User talk:Hamtechperson/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Hamtechperson. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative
Hi Hamtechperson,
You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.
Thank you.
Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Dispute resolution survey
 Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Hamtechperson. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 00:36, 6 April 2012 (UTC) |
 Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1163 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
News
|
Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Happy reviewing! TheSpecialUser TSU
- Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 09:00, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
EdwardsBot (talk) 00:10, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
WHY DID YOU REMOVE MY EDITS ! ! ! ! !!
Hello,
I really want to know why did you undid my edits... All the information I provided was from http://oggyandthecockroaches.wikia.com only... It was NOT wrong! So it will be great if you undo your action...
Thank you, Sushruta Bhattacharjee — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.179.131.130 (talk) 13:02, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- I reverted the edit because A) Wikia is not a reliable source and B) the information was uncited. Hamtechperson 13:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Vermont page edit
You recently undid a page edit in the Geology Section of the Vermont Page. I edited the page because it erroneously listed all of the types of granite sold by the Rock of Ages Quarry Co., many of which are quarried outside of Vermont, and therefore is not relevant to a discussion of Vermont geology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.205.243.200 (talk) 13:25, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- The edit is representative of only one company, and, while I agree that it may need to be changed, it would also be a good idea to have sources to back up your edits Hamtechperson 13:30, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- I agree, which is why I do not think the page should list all of the granites sold by Rock of Ages. I did not change the citation because following the current citation takes you to Rock of Ages' website, where they list their stones. The previous edits give the false impression that those are all stones present in Vermont, when they are in fact the products of one company that also quarries two stones - Barre Grey and Bethel White - in Vermont. http://www.rockofages.com/en/quarry-blocks/granites — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.205.243.200 (talk) 13:42, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Valencia Open 500
Sorry, i made a mistake and i apologize, but isn't it a little too strong to banning me from Wikipedia only for one little error? I'm not a vandal and in all my edits i try not to made errors, but it can happen. I hope to make better in the future and to improve myself. Best wishes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.37.128.161 (talk) 13:27, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
edit dat politics page
Hi, i'd like to edit Dat Politics' wikipedia page... THANKS!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy DCDT (talk • contribs) 13:38, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
The undoing should be redone.
Hello. As you mentioned the edit I made to Jenna K. Moran considering the reference should be remade. The current reference links to domain that has expired. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.109.224.95 (talk) 13:47, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Articles for Creation Appeal
| Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!
Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently the are 1163 submissions waiting to be reviewed.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. |
Happy First Edit Day (2012)!
|
Happy First Edit Day, Hamtechperson, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
AFC Backlog
| Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help!
Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1163 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial. |
Your decline of the Faisalabad thing
Actually, all the contributors except the maintenance taggers etc are socks of User:Mr Hamza, including the 119.xxx IP. See Mr Hamza's SPI. I've put the tag back on. I'm not deleting because I've been rather involved with the SPI of the blighter for some time. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:55, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Not sure why Reaper's name is on that - it woz me what said that... Peridon (talk) 19:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
TheSethMovieChannel vandal
Hi. Noticed you reverting vandalism by User:Thesethmoviechannel4. This guy is a long-term vandal & I just noticed he's had some other accounts in the past. You may wish to comment at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheSethMovieChannel since you're dealing with his vandalism as well. --IllaZilla (talk) 23:40, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Easy does it
Best you stop using rollback at Rejuvenation Research. Are those edits really vandalism? I'm being sincere, I don't know. Tiderolls 23:44, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- If not Vandalism, then POINT or OWN. Person needs whacking either way. Hamtechperson 23:46, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- They may indeed. I just don't want you to overstep with rollback. Folks get sensitive to rollback use when edits being rollbacked aren't vandalism. Tiderolls 23:50, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- Also DUCKy socking going on too. That had something to do with it. IP was making the same edits earlier. Hamtechperson 23:53, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- Agree about the socking, but best be careful about using rollback. I'd hate to see you lose it over bullshit like this. The SPI was a good idea, though. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 23:59, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- Also DUCKy socking going on too. That had something to do with it. IP was making the same edits earlier. Hamtechperson 23:53, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- They may indeed. I just don't want you to overstep with rollback. Folks get sensitive to rollback use when edits being rollbacked aren't vandalism. Tiderolls 23:50, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Puerto Rico status
