This is an archive of past discussions about User:Folic Acid. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hey Folic Acid, How are you? I haven't "spoken" to you in a while. Anyways, just to let you know, no more TingMing socks have appeared so far, if he has, he's brought down his POV a lot...anyhoo, just wanted to tell you that I added you on Facebook (Just in case you think I some random person...well I am random but you get what I mean :D :P). Nat Tangta | co | em15:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Hey Nat! Yeah - I've been on a break for a little while, since I've been inordinately busy with work and my family. Still, I can't let things slide too much. I'm sure that even if the TingMing isn't around, someone like him is waiting in the wings for an opportune time to come and muck things up. As for Facebook... do I even have a page? If I do, it's been quite some time since I looked at it. I probably ought to go see what's going on with it. :) Thanks for the note - great to hear from you! --Folic Acid12:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello yourself! I hope I haven't missed too much. The war against the forces of Ting really tired me out, so a bit of a wiki-holiday was in order. Nice to see that there's still activity in our corner of wikiland. --Folic Acid19:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Well Ting is gone now, thank God! Even if he comes back he'll just be banned again. So our hard work in stopping him was not in vain. John Smith's14:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Hey Folic Acid, I thought about it, but I feel that I'm probably gonna get a lot of opposes because of some, now that I look back, questionable activities and comments. However, If you wanna nominate me, go for it :D. Nat Tangta | co | em13:44, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
You sent me a message regarding vandalism to Red Wolf. I haven't ever viewed that page, and there is no one else that could have viewed or edited that page on my IP address. I'm just replying to see if it was a mistake or I am having some sort of security problem. I would strongly dislike being prohibited from editing in the future, so I'm just trying to clear this up and get some sort of confirmation. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.213.15.120 (talk) 00:23, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Wikimania in Atlanta!
Hi! I noticed your involvement on U.S. South-related articles, categories and WikiProjects, and I wanted to let you know about a bid we're formulating to get next year's Wikimania held in Atlanta! If you would like to help, be sure to sign your name to the "In Atlanta" section of the Southeast team portion of the bid if you're in town, or to the "Outside Atlanta" section if you still want to help but don't live in the city or the suburbs. If you would like to contribute more, please write on my talk page, the talk page of the bid, or join us at the #wikimania-atlanta IRC chat on freenode.org. Have a great day!
P.S. While this is a template for maximum efficiency, I would appreciate a note on my talk page so I know you got the message, and what you think. This is time-sensitive, so your urgent cooperation is appreciated. :) Mike H.I did "That's hot" first!22:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I would like to thank you for your participation in my successful RfA, which passed with a tally of (44/10/5)[1]. Whether you supported, opposed or were neutral in my RfA, I appreciate your participation and I hope that we can continue to work together to build a stronger and better Wikipedia.
Thanks for the welcome. I felt I needed a long vacation after the last major incident, glad to see that everything is still running (relatively) smoothly. -Loren00:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to History of the Republic of China: You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. --LeyteWolfer03:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the support.
Hello Folic Acid,
Thank you very much for coming out in support of my RfA, which was successful. I especially appreciated the part about being an "excellent candidate!" ;)
Anyway, please feel free to contact me if you need help with any actions requiring administrative access. I will do my best to be of assistance to you. Cheers, --Aarktica01:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Folic Acid. I'm wondering if you can check for any grammatical mistakes in the article Hsu Tain-tsair. If not, don't you think it's good enough for it to be a Good Article? Or do I need more sources?--Jerry19:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Would you like me to make some edits to it, or would you rather do it? There are a couple of minor things that need to be fixed, I think. --Folic Acid18:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Go ahead and fix the minor things, I think that'll be easier. If you see some major mistakes, feel free to fix them too!--Jerry19:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for commenting on my RFA, which was withdrawn. Whether you supported or opposed, I thank you for the suggestions for improvement. And please forgive me if my wording was a bit harsh, by oppose I meant opposing Wikipedia. MarlithT/C04:25, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed unsuccessfully with 39 supports, 15 oppose, and 1 neutral. I would have liked to gain some experience of being an admin, but it wasn't to be. At least I gained some valuable time there and will use my knowledge picked up to my next candidacy. I would like to say once again, thank you for voting and I hope to see you at my next request be it a nomination or self-induced, I hope I don't get as many questions!
