User talk:Jijugs

Welcome!

Hello, Jijugs, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Jijugs, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cahk (talk) 08:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jijugs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I went to list of Press releases companies and found our company name missing and I Have created a Company Page, HEre the same content, more over with less details than other companies were listed, I detailed on that page and its shocking that all other companies got permission to list and for me its came as its advertisement. you can once more check the list or press releases page and what all other companies quotes, these are more over same of mine so if the rules are same for everyone why wiki blocking my page only;

Decline reason:

JamesBWatson has given a detailed explanation below. If you think copy-pasting your "about us" page onto Wikipedia improves the encyclopedia, this is not the project for you. There are other wikis that allow people to write about their own companies. Huon (talk) 21:17, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Here are a few comments relating to your unblock request, which I offer in the hope that they may help to clarify for you a number of points which you seem not to have understood.

You evidently misunderstood the instructions on how to request a block. "Add the following text below the block notice on your talk page" was intended to mean that you should make a copy of the text and add it below the block notice, not that you should edit the block notice by adding your reason into its text. Luckily, I came back to this page and saw what yo had done, so I have been able to put it right for you. If I hadn't come back and seen it, it is very likely that no administrator would ever have seen the request and reviewed it, as it would not have appeared in the list of unblock requests waiting to be reviewed.
You say that there are other PR companies which have posted content similar to that which you posted. If you can give me the names of some accounts that have written whole pages of such blatant marketing copy as "a unique online media solutions provider that empowers you to CONNECT, MEASURE and REACH your objectives", "Be part of our invaluable network of professionals with our exclusive career interface", "a comprehensive, state-of-the-art platform offering users invaluable insights into a wide spectrum of multichannel media, advertising, PR and digital services", and so on and so on and so on, as you did, then I will happily look at them and consider deleting the spam pages and blocking the accounts. It is very rare that such extreme examples of posting advertisements slips through, but if you know of any please do let us know.
You are mistaken in thinking that your promotional pages are the only ones to be deleted. Hundreds of promotional pages are deleted every day, and hundreds of accounts are blocked per day for promotional editing. Most of them are blocked for editing at a far more moderately promotional level than what you did, but some do slip through, so if you tell us about the ones which you have seen that have been as promotional as you and got away with it then that will be very helpful. You are, however, mistaken in thinking that "all" other companies get away with posting advertisements to Wikipedia. Most articles about companies are written from a more or less neutral point of view, largely by independent third parties.
You may possibly find that reading Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#What about article x? will help to make it clear why the existence of some unsuitable pages does not justify the existence of more of them.
I assume that you did not take the advice I gave you to read the guide to appealling blocks before posting an unblock request, as if you had done so you would have been unlikely to think that the request you posted was likely to succeed. I suggest that you read it now, and in the light of what you see there consider whether to rewrite your unblock request. Editors are unblocked if they indicate that in the future they are likely to comply with Wikipedia policies, not if they make it clear that they intend to continue to edit in violation of those policies, which is what you have done. Wikipedia policy does not permit advertising, and if it seems that you intend to continue to post advertising copy here then you are not likely to be unblocked.

I hope that some or all of those comments will be helpful to you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:36, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jijugs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for the detailed description and sorry for my mistake. I went through your policy and other pages and started preparing sentences whicha re not about meaning advertisement and which will meet wiki policies. hopefully I could give it for review by tomorrow for your review. As we are first to wiki edit we went through some wrong channels and kindly ignore our mitakes and unblock for edit Here I have made a draft as per wiki suggetions Kindly help if anythngs to change ---OMNESmedia.com is an International Media Company. Through online media platform services users can explore with a global network of all Media sectors, Media Directory, Media professionals, Media Events, Media Recruit, Media Tenders, Press releases distribution, Media monitoring services and service providers. BASMA Media headquarters is located at Dubai Media City and serving its International network. --- This will be the content with company logo and for confirmation of logo we will be sending mails from comapny ID also I like to list my company name in list of press releases agencies area with comany name only, apart form this we wont do any insertion. Jijugs (talk) 05:20, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As long as we believe that you have any intention of writing about OMNESmedia on Wikipedia, you will not be unblocked. If you are not here for any other purpose, please go and promote your company somewhere else. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:37, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jijugs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

O , I got your point, Kindly delete if any content that I created with omnes media and i assure Im not going to overwrite the same or anything about it. if possible kindly make unblock. Thank you

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:10, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What would you do here?

Unless you will help us improve Wikipedia, there is no reason to unblock you.

Category:All articles needing copy edit

Category:Articles lacking sources

Category:Articles lacking in-text citations

There is more information at Wikipedia:Community_portal Cheers, and happy editing.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:12, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]