It IS constructive because fact is that 53% rejected the status. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.45.196.253 (talk) 00:15, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Please stop
You really need to do some reading and learn the rules before you do any more rollbacking and reverting. My edits were not even remotely vandalism. The Garbage Skow (talk) 00:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Nicholas Hoult Edit
Hi, you marked my change of Movie Warm Bodies film in the Nicholas Hoult page (from teenage movie to zombie romance movie) as vandalism. Maybe you should have a look at the Warm Bodies entry on Wiki before making knee jerk reverts. Or watch the trailer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.167.244.126 (talk) 02:17, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Follow-up regarding your edit of Islamic terrorism
Thanks for the message. The contribution discusses a form of islamic terrorism (piracy against civilian ships) that is well documented and existed up to the mid 1800s. These accounts put islamic terrorism in its proper historical context and show that the current jihadi ideology existed very early on and in particular prior to European colonialism I believe this is the only place in the article where these early events are mentioned. The significance of these events are further highlighted by the fact that these events lead to two wars and shape the early American experience with terrorism. Without this contribution the reader would be left thinking that the jihadi ideology and actions fiest appeared after Euoropean colonialism. This is simply not consistent with history. Finally, the contribution is well referenced. So why would anyone deem the contribution not to be relevant or appropriate? ----WikiAC123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiAC123 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1163 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script!
|
| The WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trevor Donovan
I was just trying to learn the html coding. I thought a better picture can be used because the previous wasn't flattering — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.3.144.74 (talk) 14:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Rami sepo
I google translated Rami sepo from Finnish to England and the following is given: RAMI Sepo is known for his peculiar and homoudestaa sairaudestaa, ie level 3 assburgeri. Rami also happens to be known as anal sex RU's chairman, JB Burggisen male friend Hence my tagging of vandalism. Cheers, Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 14:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- Very well, Carry ON! Hamtechperson 14:16, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- No worries, will do :) Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 14:17, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Tama Drums
Hi there, I think the page lacks a lot of vital information regarding Tama Drums, their line up and the history. Everything you undid that I change jumps back to only basic and overall information about the Tama Drums company. I have been in the business for more than 30 years and the time has come when the all the information should be put in one place from various drum forums and unanswered questioned all over the world. Please do change back what I did. Thanks J — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.110.43.9 (talk) 14:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Re: February 2013
If you re-read the contents of my edit summary, you will find a reason why I removed the content related to polling in United States Senate election in New York, 2012. My edit summary was clearly not left blank. I shall proceed to revert your unnecessary revert if you don't give a more thorough explanation for your actions. 69.121.17.200 (talk) 14:49, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Disregard my last comment. My removal of content was legit, and my initial edit was not without an edit summary. So I decided to undo your revert nonetheless. 69.121.17.200 (talk) 15:13, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You!
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:38, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
My Changes Are necessary for proper information on The Unabomber
Evan Did in fact eat cheetos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evaniamayne (talk • contribs) 13:44, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject AFC needs your help... again
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.
Delivered at 12:42, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC
Your involvement with DRN
Hi there, I noticed that you haven't been as active at DRN as you was before. DRN has been a bit backlogged lately and we could use some extra hands. We have updated our volunteer list to a new format, Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteers (your name is still there under the old format if you haven't updated it) and are looking into ways to make DRN more effective and more rewarding for volunteers (your input is appreciated!). If you don't have much time to volunteer at the moment, that's fine too, just move your name to the inactive list (you're free to add yourself back to active at any time). Hope to see you again soon :) Steven Zhang (talk) 13:19, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1100 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:03, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Hamtechperson:
WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1100 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) at 09:19, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list
Hello Hamtechperson! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
- This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive
Hello Hamtechperson:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1100 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
No Problem
Was proving to some people that wiki is way too easy to edit. If I remember the guys name I would of should them one from a year ago that never got changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.99.76 (talk) 04:41, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
DRN needs assistance
You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard.
