User talk:Geo Swan/archive/2012-03

This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

If you are considering initiating an xfd on material I started

2004, 2005, 2006-01--2006-06, 2006-07--2006-10, 2006-10--2005-12, 2007-01--2007-06, 2007-07--2007-09, 2007-10--2007-12, 2008-01--2008-06, 2008-07--2008-09, 2008-10--2008-12, 2009-01--2009-03, 2009-04--2009-06, 2009-07--2009-09, 2009-10--2009-12, 2010-01, 2010-02, 2010-03, 2010-04, 2010-05, 2010-06, 2010-07, 2010-08, 2010-09, 2010-10, 2010-11, 2010-12, 2011-01, 2011-02, 2011-03, 2011-04, 2011-05, 2011-06, 2011-07, 2011-08, 2011-09, 2011-10, 2011-11, 2011-12, 2012-01, 2012-02, 2012-03, 2012-04, 2012-05, 2012-06, 2012-07, 2012-08, 2012-09, 2012-10, 2012-11, 2012-12, 2013-01, 2013-02, 2013-03, 2013-04, 2013-05, 2013-06, 2013-07, 2013-08, 2013-09, 2013-10, 2013-11, 2013-12, 2014-01, 2014-02, 2014-03, 2014-04, 2014-05, 2014-06, 2014-07, 2014-08, 2014-09, 2014-10, 2014-11, 2014-12, 2015-01, 2015-02, 2015-03, 2015-04, 2015-05, 2015-06, 2015-07, 2015-08, 2015-09, 2015-10, 2015-11, 2015-12, 2016-01, 2016-02, 2016-03, 2016-04, 2016-05, 2016-06, 2016-07, 2016-08, 2016-09, 2016-10, 2016-11, 2016-12, 2017-01, 2017-02, 2017-03, 2017-04, 2017-05, 2017-06, 2017-07, 2017-08, 2017-09, 2017-10, 2017-11, 2017-12, 2018-01, 2018-02, 2018-03, 2018-04, 2018-05, 2018-06, 2018-07, 2018-08, 2018-09, 2018-10, 2018-11, 2018-12, 2019-01, 2019-02, 2019-03, 2019-04, 2019-05, 2019-06, 2019-07, 2019-08, 2019-09, 2019-10, 2019-11, 2019-12, 2020-01, 2020-02, 2020-03, 2020-04, 2020-05, 2020-06, 2020-07, 2020-08, 2020-09, 2020-10, 2020-11, User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/list

Thank you for the image=

I have been trying to get good, 'professional' looking images for Oakland's sitting elected officials. Thank you very much for uploading the one of Libby Schaaf-- it was much appreciated.

Recently, it looked like all my contributions were going to get AFDed out of Wikipedia. Now I can rest assured knowing that there mere "no consensus" about whether my contributions are welcome here or not.

I could have created only finished articles, but I decided to create stubs to invite contribution to this under-covered subject. Thank you for making me feel validated by taking something I did and making it better. --HectorMoffet (talk) 00:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome. I took a crack at the Reid article as well.

I still remember my first encounter with {{afd}} -- 2005-09-23. I am sorry that the culture of collegiality we are all supposed to aim for can't be counted on there. Rather there is a subculture of incivility rampant there.

Individuals who hold National and State/Provincial offices are generally recognized as "notable". More work is necessary to establish the notability of municipal office holders.

Anyhow, keep up the good work! Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 01:47, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

51 Division

That's a vastly improved picture now, and you only beat me by a couple of hours. The original clipped one is really bad and I headed down to get a better one - but you got there first. I will add mine later. I suggest you delete your earlier ones from Commons, since they are poor quality and add nothing to our appreciation of the subject. Thanks George. Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:05, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. When you recently edited Whatcom Chief, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington State (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Unwin Avenue for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unwin Avenue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unwin Avenue until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 20:05, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CEGEP talk page "question..."

You have an answer for your question on the CEGEP article talk page. --MaxDawsonC (talk) 02:12, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trillium

OK. The Trillium was launched in 1910 - all references except one say that.
The Trillium is not a sternwheeler - just look at it, the paddles are on the side.
I don't want to get into a war over this. I will add some categories (you included none) and leave you to make the changes.
Perhaps we can get some photographs of the plaques and the ship.
Try these for references:

Good luck George. Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:47, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to make any improvements you see fit. Geo Swan (talk) 20:36, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

John Kiriakou

nice work. im gonna link to the other Espionage Act cases under Obama. Decora (talk) 22:33, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Its been so long I had to go check and see who he was and what I contributed. Some fine changes have been made since I last touched it.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 23:08, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]