This is an archive of past discussions about User:Heliosxeros. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Lay (entertainer)#Endorsement. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
The comment the reviewer left was:
There is no reason for a split off article like this to exist. A star's endorsements are not independently notable. Any relevant content should be merged into the base article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lay's Endorsement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Hello! Ernestchuajiasheng,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ZXCVBNM (TALK)23:52, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Go Fighting! episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. John's University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
File permission problem with File:Chen Xuedong in 2017.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chen Xuedong in 2017.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 03:29, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Madame Tussauds Beijing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! Ritchie333(talk)(cont)12:11, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Ernestchuajiasheng. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello Ernestchuajiasheng, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of St .Sebastian Church Permannur, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 cannot be applied to buildings. Also, a merge to the town's article seems possible per WP:ATD-M. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy10:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Abishe. Ernestchuajiasheng, thanks for creating Inoherb!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I have noticed that you have been working on some popular skin care companies like Inoherb. I recommend you (but not compelling you) to create a Spanish skin care company called Germaine de Capuccini which was founded by Carmen Vidal, a Spanish cosmetologist in 1960's. If you can able to create that article with gathering more reliable References that would be great!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Hello Ernestchuajiasheng, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sharla Martiza, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy16:20, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Anyone may nominate an article to be reviewed for GA, although it is preferable that nominators have contributed significantly to the article and are familiar with its subject and its cited sources. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination.
As far as I can see, you have made no edits to The Big Bang Theory, nor did you consult any regular editors. Additionally, the page had clearly visible signs of serious issues (e.g. {{citation needed}} tags). In addition to re-reading the good article criteria, I would recommend that you look at examples of good articles to see the standard required before nominating any further articles for GA – and do so only after (at the very least) reading the article in its entirety, fixing any issues you notice and looking for sources to make sure the article contains all relevant information. You may also wish to withdraw your nominations of Lay (entertainer), Lu Han and Fan Bingbing for the time being. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e)09:03, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello Ernestchuajiasheng: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 16:51, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Congratulations! You have more than 4 accepted articles in Wikipedia Asian Month! Please submit your postal mailing address via Google form or email me about that on erick@asianmonth.wiki before the end of Janauary, 2018. The Wikimedia Asian Month team only has access to this form, and we will only share your address with local affiliates to send postcards. All personal data will be destroyed immediately after postcards are sent. Please contact your local organizers if you have any question. We apologize for the delay in sending this form to you, this year we will make sure that you will receive your postcard from WAM. If you've not received a postcard from last year's WAM, Please let us know. All ambassadors will receive an electronic certificate from the team. Be sure to fill out your email if you are enlisted Ambassadors list.
Hi! You appear to have accepted my draft list of countries by mercury production. Thank you! I'm also thinking about creating one for diamond production. Could you help me get that one through as well? I think I managed to leave a message in the talk page for the "Lists of countries by industrial output rankings" box, in which I requested a link for Diamond be added in the Minerals field - do you have any idea how that could be done? Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JKen (talk • contribs) 15:34, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
I've deleted the 'business interests' section. I didn't view it as advertising but as you pointed out, it may not look encyclopedia-like. Could you be so kind as to re-review? Thank you.
@Okolokolo: Hi. Your submission still lacks in some aspects especially his career. As of now, your submission is still not in-depth and comprehensive enough. It would be better if his career as a businessman is further elaborated in terms of the events occurred in his career. You might find Wikipedia:BLP helpful. Happy 2018. RedFlame(talk)02:49, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
03:52:08, 2 January 2018 review of submission by Shenalyn2018
Hi Ernetchuajiasheng, can you please give me your guidance on how I can improve the article above. What do I need to omit or add? Shenalyn2018 (talk) 03:52, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Greetings Shenalyn2018. It's great that you posted your enquiries on AfC's help desk. There are a few aspects to your submission that is in need of improvement. For instance, in the career section, the phrase, At the age of 40, Aaron is already living a comfortable life, earning a six figure income reads more like tabloid release and isn't neutral in tone. You can refer to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch as guidelines to help you. Moreover, you included information of his residence which isn't suitable as an encyclopaedic entry. It would be best if his career as a businessman is further elaborated in terms of the events occurred in his career; and not his personal life or the company he established. You might find Wikipedia:BLP helpful. RedFlame(talk)04:29, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Please do not send articles to AfD that are clearly candidates for PROD or CSD. Your page patrolling is currently making double work for the registered New Page Patrollers. I suggest you need significantly more experience before continuing to tag pages for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:35, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Noted. Will watch out for that.