Hi, and thanks for the help. Toko (aka Keith Bridgeman) is a long term banned vandal who tries to promote his crappy products on Wikipedia. He suffers from some sort of delusion of genius ("My site [is] infinitely better [than Wikipedia].", "My knowledge of [...] is way beyond yours and all of the other amateurish editors put together", etc.) and a lack of basic social skills ("wanker, pedophile, sex offender, faggot, asshole, looser, lesbian," etc.). Since i have blocked by now probably close to 200 of his sockpuppets in the last 2 years and removed his adverts, he does not like me. Like i care. Details are on WP:TOJO. Thanks for your help. -- Chris 73 | Talk18:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Wow - impressive! I had no idea he even existed. I have to give the guy credit - I imagine it takes an enormous amount of persistence (or pique) to create over 400 socks. Anyway, I'm glad to lend a hand. Cheers -- Folic_Acid | talk 19:02, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Heh - thanks Chris. I think it's more amusing than anything. Funny what people like to waste their time on. Congratulations on achieving notoriety, Tojo. I hope it does you some good, somehow. -- Folic_Acid | talk 03:38, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
RfA thank-spam
Thank you! Thank you for your help in my RfA. It hammered home a few things I need to keep in mind while admining and passed with a final tally of 40/0/4; two people forgot to vote in time, leaving me short of that exquisite number :-(, but I'll just have to fudge the next vote about me. Adminship feels slightly august but not particularily exalted, so I shall endeavour to consider it a toolkit and make sincere efforts to know what I'm doing before using it. If you later on have something to say or want to ask for --
Actually, I kind of liked that - it was clever. :) Anyway, I didn't call them frivolous, I called them premature, since they haven't actually violated 3RR yet. It is a revert-war, though, and that's only going to get you and them into trouble. Since it's a content dispute, I'd recommend an RfC. Cheers, Folic_Acid | talk 17:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
China
Hey I started a new discussion here on the China renaming issue. Could you please give some of your opinions too?--Jerry22:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
The project has a stress hotline available for your use.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill17:44, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! I've been toying around with the idea of joining for a while, but wasn't really sure where (or how) I could contribute. I suppose jumping in with both feet is the best way, so here I am. Cheers Folic_Acid | talk 17:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Oh -- and the valid reason for RFCU is code E: 3RR violation using socks which if this is the same user, falls right into it. ∴ Therefore | talk23:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Yeah - I noticed that you'd created one after I had. But, since it asked for the puppeteer's RFCU (and the other guy is the older account), I figured I'd let it stand. Folic_Acid | talk 23:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Puppet master isn't only defined as the older account. In this case, I took the initial editor to the page. These two (one?) performed their tag teaming also on the Louisiana Family Forum page. In that case, it was successful (for now -- it's on my todo list). And I disagree (respectively, natch) with your choice of Code -- this is clearly an 3RR dodge (if it proves true). Thanks. ∴ Therefore | talk23:39, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
EDIT: Actually, it seems I cut myself off in mid-sentence. What I meant to say previously was "I noticed that you'd created one after I'd already entered mine" - I hadn't checked to see if you'd already started one until I'd already finished entering mine Doesn't really matter - they'll end up in the same place. :) Folic_Acid | talk 00:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Ack, I really do feel I've been too officious, particularly with you. Sometimes my discussions don't sound as friendly as I prefer being. I apologize for that and do realize that you are being helpful. Usually I try to be more patient to the newbies. I just hate edit wars and avoid them whenever possible so that is probably the root cause of my "severity", as it were. Thanks! ∴ Therefore | talk01:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Bah! <waves hand dismissively> Think nothing of it - it's a non-issue. I've worked in politics long enough to have developed a thick skin, so no harm done. :) Folic_Acid | talk 02:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Another RfA Spaming
Thank you for constructive criticism in my recent RFA which did not pass at (18/27/10). I will be sure to improve my editing skills and wait until someone nominates me next time. Thank you for you comments! Tiptoety00:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
OhanaUnited's RfA
Thanks for voting at my RfA. Unfortunately, the result stands at 51 support, 21 oppose and 7 neutral which means that I did not succeed. As many expressed their appreciation of my works in featured portals during my RfA, I will fill up the vacuum position of director in featured portal candidates to maintain the standards of featured contents in addition to my active role in Good articles. Have a great day. OhanaUnitedTalk page04:20, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
My sincere thanks for your support in my request for adminship, which ended with 51 supports, 0 opposes, and 0 neutral. Doubtless it was an error to put one of the government-bred race of pigmen in any position of authority, but I hope your confidence in me proves justified. Even a man pure of heart and who says his prayers at night can become a were-boar when the moon is full and sweet. Fortunately, I'm neither a were-pig nor pure of heart so this doesn't appear to be an imminent danger to Wikipedia for the moment. Fortunate as well because were-pig hooves are hell on keyboards and none too dexterous with computer mice. If ever I should offend, act uncivil, misstep, overstep, annoy, violate policy, or attempt to topple the fascist leadership of Wikipedia, please let me know so I can improve my behaviour and/or my aim. I am not an animal; I am an admin. And, of course, if there is any way in which I can help you on Wikipedia, please do not hesitate to ask me. Despite my japes, I am indeed dedicated to protecting and serving Wikipedia to the best of my foppish and impudent abilities. I will strive to be an admirable admin, shiny and cool, reasonable and beatific. Pigmanwhat?/trail05:56, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Post Scriptum: I believe my collaged graphic at left, which incorporates the WP globe and mop image, falls under the rubric of parody for my purposes here. Or is it satire? Regardless, it's a legitimate and legally protected First Amendment usage under US law. Complaints and allegations that this is an improper "fair use" image will be entertained on my talk page, probably with fruit juice, finger food and exotic coffees.
