User talk:George Simon Ohm

Welcome

Hello, George Simon Ohm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
Check out some of these pages:
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 06:48, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.

How do I create citations?

Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Nomination of Left Front (Bharat) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Left Front (Bharat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Left Front (Bharat) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Soman (talk) 13:39, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Maha Vikas Aghadi, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 05:55, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

I am here to address a lot things you are doing wrong. I think that before starting to make large scale edits you have not read Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. I am giving you some important links that you must read.

Wikipedia:Five pillars these are most important
Wikipedia:No original research you are continuously violating this most recently you violated this in Next Indian general election in West Bengal by predicting that TMC will contest in 38 and will support INC+ in 2. No official announcement like this is made.
Wikipedia:Citing sources always give citations.
Wikipedia:Reliable sources always provide reliable sources to support your actions.
Help:Edit summary Always try to give explaination of you edits in edit summary.
Wikipedia:Notability Articles you create must be notable. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:30, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In a newspaper report it has been mentioned that in Next Indian general election in West Bengal TMC will contest 38 seats George Simon Ohm (talk) 17:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I gave you all the rules above to read. How can you prove what you are mentioning. Just saying you read won't help. Wait for formal seat sharing announcement and not expert opinions in news papers. Please read citing sources and reliable sources that I mentioned above. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 20:21, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for specifying the rules which I must be familiar with. George Simon Ohm (talk) 06:41, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

INC ideology

@George Simon Ohm I would suggest you not to make ideological changes in Indian National Congress article without citing reliable sources. Even that is not sufficient. Making a big change in one of the most read pages requires discussion. I would suggest you to refrain from it. Since you still are in a initial stage. Those pages draw admin attention at large. I hope you get me. And secondly, things related to state organisations can't be added in national party page. Because it is not adopted by the whole party. It is a party not a big-tent alliance that can have factions. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 07:38, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I though I had used reliable sources as it has been used and widely accepted in Wikipedia. George Simon Ohm (talk) 11:46, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@George Simon Ohm please see the notice that is put in those sections it clearly says that even when you have reliable sources you should first bring them to talk page. Please read before adding or removing. Ignoring them repeatedly might land you in trouble. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I might not had observed George Simon Ohm (talk) 11:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't make unilateral changes

Why are you adding small parties in previous general election infoboxes. Small parties are not added only parties with atleast 10% seats or top 2 parties are added generally. Don't make unilateral changes. Adding more parties wont show multi party symbol. Detailed breakdown is there in the article. Please refrain these disruptions. I had advised you about this previously too. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 17:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@George Simon Ohm you are continuously violating WP:NOR. Your edits are Unsourced and based on original research which is not allowed here. You are adding how you see things which is not accepted in many cases. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 17:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have not added any unsourced information till now. George Simon Ohm (talk) 01:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is this? Is it sourced? Revision as of 21:12, 23 September 2023. Look I have always given you advise and you have listened. This is also one of them. Donot indulge in WP:NOR. Repeated edits violating this may result in loss of editing privileges. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 02:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic socialism and social democracy is a centre-left or left-wing ideology as per as books based on ideology George Simon Ohm (talk) 03:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@George Simon Ohm You need to cite them. You know it doesn't mean every one knows it. This is the thin-line here. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 03:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where it has been said. George Simon Ohm (talk) 01:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023 (2)

@George Simon Ohm I have reverted your recent edits at Next Indian general election. I am here to explain you what me to do it because I am too much tired to get into a dispute atleast for a week now.

Revision as of 12:39, 30 September 2023 here you added link to an article which is about the members of the I.N.D.I.A. But the section is not about the members of the alliance but the candidates. So it is the wrong page.
Revision as of 12:29, 30 September 2023 here you have added analysis and made some corrections in it. This too is not to be mentioned. Because had that analysis been done by some independent expert it would have been right to mention it. But since it is done by Congress party it can't be termed as independent as this is by a party involved. Only analysis by independent experts should be added.