10:21:17, 2 January 2018 review of submission by Eckvoigt
Dear reviewer, as a further comment by a user unknown to me suupports, the entry is definitely valid (as supported by the discussions of Peter Lawson and eminent theatre critic Billington in The Guardian. Following the comment, I have since checked Peter Lawson's entry in the Cambridge Dictioinary of Judaism and Jewish Culture and can confirm that the entry does not quote from the article without proper reference. It should now be fit for publication.
@Eckvoigt: Greetings. At the time when I declined the submission there was only a single reference by The Guardian. The draft was subsequently improved after that. It would be great if you could add in a couple more of references to your draft.
Request on 10:44:54, 2 January 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Eckvoigt
I have also made minor edits and included a further reference to Peter Lawson. Harold Pinter is a British-Jewish playwright. He received the Nobel Prize for Literature. Sir Tom Stoppard was knighted. Patrick Marber's Closer was turned into a major Hollywood movie. This is definitely a notable subject.
The person is really notable and very well known, he has been in newspapers and their archives, he has been interviewed a lot, pretty popular on social media, have good significance of his name in market and on other film websites.
Im taking this case as a challenge thats why i am after it. If a person who has done a lot of productions and now making a feature film which is verfiable on all the websites and newspapers, what else makes him notable? Or wikipedia just prefers American newspaper or news sources? What about other sources which are very reliable in our part of the world ?
Mere mentions are not sufficient, and whole comprehensive interviews are not reliable? Please do not forward me to a the page of "Reliable sources", i have read it and its illusive. I request a human guidance please, in not-so-official jargon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usmanali1296 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
19:08:10, 4 January 2018 review of submission by Jozefsebest
Hello, I made some changes in reviewed article. namely I cut word "successfull" and link to local page. I am new on wiki so I will so I am like elephant in a china shop.
Hello Heliosxeros. You used the {{Help me}} template, but you wanted an answer from a specific editor. If you still need help, please add your question to that editor's talk page instead. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance.
Hi there. This is a reminder to fill the address collection. Sorry for the inconvenience if you did submit the form before. If you still wish to receive the postcard from Wikipedia Asian Month, please submit your postal mailing address via this Google form. This form is only accessed by WAM international team. All personal data will be destroyed immediately after postcards are sent. If you have problems in accessing the google form, you can use Email This User to send your address to my Email.
If you do not wish to share your personal information and do not want to receive the postcard, please let us know at WAM talk page so I will not keep sending reminders to you. Best, Sailesh Patnaik
Confusion in the previous message- WAM
Hello again, I believe the earlier message has created some confusion. If you have already submitted the details in the Google form, it has been accepted, you don't need to submit it again. The earlier reminder is for those who haven't yet submitted their Google form or if they any alternate way to provide their address. I apologize for creating the confusion. Thanks-Sailesh Patnaik
FxPro
Hello! You left a comment in my discussion of FxPro. You wrote that the material was copied and protected by copyright. However, it is obvious that this is not. And the source that you specify, obviously, took this information from the old version of the article in Wikipedia, before the old article was deleted.
Am I doing something wrong?--Darislaw (talk) 22:40, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Greetings Darislaw. On December 28, I ran a copyright check on the submission and the check found multiple similarities of the submission with another website. Anyway, you could construct another submission of FxPro but this time try to "copy paste" less from websites and to reform sentences with your own words. EROSmessage01:32, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Can you help me how make it better!!! I am new to wikipedia. I dont how to use and work in wikipedia. I am new user. OTserInW (talk) 10:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Sir/Madam,
I am trying to publish Wikipedia page of my college. I have followed the pattern of few colleges Wikipedia page. Also, I have tried to write in the neutral point of view. still, the page got rejected. kindly suggest some changes.
Respected Sir,
I am an artist and you know how having a wikipedia page affects our work .
This is the first time I am trying to upload an article here .
I posted the links to my songs which have been released under big labels in my country .
I haven't been able to make my name in the news yet.
What kind of resources can I add apart from my songs which are released.
Any help would be awesome and its gonna help me in my career as well.
Thank you . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harpreetsingh04 (talk • contribs) 20:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
08:43:46, 11 January 2018 review of submission by Keithmacfarlaine
First, I'd like to thank you for commenting my draft. But I don't agree with you ahout "There is no reason for a split off article like this to exist."
As far as I know, there are lots of articles about President of Mainland China's Universities in english wikipedia like Peking University and Chongqing University, etc. Therefore, I think creating "President of Tianjin University" is reasonable.
Hope to get your reply and agreement.
Thanks again.
Zzhtju (talk) 06:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
I just don't understand why you reject my draft, there are similar articles out there, such as a list of world longest flight, flight number, etc. I am writing this to show the meaning, and the history of flight number 1. Most aviation geeks will love it cause they love to fly these flight number 1.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Golden Eyes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Hello, it means you need more sources (not 1 article only)?
