User talk:GrahamHardy/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, GrahamHardy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Don't let grumpy users scare you off
• Meet other new users
• Learn from others
• Play nicely with others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us about you

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! --GreenJoe 18:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Minor barnstar

		The Minor Barnstar
		For your fixing of the hyperlink on The Real Inspector Hound article. Many thanks. Lradrama 09:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Zelda Popkin

Before you made your comment, it was my impression that she had been largely forgotten -- there haven't been any new editions of her books for decades, and that was my rule of thumb. But then I read the entry under her name and started to reconsider; she was better-known than I'd thought. If you want to change this reference, let me know, or just change it to what you want it to read, and I'll find another name to substitute if necessary. BTW, I think Rex Stout's Dol Bonner novels are closely related, if you haven't found those ("The Hand in the Glove, among others"). Accounting4Taste 16:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Mole

I thought there was nothing wrong with your edit. UtherSRG reverted it for some reason Floodamanny 11:06, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Empery

I'm not an admin, so I can't delete it. If you as the sole author tag it with {{db-author}} then an admin will come by an delete it for you. Hope this helps. GreenJoe 15:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Message

Hi graham, I haven't been on wiki for a while but I see that you've been hard at work expanding some of the pages I created: Bramerton, Kirby Bedon, Claxton etc. Good stuff. Interested in your Bramerton Pits article. Cheers C1self

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Ridley Pearson Stel Pavlou Tad Williams Joan Smith (novelist and journalist) Liz Williams Henry McKinnell Southfields tube station Papal legate Randolph Lycett Furzedown Tom Everett Scott Centre Court Wimbledon Park tube station WCWM Joan Aiken Spur Award Cecil Frank Powell The Valley, Anguilla Michelle Paver

Cleanup Birkenhead Barrow-in-Furness Wengo Merge Taipan 4.9 Southall Antakya Add Sources Extract, transform, load Magic Sam Robert Fagles Wikify Millwright Carolyn Howard-Johnson Russian roulette Expand Hobie cat Lee Child William of Norwich

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 22:02, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

defaultsort vs lifetime

Instead of using defaultsort for articles on people could you use {{Lifetime}}? Defaultsort should only be used for articles not on people. For An Angel (talk) 12:34, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Graham, I wondered why, in your edit to the Raby article you use the name "Peter" instead of "Philip" Raby? Julia Rossi (talk) 00:38, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Oops, now corrected, Thanks

GrahamHardy (talk) 01:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Ann Bannon

Hello, GrahamHardy. Can you explain the changes you made to this article? Is this a new form of wiki-devilry that I am not yet familiar with? I appreciate it. --Moni3 (talk) 19:50, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Devilment it be !(see previous item in my discussion db)GrahamHardy (talk) 19:53, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

One Man and His Bog

Just to say thanks for the article, I never thought about doing that so congrats. Wish I had read it before I did the PW, may have changed my mind ! To quote Barry..... "I mastered my compass just as the sun slowly sank in the south". Thanks again Phil aka Geotek (talk) 00:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Calling Perry White

While I don't quite see it myself, as I understand it, adding links, like here, isn't considered a minor edit. So you know. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 01:27, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

The Help:Minor edit documentation lists "Adding and correcting wiki links" as a Minor edit, do you know something I don't...GrahamHardy (talk) 19:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

The Twyborn Affair

Graham—I see that you made an edit to the article. I presume you've read the novel, and wonder whether you liked it. Tony (talk) 08:41, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

I've only read The Tree of Man and Riders in the Chariot so far, I really enjoyed the former (it was like nothing else I've ever read) but struggled a little with the latter. I'm thinking of trying Voss next...GrahamHardy (talk) 19:24, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 19:29, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Look Homeward, Angel

You removed my picture and replaced with a zoomed out view of the first edition. However, I think the one that I orginally had in their was more aestethetically pleasing. Is there a policy about first editions having to be pictured, or why, why would that be more favorable.--Robert Waalk (talk) 18:17, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't like the new image either so I've made it full frontal. I general I think they prefer first editions; but if its a boring plain cover I too would prefer a later edition with more interest. What did your image look like ? GrahamHardy (talk) 18:29, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

It looked really good. I reloaded it. Here is a link to it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Wolfe_Lost.gif .--Robert Waalk (talk) 21:06, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

I went ahead and changed to see how it looks and it looks very good.--Robert Waalk (talk) 21:06, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

The point being that it is the more literary significance that is the focus. We are not here to entertain but to inform and educate. In the literary world the first appearance of a work is "nearly always" the most significant. If another edition is more significant it would need argueing for. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 08:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Then I will argue for it. Lets go, boxing gloves are on, I'm more than willing to debate Wikipedia's ridiculously prissy policies at times, no matter how much effort I may put into the site.--Robert Waalk (talk) 01:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Well there you go, First edition stays, and it is rather colourful ! GrahamHardy (talk) 17:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Nice

Nice first edition cover @ The Burnt Ones. :) Julia Rossi (talk) 08:23, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

First edition covers

I know not much thanks is issued around here - but I would like to send my appreciation of your work in providing 1st edition cover for books and novels. I have noticed and although my more recent images are largely being replaced that is how it should be. Thanks. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 09:18, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

