cup matches

Category:List of FIFA Women's World Cup matches has been nominated for speedy renaming to Category:Lists of FIFA Women's World Cup matches (plural). – Fayenatic London 08:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aaron Wan-Bissaka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reece James. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Arab Cup U-17‎‎

Hi, do you know where we can find the official match reports? Nehme₁₄₉₉ 11:44, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi friends. You can read there:

For myself not an Arabic speaker, I hope someone will take care of such a page, don't neglect it. HiddenFace101 (talk) 11:46, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Revelations Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Torres.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

South American nations at the FIFA Women's World Cup moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, South American nations at the FIFA Women's World Cup, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:56, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oceanian nations at the FIFA Women's World Cup moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Oceanian nations at the FIFA Women's World Cup, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:05, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

North, Central American and Caribbean nations at the FIFA Women's World Cup moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, North, Central American and Caribbean nations at the FIFA Women's World Cup, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Jenya, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Centcom08 (talk) 14:11, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Switzerland at the FIFA Women's World Cup

Hello, HiddenFace101. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Switzerland at the FIFA Women's World Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive edits at 2022 FIFA World Cup Final

The edits you made at the article 2022 FIFA World Cup Final are highly unconstructive and serve no purpose whatsoever informing a reader about the performance of the finalists at a randomly selected world cup, whose choosing was an arbitrary decision by you. Hence, the edit has been reverted hy[Ω]🐐 HyperionLEO (talk). 12:53, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Modric

Hey, he has announced to continue playing for the national team. So please, do not assume anything or so until something is confirmed. Kante4 (talk) 19:04, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Oman women's national football team

Hello, HiddenFace101. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oman women's national football team, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Lajud

Hi, do you have a source for this? Thanks, Nehme₁₄₉₉ 16:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Hervé Renard seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Giant Snowman 11:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Switzerland at the FIFA Women's World Cup

Hello, HiddenFace101. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Switzerland at the FIFA Women's World Cup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:08, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Guillermo Ochoa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Oman women's national football team

Hello, HiddenFace101. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oman women's national football team".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Fragrant Peony. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Zeeko Zaki, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 13:04, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Hervé Renard, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Giant Snowman 22:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Akiba Maid War, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 07:04, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SLBedit. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Béla Guttmann, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SLBedit (talk) 15:33, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Oquassa Chong. Giant Snowman 08:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowmanJust reverted information that @HiddenFace101 had placed on the United States men's national soccer team‎ article that was inaccurate. Assumed it was done without malice, so I provided info on why I reverted the information, but after reading this am concerned it was done with malice. Demt1298 (talk) 20:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps malicious, perhaps not - definitely incompetent. I have blocked. Giant Snowman 16:09, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for the repeated addition of unsourced content to articles, including BLPs, despite multiple warnings from numerous editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Giant Snowman 16:10, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. SLBedit (talk) 23:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Euryalus (talk) 00:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Further to the above. I believe you are editing in good faith, and a fair few of your edits are valuable additions to sports articles. Unfortunately your edit history also shows a large number of unsourced additions, non-neutral statements and most recently a personal attack on another editor. Your previous block expired a few days ago and yet here we are again. Hence the slightly longer block to prevent further disruption.

During the block please take the time to read up on policies and guidelines such as verifiability and neutral point of view. When disagreeing with anther editor it's usually essential to restrict your comments to the content of their edits rather than criticising them as a person. With these points in mind, you're welcome to return to regular editing when the block expires. All the best. -- Euryalus (talk) 00:58, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Charles III requested move discussion

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 07:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fan wiki links as source

Hello! Please note that a fan wiki cannot be used as a source, even if there are no questions about the published information. I know a number of authors from there and they are good people, but wikipedia rules forbid fan content as sources. If it's about things that were directly and openly shown in the show and anyone can verify it just by watching the anime or playing the game, then you can just refer to the original itself. Solaire the knight (talk) 20:20, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Germany–Spain football rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Germany–Spain football rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Germany–Spain football rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:14, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Brazil national football team, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Bocafan76 (talk) 15:37, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tim Borowski. Robby.is.on (talk) 19:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Oceanian nations at the FIFA Women's World Cup

Hello, HiddenFace101. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oceanian nations at the FIFA Women's World Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:South American nations at the FIFA Women's World Cup

Hello, HiddenFace101. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:South American nations at the FIFA Women's World Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tanzania National Football Team

Hi, just checked out your edit of the team's wikipedia page. You said that Eddy Francis was involved in a Tanzania training camp, can you verify this? I'm a contributor for Sports Interactive and we need to know this as it's pretty important for his nationality settings in the game. Josh Dransfield (talk) 14:46, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Oceanian nations at the FIFA Women's World Cup