I wrote it before quoting several sources but it was refused anyway by an editor.
Please let me know what I'm doing wrong.
thanks!
I have added all the sources from newspapers that are relevant, it is mentioned in other articles Tartu Teaduspark, but I can't see how I can use those because they are not abut the park. I can't replace the sources from the European Union agencies as the information isn't available anywhere else. Also the sources in its other wiki article are not better than what I have used. Ilyina Olya Yakovna (talk) 12:15, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
I see your dilemma. There is English Wikipedia and Wikipedias in other languages. Different Wikipedias have slightly different rules. Some are stringent while some are not that strict.
I understand, your policy is very stringent. The article has issues which mean it can't be approved on English Wikipedia. That is alright I can maybe rewrite it later if more newspapers make reports about the park. I don't know how to get the draft out of the articles for creation process, please make it a normal draft again, don't delete it as I may be able to make it acceptable later. Ilyina Olya Yakovna (talk) 13:30, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Heliosxeros, I submitted the article on the online music publication Soundblab that you rejected because it did not have reliable sources. Can you elaborate for me? THis is my first submission, I looked over the guidelines and I'm wondering if you rejected it because I didn't have a source for the quote I used? The source is the person I attributed the quote to, the creator of Soundblab, Bob Coyne. He gave me this quote in an email correspondence. How would I include that information (assuming that is the reason you rejected the article)? Thanks.2601:89:C701:AE4:ECD1:5CF:CE37:4081 (talk) 23:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Jeff Penczak
2601:89:C701:AE4:ECD1:5CF:CE37:4081 (talk) 23:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi 2601:89:C701:AE4:ECD1:5CF:CE37:4081. Your submission was rejected because it doesn't have any references. Wikipedia requires you to cite the sources you used as prove to support your facts on the article. Your reference must be reliable, meaning they must be trust-worthy. E.g. a major newspaper, a factual, widely-published book, high-quality generally trusted mainstream publications and not homepages, user-generated content like blogs, MySpace, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, fansites, Twitter, or other forms of wikis. You could use SoundCloud as a role model to construct your article. There is a list of references on the soundcloud article. That is what you need. Moreover, the history and writers sections are considered to be written in a promotional tone..There is a guide on how to make your articles sound more impartial in tone.EROSmessage02:10, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Request on 11:19:00, 17 January 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by TFGM
Dear Heliosxeros, my draft "Acta Neurochirurgica" has been declined for publication in Wikipedia. Acta Neurochirurgica is an English language scientific journal on neurosurgery and has the same right to appear in Wikipedia as "Neurosurgery" or "Journal of Neurosurgery" which are published in Wikipedia. I have included primary sources. What do I have to do to get the article published? Thank you for your help, TFGM
Hello, thank you for your review! I am the author of Draft:MyChat. MyChat was initially oriented on Russian and Ukrainian audience, so we actually have reliable second sources but they are written in Russian language. We are new for English-speaking audience, that is why article has only one reference for now. What is not less important, we have approved articles of MyChat in Russian and Ukrainian sections of Wikipedia. I would be glad to hear your response. Thank you for your time. Astronomich (talk) 11:39, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
There isn't harm at including sources which are in Russian or Ukrainian. English wikipedia is open to foreign language sources if they meet the basic requirements for being reliable. EROSmessage12:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your response. I added 4 external links with articles which are written in Russian language. They are considered as reliable sources in our country. MyChat russian and ukrainian articles on Wikipedia have the same links in "External links " too. I would be glad to hear your opinion. Thank you for your time! Astronomich (talk) 13:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Your review of Draft:Smarter Analyst
Hi, I came across your review of Draft:Smarter Analyst. As this is not a biography there's no need for inline references. Citation style isn't a valid decline reason. Take a look at WP:CITESTYLE for the various styles of citation and WP:MINREF for the cases where inline references are required. I would have declined that draft for other reasons, though. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:58, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
I have just gone through the references in the draft. Your comment to the submitter was "References are good and diverse". I strongly disagree. These references are mere mentions of the company. A good reference would be one that discussed the company in depth. These don't have anything at all about Smarter Analyst. This is just a WP:PROMO piece and has no place in Wikipedia. I have tagged it for speedy deletion. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Request on 14:03:09, 18 January 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Genericusername1
Hello, Ernestchuajiasheng! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Brookie :) { - like the mist - there one moment and then gone!} (Whisper...)15:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for the review on the page submission that I did. I am a wikipedia noob, sorry the citations were not acceptable. I have removed some FIS citations please let me know if you have any other suggestions for me.
