Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Kleuske (talk) 13:15, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Riverhill Trials and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Riverhill Trials, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
Hello, Thade2k!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROSmessage14:07, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
On Wikipedia, articles require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The sources you find must at least be one lengthy paragraph, preferably more and not just passing mentions or directory listings. Next, the published sources you find must have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Eg. a major newspaper, a factual, widely-published book, high-quality generally trusted mainstream publications and not blogs, MySpace, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, fansites, Twitter, wikis, or other sites with user-generated content. Lastly, sources must be nothing written by the subject, paid for by the subject, or affiliated with the subject which will not be their own website/homepages, and not a press release. The sources must be independent. Its alright to add non-English sources into the English Wikipedia, as long as they meet the above criteria above. Cheers. EROSmessage03:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
