User talk:Gongshow/Archive 2


Gongshow	Talk	Awards	Email	Contribs

DYK for Stoneground

On April 3, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stoneground, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for writing the Stoneground article; I had it on my list of to-dos. Ecphora (talk) 00:11, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing; I was a little surprised there wasn't already an article for the band. It has a pretty good start - feel free to add any info I've missed. Gongshow ^Talk 18:09, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles

A massive "thank you!" for your excellent article contributions! I'm poking someone to give you Autoreviewer status as we speak. Ironholds (talk) 21:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's rather the point of autoreviewer :P. Keep up the good work! Ironholds (talk) 22:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mickey factz

Nice work on finding sources. You are way better than me at finding sources for music related articles. Heck, I think that you're one of the best. Joe Chill (talk) 22:00, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, coming from one of the best all-around AfD contributors, that means a lot. Gongshow ^Talk 22:38, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MagicHollow.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MagicHollow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Gongshow ^Talk 05:07, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Causing a Commotion GAR

Thank you for the review. I went ahead and addressed it. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:56, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the passing of "Causing a Commotion". As for the Madonna FAC, (keeping my fingers crossed), feel free to comment there if you want to.

--Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:46, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. One request if you really wanna comment on the FAC, will you please do it in the link? Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Madonna (entertainer)/archive1. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 07:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thnk you for the comments. I went ahead and addressed them all. Take a looky :) --Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:48, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. :) --Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:46, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha, thanks. I know, but the ultimate decision lies in the hand of the FAC delegates, there in I keep my fingers crossed. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I Miss You (Miley Cyrus song)

Thank you for taking your time to review the article. I fixed a few things and have been trying to reach you on the GA talk and can't edit it. Everytime I leave something it doesn't appear. Can you fix that please? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 21:28, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What must I do to respond to your comments because I guess it's something that I'm not doing right, -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 00:19, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's probably the way it is formatted. How many colons must I put? Anyways, the first wo comments for prose are taken care of. As for the third, Heather Phares of Allmusic wrote,

"Even though the title Hannah Montana 2/Meet Miley Cyrus seems a little self-defeating, it's true that the songs Cyrus sang as herself on the first soundtrack weren't especially memorable, so in a way her part of the set is a second chance to make a first impression. This time, the sound and the songs are better -- several tracks, such as 'GNO (Girls' Night Out)' and 'I Miss You,' could easily be Hannah Montana songs, but Cyrus' singing is lower and throatier, and the arrangements are more organic and rock-oriented."

The entire paragraph relates to each other and I know she only referenced "I Miss You" once. But, she is conveying the idea that her first songs were not memorable and this time around they are. Some songs could even be confused with quality of those of Hannah Montana. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 20:31, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. That's great. I love it. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:32, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

The first comment, I think we just addressed it and the third, I removed the quotes but the sky background is seen in the image. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:39, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And for the fifth, I moved the comment to the "Live performances" section. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:41, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The fourth does stay that her songs are better than what's heard on Radio Disney and says that those songs includes "I Miss You" so that should not be removed. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 23:43, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First: On the side, it has teen pop as one of soundtrack's overall styles. Can we use that? And we can also just use rock music since it does say that.
Second: I'll see what I can do. The Oprah Winfrey Show shows that his passing was her inspiration. Does it suffice?
Third: O.K. Can we just describe the background as light blue rather than a sky? If not, deleting it is fine with me.
Fourth: I beg to differ. It adds to it. Can we say "Joseph P. Kahn of The Boston Globe mentioned that Cyrus' songs surpassed much of what is heard on Radio Disney, adding that Cyrus' writing in 'I Miss You' was a portrayal of it."?
Fifth: Done -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 02:11, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. I think everything is taken care of. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 05:01, 30 May 2010 (UTC) And thank you for actually reviewing the article with such thoroughness, not everyone would take their time to do that. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 05:17, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Forgive Me (Leona Lewis song)/GA1

Thanks for your input! Adabow (talk) 06:55, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Movieswwwbeaub01.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Movieswwwbeaub01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:54, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for So Close (Hall & Oates song)

On June 11, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article So Close (Hall & Oates song), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Downfall (game show)

On June 11, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Downfall (game show), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Downfall game show.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Downfall game show.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:17, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catch21 2009logo.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Catch21 2009logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hugahoody (talk) 20:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Catch21 2009logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Catch21 2009logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rescue