Hi Justin. There is always the first step at doing anything. First of all, you could source for mainstream publications, newspapers. And avoid user generated content like Youtube, Instagram, Facebook. Since he is Portugese, you could find Portugese newspapers or local newspapers like Korean news if they feature him as a contestant and etc. EROSmessage05:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
15:30:53, 22 January 2018 review of submission by Stevendalyinsitu
thank you for reviewing the page I have created for the artists Joana Hadjithomas and Khalil Joreige. I am trying to add more information about French artists to wikipedia as many are missing in English. when i first created the page, I took a lot of info from their website so thats why i think it has been rejected twice. Now, however, I have removed much of the subjective information, done more research, cited from a range of sources and kept it as factual and objective as possible.
Do let me know if there's anything else I should do,
Greetings User:Stevendalyinsitu. Are you sure you are the creator? I ask this because it wasn't indicated that this account created the page. Anyhow, it is odd that your page features two artiste at a go. And since this is a biography, you must incline your references as facts you write might be challenged. The reason given for being rejected twice is that your submission reads too much like an advertisement. Writing style and tone for the article must be neutral and impartial. You would have to look out for some words that would make your article feel bias. You could browse around Wikipedia and find other French artiste of similar artistry and stage to model after and improve your submission. Cheers. EROSmessage03:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
19:33:36, 24 January 2018 review of submission by Mckaystewart
I'm confused about why the addition was rejected. I included two articles from well-known and estblished newspapers that are more than 50 years old. Why was this insufficient evidence? I just copied an article from the newspaper.
Do I need more than two legitimate press/media articles? How many must I provide? Will podcasts and interviews on red carpets help?
It's weird that the entry I submitted was rejected for lack of notability.
I'm so sorry that I can't review your submission because it has already been speedy deleted for copyright infringement. EROSmessage03:26, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
10:58:57, 26 January 2018 review of submission by 217.45.209.65
Greetings. It is good to see you made improvements but as per my declined reason, you have not yet incline your citation. When you are editing, there is a " Cite button. You have to use that tool to make incline citations. The reason is because this is a biography. The facts must be supported by the references to avoid dispute. EROSmessage11:11, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
20:28:16, 26 January 2018 review of submission by Loudbabyjoe
Thanks for reviewing our page. I have a couple questions:
1. I know there are a lot of reviews in the queue, but I was hoping you could check out the Latroit page sometime shortly. He is an artist that is up for a Grammy in 2 days and we'd like to get the page live before then, if at all possible.
2. I'm not sure why our page is being redirected. I see this note at the bottom of the Review waiting panel: Warning: The page Latroit redirects to Magic (Mystery Skulls song). Please verify that it is not a copy of this submission and that this page does not need to be moved to a different title.
Greetings, Loudbabyjoe. Thank you for understanding that we have many reviews in queue. May I know if you are paid to write about the singer as you used "we". If so, you have to declare that you are being paid to write. There are still many sentences which are not inclined with citation. As a biography, inclined citations are a must which will be the proof when facts are challenged. Moreover, the Grammy Nominated Remix of Depeche Mode's 'You Move is rather written in an editorial tone. You could refer to other grammy nom. artists for better construction of your article. EROSmessage07:36, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Heliosxeros Thanks for the response. I am not paid to write about the artist, I am a web developer helping create the page with existing materials.
15:24:11, 28 January 2018 review of submission by Emailgb123
Unsure why Han Jin draft does not meet specifications. The note talks about citations, but the editors on the help page seem to think it's a problem with notability.
Pages like the examples above may be tagged as stubs, or similar, but they exist as pages. Which makes it seem that this page falls into the unfortunate circumstance that publication is prevented simply because there's a pre-existing redirect of the same name. Yet the page redirected to contains even less relevant information pertaining specifically to the title's topic. So, it would seem that this page's publication would increase Wikipedia's relevant information on the topic.
Thank you very much for your quick initial review. However, an example illustrating the editorial problem would be appreciate. Is it the whole entry article or part of it?
Dear Heliosxeros,
thank You very much for reviewnig my article so soon!
if I correctly understood the message the acception problem for my article appeared because of the nature of the links mentioned in the article. Let me explain why I made such links - on a private site. As you already noticed this article is about a new experimental breed of cats called caracat. This cat breed was first accidentally created in the Moscow zoo. Information about this event is fixed in the German magazine, the paper original of which can not be linked - everything I can do is to specify the issue number and date of the magazine in which the event is described. Further, the story of this cat breed developed as follows: the caracat offspring was obtained in the USA by two people and this fact was fixed only on their personal accounts in the Facebook and YouTube. Both people who got the caracat kittens in the USA stopped their caracat programme for private reasons and no more info provided further on. Next, the caracat offspring was obtained in Russia by the felinologist Irina Nazarova - and she is the only one around the world who gets the caracacat kittens by now. It is Irina Nazarova who possesses all the information about the caracat breed, as she is the only one who develops this breed. All information about the caracat, including the responses of the caracat owners, Irina Nazarova places on her website (her caracat cattery Kataleya). Since no one except Irina Nazarova has detailed information on this cat breed, I therefore made references to her website as the only possible source of information for the article.