I've noticed your name on quite a few images; I'll try and use the same filename so at least you don't get warning messages about the old images no longer being in use; apologies for not doing this in the past. Thanks for your appreciation; there's an awful lot of books out there !GrahamHardy (talk) 20:42, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Please see discussion below re problems I'm having replacing existing images GrahamHardy (talk) 18:49, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Saint covers

Good work on the Saint covers. I don't know if you have admin privileges or not, but if you do you have permission to delete any images I've uploaded that you replace with first editions (it saves me getting bot messages like those above!). If you aren't an admin you can effectively do the same thing by using the same file name (if it's applicable). Cheers! 23skidoo (talk) 14:22, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I've just twigged myself that using the same name is less disruptive and friendlier...;I'll try and remember to do it on future; Its just a little disconcerting when the old image stays around for quite a while before getting refreshed in the article; but I need to be more patient ! Thanks again GrahamHardy (talk) 20:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately I'm having problems using the existing filename as evidence Image:HappyHighwayman.jpg, I added a new Summary (present in comment bit at bottom) but it hasn't updated the Summary ! So until this is fixed I'm afraid I'll have to continue using new filenames I'm afraid, any ideas?GrahamHardy (talk) 18:52, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Resurrection.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Resurrection.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Garion96 (talk) 10:40, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

I saw your message on User talk:Kevinalewis. The book is published in 1899, therefore it should be quite easy to get a public domain image of the book. There is no need for a non-free content image, hence it is replaceable non-free content. Garion96 (talk) 19:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

I wouldn't know where to look I'm afraid; If its fairly easy then feel free to find one or give me some clues where to look! Thanks, GrahamHardy (talk) 19:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

A library with old books would help, or search the internet for the first edition. The fact that a non-free content image is replaceable does not mean it only should take a minute of googling to find a replacement. Garion96 (talk) 20:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Same thing is true of Image:LeoTolstoy AnnaKarenina.jpg I'm afraid. If it so easy I wonder why someone else hasn't done it. These things do take quite a bit of search out. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 17:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

True, not easy but not that impossible. See War and Peace, another example of a Tolstoy book. Garion96 (talk) 18:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

I did search the Internet for a first edition and found this image (resurrection.jpg)! For the War and Peace article someone scanned it in themselves (presumably at a "library with old books") ! As the Resurrection was first published earlier than 1st January 1923 then why can't Garion96 change it like they did to A Little Tour in France image and add a Public Domain tag? What is to stop somebody me getting a copy from somewhere unspecified and using the same rationale as Kilmeny of the Orchard image ? I am confusedGrahamHardy (talk) 18:36, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

That is because the edition of this bookcover is unknown. Plus the image has creativity. The way the book is set, the light etc. The other image you mentioned at File:LittleTourInFrance.JPG has no creativity so always is in the public domain (provided of course the bookcover itself is public domain, which it is). Garion96 (talk) 15:41, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Hippos

Technically And the Hippos Were Boiled in Their Tanks doesn't have the correct first-edition cover. It has the UK edition cover, but it is an American release, so it should use the white-colored cover as used by Grove Press. Cheers! 23skidoo (talk) 18:15, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

I agree that it ought to have the US cover but I liked the UK cover so put that. Feel free to change it !GrahamHardy (talk) 18:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Resurrection.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Resurrection.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 15:24, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Images

Sorry for the late response, wasn't online much lately. Regarding flat images. Basically yes, when there is no creativity, basically a scan, there is no new copyright. That was the reason the Age of Innocense image was deleted. Regarding the other images, AnneOfAvonlea.jpg and AnneOfTheIslandCover.jpg. They were originally tagged as fair use (non-free content). If they are indeed images of public domain editions then the images can be undeleted. Message me if they are and I will undelete them. Garion96 (talk) 14:31, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:DoAndroidsDream.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:DoAndroidsDream.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:ShadowsInBronze.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:ShadowsInBronze.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:VenusInCopper.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:VenusInCopper.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Old Georgians category

Thoguh I'm a KGV Old Georgian myself, I think we might be being a bit presumptious in claiming Category:Old Georgians for ourselves. St George's College, Weybridge also usese the same term for its alumni, and it's quite probable that some fo the other St George's Colleges do too. It might be better to rename the KGV one Old Georgians (KGV) instead, what do you think? David Underdown (talk) 20:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Sounds a good idea so renamed as suggested !GrahamHardy (talk) 18:31, 23 February 2009 (UTC)#

Unfortunately I did it wrong and did KJV instead, oops; not sure I can fix this myself now; think I'll have to wait for this to be fixed automatically, Sorry GrahamHardy (talk) 20:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Harrington (surname)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Harrington (surname), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Harrington. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:38, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