We have a backlog of cases there which need volunteer attention. If you have time available, please take one or more of these cases.
If you do not intend to take cases or help with the administration of DRN on a regular basis, or if you do not wish to receive further notices of this nature, please remove your username from the volunteer list. If you later decide to resume activities at DRN you may relist your name at that time.
Best regards, TransporterMan 15:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)
Restarting Exploding Kittens
I'm going to restore Exploding Kittens, now that it has reached historic proportions, ala CNN and other sources - [1], [2], [3] -- Fuzheado | Talk 16:41, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Pages not in English
Hi. In case you didn't catch it, the deletion template you placed at Nick-Bertrand Ntahokaja was removed. Being in a language other than English isn't a qualification for speedy deletion. You can see WP:Pages needing translation into English for the treatment of such pages. —Largo Plazo (talk) 00:55, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
why did you destroy the page I was working on?
There wasn't any reason to do that and results (ballot placement) have already started. no W:Recentism at all. YoursT (talk) 00:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- The page is redundant to the main page for the subject. There is no reason to have a separate article on it. Hamtechperson 00:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Not it isn't, and here's why: unlike last cycle, where there were only five contested primaries, ALL the primaries through the end of March are, and it's still quite possible to have a genuine long-term race. Look at Results of the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2012, which was definitely necessary. With the Iowa caucuses only 80 days away, we need to get everything ready so when the big show starts all we need is to plug in the numbers.YoursT (talk) 12:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
I'm adding information to provide her with a page of her own, separately from her husband or her band. You can include other information to the page but it does not need to be deleted. Tomayotomayo22 (talk) 22:28, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
Kam Chancellor edit
I don't think you made mistake. I just think that a page about a person does not need to contain ANY information available but just relevant ones. This means thing like marriage/children and maybe charity work. Detailed schedules of fitness classes and what presents people buy for their parents is TMUI (too much unnecessary information). Remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a tabloid magazine. That's why I deleted the most part of that section. 178.2.23.3 (talk) 11:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Help needed at DRN
You are receiving this message because you are signed up as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. We have a number of pending requests which need a volunteer to address them. Unless you are an inexperienced volunteer who is currently just watching DRN to learn our processes, please take a case. If you do not see yourself taking cases in the foreseeable future, please remove yourself from the volunteer list so that we can have a better idea of the size of our pool of volunteers; if you do see yourself taking cases, please watchlist the DRN page and keep an eye out to see if there are cases which are ready for a volunteer. We have recently had to refuse a number of cases because they were listed for days with no volunteer willing to take them, despite there being almost 150 volunteers listed on the volunteer page. Regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
DRN help needed and volunteer roll call
You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself on the list of volunteers at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteering#List of the DRN volunteers.
First, assistance is needed at DRN. We have recently closed a number of cases without any services being provided for lack of a volunteer willing to take the case. There are at least three cases awaiting a volunteer at this moment. Please consider taking one.
Second, this is a volunteer roll call. If you remain interested in helping at DRN and are willing to actively do so by taking at least one case (and seeing it through) or helping with administrative matters at least once per calendar month, please add your name to this roll call list. Individuals currently on the principal volunteer list who do not add their name on the roll call list will be removed from the principal volunteer list after June 30, 2016 unless the DRN Coordinator chooses to retain their name for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. Individuals whose names are removed after June 30, 2016, should feel free to re-add their names to the principal volunteer list, but are respectfully requested not to do so unless they are willing to take part at DRN at least one time per month as noted above. No one is going to be monitoring to see if you live up to that commitment, but we respectfully ask that you either live up to it or remove your name from the principal volunteer list.