Archiving
Thanks for the archiving -- way too tiring to have to edit that monster! Although I quibbled with your rewrite, I would be happy to support it. ∴ Therefore | talk20:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Yeah - it was getting a little unwieldy. I actually thought about moving the PFF discussion to its own page, but figured that'd be more confusing. Anyway, quibble away - I'm just trying to help boil the thing down to something we can all live with. And thanks for keeping a cool head, despite the unpleasantness. :) Folic_Acid | talk 20:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your patience and help on the David Vitter page
Thanks for your input -- I always appreciate a "saner" voice participating providing some perspective. You helped tremendously to corral the editors (including me, natch) into a more even-handed approach. Thanks! ∴ Therefore | talk23:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for sharing your concern with me, FA. I've not edited any articles in order to "promote myself or the interests of any organization." My intentions are completely honorable and forthright. I strive for a NPOV.Araphel03:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm glad to hear it. However, I remain concerned that your close association with LFF may color your views, your own intentions notwithstanding. I don't want to prevent you from sharing your own ideas, but rather, wanted to make you aware of this particular guideline. Folic_Acid | talk 04:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Thankyou for supporting my successful rfa which closed with 58 supports. If i am honest i am rather humbled by the unanimous support and i hope to live up to everyones expectations. If you ever need any help, don't hesitate to ask. Thanks again. Woodym55515:40, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Vitter RFC redux
Thanks for the kind words and the star, FA. I hope I don't have to go though that again any time soon. O_o When reviewing some of my comments, I could kick myself for getting a bit hot under the collar -- particularly towards you. I had gotten into such a defensive mode that I failed, at first, to discriminate between the less than contributive, collaborative voices and the helpful ones. I too am pleased with the result and wouldn't have gotten there if not for your guidance, corralling Araphel and myself into productive editors. Thanks again. ∴ Therefore | talk22:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Anytime, my friend, anytime. I gave you the star because while I'll agree you were a bit abrupt at the beginning, I was very impressed that you have the guts to admit it - that's an uncommon and most welcome trait in an editor. And not only that, you had the patience to work through a difficult piece with some less-than-accomodating single-issue editors. You definitely earned the star. Keep up the good work! Folic_Acid | talk 03:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
My (Remember the dot)'s RfA
I never thanked you for participating in my RfA a couple of weeks ago. Thank you for your support, though unfortunately the request was closed as "no consensus". I plan to run again at a later time, and I hope you will support me again then.
You're welcome. Frankly, I'm a little surprised that went on for as long as it did. Maybe it is a legitimate cultural difference, but given that this is English Wikipedia, I'm guessing we adhere to English/Canadian/American standards, where such things are about as obviously bad as you can get. Oh well. Folic_Acid | talk 14:32, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
sockpuppetry #2
Thanks for your support Folic. It's greatly appreciated. What annoys me is that, after looking through his "evidence", I realised that this isn't even a sockpuppet case - even if both of those editors are me, it still wouldn't be sockpuppetry. Grr. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 13:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
(lol - edit conflict on my own talk page? That never happens!)