References to the Russian television reports I made on YouTube because the reports are kept there.
Please consider my explanation and I would be very thankful for Your acknowledge upon my article.
Sincerely, Alena — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alena Ross (talk • contribs) 19:15, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Simon Wallfisch
Hi, I've added another source to the biography of singer S. Wallfisch. Could you please be more specific, why an article is declined, when there are already a dozen of references and sources, thank you very much. Fu-Lank (talk) 14:15, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
@Fu-Lank: Greetings. First of all, there are numerous grammar errors which are best corrected. But more importantly, articles require significant coveragein reliable sources which are also independent of the subject. Eg. a major newspaper, a factual/widely-published book, high-quality generally trusted mainstream publications. The sources you provided relate closely to the Simon. It'll be even better if you can provide sources like local newspapers, classical books and journals about him, music magazines or major music publications. EROSmessage08:55, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Request on 11:25:55, 4 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Alena Ross
Dear Heliosxeros,
please see my article update according to the remarks You made earlier. I placed the references to each piece of text and also mentioned the German mass media name and issue where the fact of the caracat story beginnig was fixed. Let me explain the references again: so mostly the info inside the article is linked to the website of the caracat breed founder Irina Nazarova www.kataleyacat.com (for the reason I explained previously - cause she is the only one around the world who possesses the adequate and reliable info upon this subject). If I correctly inderstood the Wikipedia rules there are permits for the self-published material when its author is an established expert (Irina Nazarova is the expert) whose work in the relevant field has been published by reliable third-party publications (that the ICU organization (see further) which granted her the Status). Also I linked the info about caracat appearance standartds and some other to the ICU website (www.icun.ru - its the International Cat Union, the official worldwide organization to register and proceed cat clubs, breeds and the breeders).
Please note that mostly the linked recources are Russian language based for the reason the breed development is officially provided only in Russia. But for the readers the problem can easily be solved by using languages switching function provided by the websites.
Please let me know if I correctly understood Your remarks and carried out the corrections. Also please mention if it's convenient to discuss the article acception here at Your talk page (English is not my native language and I apologize in advance if I seeem to misunderstand You or the WikipediA rules!)
Thnak You!
YOu recently reviewed my first attempt at a new entry for Fry, Arizona. My question is that I used the same sources (and 2 additional ones) I see on other pages. There first section you marked as problematic uses the exact same sources used in every other city or place at wikipedia, so I do not understand what problem you see. One of the additional sources is a blog by the local historical society that has pictures of articles, as well as books and living history statements for things the books or media are not longer available. I disagree, as the other local pages (bisbee az[1], and sierra vista,az[2] comes to mind as they are local to me) contain large portions of "historical" info that is completely unsourced and portions disagree with the items in the local library. There is not much published history as the county has a small population for the size at around 130,000 people. SO by observation, the rule seems to be that if you do not cite or source things the entry is approved, but if you do cite they are not approved. I really am confused. If I am doing this at the wrong place or way please tell me. I do want do things the right way, and I am known for my research from my college papers 20 years ago through my current ones for the historical educational non-profit I'm a member of, all of which won awards. I hope I did this correctly, LOL! I am out of practice with any kind of coding and prefer the visual editor.
My page has been declined due to no reliable sources, but there are many upcoming video games on Wikipedia and the page is neutral, about an upcoming video game, with a lot of details and information. How can I add reliable sources, I mean, it's an upcoming indie game :)
Hello Heliosxeros. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:OMSEPC/sandbox/OMSEPC, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G2 does not apply to user space, particularly sandboxes. Thank you. ~ Amory(u • t • c)15:22, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
I'm neutral as to the AfC form remaining, however. If it remains, it will be G13 eligible in 6 months. ~ Amory(u • t • c)15:28, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Request on 01:50:36, 6 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Shermanm365
It had one reliable source. Now it has 3. However every other cycling team wikipedia page is based off of Procyclingstats.com but this one is now well covered.
Hi Heliosxeros thankyou for reviewing my article, actually i am first time editing an article. so i am unable to understand the reason why you have declined please give one example so that i can understand.
10:16:32, 6 February 2018 review of submission by Gnjoff
Hello,
Thank you most cordially for reviewing my first article at such a short notice. As I understood from your message there is a certain problem with the citations. However, I went through some similar Wikipedia articles concerning the topic of contemporary Serbian writers/artists and I can't seem to find where exactly the mistakes were made. Please, would you be so kind as to give me an exact example of how I should excel the article. Hopefully you can help me understand in which manner I should change the citations you find inadequate, so that I could improve my writing concerning this article as well as the future ones.