Best regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) (Not watching this page) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Missing
Hi. You are now listed as missing. Should you ever return or choose not to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Chris Troutman (talk) 04:57, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Follow-up regarding your edit of Islamic terrorism
Thanks for the message. The contribution discusses a form of islamic terrorism (piracy against civilian ships) that is well documented and existed up to the mid 1800s. These accounts put islamic terrorism in its proper historical context and show that the current jihadi ideology existed very early on and in particular prior to European colonialism I believe this is the only place in the article where these early events are mentioned. The significance of these events are further highlighted by the fact that these events lead to two wars and shape the early American experience with terrorism. Without this contribution the reader would be left thinking that the jihadi ideology and actions fiest appeared after Euoropean colonialism. This is simply not consistent with history. Finally, the contribution is well referenced. So why would anyone deem the contribution not to be relevant or appropriate? ----WikiAC123
AFC Backlog Drive
Dudi Sela
The change I made only made the page a little bit more aesthetic... really I don't get what's the problem
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Hamtechperson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Eric Ebron
If I wanted to say Eric's favorite candy bar was a butterfinger, what would count as a valid source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webbling (talk • contribs) 06:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- No. Please see WP:Source for info on what would count as a verifiable reliable source. Hamtechperson 06:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
I believe that Eric Ebron has a medical condition in his hands that isn't being reported by any news source. I suspect his fingers are made out of butter. Where is the best place on his wiki page to add this suspicion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webbling (talk • contribs) 06:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Nowhere. See WP:NOR Hamtechperson 06:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Why do you take Wikipedia this seriously. Why won't you let me make fun of the worst player on the Detroit Lions starting roster? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webbling (talk • contribs) 06:52, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- You can make fun of him all you want. An encyclopedia is not the place to do so. Try reddit or some other site, but not here. Hamtechperson 06:58, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
If a person figuratively dies, would it be acceptable to add a figurative date of death? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webbling (talk • contribs) 07:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Lol you must live a sad life if all you do all day is maintain fucking Wikipedia articles. Good luck.
Semi?
Hi, Hamtechperson. Please let me know if you're getting tired of your harasser and would like this page semiprotected for a while. Bishonen | talk 18:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC).
- Thanks for offering. The above person was indefed earlier today, so I don't see a need at this time. I'll keep that in mind though. Hamtechperson 18:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, that account was indeffed. But there's already another, which I have now also indeffed. It that was the same person, there may be a third, a fourth, etc. Just let me know on my page if you should change your mind. Bishonen | talk 18:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC).
Podesta
Sorry, but this went on way too long. Next time if you see something like what you saw at 2:44, report it to AIV right away--now I got to go through dozens of edits that need to be rev-deleted, 45 minutes later. RFPP and all that is nice--but nothing beats a quick block. Or go through Recent changes and see what admins are on call. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 03:27, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I'll bring things like that straight to AIV in future. Is there a different page than AIV where something like this may get eyes even faster, or is that the best forum? Hamtechperson 03:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- AIV is the best--you can leave a note saying something like HEY THIS A-HOLE REALLY NEEDS TO BE BLOCKED RIGHT NOW. If I were to see that, I would take that very seriously, since I know you're a good-faith editor. BTW apparently the wrath of the alt-right is upon us, you know. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:35, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Blocked for editing
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Sir i'm blocked for editing for no reason, as i was only making an addition in nishan-e-haider as the number of person who received it has been increased as you can see in the link I've posted below. It will be very helpful if you could do that, I'll highly obliged to you. Thanks Regard, user
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nishan-e-Haider
Moon Lovers Scarlet Heart Ryeo
Hello, just want to drop a note here about the edit wars going on on Moon Lovers: Scarlet Heart Ryeo's page. There is a potential socking situation going on there. Please see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bertrand101#30_October_2017.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.216.42.224 (talk) 08:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Why small=yes?