I would advise you to please read MOS:INDELECT before you start editing election pages. And remember the content added to the pages should always be from a neutral point of view. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 09:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

I told you to read MOS:INDELECT before editing Indian election articles. But it seems like you have not read it. I also told you to read Wikipedia policy and guidelines. But it seems you haven't read them too. Had you read them you would not have made these changes at Opinion polling for the next Indian general election.

I have reverted your changes. Since Times Now survey passes all the requirements of MOS:INDELECT be it MoE or Sample Size or reliability. We follow Wikipedia's policy. Times Now Group is a reliable source on Wikipedia. This is the only thing that matters here. Anyone can criticise it in outer world. But for it to be followed here you have to make it here avoiding to Wikipedia policies. I wouldn't expect you to do things like this again. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 15:43, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@George Simon Ohm If INC & CPI(M) or collective Sanjukta Morcha performs good in Lok Sabha elections then we can add them in Next West Bengal Legislative Assembly election. Please don't add them now. And the claim you gave in your edit summary that they are present in previous year infobox also. I see that you only have Congress there. It wasn't there. This will be second revert if you do so. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 04:25, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It must be added because CPI(M) and INC is still considered a major party of West Bengal. Moreover, West Bengal is still considered CPI(M) stronghold. In 2019 Congress won 2 seats from Bengal more than where it's the government such as Rajasthan where it won 0 seat. Take a glace at 2015 Delhi Legislative Assembly election even though Congress and BJP won 0 and 3 seats respectively. It has been added. CPI(M) and INC has representation in parliament. Until now from its creation. It was added but you're the first one to removed it. I've checked the history. In recent by polls Congress once won 1 seat. As the winner joined TMC. Congress has 0 seats. There alliance partner ISF has representation in the legislature. So, I think I should add. You must start discuss on this issue with other admins. George Simon Ohm (talk) 07:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alliance partner has something doesn't mean it can be used to add other. Congress and BJP did good in 2013 thatswhy were there in 2015. INC & CPI(M) got 0 in last election that's why they are not to be mentioned in next election. And you have once again added it without discussing. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 07:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits at Next Indian general election in Bihar appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have told you to so many times to read and follow the rules. Please read MOS:INDELECT. Infoboxes habe information of parties. Alliance is just a parameter. As you said you did it like Jharkhand you yourself removed name of parties from it. Please don't make disruptive edits. Also I have requested you mamy times to not remove the spacing from infobox. But it seems you don't want to listen to it too. Repeated disruptive behaviour might lead in restrictions for your account. Since I am here, please tell me what you meant by the message you left at my talk page Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)ge.[reply]