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:11, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Redirect Barnstar
		I took the liberty of reviewing your work, and you deserve recognition for all your hard work on WP. Happy editing, Obamafan70 (talk) 22:52, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hard work barnstar

For all your hard work, you deserve it. Obamafan70 (talk) 15:32, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Billboard's Hottest Hot 100 Hits

Hi Gongshow! I am Novice7. I noticed your contributions and usage of Billboard's Hottest Hot 100 Hits. I was wondering if you could help me out with some Whitney Houston articles. If I'm right, the book has information on lot of her songs. I usually work on her articles, so your help is much appreciated. Novice7 | Talk 13:03, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. From what I've known, the book has information on how the songs developed and how they were done (Background information). So, if it is possible, could you add that information for this and this? I hope I'm not causing a nuisance for you :) Novice7 | Talk 04:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow!!! Amazing... You're really amazing. Thank you so much!!! I would have never got that much even if I spent all day searching the web.. Novice7 | Talk 09:38, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Wow, Preacher's Wife is such a great film. A classic forever :) Novice7 | Talk 09:59, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Triangle

Take this brother, may it serve you well.....

A useful, informative and pleasant read. SilkTork *^YES! 21:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

It can come in useful sometimes, and you appear trustworthy. Also, it's another step toward becoming an Admin. SilkTork *^YES! 22:03, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks! I really appreciate you taking the time to type that comment on my talk page, sorry about the trouble. And i see what your problem is now with it, thanks for narrowing it down, and I'm glad you like the genres i chose for my best friends girl because boy do The Cars use alot of genres, especially in theirs singles ("just what i needed" new wave, power pop, rock)("drive" synthpop ballad rock etc..) . But really, I'm glad you like the genres i chose for it, and i like to hear peoples opinion on what genre(s) i choose for a cars song, songs like bye bye love and just what i needed are really tough to label 1 or 2 genres to. Theirs not many bands out there like the cars that can mix or separately use genres such as rock, hard rock, art rock, power pop, synthpop, classic rock, rockabilly etc.. and still sound great. That's the thing about the cars, they had both a rock and pop side to them and sometimes their sides combined. take care!MajorHawke (talk) 21:14, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References in golf articles

I truly think what Tewapack did to my edit on Keegan Bradley is nitpicking. First of all the accessdate of the article is totally unessential information. Does it tell readers anything important? Nope.

As to what news source it came from, its a wire service story posted to a sports website. ESPN isn't the originator of the story. Why give them credit.

Thirdly, I've been doing edits to golf tournament articles, Honda Classic Pensacola Open and Bob Hope Classic, just to name three, where I been putting tournament highlights sections. The highlights are all referenced without mention of the access date or what website or publication I got them from and Tewapack has gone through these edits to fix up any typos I made my KeeganWITHOUT putting in the access dates or news sources.

Then why does he revert my Keegan Bradley edit using that criteria? It's hypocritical clearly.

Tewapack may not like that I go into articles he has edited clearly wrong information and fixed them up. I tell him about it on his talk page. Recent examples of this are my fixes to articles on Calvin Peete and the 1975 U.S. Open. He had a wrong quote from Lee Trevino and trivial weather info in the article rather than the fact that Tom Watson tied the 36 hole scoring record in 75. The Peete article had Calvin working as a migrant farm worker instead selling jewelry to those people. I mean did he read the article he cited? Golf watchers in the 80's knew how Peete came to play golf.

Fix my edits if I got typos in them or factual mistakes, fine, if you're doesn't in no way changes the quality of the article, why do it and signal to me what I'm doing is a waste of time? Ask yourself- William 17:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jivesh Here

Hi. I am Jivesh. I am on Wikipedia since two years. I have noticed that you usually make edits to Beyonce-related articles. May i invite you to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Beyoncé Knowles? Jivesh • Talk2Me 05:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. Regards. Jivesh • Talk2Me 17:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Futuristics