W. H. Davies

Please excuse the intrusion, Graham, but you seemed to be an experienced editor with a leaning towards Eng Lit. I am struggling to find a free image of Davies for the article and wondered if it was acceptable to use a book cover? Any advice gratefully received. Thank you for your time. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Or are you aware of any similar uses? Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay in replying, apologies you needed to give me a poke. I'm flattered you regard me as an experienced editor; My experience is wide rather than deep; lots of 1st edition book covers uploaded and a few book articles started - I'm reading books obsessively at the moment - and if they haven't got an article I start one. Re your specific question I suspect it isn't allowed, see Wikipedia:Non-free content#Unacceptable use, which includes as an example under images, A magazine or book cover, to illustrate the article on the person whose photograph is on the cover. So you're a bit stuck; here is some help to find an igane User:R. Baley/Acquire a free image which may be of help.GrahamHardy (talk) 15:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you Graham and sorry to disturb your reading frenzy! Your reply confirms what I suspected alas, but is also very helpful. Searching Google images I now see that the National Portait Gallery has seven images of Davies [1] and it may be possible for me to request a licence to use one of these in the article. I'll give it a try anyway and I'll let you know what happens. Thanks again. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:13, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi again Graham. The short answer is that the image I am interested in is "Unknown Copyright". But NPG are currently in dispute with Wiki over unauthorised images and so won't release copies of anything, even for a indemnity fee. I can email you further details if you are interested. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:23, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:DaVinciCode.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:DaVinciCode.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Anna Wintour ... Old Queen?

I know she's claimed as an alumna in the Queen's College article, but do you have a source for this? (It doesn't, and this article is ten years old, and has some other errors.). Because I pretty thoroughly researched her, and Jerry Oppenheimer's unauthorized biography, the only decent source for her early life, is pretty explicit that she attended only North London Collegiate and went to work in fashion before she was even twenty. I have come across nothing suggesting she went to Queen's (she worked at Harper's & Queen briefly, which may have caused the confusion). Daniel Case (talk) 16:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Removed, and added the above to Queen's College discussion page, hope that's OK, ThanksGrahamHardy (talk) 17:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Unvanquished.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Unvanquished.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:IfHeHollersLetHimGom.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:IfHeHollersLetHimGom.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:43, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Layout

Howdy. Regarding the section order at Anthropology: And a Hundred Other Stories, the recommended order, per WP:LAYOUT, is for external links to be the very last section (see Wikipedia:LAYOUT#External_links in particular). This is the standard throughout Wikipedia. (However, I'll leave it up to you until the article starts getting peer reviewed or FAR or somesuch.) Just fyi :) -- Quiddity (talk) 18:32, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Corrected (and elsewhere), Thanks for pointing it out.GrahamHardy (talk) 17:49, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:LucyGayheart.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:LucyGayheart.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:56, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

My mistake

I appologize, I reverted your image accidently. I appologize for my error. DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 19:25, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Mollocking

No, you're right: all that's said about it in CCF is "What does mollocking mean? , . . No, you need not tell me. I can guess." (See Google Books). The OED says of it "Apparently coined self-consciously in imitation of regional speech". Gordonofcartoon (talk) 11:19, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, GrahamHardy. You have new messages at Hysteria18's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Articles for deletion nomination of Relentless (novel)

I have nominated Relentless (novel), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relentless (novel). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ^TheWeak_Willed 16:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

List of rail accidents in the United Kingdom

I see that you've been putting a lot of refs into List of rail accidents in the United Kingdom - this is good, but they're not exactly in Wikipedia style per WP:CITESHORT. Also, they don't give terribly much about the actual book itself.

For example, there's the question of edition. You're giving the publication year as 1955, which is that of the first edition; but I've never seen one of those in the wild; most copies in libraries or available secondhand are second or third editions (1966 and 1976). There is also a fourth (1982) edition, which seems rare: but I just happen to have owned one since about 1984. The 3rd and 4th were published after Rolt's death, and have revisions and additional material by Geoffrey Kichenside. Kichenside later wrote his own book on railway accidents, some parts of which were based on the material that he'd provided for the 3rd and 4th editions of "Red for Danger". His text was later removed from RfD, so virtually all copies sold new since the early 1990s (including the current June 2009 printing, ISBN 978 0 7524 5106 0) are essentially the second edition.

I'd like to amend the refs, so that they will show more detail about the book yet won't take up much more space. I've already done that to South Croydon rail crash, but with only one reference per book, it's not too clear what I mean. You can see an example of the style that I'd like to use in Hinksey Halt railway station, where some books have several cited refs. If you suggest a section within List of rail accidents in the United Kingdom for me to have a bash at, I'll amend it along those lines, and then you can see what you think. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Feel free to do Before 1850 and I'll copy the format and try the other sections, ThanksGrahamHardy (talk) 20:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

I've now fixed up the existing refs in List of rail accidents in the United Kingdom#Before 1850, and popped in a few more (refs, not accidents) into the same section. I added a "Sources" section too, which lists each of the (three) texts that I consulted. You'll notice that if you click where it says "Rolt & Kichenside" in the "References" section, then the browser moves to the relevant row in the "Sources" section. If you're using Firefox, that row is also highlighted in pale blue; Internet Exploder will move but won't highlight. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:39, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

All done, also list by death-toll...GrahamHardy (talk) 17:56, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Splendid. I have a few other books on railway accidents, shall I pop in the refs for those against the existing entries? Also, if an accident is in those but not in either List of rail accidents in the United Kingdom or List of United Kingdom rail accidents by death toll, shall I add entries for those accidents too? --Redrose64 (talk) 18:17, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Go for it; I'm just reading through Red for Danger (from the library) adding those not mentioned. I'm currently up to page 248...GrahamHardy (talk) 18:20, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Page 248 - that would be Norton Fitzwarren 1940. Anyway, a small point: when using the {{sfn}} template, the last parameter should only be |p= when a single page is referenced. For multiple pages, use |pp=, for example |pp=248-251. You can also reference something that has not got a page number, such as the photos between pages 164 & 165, for which you can use |loc= instead. You can have only one of these three parameter types per {{sfn}}, and if there are more than one, |loc= takes precedence over |p= which takes precedence over |pp=. For example, for Welwyn 1935 you might want to have two {{sfn}}, one with |pp=220-223 and the other could have either |loc=fig. 8(a) or |loc=plate 8(a). --Redrose64 (talk) 19:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Wikicookie