Thank you very much, best regards!
Gnjoff (talk) 10:16, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
21:36:38, 6 February 2018 review of submission by 184.189.200.197
Thanks for reviewing this, I guess it was declined for reading as an advertisement, but I'm honestly perplexed by that, since I'm not sure who I would be advertising? I am incredibly surprised wikipedia does not have a page about masternodes as of yet, as people will be looking to find out what they are and thought it would be a good idea to write one. I would like any help on the reason it was declined or the changes to be made. Thanks
75.69.68.220 (talk) 16:15, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
75.69.68.220: First of all, are you the original author? Because the ori author stated on the submission wasn't you. Anyway, it reads like an advertisement due to the editorial style of writing. Your submission very much looks like an extract from a catalogue with Type of Services and leads like Why masternodes need a collateral to be created and What is a server and why does a masternode need one?. If you browse around Wikipedia, you will find none with such style of writing. Instead, articles on Wikipedia are written with neutrality. Please visit Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch, WP:SPAMBAIT and WP:PROMOTION to get a much deeper clarity. EROSmessage02:12, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Rejection For Unreliable Sources
Greetings EROS, and thank you for taking the time to review my articles. I have a question. YouTube is not a reliable source for sourcing informnation, as in, what is being said during the video. However, it should be a realiable source for providing data. Meaning, when I cited YouTube, I was just proving the existence of the video itself.
For Example, this a line chosen at random from Unbox Therapy draft:
Lewis posted his first video on December 27th 2010. He was showcasing an Apogee One that he received for Christmas. This video has garnered over 200 thousand views.[9]
The purpose of this source is to prove that what I said.
A video was uplaoded on December 27th,
It received over 200 thousand views
It was about an Apogee One
Can't all 3 of these bits of information be proven by a YouTube link? It shows the "Upload Date", "The View Count", and "The Title Of The Video"
Another question would be, if I can't use the actual YouTube video to prove the video exists...then do I even need to source it?
Would it be acceptable to say:
Lewis posted his first video on December 27th 2010. He was showcasing an Apogee One that he received for Christmas. This video has garnered over 200 thousand views.
Without a source?
The same goes for the Google Play link. I was linking to the app just to prove that the company has an app. I can't think of a better way to back up that info. So if I'm not allowed to source to app to prove of its existence, then does such a thing even need to be sourced? Also Twitter, I was trying to prove that the tweet itself does exist, not using what was said in the tweet as a source.
I don't understand what makes my article look like an advert. The writing style is surely neutral.
Also, in regard to the company not being notable, it is ABTA approved and the biggest firm in its field. I can see smaller competitors with less notability and no recognition with wiki pages so why should my page not be accepted?
Ian McAleavy (talk) 12:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
16:06:58, 8 February 2018 review of submission by Intriplikit
Hi Heliosxeros. Thank you for reviewing my new page submission. Would you be able to tell me why it was not successful? Were the sources not worthy enough, or were there simply not enough citations?
Hello! You reviewed a page I tried to put up about a month ago on the International Pole Sports Federation. I edited it once to add in peer-reviewed publications but another reviewer said it still did not seem neutral. I edited it again to try to include some controversies. Would you mind giving me more specific feedback on what else I perhaps need to change? I tried to copy other sports federation pages and just lay out the basics of the federation. I wanted the federation to have a page because the International Pole Sports Federation is the one that is recognized by GAISF which has come up quite a bit in the news in the recent year. Thanks-Dmfennell (talk) 23:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
@Dmfennell: The tone of your writing is at fault here. There is no doubt that the federation has significance and notability to the article but you could fine tune your style of writing to be more encyclopaedic. You could visit Wikipedia:NPOV for more clarity. EROSmessage08:38, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Are you talking about the current version or the old version because I visited the page you suggested in December. I added in more sources, peer-reviewed journal articles as well as items from the news. I also changed my tone. Previously I talked about the IPSF's goals and if they met them. Instead, in my rewrite I copied the tone of what I saw in other federation pages and gave basic facts about the organization, the competition they host, and how the public views the organization. If you have any other tips please let me know so I can get to more editing. Thanks for your time and help. Dmfennell (talk) 14:37, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
@Dmfennell: I refer to the current version. There is still editorial style of writing to the submission. Try to make it concise and less like writing a column article. EROSmessage07:40, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your fast reply. I changed the tone and made things more concise. In the meantime, another reviewer commented that I needed different sources for notability. I have since added in more sources. It is true that limited sources exist on this organization. However, other pole organizations have wikipedia pages and they are not the internationally recognized governing body for pole sports...hence I thought the IPSF worthy of inclusion. If you have any further guidance, please let me know. I am sure you are busy so thank you for your help. Dmfennell (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Submission declined; ITF Junior Masters
Submission is improperly sourced is what you said. Every piece of information is sourced from official sources (ITF), from the root source. Every piece. How is it improperly sourced???? I demand an explanation. If ITF is not reliable than you can immediately shut down wikipedia as all of its sources are crap/fake/non reliable.