My pleasure. Seems like a no-brainer issue to me. You're a much more valuable editor than Jacky/Peter/<othersockpuppet>, and frankly, I want to avoid another Sumple incident, even if we are occasionally on the opposite sides of issues. I much prefer having having reasonable and intelligent editors like you to discuss things with, instead of POV-pushers with an agenda like our friend here (even if he does know some "renowned sinologists.") :) Folic_Acid | talk 13:16, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks again - the sockpuppet case has been closed. And for the record, I live nowhere near Chatswood. Both of the IPs the sockpuppet brought up were indeed me. I don't think editing once or twice without bothering to log in is a hanging offence. Anyway, just glad this is over. Thanks again! --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 11:27, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
Howdy Folic Acid, thanks for participating in my request for adminship. I am happy to say it was successful, 55/0/0, and I am looking forward to getting to work. Thanks for your vote of confidence. By all means, feel free to check in on my work to come. Suggestions and advice are always appreciated.
I considered not spamming talk pages but not saying "thanks" just isn't me. The support was remarkable and appreciated. I only hope that I am able to help a little on here. Please let me know if I can help you or equally if you find any of my actions questionable. Thanks & regards --Herbytalk thyme12:38, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Republic of China
Hey, I think the article is probably good enough to become a GA, but the whole China/PRC/ROC issue just totally makes the article unstable. Keep up the good work, though.
I'm wondering if you can give your opinion on the requested move of Premier of the Republic of China to President of the Executive Yuan. My point on this is simple (and I don't know why anyone would oppose the move): We're moving it to the official name, as the result of not being able to move it to the most common name (Premier of Taiwan; NPOV issue). And I should also inform you that the current name is neither the common or the official name. Thanks Folic.--Jerry01:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback! I'll keep plugging away at it, but I'm not sure how or if we'll be able to resolve that issue to everyone's satisfaction. As for the proposed move, I'll try to get over there tomorrow. Cheers Folic_Acid | talk 03:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey Folic, I think you misunderstood my point. I replied to your comment, maybe you'll change your mind :)--Jerry20:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your vote
Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed with a vote of (53/0/1).
As a token of my appreciation, please accept this bowl of tzatziki.
I feel honored to be trusted by so many of you. Wikipedia is such a large community, that my acceptance in the face of such large numbers truly is humbling. I will use my new tools to continue the tasks for which you entrusted them to me.
PS: You were listed after the case was filed, as a "user that had commented on the issue". Although your input is welcome and appreciated should you choose to give it, the case will proceed without your acceptance if you choose not to participate at all (which occurs occasionally with outside commenters in RfM's). Thanks, Daniel01:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)
The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot01:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
I noticed that you have associated yourself with WikiProject North Carolina in one way or another and I wanted to say Hi. I have been doing a bit of work on the project and wanted to know if you were still interested. One of the major things that we need help with is article assessment. If you go to NC Article Grading and Ranking you will see that as of 12-25-2007 we have over 2,900 articles that are either unassessed and/or have not been tagged with importance. If you are interested in remaining a part of WikiProject North Carolina, please consider placing the userbox {{User WikiProject North Carolina}} if you have not already done so that others will know that you are a part of this Project as well as ensuring that you are listed on the WP North Carolina Participants. If you are no longer interested in participating in the project, please strike through your name on the WP North Carolina Participant list and/or remove the WikiProject NC Userbox! If you have any questions, please let me know!Rob110178 (talk) 22:57, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
The contest department has completed its ninth month of competition. The top scorer this month is Blnguyen, with 22 points, followed by Dreamafter, with 8 points, and Redmarkviolinist, with 6 points. Blnguyen also remains the overall leader, with 162 points in total. All project members are encouraged to submit the articles they're working on as entries.
Blnguyen has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his efforts in improving the quality of articles related to Vietnamese military history, including the creation of numerous A-Class articles.
Woodym555 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding work on topics related to the Victoria Cross, notably including the creation of featured articles, featured lists, and a featured topic.
Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes.
We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-participants
alike are very welcome and appreciated.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! TomStar81 (Talk) 03:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)
The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Since another of my interests is pharmacology, I'm chuckling about your username, and wondering if methotrexate is to you as Kryptonite is to Superman. Methotrexate is a very useful drug, but it works by suppressing folic acid.
Welcome to the task force! There hasn't been much discussion on the task force itself, but there are comments on articles. Before the task force was formed, there were discussions on the main Project list about what became the hierarchy of articles under intelligence cycle management. There are some miscellaneous intelligence activities, such as financial and medical, which I haven't decided where to place in the hierarchy.