Hello, HiddenFace101. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oceanian nations at the FIFA Women's World Cup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:18, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:South American nations at the FIFA Women's World Cup

Hello, HiddenFace101. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "South American nations at the FIFA Women's World Cup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:26, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2026 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC second round - referees for matches

Hi. Would it be possible to add some sourcing for this in the changelog. I am loathe to revert these changes as I am aware that this information is often available - particularly for Chinese matches (or where Chinese official are involved). However, at the very least it would be better if it were possible to check you haven't made an error by (for example) accidentally linking the referee to the wrong match (it is easy enough to do). Just a reference in the update box would be enough - I am not talking about creating huge lists of "links" like some pages have - just a way to confirm these names. 165.12.252.109 (talk) 06:12, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Sweden men's national football team

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sweden men's national football team, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:North, Central American and Caribbean nations at the FIFA Women's World Cup

Hello, HiddenFace101. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:North, Central American and Caribbean nations at the FIFA Women's World Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Kirilov

Hello, you added a new category to Martin Kirilov article; Finnish people of Bulgarian descent. What is your reference on that edit? I haven't found any info of that. Syvä-äksy (talk) 23:44, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He was born in 2007. Yes, there is a Bulgarian player with the same name born in 1997 but that doesn't prove a thing. Syvä-äksy (talk) 23:46, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited 2023 AFC Asian Cup Group F, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ibrahim Al-Mukhaini.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karachi_Football_League#

https://www.instagram.com/sindhsuperleague/?utm_medium=copy_link

This article needs major updates. if can help appreciate 93.138.234.163 (talk) 14:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

African Cup

Discipline is not needed. See 2021 tournament. This is not a table dedicated to it. Island92 (talk) 20:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Asian Cup

Keep your comments on other people posting about Iraq wins, draws and losses civil and professional, including to assume WP:GOODFAITH. Revert where necessary, but don't blow up. Matilda Maniac (talk) 00:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HiddenFace101, please avoid commenting on another user's supposed nationality, as you did at WP:RFPP. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 10:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hi HiddenFace101! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Bsharri that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 19:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Dogra–Tibetan war seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 11:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Branko Ivanković. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. MacAddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 10:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited China–South Korea football rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republic of China national football team.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are Hiddenface101 Staff or Admin ?!?!?

Punya Thailand (talk) 19:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An user, no staff, no admin. Fix for free, not interested in joining any admin group whatsoever. HiddenFace101 (talk) 20:03, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit on Gregg Berhalter

I have undone that highly WP:POV edit on Berhalter's page. Those were very cherry-picked sources, and you have been around long enough to know that citing Reddit and YouTube as reliable sources is not acceptable. If you have not already, I highly recommend you familiarize yourself with this page, including the section on Forbes contributors, because the controversial nature of his appointment it worth writing about. Just not with those sources. Jay eyem (talk) 04:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Chinese Empire

added links pointing to Pamir, Daxing, Tibetan language and Battle of Aksu

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Ethiopia, you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned about this before: please do not add inappropriate POV to articles. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 19:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 AFC U-23 Asian Cup final, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Takashi Uchino.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Remsense诉 10:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Remsense 诉 10:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HiddenFace101! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Anti-German sentiment that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Rsk6400 (talk) 05:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Imperial China by religion has been nominated for merging

Category:People from Imperial China by religion has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Red Sea Derby for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red Sea Derby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Sea Derby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Walsh90210 (talk) 00:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chinese conflicts

Template:Chinese conflicts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Walsh90210 (talk) 00:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anti-German sentiment. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. I pinged you twice to invite you to the discussion I started. Instead of taking part you keep reverting and even marked your last revert as "minor edit". Rsk6400 (talk) 05:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. This means that article should be written in a neutral tone. The use of hyperbolic language, like in you recent edits to Rob Page, Brazil v Germany (2014 FIFA World Cup), French Indochina in World War II and Magomed Adiyev, is almost always in appropriate. The last of these is particularly concerning given that using the exact same wording elsewhere is what prompted the last warning regarding point of view concerns. Refusing to engage with legitimate concerns that other editors have with your writing will result in a block. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Between numerous warnings and a previous block for similar editing, you should know that changes that do not respect the policy on neutral point of view, like your most recent edits to the Thailand and Syria national football teams are unacceptable. There have been persistent concern about your unwillingness to engage with the concerns of others. If this does not change when this block expires, expect the next one to be indefinite. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kenya at the Africa Cup of Nations

Hello, HiddenFace101

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Dclemens1971, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Kenya at the Africa Cup of Nations, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Albania–North Macedonia football rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albania–North Macedonia football rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albania–North Macedonia football rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

StephenMacky1 (talk) 09:14, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:North Macedonia national football team rivalries

A tag has been placed on Category:North Macedonia national football team rivalries indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 10:59, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]