User talk:Froglife94

Froglife94, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Froglife94! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Charlotte State Forest, from its old location at User:Froglife94/sandbox/Charlotte State Forest. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 08:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Froglife94, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 08:45, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: First Mountain State Forest has been accepted

First Mountain State Forest, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:09, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlotte State Forest has been accepted

Charlotte State Forest, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 17:48, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Protected areas of Rockingham County, VA

A tag has been placed on Category:Protected areas of Rockingham County, VA indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 07:17, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Old Flat State Forest moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Old Flat State Forest, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:59, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is only one primary source that I'm aware of for Old Flat State Forest. The source is authoritative and should be allowed to remain as-is. Why do you think there would or should be more sources?

Froglife94 (talk) 23:56, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Virginia Scenic Byway

Hello, Froglife94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Virginia Scenic Byway, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Machicomoco State Park

Hello, Froglife94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Machicomoco State Park, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seven Bends State Park

Hello, Froglife94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seven Bends State Park, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bald Knob Natural Area Preserve

Hello, Froglife94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bald Knob Natural Area Preserve, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Old Flat State Forest

Hello, Froglife94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Old Flat State Forest, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Piney Grove Flatwoods Natural Area Preserve

Hello, Froglife94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Piney Grove Flatwoods Natural Area Preserve, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:19, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bald Knob Natural Area Preserve

Hello, Froglife94. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bald Knob Natural Area Preserve".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Piney Grove Flatwoods Natural Area Preserve

Hello, Froglife94. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Piney Grove Flatwoods Natural Area Preserve".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:23, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Conor Gallagher have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Giant Snowman 11:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox stats

Please note that we only include domestic league games in the infobox - so no Cup or Continental matches etc. Please also ensure that when you update the stats you also update the date, using ~~~~~. If you have any questions please ask. Giant Snowman 09:15, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Froglife94 (talk) 00:02, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Isak edit summary

To me, the edit summary you gave in this edit seems confusing. In the English football pyramid, any league below League 2 is considered "non-league" therefore some people may think Alexander Isak played non-league football today instead of the Champions League. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 22:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. My summaries are more detailed than 99% of football editors out there, but I can see where you're coming from.

23:15, 28 November 2023 (UTC) Froglife94 (talk) 23:15, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:North Fork Shenandoah River.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:North Fork Shenandoah River.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Seven Bends State Park have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 23:10, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Froglife94. I noticed that your recent edit to Seven Bends State Park added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 23:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Signatures v Datestamps
Just a friendly reminder re Craig Dawson and Aitor Ruibal - it's 5 tildes for a date stamp, not 4 - Arjayay (talk) 14:20, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yikes, thanks. Not sure how that happened. Froglife94 (talk) 15:27, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sweet Run State Park has been accepted

Sweet Run State Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dcotos (talk) 11:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Good work! on Sweet Run State Park article, Thank you. Cheers!

Dcotos (talk) 11:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I appreciate it!

14:14, 14 January 2024 (UTC) Froglife94 (talk) 14:14, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Froglife94. Thank you for your work on Sweet Run State Park. Dcotos, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, Froglife94 Nice work! you may add more reliable source in history section.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 11:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clinch River State Park has been accepted

Clinch River State Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the quick review! I appreciate it!

17:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Froglife94 (talk) 17:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 21:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert this. I am going to re-write based on that info. I am not going to use the content verbatim.

22:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Froglife94 (talk) 22:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to removing the target, you removed a bunch of my other edits as well. Please restore them.

22:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Froglife94 (talk) 22:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Can you please respond? You removed a considerable amount of my article draft. Emphasis on DRAFT.

14:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC) Froglife94 (talk) 14:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Timestamps

Hi, Please update the timestamp when making edits on footballers statistics as they are currently wrong. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm, can you be more specific? Froglife94 (talk) 02:43, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What article are you referring to? Froglife94 (talk) 02:46, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hi, we don't include Play-off appearances in the infobox stats (league appearances only), and within the Career Statistics table, they go in the 'Other' column rather than the League column. For example your recent edit to Sorba Thomas had incorrectly moved his 3 2021-22 Championship play-off appearances into the League column from the Other column. If using Soccerway it can be difficult to realise because it lumps both categories together, so it might be best to double-check before changing any old seasons. Regards, Nonleagueapps (talk) 17:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, thanks for the info. Could you not have just made the adjustment instead of undoing my entire edit? Froglife94 (talk) 17:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Alvin Bragg. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 20:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 20:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:David Ankeye

Hello, Froglife94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Ankeye, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David Ankeye

Hello, Froglife94. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "David Ankeye".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Darren Lyon, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 07:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Cammy Gill, you may be blocked from editing. Giant Snowman 17:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't add the new team (Montrose) for Cammy Gill, someone else did. They did not source the edit. I merely updated the infobox and added the template (made a mistake initially with the team but eventually corrected) to align with the current team. Shouldn't the original unregistered user be warned? Froglife94 (talk) 19:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soccerbase

Please do not use this for anything other than English and Scottish league players - it is notoriously innacurate for everything else. Your stats on Lamine Fanne were wrong. Giant Snowman 19:10, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. By "this" I assume you mean Soccerbase. And to be clear, they're not "my" stats, they're the stats that Soccerbase has for him. That's why I posted to Wikipedia:WikiProject Football for guidance on what to do when Soccerbase and Soccerway differ on stats. I didn't get any actionable advice. Froglife94 (talk) 21:02, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]