You deleted this page because of poor sources but after reading the general notability guidelines I'm confused as to why. The Lonely Island webpage is a credible site by a notable group, which mentions this production team as having worked with them. Please help restore this Wiki article as it meets all sufficient guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.167.155.161 (talk) 01:13, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I didn't delete the page actually, I just expressed an opinion in the discussion in favor of deletion at this time because there was no evident significant coverage for the producers in reliable sources, thus not meeting the WP:Notability or WP:MUSIC guidelines. By "significant coverage", Wiki editors typically try to find sources that "address the subject directly in detail [...] more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material." So, the coverage doesn't have to be 500+ words or anything, but it should be more than just a mention within a single sentence or listing. That's considered trivial, not significant. By "sources", secondary sources are preferred for establishing notability. An article in Billboard, Rolling Stone, The Source or some other notable magazine/newspaper, a write-up on MTV.com, Pitchfork, Stereogum or some other reputable website...those are some of the types of examples of getting "coverage" from outside, objective sources. Again, the Futuristics (as with any topic) don't have to be the main focus of the article, provided there is at least more than just a one-off mention. That's why, in my view, this production team needed more than a namedrop on the Lonely Island website (and other similar passing mentions in articles and/or directories) in order to sustain an independent article. It seems The Futuristics have worked with some notable people (The Lonely Island, Chris Brown, Cody Simpson, etc) so it may just be a matter of time before that type of coverage exists (if it doesn't already). If/when it does, I'll happily support an article. I hope that helps explain where I'm coming from. Take care, Gongshow ^Talk 04:05, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nicki Minaj "Super Bass"

Hello,

I created this page because I was unable to get the current Super Bass page to reflect the correct information about the song because one of the editors continues to delete my changes. http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/charts/currentsingles/the-billboard-hot-100 lists First Born with the credits and he should get publicity for his production work. If possible, can this page be undeleted or may I recreate it so Wikipedia has the correct information?

Thanks,

Rashad Lilashad (talk) 20:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lilashad, I appreciate you wanting to avoid edit warring with another editor, but creating a virtually duplicate article in the meantime is not the solution. Since you've already tried to add the info to the "Super Bass" article, my advice is to state your case here on the article's talk page using any reliable sources you've found (perhaps like the Billboard link you mentioned). There's probably a reason why it's gotten removed, so the communication may help to reach an understanding and develop a consensus. Good luck. Gongshow ^Talk 20:57, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding. I've tried to work with the page creator and he's not listening to what I have to say. Thanks again. Lilashad (talk) 02:05, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alli Live/Alli L!ve

If you come on any more of these (and they are appearing at quite a rate) you can tag them WP:CSD#G4 because of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alli L!ve, way back in November. This is a very persistent socker/hoaxer - see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SharkEmpress01. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

g4 on the 4d motion cinema article

Hi Gongshow, just wanted to drop you a note. G4 does not apply to articles that were deleted by speedy, only to ones that were deleted through an AFD. In this case, the author still hasn't corrected the advertising tone that caused the article to be deleted in the first place so one could place a G11 notice (which I did). Hope this helps. Syrthiss (talk) 14:39, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Geraint Watkins

How about ADDING those sources you dug up in the Geraint Watkins AFD instead of making it somebody else's problem? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 20:33, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've incorporated four of the sources (plus another that was cited earlier in the AfD) into the body of the article. Hope this helps. Gongshow ^Talk 04:42, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 04:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I've also referenced another source mentioned elsewhere in the AfD. Gongshow ^Talk 04:53, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do It My Way Press Article http://refreshmagazine.typepad.com/my_weblog/2011/07/musical-moment-john-galea.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.19.235 (talk) 09:26, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Creeggan

Good WP:HEY job here. Where was all that stuff when I googled? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 04:08, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

News and notes: Girl Geeks edit while they dine, candidates needed for forthcoming steward elections, image referendum opens

In the news: Journalist regrets not checking citation, PR firms issue advice on how to "survive" Wikipedia (but U.S. Congressman caught red-handed)

WikiProject report: Images in Motion – WikiProject Animation

Featured content: JJ Harrison on avian photography

Arbitration report: After eleven moves, name for islands now under arbitration

Technology report: Engineering report, sprint, and more testers needed

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:39, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

News and notes: Abuse filter on all Wikimedia sites; Foundation's report for July; editor survey results

In the news: Wikipedia praised for disaster news coverage, scolded for left-wing bias; brief news

Recent research: Article promotion by collaboration; deleted revisions; Wikipedia's use of open access; readers unimpressed by FAs; swine flu anxiety