LAAFan has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! --LAAFan^sign _review 20:00, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

W&P Rly Opening Date (your Category change)

It is probably a moot point but the W&P opened for business, albeit over 6 miles only, in 1835 (as per the original category entry) although it opened its complete line in 1836 (as per your change) but which is correct as a Wiki Category? XTOV (talk) 20:30, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Good question; as both Whitby and Pickering are included in the article title, and the Railway name, so I thought that we'd better use the date when both were connected. Its more difficult when the name is just "North Railshire line" for example and was opened in stages; do you use the date the first bit was opened, or the last bit, or the biggest bit? But as I said earlier as both Whitby & Pickering were mentioned I decided to use the date they were linked... No idea what the official rule is but that was my reasoning!GrahamHardy (talk) 20:39, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

HotCat

Hi Graham. You seem to have got the category bug big time! I know from experience that this can lead to large numbers of edits in a short period. Were you aware of the 'HotCat' tool? You may find that it speeds up your categorising (unless you are applying multiple categories.) It allows you to add, remove or replace categories without opening the page for editing. It also does an automatic edit summary (which is useful for other editors, since they can see that it is a HotCat edit and, probably, ignore it). HotCat is available from 'my preferences-->Gadgets-->Editing gadgets'.

Keep up the good work! Cheers -- EdJogg (talk) 10:55, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Works a treat ! GrahamHardy (talk) 14:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Dyce

Was the closed in 1903 category a typo? The infobox states closed: 2 October 1965. --Tagishsimon (talk) 20:24, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Oops well spotted, now fixed.GrahamHardy (talk) 20:27, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Addition of Categories for Station opening and closing dates

I support your addition of these categories but in some cases, for stations whose history I am familiar with, your changes are somewhat misleading or even confusing. Specifically listing Grosmont as opening in 1865 could be said to be wrong since only the Esk Valley line platform was opened on that date. The original station at Grosmont opened under the name Tunnel in 1835, this station was rebuilt and given two platforms and reopened in 1847, now named Grosmont since the village of that name had developed around the original station.

The dates for Beckhole are even more complicated, originally officially opened in 1836 (although it may have been in use during the previous year), it closed to passengers only in 1865, becoming a terminus station at the same time. It reopened to passengers in 1908 closing to passengers on the outbreak of WW1 in 1914 but it remained open for goods for some time, losing that service at some so far unrecorded date as the branch serving it was gradually truncated as the individual private sidings it served were closed, the last fragment of the branch was closed in the early 1950's.

XTOV (talk) 10:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Re Grosmont railway station; I remember being uncertain at the time what date to use and plumped for that in the Infobox ! I remember being uncertain whether the name 'Tunnel' referred to the town or the station. I guess thinking about it this referred to the station ! I have therefore corrected the Category to 1836 - I have also corrected it in the Infobox.

Re Beckhole railway station; all I had to go on is the article itself which makes no mention of 1836; hence I could not use that; I could I guess have added Closed in 1865 category but I didn't, never mind I have added it now - If you can include a referenced statement to Beckhole station opening in 1836 then I'll (or you) can add the category !

ThanksGrahamHardy (talk) 17:19, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Re Beckhole railway station; All done as suggested

XTOV (talk) 18:52, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

List of rail accidents in the United Kingdom II

Since you have contributed to List of rail accidents in the United Kingdom, this is to inform you of a discussion which I have started at Talk:List of rail accidents in the United Kingdom#Criteria for inclusion. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:17, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

The King is Dead

Have you read this novel of Ellery Queen ?

List of rail accidents in the United Kingdom III

Re this edit - it creates invalid HTML if you use the same value for the name= in more than one <ref name=value>some text</ref> style reference. Instead, use it only once (I suggest leaving it on the Ratho accident, seeing as it was already there), and the following should be used for the second and subsequent cases: <ref name=value />. I have fixed it up: see here for my fixes; and the combination of yours and mine is here.

Note that the {{sfn}} template guards against such mistakes internally; but it's not used for Wilson. It could be; I am going to look at that soon. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:03, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

I didn't think it looked right! Thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 03:51, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

I have also corrected them in List of United Kingdom rail accidents by death tollGrahamHardy (talk) 04:34, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Request for Review

A couple of months ago you made some edits to The Ku Klux Klan In Prophecy and there is currently a dispute underway that I'm requesting you to review and offer your perspective. Thanks Buz lightning (talk) 22:04, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Service awards proposal

Hello, GrahamHardy/Archive 1! I noticed you display a service award, and would like to invite you to join the discussion over a proposed revamping of the awards. If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — the Man in Question (in question) 04:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Saqi Books

