User talk:Geo Swan/archive/2011-02

This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

If you are considering initiating an xfd on material I started

2004, 2005, 2006-01--2006-06, 2006-07--2006-10, 2006-10--2005-12, 2007-01--2007-06, 2007-07--2007-09, 2007-10--2007-12, 2008-01--2008-06, 2008-07--2008-09, 2008-10--2008-12, 2009-01--2009-03, 2009-04--2009-06, 2009-07--2009-09, 2009-10--2009-12, 2010-01, 2010-02, 2010-03, 2010-04, 2010-05, 2010-06, 2010-07, 2010-08, 2010-09, 2010-10, 2010-11, 2010-12, 2011-01, 2011-02, 2011-03, 2011-04, 2011-05, 2011-06, 2011-07, 2011-08, 2011-09, 2011-10, 2011-11, 2011-12, 2012-01, 2012-02, 2012-03, 2012-04, 2012-05, 2012-06, 2012-07, 2012-08, 2012-09, 2012-10, 2012-11, 2012-12, 2013-01, 2013-02, 2013-03, 2013-04, 2013-05, 2013-06, 2013-07, 2013-08, 2013-09, 2013-10, 2013-11, 2013-12, 2014-01, 2014-02, 2014-03, 2014-04, 2014-05, 2014-06, 2014-07, 2014-08, 2014-09, 2014-10, 2014-11, 2014-12, 2015-01, 2015-02, 2015-03, 2015-04, 2015-05, 2015-06, 2015-07, 2015-08, 2015-09, 2015-10, 2015-11, 2015-12, 2016-01, 2016-02, 2016-03, 2016-04, 2016-05, 2016-06, 2016-07, 2016-08, 2016-09, 2016-10, 2016-11, 2016-12, 2017-01, 2017-02, 2017-03, 2017-04, 2017-05, 2017-06, 2017-07, 2017-08, 2017-09, 2017-10, 2017-11, 2017-12, 2018-01, 2018-02, 2018-03, 2018-04, 2018-05, 2018-06, 2018-07, 2018-08, 2018-09, 2018-10, 2018-11, 2018-12, 2019-01, 2019-02, 2019-03, 2019-04, 2019-05, 2019-06, 2019-07, 2019-08, 2019-09, 2019-10, 2019-11, 2019-12, 2020-01, 2020-02, 2020-03, 2020-04, 2020-05, 2020-06, 2020-07, 2020-08, 2020-09, 2020-10, 2020-11, User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/list

AfD nomination of Abu Bakr al Jaziri

I have nominated Abu Bakr al Jaziri for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abu Bakr al Jaziri. Fram (talk) 10:40, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Khalid Shekh Mohammed by Janet Hamlin -- after correcting the size of his nose.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Khalid Shekh Mohammed by Janet Hamlin -- after correcting the size of his nose.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re

I never came at him in a threatining manner, I simply was shocked that a admin would quicky delete several notable articles without hesitation. Live and Die 4 Hip Hop (talk) 02:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(The above is in response to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Live_and_Die_4_Hip_Hop&diff=412068050&oldid=410640416)

OK, a couple of points:

When articles are tagged with a {{prod}} administrators are supposed to give interested parties 7 days to contest that {{prod}}. Now the contributor who tagged the articles was supposed to give you a heads-up. And that contributor seems to have let the project down. But if Courcelles let that 7 day period run to completion, I wouldn't call the deletion "quick".
I accept at face value that you didn't anticipate your notes would be seen as confrontational. But I encourage you to accept, at face value, Courcelles comment he or she found your notes confrontational. I assure you I am not a friend or ally of Courcelles. Like you I too am trying to discuss some deletions they made that I think were mistakes. So, so far as I am concerned, I encourage you to think of my note as coming from an uninvolved third party. I am going to remind you that you picked "What is wrong with you?" as the subject heading.
Did you see that Choppa has been restored? I added those references. But I would prefer to let you finish polishing the article.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 04:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Suspected jihadists from the Maldives

I have nominated Suspected jihadists from the Maldives for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suspected jihadists from the Maldives. Fram (talk) 13:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Afd nomination for Abd al Malik Abd al Wahab

I have nominated Abd al Malik Abd al Wahab for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abd al Malik Abd al Wahab (2nd nomination). Fram (talk) 09:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination for Amran Baqur Mohammed Hawsawi

I have nominated Amran Baqur Mohammed Hawsawi for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amran Baqur Mohammed Hawsawi (2nd nomination). Fram (talk) 10:08, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Geo Swan, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Geo Swan/rough work/CASR links. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.

Shut off the bot here.

Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination for Karabakh camp

I have nominated Karabakh camp for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karabakh camp. Fram (talk) 12:14, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination for Suspect Bosnian training camp

I have nominated Suspect Bosnian training camp for deletion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 February 9. Fram (talk) 12:21, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination for Muhamad Naji Subhi Al Juhani

I have nominated Muhamad Naji Subhi Al Juhani for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhamad Naji Subhi Al Juhani (3rd nomination). Fram (talk) 12:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BLP issues

Geo, as you probably know by now, Suspected jihadists from the Maldives was deleted as an egregious BLP violation. This was because what sourcing was there only mentioned the people on that list in passing. You've been here awhile, so you should really know better. Blueboy 96 20:10, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Afd nomination for List of 324 Arabic names

I have nominated List of 324 Arabic names for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 324 Arabic names. Fram (talk) 09:54, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Afd nomination for Yusif Khalil Abdallah Nur

I have nominated Yusif Khalil Abdallah Nur for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yusif Khalil Abdallah Nur. Fram (talk) 10:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination for User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/not ready yet/Muhammad Ahmed (ghost prisoner)

I have nominated User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/not ready yet/Muhammad Ahmed (ghost prisoner) for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/not ready yet/Muhammad Ahmed (ghost prisoner). Fram (talk) 09:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Orio Palmer for deletion

The article Orio Palmer is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orio Palmer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sottolacqua (talk) 17:48, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pages at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/working/Summary of Evidence memos/pg112

Have you finished the transwiki of the pages at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/working/Summary of Evidence memos/pg112? Over three weeks have passed since January 23, 2011, the date set by the closing admin. Cunard (talk) 09:39, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possible RfC/U about you

I am currently drafting a WP:RFC/U about your edits. The draft is at User:Fram/Sandbox. I have invited other editors who have expressed similar ideas about your articles and userspace to help draft the RfC/U, as outlined in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct/Guidance. If this ever becomes a real RfC, I will again drop a note here obviously. Fram (talk) 12:00, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination for Sara Wood (military writer)

I have nominated the article Sara Wood (military writer) for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Wood (military writer). Fram (talk) 12:29, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination for Jalil (detainee)

I have nominated the article Jalil (detainee) for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jalil (detainee). Fram (talk) 12:38, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark Hadsell for deletion

The article Mark Hadsell is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Hadsell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 22:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abd al-Muhsin al-Libi for deletion

The article Abd al-Muhsin al-Libi is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abd al-Muhsin al-Libi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. IQinn (talk) 02:06, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination for Ehsanullah (Guantanamo detainee 350)

I have nominated Ehsanullah (Guantanamo detainee 350) for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehsanullah (Guantanamo detainee 350). Fram (talk) 09:44, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RfC notification

An RfC on your conduct has been opened at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Geo Swan. You are invited to participate there to present your side of the story. Fram (talk) 13:08, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hope I can assist with the procedural issues of this. Your response isn't required within 48 hours but obviously, the sooner it's posted, the better - so that others commenting can also see it. Bear in mind that the RfC/U is almost certainly going to close after 30 days. When drafting a response, do read the views that have been provided and the statement of the dispute as written by the certifiers; any comments you make on the desired outcome may be relevant (in fact, you might even propose an outcome that modifies that proposal, and that might become a compromise attempt). You can post as many responses you need to in your section (and leave a section for endorsing each response so others can indicate their endorsements). But if you're just responding to a specific outside view or statement, then you would need to do that on the talk page. Again, I hope that helps. Ncmvocalist (talk) 08:51, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination for Rashid Awad Rashid Al Uwaydah

I have nominated Rashid Awad Rashid Al Uwaydah for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rashid Awad Rashid Al Uwaydah. Fram (talk) 14:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abdulaziz Saleh Sultan Sinan Al Dossary

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abdulaziz Saleh Sultan Sinan Al Dossary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. noclador (talk) 02:32, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mehdi Muhammed Ghezali's passport photo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mehdi Muhammed Ghezali's passport photo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:30, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

fyi

I just put "Category:Alleged bodyguards of Osama bin Laden" [1] up for discussion at the CSD page. IQinn (talk) 03:17, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Khalid al-'Unaizi for deletion

The article Khalid al-'Unaizi is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalid al-'Unaizi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. IQinn (talk) 10:54, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Akhtiar Mohammed (Guantanamo detainee 969) for deletion

The article Akhtiar Mohammed (Guantanamo detainee 969) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhtiar Mohammed (Guantanamo detainee 969) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. IQinn (talk) 15:14, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pages at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/working/Summary of Evidence memos/pg112

Have you finished the transwiki of the pages at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo Swan/working/Summary of Evidence memos/pg112? Over four weeks have passed since January 23, 2011, the date set by the closing admin. IQinn (talk) 15:46, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The WITF wants you

The World Intelligence Task Force would like to recruit you as an agent. If you accept, comment under the pending section on the project page. It is a relatively new task force and we need new members right away so if you are interested please don't be shy. At this moment in time we only have three members. If you want more information, please go to the project page.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by SunCountryGuy01 (talk • contribs)