Opinion essay: How an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire

WikiProject report: WikiProject Tennis

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Four existing cases

Technology report: The bugosphere, new mobile site and MediaWiki 1.18 close in on deployment

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:10, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

News and notes: 24,000 votes later and community position on image filter still unclear; first index of editor satisfaction appears positive

In the news: Britannica and Wikipedia like "apples and chairs"; should anyone who's anyone get an article?; and why fighting and barriers to editing may be useful after all

WikiProject report: Riding with WikiProject London Transport

Sister projects: Wiki Loves Monuments 2011

Featured content: The best of the week

Opinion essay: The copyright crisis, and why we should care

Arbitration report: BLP case closed; Cirt-Jayen466 nearly there; AUSC reshuffle

Technology report: Pencils down in Google Summer of Code, August analysed and integrated HTTPS support in action

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:53, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

News and notes: Foundation reports on research, Kenya trip, Mumbai Wikiconference; Canada, Hungary and Estonia; English Wikinews forked

In the news: 9/11 coverage, Wikimedia hypothetically rebranded and Wikipedia golf 2.0

WikiProject report: Politics in the Pacific: WikiProject Australian Politics

Featured content: Wikipedians explain two new featured pictures

Arbitration report: Ohconfucius sanctions removed, Cirt desysopped 6:5 and a call for CU/OS applications

Technology report: What is: agile development? and new mobile site goes live

Opinion essay: The Walrus and the Carpenter

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:38, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

From the editor: Changes to The Signpost

News and notes: Ushahidi research tool announced, Citizendium five years on: success or failure?, and Wikimedia DC officially recognised

In the news: Wikipedia: yesterday's news? Calls for women, doctors, and scholars of humanities; Wales makes Wikimedia work "look easy"

Sister projects: On the Wikinews fork

WikiProject report: Back to school

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: ArbCom narrowly rejects application to open new case

Technology report: MediaWiki 1.18 deployment begins, the alleged "injustice" of WMF engineering policy, and Wikimedians warned of imminent fix to magic word

Popular pages: Article stats for the English Wikipedia in the last year

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Young the Giant - My Body.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Young the Giant - My Body.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:26, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2011

Opinion essay: The global mission, the image filter and the "German question"

Recent research: Top female Wikipedians, reverted newbies, link spam, social influence on admin votes, Wikipedians' weekends, WikiSym previews

News and notes: WMF strikes down enwiki consensus, academic journal partnerships, and eyebrows raised over minors editing porn-related content

In the news: Sockpuppeting journalist recants, search dominance threatened, new novels replete with Wikipedia references

WikiProject report: A project in overdrive: WikiProject Automobiles

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: "Broadly construed" explained, voting begins on Senkaku Islands case, invitation to comment on CU/OS candidates

Technology report: 1.18 deployment on track, "mythical" Git migration scheduled, editor decline statistics improved

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:25, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 October 2011

News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy

In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts

WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand

Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan

Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:13, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians

News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised

In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist

WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People

Featured content: The weird and the disgusting

Arbitration report: Senkaku Islands closes; administrators authorized to place articles on discretionary sanctions

Technology report: 1.18 deployment and HTTPS switchover completed, but developer help now needed with new projects

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:31, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 October 2011

News and notes: Arabic Wikipedia gets video intros, Smithsonian gifts images, and WikiProject Conservatism scrutinized

In the news: Why Wikipedia survives while others haven't; Wikipedia as an emerging social model; Jimbo speaks out

WikiProject report: History in your neighborhood: WikiProject NRHP

Featured content: Brazil's boom-time dreams of naval power: The ed17 explains the background to a new featured topic

Arbitration report: Case requests on ethnic strife and a WikiProject declined, Abortion case stalls but topic bans look to be lightened on amendment

Technology report: WMDE renew investment in Toolserver, first offsite backup programme of Wikimedia begun

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:22, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Gongshow/Archive 2! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Gongshow/Archive 2! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

From the editors: A call for contributors

Opinion essay: There is a deadline

Interview: Contracting for the Foundation

In the news: Are Wikipedians reluctant journalists?; Wikipedia:The Musical

WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos

Featured content: The best of the week

Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case

Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arrested Development - Mr. Wendal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arrested Development - Mr. Wendal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.