Hey, no problems with the reversing the changes - the tag's aren't needed anymore anyway. Did a quick edit and changed the Sources section into separate References and Notes sections since that seems to be pretty much the standard. However, if it's different with related articles, then feel free to change it back. Regards, Miyagawa (talk) 21:16, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Reynolds

What an absolute pleasure it is to see someone who has actually put some thought into their edits! It's a very pleasant change from being assaulted by purile vandalism. Thank you for restoring my faith in "the average wikipedian". Pdfpdf (talk) 11:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NewConfessions.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NewConfessions.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:49, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi. Just wanted to drop you a personal line in addition to Twinkle's auto notice to let you know that this one was orphaned because the article itself was deleted as a copyright violation. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Category:Newspapers published in Nunavut

Just curious about this edit. Did you confuse the territory of Nunavut with the region of Quebec called Nunavik? something lame from CBW 21:58, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

If Nanavut is in Quebec is in Canada then I think all should now be OK (I made another tweak); do you agree ?GrahamHardy (talk) 22:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

You are mixing two different places up. Canada has 10 provinces, one of which is Quebec, and 3 territories, one of which is Nunavut. The province of Quebec is made up of several regions, one of which is Nunavik. However, Nunavut is not part of Quebec. something lame from CBW 23:32, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Nanavut was created in 1999; my knowledge of Canadian geography predated that. Hence my mistake! Anyway I've now been updated; thanks for spotting it; looks like you've straighted out the categories, Thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 08:30, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

No problem. All sorted. Cheers. something lame from CBW 16:00, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Rodimus category removal

Thanks for removing those silly categories from the Rodimus page. There was a guy (User talk:Hasbro sp) running around at a couple months back adding silly stuff to GI Joe and Transformers related articles. I kept reverting his nonsense, but I must have missed that one. Mathewignash (talk) 21:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikilink Change on Lauderdale County, Mississippi

I think it's neat that you edited this page and are thousands of miles away with the name Graham Hardy. We have a Hardy Graham here in Lauderdale County that's locally famous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdpalm1981 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

MSC and ship prefixes

I noticed you had defaultsorted some ships owned by MSC so that they're not listed under M. You should know that MSC in these cases is not a ship prefix like MS, but the abbreviation of the company name (Mediterranean Shipping Company). Therefore similarly as Carnival Fantasy is sorted by it's full name and not as "Fantasy", MSC Fantasia should be sorted as "MSC Fantasia" and not "Fantasia". Just thought you should know—you aren't the first one to make this mistake. — Kjet (talk · contribs) 10:19, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NotebookOfTrigorin.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NotebookOfTrigorin.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:37, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:OneHundredYearsOfSolitude.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OneHundredYearsOfSolitude.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:56, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Monitoring changes to a category

I use this tool to monitor changes to a category.--SPhilbrickT 23:36, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Help desk question

I was wondering if you had seen my response to you at the help desk, since you haven't acted upon it by creating either of the two pages necessary to watch categories. See Wikipedia:Help desk#Category watching. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:09, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

I hadn't seen your response but I have now and will have a bash shortly, Thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 21:39, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

List of rail accidents

• 2010 Naugachia train derailment / List of Indian rail accidents & List of rail accidents (2010–2019)

Discussion re the merits of any single entry on any of the lists should be held on the talk page of the relevant list. A note to TWP and/or UKRail may also be in order so that interested editors may have a chance to comment. If you object to the above being included, please feel free to open up a discussion at the relevant talk page(s). Mjroots (talk) 09:13, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Bere Ferrers rail accident

Just a courtesy note that I have nominated this article for DYK. Well done. If you wish to reply, please do so on my talk page or the article's talk page. Schwede66 05:43, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Bere Ferrers rail accident

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

In case you haven't checked, the article got 5,700 views when it was on the homepage. That's a great result and I've added it to the DYK stats page (pages with more than 5,000 views qualify). So well done for getting a great article off the ground. Schwede66 06:58, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:OrlandoABiography.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OrlandoABiography.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

Factotum (novel)

How can i use the front cover Factotum'. For the french article fr:Factotum (roman) . Could you give me your answer [2] thank's . 90.3.220.36 (talk) 15:51, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Marden train crash

The link you added is to footage of one of the Weedon rail crashes. Mjroots (talk) 05:33, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Well spotted, now corrected, Thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 13:48, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Doodlebug Disaster

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:04, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Shepherdsville train wreck

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Pilcrow

For future reference, {{about}} and friends are typically used for disambiguation hatnotes. --Cybercobra (talk) 20:12, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EdibleWoman1stEdition.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EdibleWoman1stEdition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:23, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Cowlairs East Rail Collision ('List of United Kingdom rail accidents by death toll' page)

Hello there. I thought I had copied those figures directly from the official accident report as published on the Railways Archive website (http://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/MoT_CowlairsEast1942.pdf), but on checking it again I seem to have somehow managed to get them completely wrong, for reasons which I cannot now comprehend... Many thanks for noticing and correcting. Kbathgate (talk) 22:45, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Defaultsort (for Roman bridges)

Hi. Your input would be welcome at Wikipedia:Help desk#How to determine defaultsort. Regards Gun Powder Ma (talk) 23:38, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Well Done!

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	for creating so many new pages on books SmokeyTheCat 00:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Also for adding to the article on The Tin Men by Michael Frayn. For all I know you may well have been the only person to even read that article in three years! Well done again. Keep up the good work.