When you declined Draft:Christopher Roach, you inserted this line:
{{AFC submission|d|ilc|u=Jnice2k3|ns=118|decliner=Atlantic306|declinets=20171023225648|small=yes|ts=20171023142638}}
The |small=yes triggers a Lint error of type Missing end tag, leaving a <small> tag unclosed.
- Is
|small=yesnecessary here? - If so, perhaps
{{AFC submission}}needs fixing to properly close the small tag.
—Anomalocaris (talk) 22:49, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Anomalocaris: Small=yes in the context of the AFC template cuts down an old rejection to just the rejection reason. It saves space within the page when rendered. It looks like there may be some issue deep in the template code that's causing the lint errors. It may also be a bug in the lint error detector. It may also be an AFCH error. I would recommend bringing this up with the AFC project as a whole somewhere. It would get more eyes, and from people who may be more familiar with what may be causing it. Hamtechperson 23:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Declined submission
Hi Hamtechperson,
Thanks for reviewing my submission on "Ammar Ahmad".
Just a question on this. I'm going to change the content into more formal and neutral tone. Do I have to change the sources as well?
Thanks User457b — Preceding unsigned comment added by User457b (talk • contribs) 04:03, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- @User457b: I would suggest that you find sources that are slightly more biographic in nature, but I do not see any issues on that front. The current sources are good, but can always be better. More importantly, I would focus more on the man himself in your article. As the article currently stands, not only are there tone issues, but it reads like it's trying to be an article both about the person and the company he founded. The article for Ammar Ahmad should focus solely on Ammar Ahmad. If you can rewrite the article so that it's more focused on the person, I can get a better sense of his notability. I would also suggest you check our Biographies of Living Persons policy. I'm not completely sure your subject is notable. While a rewrite would help clarify the situation, if you can show coverage outside of the business context that would be even better. Feel free to let me know if you need further help. Hamtechperson 18:00, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors, and also Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links. You are encouraged to change
<font color="#1B1BB3">[[User:Hamtechperson|Ham]]</font><font color="#98ED00">[[User talk:Hamtechperson|tech]]</font><font color="#FB000D">[[Special:Contributions/Hamtechperson|person]]</font>→ Hamtechperson
to
[[User:Hamtechperson|<span style="color: #1B1BB3;">Ham</span>]][[User talk:Hamtechperson|<span style="color: #98ED00;">tech</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Hamtechperson|<span style="color: #FB000D;">person</span>]]→ Hamtechperson
Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for fixing your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:09, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Hamtechperson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
11:08:38, 5 December 2017 review of submission by Coralroot
I don't understand why this article has been rejected. It is exactly the same article as the one that was already on wikipedia but unfortunately had been added to the page on Sebastian Faulks' novel "Human Traces". A colleague of yours thus removed the "Human Trace" article and created a new draft. If the sources were considered reliable in the original instance, why all of a sudden are they not in the second? I've checked them all and they are reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coralroot (talk • contribs) 11:08, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Coralroot: A work can't be the source for an article about that work. We need independent sources to prove notability. Hamtechperson 05:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
ANI Experiences survey
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.
The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:
If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.
Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.
Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
13:37:21, 22 December 2017 review of submission by Pundrihero
- Pundrihero (talk · contribs)
Hi, I am a voter at the Pundri Vidhan Sabha, and I wanted to put our leaders on Wikipeida. I wanted to ask why this was declined. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pundrihero (talk • contribs) 13:37, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Pundrihero: Please read the links in the decline reason. Hamtechperson 22:12, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
16:16:16, 20 February 2018 review of submission by Pundrihero
- Pundrihero (talk · contribs)
I am requesting a re-review, because it was rejected and I have mended the changes required. It is important to me as a voter in the Pundri Constituency that people of Haryana have access to their leaders.
Pundrihero (talk) 16:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)