User talk:Jiahualin

This is Jiahualin's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Writing style and tone of writing is editorial. Visit WP:NPOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 09:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jiahualin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS ^message 09:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety

Greetings. Editorial style of presentation is apparent in your submission. I'll take the introduction lead as example. For more than 60 years, the Institute helped to improve the safety and health of people throughout the world. It was owned and operated by Liberty Mutual Insurance, Boston, MA, USA. This extract is considered not encyclopaedic and editorial in style as it reads very much like a newspaper article from a tabloid press. Your writing is too much like writing an essay. Hence, do read these for more clarity: Wikipedia:Writing better articles, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch. Moreover, per the reason declined, there are numerous parts of your submission which are not inclined with citation of the references used. This is to prevent the facts you provided from being challenged in the future. EROS ^message 09:35, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by K.e.coffman were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

K.e.coffman (talk) 22:45, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety

Hello, Jiahualin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 18:15, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]