Also thank you for adding the image cover to Sabbatical: A Romance.--Sum (talk) 12:47, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GoBetweenNovel.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GoBetweenNovel.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:19, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GoBetweenNovel.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GoBetweenNovel.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FearAndLoathing.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FearAndLoathing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:33, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Harmon Hotel

Noticed that you tagged this as being established in 2006. How can a hotel be established, which tends to mean open, when it still has not been finished? I suggest that you limit the hotels established category to when they were actually opened like all of the other established in categories. If you are trying to use the Category:yyyy architecture categories I advise extreme caution since those contents need cleaning up. In moving the contents from there to more specific categories I have found many errors or incorrect assignments to actual years. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:15, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

File:1906AtlanticCityTrainWreck.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:1906AtlanticCityTrainWreck.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Essam Sharaf (talk) 18:36, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheRestraintOfBeasts.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheRestraintOfBeasts.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:OracleNight.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:OracleNight.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip [i.e. a Word document or PDF file] that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TehMissingLink ^Talk 19:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:PenalColony.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:PenalColony.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Armbrust ^{WrestleMania XXVII} _{Undertaker 19–0} 17:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KafkaCompleteStories.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:KafkaCompleteStories.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Armbrust ^{WrestleMania XXVII} _{Undertaker 19–0} 17:50, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:DescriptionOfAStruggle.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:DescriptionOfAStruggle.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Armbrust ^{WrestleMania XXVII} _{Undertaker 19–0} 17:57, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ChamberMusicJoyce.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:ChamberMusicJoyce.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Armbrust ^{WrestleMania XXVII} _{Undertaker 19–0} 19:01, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:DearestFather.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:DearestFather.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Armbrust ^{WrestleMania XXVII} _{Undertaker 19–0} 22:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Image rescues

Done. I don't know why Armbrust is doing this, since the use of a book cover to identify a book is at least as clear (perhaps more) of an example of fair use as a logo to identify a company. Nyttend (talk) 22:19, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:WeddingPreparations.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:WeddingPreparations.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Armbrust ^{WrestleMania XXVII} _{Undertaker 19–0} 22:31, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheAlbatross.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheAlbatross.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MasterAndMargerita.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MasterAndMargerita.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

The Plague

Please be more careful when fast-editing. I have reverted this edit, since The Plague was originally published by a French publisher, not by Alfred A. Knopf. --EncycloPetey (talk) 02:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

I was careful ! I just assumed that as its first publication in the US was by Knopf that counted. I stand corrected. By I did take care, no worries GrahamHardy (talk) 09:07, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:ComingThroughSlaughter.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ComingThroughSlaughter.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TalentedMrRipley.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TalentedMrRipley.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:46, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Primary School

The article The Primary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing on this page asserts, let alone establishes, notability. Can find no coverage in reliable sources. I looked.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David in DC (talk) 01:03, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Book covers not showing up on the pages you are adding them to

Hi Graham. Thanks for uploading book cover images to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, none of the cover images you have added to articles are showing up in those articles because you have not followed the template precisely. Please note that the infobox template for books requires that the format for images conform exactly to this style: [[Image:FirstPageGreenGables.gif|200px|Cover]]. That is, there must be a descriptor word or phrase at the end, after an "|" character. Without that, the image will not show up on Wikipedia.

Could you please go back and correct all of the images you have uploaded, so that they will appear in the infoboxes? Right now, all that appears is a large empty space and a non-existent image character. Lastly, please remember to check "Show preview" on any page you edit on Wikipedia before you click "Save page". Thanks very much! Softlavender (talk) 18:27, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

I did do preview; and noticed the problem but thought it was my slow browser. I can see nothing wrong with the syntax:

• A Man in Full has [[Image:Tommywolfie.jpg|200px]] and displays OK.
• Take a Girl Like You has [[File:TakeAGirlLikeYou.jpg|200px]] and does not.

So something strange is happening... GrahamHardy (talk) 18:58, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Just double checked and Take a Girl Like You now appears OK ! GrahamHardy (talk) 19:02, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Something strange is happening - I have added several hundred images recently and have never had this problem before...GrahamHardy (talk) 19:07, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Image server problem? looks relevant GrahamHardy (talk) 19:12, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm sure that's it as eventually they do appear after several attempts - I'm sure it's not me...GrahamHardy (talk) 19:16, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Refresh does not work but Page - View Source (in Internet explorer) seems to do the trick ! GrahamHardy (talk) 19:23, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm a little confused myself, but all I know is, I'm not getting this problem on any images but yours. So it definitely needs to be sorted out. I suggest you avoid adding images until the problem is resolved. Softlavender (talk) 20:41, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

I suspect its affecting all recently added images, but I wont add any more until it's fixed ! GrahamHardy (talk) 20:43, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi Graham, I apologize, I didn't actually check that village pump thread you linked as I thought it was simply you asking about it. I do agree it was a server problem and not your images. Apologies for my rushing to a conclusion! Cheers, Softlavender (talk) 05:25, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Montgomery help

Mr. Hardy, I am a Lucy Maud Montgomery scholar and collector. Can you please let me know where you found the first edition cover for Rainbow Valley as it appears on the wikipedia entry? Vanessa Brown daffy_cat@yahoo.com Daffy cat (talk) 06:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