It's been frustrating but rewarding to revise, into a hierarchy of articles not dominated by conspiracy theory, Central Intelligence Agency.
See my userpage for a full list of the intelligence and special operations topics on which I've worked.
It's my pleasure! Intel has long been a pet fascination of mine (as has pharmacology, until I realized that I hate math), so I'm happy to contribute what I can. I'm sure beating back the tin-hats is a full time job, so I'll do what I can. -- Folic_Acid | talk 16:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
The Matrix (no, not the movie. Scary
Howard - I like the look of this! However, if you don't mind a couple of suggestions, I've tweaked your matrix a little. For the most part, I've added DIA as a collector and processor. The ODNI doesn't really do much in the way of processing raw intelligence, while the DIA does. Also, I noticed that there's no mention of collection from the various military branches - was that intentional? -- Folic_Acid | talk 19:01, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Originally, the matrix was just to address a question of Ernx, but there seems to be interest in making it more solid. Let me make several comments, in no special order.
ODNI is in some odd roles. I didn't distinguish between analysis and estimates; if I did, the National Intelligence Council is in ODNI and is really the only IC-wide estimates agency. Some of its individual reports are more analysis.
Where things get even trickier in ODNI is that the National Open Source Enterprise is there, and does do open source collection, as with the Foreign Broadcast Information Service (which swallowed the DoD Joint Publications Research). Arguably, OSINT goes at least from collection and processing, to some analysis; I've had a couple of contracts to do OSINT-only as a reality check for some all-source analysts at an agency that I was told I had no need to know. I don't know if the former CIA Domestic Contact Service has moved there or is still in NCS.
Some of the cross-functional Centers/Executives, like Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence, and Counterproliferation do some processing.
Now, the military. In fact, if I expand this significantly, I'll go below the level of the service when they have a major activity for a discipline -- say, Air Force Foreign Technology Division (FTD), which I think has been renamed, for TECHINT. The Air Force also runs a MASINT center, more for education although the MASINT god still is in DIA. Army has the lead medical intelligence function, although there's probably some in the CIA Office of Scientific Intelligence (again an old name), and the NIC has done worldwide disease analysis.
I agree NCS has not been promoted. Still, to be comprehensive rather than hierarchical, it's a major component that is at least quasi-independent. How it relates to what was the Special Collection Service, previously Division D, is something I don't know, but I think SCS, a joint CIA-NSA operational activity, needs to be there, and perhaps some of the military collection activities.
Still thinking about it all, though. I started a userspace page on it, User:Hcberkowitz/Sandbox-ICmatrix, which doesn't have your tweaks yet.
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)
The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)
The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)
The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:51, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)
The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:38, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)
The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:44, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)
The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:15, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)
The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:05, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello I just noticed that you were the last person who put up the POV tag in the "Political NPOV" section of the "Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese)" page. You put it up on 20 June 2007, which was over a year ago.
Given that there haven't been any active discussions relating to this section since January 2008, I have removed the tag. If this is not appropriate, please let me know.--pyl (talk) 05:59, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)
The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)
The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)
The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:56, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)
The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:49, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. Would you please explain in more detail why a more detailed article would cause an even bigger storm?
I thought that would be the neutral way of describing what the term means, instead of constantly getting into arguments whether "Republic of China (Taiwan)" is indeed the Republic of China or it is only past stage of the "4 stages of the ROC".--pyl (talk) 09:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Folic Acid/Archive 1! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:33, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts.
There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
I hope you remember me, but I sure remember you. You were the first person who welcomed me with a "smile" at Wikipedia back when I first joined in 2007. I still remember how confused and frustrated I was. You may not know it, but without your encouraging words, I may have not continued to participate in this very interesting experiment, so I just wanted to take the time to thank you. Ottawahitech (talk) 00:10, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi! I regret that I don't remember you (my brain is full of useless things, sadly), but I'm immensely gratified to know I had an impact on you like this. I'm very glad you've kept up with editing and making this a better place. Sadly, I've had to put it down in favor of my family and work. But, hopefully someday I'll have more free time and the ability to join up again. Good luck, and happy editing! Thanks for stopping by and letting me know how you are! Folic_Acid | talk 04:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa.02:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to History of the Republic of China: You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. --LeyteWolfer 03:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Done --nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 14:08, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