Apart from souring, many parts of the submission won't qualify. Which parts?? This is a new tournament. You have all the information that can be expected from a tournament page at this stage of the tournament. If this is not adequate than you can direct your attention to, for example, pages of tennis exhibition tournaments which can read like an advert to quote you. I will correct myself, they are adverts, for jewelry company and such. 213.149.51.161 (talk) 11:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Request on 18:31:56, 13 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by PatPiWilliams
Hello and thank you for reviewing this submission! Can I get some help regarding the references? I have included references from BBC and CNN and the subject has mentions all the internet but mostly from Greek media. The videos I linked are from big events (GoogleIO, Ignite, .conf) and there are even videos from BBC.
Would you mind providing further clarification on why this submission was declined? We wrote it based on information that our references provided. Is it because some of our references were not in English? Any tips you could give would be great! Thanks!
Alleny73 (talk) 19:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:Womenempowerment/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.delhi.gov.in/wps/wcm/connect/lib_dcw/DCW/Default/Swati+Maliwal. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Zawl12:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
16:02:14, 15 February 2018 review of submission by Alena Ross
Dear Heliosxeros,
I fixed the mistakes and now please check the updates I made according to Your remakrs about the references (that was my main mistake through the article). Please don't forget that the sources may repeat cause of the reasons I mentioned earlier (about the breed founder). Thank You!
Alena Ross (talk) 16:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
07:22:55, 16 February 2018 review of submission by Dentuso13
Kequyen is involved with a number of interesting projects including 2 books. I think people would be interested to know that he's more than just an athlete and pharmacist. At the time that I made my initial submission, www.theprimaldesire.com/kequyen-lam was the only resource with information about the upcoming books, but now they can be found on www.kequyenlam.com as well.
Dentuso13 (talk) 07:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
I'm wondering why the source cited was considered unreliable? I've provided a link to the Church's own website and in particular a page which reproduces a centennial narrative published in 1988 and retrieved from the Church archives.
Hi can you help me to get this page corrected so it can be published? there are similar pages like my page e.g. Constellium. Thank you.
Lcvoet (talk) 10:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
03:37:42, 19 February 2018 review of submission by 98.144.183.245
Like every other press release company, you have listed the same we added our details too. We tried when someone reaches Wikipedia and search for omnesmedia.com they should get what it is and how its work
talk I am currently held up at the moment with the heavily backlogged AfC submissions. It'll be better if other reviewers review your submission for a more neutral judgement. BTW, your name didn't appear on the contirbution list of the submission page. If you already have a Wikipedia account, it'll be better if you log in with your account. EROSmessage16:14, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Request on 16:57:40, 19 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Winnie-too
Hi, I do not understand why the page on Agile Learning [1]was considered advertisement. Agile learning is a concept that spreads out among educational scientists and researchers in Europe. Some base it on research and some apparently not. There is noboby owning this, nobody making money with it and nobody paying royalties. Instead it is an issue in several research projects, one of them currently funded by the EU and involving several countries. The page is meant to give an overview to interested parties on how the term is used and where the discussion takes place at the moment, citing 15 sources from a number of countries - including the US, where it does not seem to be very popular. A lot more research papers, publications and web pages had been checked but did not seem to contribute something substantial. We would be glad to be informed about more cntributions - also critical ones if they exist somewhere. But please allow the discussion and development of the term and the concept to continue.
Thanks and all the best
Winnie-too (talk) 16:57, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Hey Heliosxeros, first of all thank you for reviewing the draft I've submitted. The fact though that the draft has been rejected makes me wonder why the cited sources are not reliable. There are other apps like ours that have pages, and their sources are less credible - please have a look at this example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Doctor. If those are credible sources and ours aren't... and in our case, what would be a reliable source?
Thank you.
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lay's Endorsement, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Hello, I don't understand how I can improve the article. The comment refers to lack of reliable sources and I've cited the Business of Fahion, The New York Times, the Telegraph, among others. Should I add more or change something? Please help
I am surprised at how things have developed during my extended editing holiday. Minetest (draft here) ought to be an article. There is a significant article on the German language edition[1] and half a dozen other language editions of Wikipedia have article. There is a glowing review.[2] It certainly is notable enough. I think the article would develop... the delete re-delete strikes me as something foreign to Wikipedia. Nephron T|C01:38, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Request on 07:42:03, 26 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Chanah9
Hello, could you explain better as to why my submission was rejected. I'd like to do the necessary correction(s) in order to get a positive review. Thanks.