If you just click on the image it shouls bring up File:RainbowValley.jpg, you should see a summary section beneath the image where the source of the image is written : http://static.flickr.com/85/234901000_a85211df37_o.jpg

Thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 08:53, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MostlySally.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MostlySally.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 07:16, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

More Work for the Undertaker

Could you clarify why you think this image is of the first edition cover, rather than as previously captioned ? RGCorris (talk) 17:23, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Looks like delays in the image server; if you click on the image and see the summary thumbnails at the bottom you should see the new image, thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 17:25, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Not sure about "delays in the image server" - the article is still showing the original image, which suggests there is a problem with the link you set up to the new image. RGCorris (talk) 09:59, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Raised at Wikipedia:Helpdesk#Image server delays ? as it does seem odd ! GrahamHardy (talk) 11:34, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Now fixed ! GrahamHardy (talk) 11:45, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LandsEdge.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LandsEdge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:51, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LaughterInTheDark.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LaughterInTheDark.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:14, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TroublesFarrell.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TroublesFarrell.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:09, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheGeneral.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheGeneral.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:41, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Reinstated usage GrahamHardy (talk) 21:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject East Anglia

Would you be interested in WikiProject East Anglia?

If yes, please support us here at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/East Anglia. Wilbysuffolk talk 07:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Literary Barnstar
		For doing an excellent job at adding first edition covers to Novels articles at least over the last couple months (you keep showing up on my watchlist) or maybe even longer judging by your talk page, 12:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC) Sadads (talk) 12:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Vanishedprince1951.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Vanishedprince1951.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Now added GrahamHardy (talk) 07:02, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:HellBarbusse.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:HellBarbusse.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 20:17, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Expanded rationale, hope its now OK Thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 23:13, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Book covers re: Stephen Crane

Hi GrahamHardy, I noticed that you recently uploaded book covers of several Stephen Crane works, including ones for The Red Badge of Courage, The Open Boat, and others. For the time being, I've removed the covers to these two works for several reasons. First, the latter is an FA and the other is currently at FAC, so the presence of any Fair-Use image may prove problematic. Second, your source (to AbeBooks) is not conclusive, mainly because the site is user-generated. Unless I'm wrong? Can you prove that these images are in fact the first US editions? I believe this to be the case for the Red Badge cover, but the Open Boat cover seems odd, especially since it doesn't include the full, original title of the work. Another issue is that you've tagged these works as being Fair-Use when, if they are in fact first edition publications, they would be in the public domain in the US because they pre-date 1923. Phew, lots of points. :) If you can clear up any of these issues, let me know! María (habla conmigo) 02:00, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Happy to leave The Red Badge of Courage until the FAC process is complete. I have changed the liscensing on File:TheOpenBoat.jpg and amended the source website to http://www.betweenthecovers.com/btc/item/95814/ if you check the source they provide more information, does that help ? Abebooks shows several first edition covers, both UK and US; all of which are just inscribed "The Open Boat"... also looking at the title page http://www.archive.org/stream/openboatothertal00cranuoft#page/n5/mode/2up indicates that the 'And Other Tales Of Adventure' was an adjunct to the main title... GrahamHardy (talk) 11:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks so much! Along with the sources you've provided, I've also researched Will H. Bradley's work and found that he did illustrate the 1898 edition, so I agree it's most probably the first edition cover. If you similarly change the Red Badge cover (as well as the other ones re: Crane) to the public domain, we could work it back into the article without ruffling any feathers at FAC. :) (Sorry for causing the automated messages below, btw; I forgot the bot did that.) María (habla conmigo) 12:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

I have similiarly amended File:TheRedBadgeOfCourage.jpg, I'll leave it to your people to reinstate it into the article, I will do the other Crane books shortly, Thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 14:29, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Red Badge cover has been re-added. Thanks so much for taking the time to research and upload these quality images! The articles are far better with them included, and I greatly appreciate your help. María (habla conmigo) 14:59, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

All done ! GrahamHardy (talk) 17:18, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheOpenBoat.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheOpenBoat.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:57, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Usage reinstated GrahamHardy (talk) 14:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheRedBadgeOfCourage.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheRedBadgeOfCourage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:57, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Usage reinstated GrahamHardy (talk) 17:19, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Request

Hi, I thought you might be able to help me. Last night I started a stub on the publishing house Boni & Liveright and I'm looking for a pre-1923 book cover to for an illustration. You're good at finding and uploading those images and I thought if you have a look at the list of authors on the page that you might be able to find something for me. Thanks. TK (talk) 18:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Found this one from 1918: http://pictures.abebooks.com/BETWEENTHECOVERS/1418465826.jpg which may do, give me a little longer and I may find something else... Thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Or there's File:EnormousRoom.JPG but the rationale needs changing from Fair Use to Public Domain... GrahamHardy (talk) 20:41, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks so much. I've spent hours today trawling through images but you're much better at this than I am. I prefer the Dreiser one because it shows the publisher on the spine. TK (talk) 20:44, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Are you OK to load it etc. or do you want me to ? GrahamHardy (talk) 20:54, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm really bad at loading - would you mind? Then we can use it for the Dreiser article too. Thanks. TK (talk) 20:56, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