Can I use this template in Next Indian general election in Bihar Infobox legislative election since many major parties are contesting election like BJP, INC, JD(U), RJD, CPI(M-L), CPIM(M), CPI, RLJP, LJP(RV) etc George Simon Ohm (talk) 12:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay sorry, I had copied the style from 2019 Indian general election in Jharkhand George Simon Ohm (talk) 12:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This edit hadn't done by me George Simon Ohm (talk) 12:35, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. That infobox is for legislative elections. This is about parliament election. It can't be used. Also why do you all of a sudden want to change it when there are no issues in it. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 12:41, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Left parties are not a major party in general election. Even RJD is not since it has 0 seats but it is added because of its vote share and being the largest party in state legislative assembly. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 12:42, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought as Kanaiya Kumar was added in last page and Left front has 16 seats in Bihar Legislative Assembly it's a major party George Simon Ohm (talk) 12:44, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Once again. There is a difference in Legislative and General elections. Learn the difference before editing. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 12:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has been used in Next United Kingdom general election George Simon Ohm (talk) 12:42, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Once again. There is a difference in UK election articles and Indian election articles. Every country article pattern is decided by its WikiProject. Like Indian election articles pattern is decided by members of WikiProject Indian Politics whcih is MOS:INDELECT. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 12:45, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@George Simon Ohm The what is this. It clearly shows that you have done this. Revision as of 23:16, 5 October 2023. Don't lie and tell me what you meant. Or I shall report this. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 12:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was just a joke George Simon Ohm (talk) 12:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The why did you say that you didn't do it. Also these jokes my cost you with your account. Wikipedia is Encyclopaediaists corner. Not made for jokes. Read WP:CIVIL. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 12:58, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reply George Simon Ohm (talk) 12:59, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why only alliances are used in 2019 Indian general election in Jharkhand George Simon Ohm (talk) 13:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is a wrong format which needs to be corrected. I shall do it in free time. You can't always ask me to reply fast. I have other things to do too. Not just here but at other Wiki sister projects too. Also I have my own personal life. Learn to wait. You will get your reply whenever or as soon as possible. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 13:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i THOUGHT YOU MISSED IT George Simon Ohm (talk) 13:05, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@George Simon Ohm Related to Bihar article you are currently working on. Not every party contending is mentioned. AAP & AIMIM are not major parties. I have explained this nicely in edit summary. Only add major alliances which have chance of forming government or have large scale persence. And rest parties are in others. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 13:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@George Simon Ohm why are you repeatedly removing the spacing from infobox whole making edits. The sign of = is better when it is in one line. Please make sure that while changes you don't remove the spacing. Whenever you see Infobox templates you will se that = is in a single line. See Template:Infobox election#Usage for example. Try to understand this. I have told this to you many times. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 14:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@George Simon Ohm I can't understand why are you doing this again and again. Seems you won't listen. Do I need to find some other way or some admin to make you understand this? Shaan Sengupta^Talk 12:13, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I had added it because they're notable parties. They performed better in 2023 West Bengal Panchayat election George Simon Ohm (talk) 12:44, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@George Simon Ohm I am talking about the spacing that you are removing from the Infobox of the articles. How many times do I need to ask you not to remove them. See above, I have explained why its wrong. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 12:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about that. I usually do visual editing George Simon Ohm (talk) 12:49, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then start doing source editing. Because that is causing a lot of errors. Don't do visual editing in Infobox. Otherwise repeated wrong actions that too after these many warnings might cause some problem for you. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 12:52, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Like here Revision as of 17:04, 7 October 2023. Make the changes but don't remove the spacing. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 12:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are not yet an extended confirmed user

Hi @George Simon Ohm, Here in Revision as of 23:14, 5 October 2023 you have claimed that you are an WP:User access levels#Extended confirmed users which you are not. Because you yet to fulfill all the requirements to be ECU. So I would request you to remove it because it is misleading and blatantly wrong. You can verify it whenever you click on the link I have given above for Extended Confirmed Users. Also I would advise you to read Wikipedia:User pages once. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 14:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed George Simon Ohm (talk) 12:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 12:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bahujan Samaj Party +

The article Bahujan Samaj Party + has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find sources which term the political alliance with a "plus" (+)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Goldsztajn (talk) 22:08, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Next Indian general election in Andaman and Nicobar Islands moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Next Indian general election in Andaman and Nicobar Islands, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 11:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Next Indian general election in Lakshadweep moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Next Indian general election in Lakshadweep, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 11:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

I see you have created several unsourced articles in article space. Usually we do not keep unsourced articles in article space for more than an hour (as an NPP rule) unless there is inuse tag over it. Seeing the history of previous deletion of your articles on your talk, I will suggest you to develop your article in draft space and submit it for review. Happy editing. Maliner (talk) 11:43, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Next Indian general election in Andaman and Nicobar Islands. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:54, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also for Next Indian general election in Lakshadweep. Please do not do this. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:56, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bahujan Samaj Party + for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bahujan Samaj Party + is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahujan Samaj Party + until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Goldsztajn (talk) 20:39, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Marxist Economist per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marxist Economist. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Courcelles (talk) 01:15, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]