I think this rejection:
"This submission appears to be taken from scottholmquist.com/sz.html." from you is not justified.
I was gathering the information from several reliable places and not at all taken from the artist's website. For sure I used it for some personal references, but all exhibitions and other activities of this artist are linked to external websites.
Please let me know which part you think not appropriate for publishing in Wikipedia.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Cleveland TN is not a large enough city that its mayors would be automatically presumed to pass WP:NPOL just for being mayors, but the sourcing here isn't really meeting the standard we would require to actually accept him as notable. More than half of the references here are either primary sources that do not count as support for notability at all, or brief namechecks of his existence in coverage about other things. While there are few sources that are more substantively about him than most of the others, there aren't enough of them -- every mayor of everywhere could always show at least as much coverage about him as has been shown here. To consider the mayor notable in a place this size, we would need to see evidence that he's substantially more notable than most other mayors of most other places this size, but that's not what the sources here are showing.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tom Rowland and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tom Rowland, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
Hello, Heliosxeros!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat (talk) 05:18, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
I apologize on behalf of Wikipedia for the inconvenience, but the AFC review tool just automatically notifies the person who it deems as the "submitter" of the page — it offers me as the reviewer no way to choose (or even to know) who it's going to notify, but just does its own thing once I hit save on my reviewer comment. You might want to take it up with the programmers who created that tool as a bug report, but there's nothing I could have done differently to make the notification go to anybody else — the system just automatically picked you because your actions technically made you the page's submitter for the purposes of how that software works, and it gives me no opportunity to even try to send the notification to somebody else instead. My apologies again, but it's an automated process that page reviewers have no control over. Bearcat (talk) 14:48, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Hey, Heliosxeros. Just made a few minor edits in hopes that Draft:HDpiano might be approved. I operate this business and my affiliation has been disclosed. I've done my best to write the article neutrally but am aware of my potential bias. Zero calls to action or links to our website; five sources, zero of which were published by our company. Please let me know what else this might need to be approved- thank you.
The article I created ("Jury.Online") has been rejected for the reason that it is too subjective. I'm asking you, Heliosxeros, where in my article one can find contents of advertising. Please answer asap.
This is new product that has been launched and the company has been established. Third party references are not yet available. They will be added to the references when the coverages occur. The company website has been qouted as a reference source.
Arkratos Blockchain (talk) 09:45, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
15:01:06, 5 March 2018 review of submission by Lyrelyrebird
I read the error message and I replaced all of the references to IMDb to be one of the other sources I had already used, or a new source that was a newspaper article.
Lyrelyrebird (talk) 15:01, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Latroit page review
I know there are a lot of reviews in the queue, but I was hoping there would be an update on the Latroit page. I believe we have made all necessary updates. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Latroit
Dear, We have deleted section citation because it rejected of that area.
in future, we can add valuable content to it with your regulations
80.227.108.78 (talk) 12:26, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Request on 13:05:18, 6 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Csmon
Hi Heliosxeros, You declined my submission: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:PlayersVoice recently. I have rewritten the line that seemed to be 'copied'. I can assure you all the text on the page now is original. Please check and advise. thank you!
Please reconsider the notability of this article. [[WP:Earthquake Commission]Earthquake Commission]] might give an indication of notability. I will edit the draft further now, if that helps. Once created, the article will expand rapidly. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 13:09, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
I'm looking to understand how I can change the information on my draft so that it does not seem like an advertisement. My intentions were to focus on the aspects of the college and what they have to offer, not "sell" the school. What can I add/take away that would help?
I appreciate having my draft reviewed so hastily though! :)
Hi, This is regarding the rejection of Wide Open Walls Sacramento Mural Festival page, citing inadequate sources. There are plenty of external websites, including sacbee, abc and several other news websites mentioned in the references and links on the page. What else is required as a reliable source?
Vishal Sharma (talk) 06:19, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Request on 07:51:51, 7 March 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Johnrusselagonoy
I have added Hugo's credentials as a semi pro ice hockey player in Sweden and added the references to back this up . I believe this should be enough to qualify for a Wikipedia page.
Dear User:Heliosxeros, Thank you for taking the time to review the article created at #WikiGapHarare. I am confused by your message about inline citations. The editor has been using the automatic citation generation tool that is part of visual editor. It seems fine from my side. Please can you explain what is incorrect. Isla Haddow (talk) 12:39, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:11, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
failed The Big Bang Theory, which you nominated as a good article. See Talk:The Big Bang Theory/GA1 for an explanation. Please note the following from the GA nomination instructions:
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laureate Group of Schools and Colleges (2nd nomination). The discussion has been re-opened:) Winged BladesGodric 14:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