I think I've done it OK : File:TheHandOfThePotter.jpg, can I leave you to do the rest ? GrahamHardy (talk) 21:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Yes, no prob. Thanks so much! TK (talk) 21:15, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

FYI, I've listed File:TheHandOfThePotter.jpg at WP:PUF because, although the book is of course PD, the photo itself is a different matter. --dave pape (talk) 18:41, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

A cover image from one of the various copies on archive.org (e.g. [3]) would qualify for {{PD-art}}, on the other hand. --dave pape (talk) 18:46, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:24for3novel.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:24for3novel.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:36, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IAmLegend.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IAmLegend.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 13:30, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:LostFace.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:LostFace.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheBestLaidPlans.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheBestLaidPlans.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:18, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

no problm 8 all.....better infact :) Supriya Srivatsa (talk) 11:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eragon.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eragon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:27, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BIsForBurglar.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BIsForBurglar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TalesOfTheJazzAge.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TalesOfTheJazzAge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PortnoysComplaint.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PortnoysComplaint.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:54, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Userfied Afd'd article

I moved the requested article to User:GrahamHardy/Before I Go to Sleep/Before I Go to Sleep (hiccuped during move :( - it was Afd'd and needs substantial work before it is good enough for article space. Please see the concerns voiced at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Before I Go to Sleep about the state of the article at the time of deletion. Skier Dude (talk)

Orphaned non-free image File:Aboutaboybsdrgh.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aboutaboybsdrgh.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:54, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Reinstated image usage GrahamHardy (talk) 10:49, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GoodManInAfrica.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GoodManInAfrica.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:19, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Reinstated image usage GrahamHardy (talk) 10:49, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

File:WinesburgOhio.jpg

I just wanted to let you know that I replaced this fair-use image with a pic of the first edition title page. The first edition looks like it had no dust jacket cover, so I figured the title page was the best choice. --INeverCry 06:24, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WinesburgOhio.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WinesburgOhio.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:15, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Hugh Walters (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hugh Walters (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugh Walters (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Gh87 (talk) 19:50, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MostBeautifulWomanInTown.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MostBeautifulWomanInTown.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:42, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheQuestForKarla.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheQuestForKarla.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:09, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

I have moved the page to Smiley Versus Karla as this is a British book and was published in the UK under that title, so this is more appropriate and I have uploaded a new image of the British book cover. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:13, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

But The Quest for Karla was published in 1982, Smiley Versus Karla was not published until 1991, so this looks more like an American book to me ! GrahamHardy (talk) 10:31, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Ah, The cover pic I added is from a 1991 edition. I have a very battered British edition from 1981, am looking for a better image of the original. 164.11.204.132 (talk) 10:35, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

I just looked at fantasticfiction & abebooks which are normally right but if you have an older copy ! GrahamHardy (talk) 10:37, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheAlchemist.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheAlchemist.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:55, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Reinstated image usage GrahamHardy (talk) 20:19, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Novels set in Columbia

I think the correct category for novels set in the country of Colombia (ie not in Columbia) is Category:Novels set in Colombia, so have nominated the other category ie Category:Novels set in Columbia for merging Hugo999 (talk) 22:12, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NotesOfADirtyOldMan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NotesOfADirtyOldMan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:38, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Reinstated image usage GrahamHardy (talk) 09:13, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:VanishingActs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VanishingActs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 20:41, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Fictional dogs and Category:Dogs in literature

Hi Graham. What is the difference between Category:Fictional dogs and Category:Dogs in literature? Both seem to contain books in which dogs are main characters. Cunard (talk) 09:44, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WOLP UK.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WOLP UK.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:31, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Reinstated image usage GrahamHardy (talk) 09:28, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello GrahamHardy/Archive 1! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Orphaned non-free image File:ColdComfortFarm.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ColdComfortFarm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:14, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Reinstated image usage GrahamHardy (talk) 19:20, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Roald Dahl task force!

Hello, GrahamHardy/Archive 1, We are wondering if you would like to join the Roald Dahl task force as you have contributed a lot to the articles in our scope. We hope you can join!

Orphaned non-free image File:Dressmaker.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dressmaker.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:48, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification (for GrahamHardy)

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

The Family Markowitz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Georgetown

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:40, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Schiedam train disaster

I made a draft article about the train disaster in Schiedam, which you had earlier made a draft about and I used some info from your draft. See User:SpeakFree/Schiedam train disaster. If you have anything to contribute, please feel welcome to do so. I also created the article nl:Treinramp bij Schiedam on Dutch Wikipedia. BTW I live very near to the location where it happened so I might take a picture of the surroundings once I figure out where it exactly happened (I have a general idea based on the NOS video but all the buildings in it aren't there anymore AFAIKS), maybe a panorama like on Harmelen train disaster. If you know the exact (GPS) location please tell me. S_peakF_ree ^(talk)_(contribs) 00:11, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In The Foothills Paper, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Montrose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dressmaker.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dressmaker.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:58, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Setting of Plot Against America

Doesn't he (or his brother) spend a summer in Kentucky working a tobacco farm? It's been a while since I've taught it, but I'm pretty sure there's a Kentucky section in the story. Aristophanes68 (talk) 06:39, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited The Ivy Tree, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Morrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 31 December 2011 (UTC)