User talk:FoCuSandLeArN/Archive 20
This is an archive of past discussions with User:FoCuSandLeArN. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | → | Archive 25 |
Request on 04:11:13, 31 July 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Jamesparticular
I'm curious about your reasoning for declining the article ANTHONY DIMORO. You note the need for more credibility and I recently added his page on Forbes where he writes. This page includes his work on Forbes where he covers sports and social media. this ties directly into the subject.
I am just confused because I feel this new addition met both the golden rule and the other page you referenced.
Please let me know how this latest addition doesn't meet the standards you eluded to
Thank you in advance for your time
Jamesparticular (talk) 04:11, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- You provided references to his own work, not evidence of notability. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:35, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Correct! Codice1000.en (talk) 19:13, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- A pretty common thing on en.wikipedia if you ask me! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Amy Hughes
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Amy Hughes. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Harassment
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Harassment. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Fire Emblem Fates
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fire Emblem Fates. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Karlodinium antarcticum
- added a link pointing to Cell
- Ophryotrocha eutrophila
- added a link pointing to Koster
- Ophryotrocha scutellus
- added a link pointing to Koster
- Takayama tuberculata
- added a link pointing to Cell
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Pyle Stop
Hi FoCuSandLeArN, you have reviewed my draft article about "Pyle Stop" and commented: "There has to be evidence of widespread use of this term". Well, there are many articles on internet including Wikipedia, written by reputed names talking about "Pyle Stops", which is mainly very known term among technical divers, not recreational divers or recreational diving agencies who mainly dive on shallower depths. This term is used interchangeably with two other terms: "deep stops" and "gradient factors". I selected 4 articles and set them as evidence references in my draft, to support that "Pyle Stops" is a widespread term. Could you please review again my draft and check : (The ascent pattern became known as "Pyle's stops", "deep stops" or "gradient factors", which have become very popular [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]since the late 1990s.) and see if this is acceptable? You will see, for example, that if the article is titled "Gradient Factors", it will mention again "Pyle Stops" as another alternate name. Another example is a dive decompression software working on "Varying Permeability Model", they state that it works remarkably similar to many established deep practices such as Pyle Stops. This two example would empathize that the term "Pyle Stops" is widespread and cannot be ignored when talking about the "Theory" or the "Marketing" of a model. Awaiting your feedback to go ahead with my article.
Another thing, "Pyle Stops" is a plural term, denoting several Stops in single dive profile. The previous reviewer of my article have renamed it mistakenly as "Pyle Stop". Could you please return the article name to "Pyle Stops" with plural "s"?, Thanks --Yahia.Mokhtar (talk) 10:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hello there! Unfortunately none of those references appear to be reliable, i.e. they show no sign of having an editorial process behing them. It is starting to appear as though you're trying to push this particular term. Best, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Kia listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kia. Since you had some involvement with the Kia redirect (the move discussion), you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Godsy(TALKCONT) 21:03, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Help with Yassin Hall page
Hi. You recently reviewed my Yassin Hall page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Yassin_Hall) and I wanted to see if you could help me get it approved.
Will any of these sources help?http://www.busbyway.com/2015/07/20/author-of-jo... http://stjohnsource.com/content/news/local-news... http://stthomassource.com/content/news/local-ne... https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/12411789.Y... http://completeworldnews.com/2015/07/yassin-hal... http://www.humanmade.net/books/journey-untold http://hosts.blogtalkradio.com/intheauthorscorn... http://caribbeanemagazine.blogspot.com/2013/09/... http://www.ectechnano.com/journey-untold-my-mot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Friersow (talk • contribs) 21:23, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- No, not found, not found, no, no, no, not found, no article selected but page is not reliable, not found. Best, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:29, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Friersow (talk • contribs) 22:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
To be clear, it is the actual references that are the problem, not the citations, correct? Friersow (talk) 23:43, 3 August 2015 (UTC)Friersow
- The sources are not good. See WP:IS and WP:IRS. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 23:44, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:Sockpuppet
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Sockpuppet. Legobot (talk) 00:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion
I would like to inquire why you believe my article on Lori St John is a blatantly non-notable subject? It is my understanding that she meets all the requirements? Thank you for your assistance. Galaxygirl0505 (talk) 17:36, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- She does not. See WP:GNG and WP:PROF for the criteria she doesn't meet. Best, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:44, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Administrators/RfC for BARC - a community desysoping process
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Administrators/RfC for BARC - a community desysoping process. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Danielle Barnett
Hi There,
I have recently been declined by you because the person I am writing about isn't notable enough. Can you explain or help me in getting this page accepted? In the beginning I had an option to write about myself or someone notable, which I chose the notable option, maybe I should have chosen writing about myself, although its not me. The person I am writing about is the lead singer for a number 1 chart act, managing successful top 10 bands and a patented inventor. I'm a little confused. Please help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iconic Sound (talk • contribs) 09:54, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- The references provided seem to indicate The Urban Cookie Collective's notability, not the lead singer's. Best, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:24, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, I have removed the reference to the urban cookie chart and only internally hyperlinked to their page. I hope that will be ok.. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iconic Sound (talk • contribs) 10:29, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
18:45:47, 5 August 2015 review of submission by Duch0404
- Thank you for your suggestion to add citations! I've read the notability and golden rule pages (before I drafted this article and many times after), but I'm still not sure if I am completely understanding what I need to do to get the article accepted. Regarding the GrapeSEED page, if I add quotes from the theorists mentioned to explain their theories (which were used as a basis for the program), and cite them in the references section, is that what you and other reviewers are looking for? Thank you for your patience and help! --Duch0404
Duch0404 (talk) 18:45, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hello there. No, the theories and the program are two different things. No matter how many references you provide about language acquisition theory, you're still not providing evidence GrapeSEED is notable. I haven't found extensive coverage about GrapeSEED in independent and reliable sources, but if you have, please provide these. BEst, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:30, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Regulation Committee and alternatives to consensus. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Saje Natural Wellness
Hi, You added a comment - Comment: There's quite a bit of local and not so local coverage about this, but it appears to be a run-of-the-mill business. Is there anything missing that I need to add or is this page not accepted? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macca2014 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- The article is still awaiting reviewal. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 17:16, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.180.73.236 (talk) 17:28, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Providence (religious movement)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Providence (religious movement). Legobot (talk) 00:05, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Alex Gilbert
Hello,
I have since updated this page Draft: Alex Gilbert with a reliable source. Please look at the sources on the page.
Thanks! Dmitry --DmitryPopovRU (talk) 01:08, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but he's simply non-notable for Wikipedia. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:19, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Re: A page you started (Girlanda Silva Palace) has been reviewed!
Hi, thanks for your review. We have seen a problem about the url of the article Girlanda Silva Palace that influences the title of the article itself: the real name is Ghirlanda Silva Palace. May you change it?
I'm doing civil service at Brugherio's library. At our library we contribute to the GLAM project WiBrugherio, whose first step is to create a multilingual tourist guide of the city using QR codes generated by QRpedia. I'm translating the Italian articles that you can see here, but someone in the en.wiki community says our English is not good enough. It would be very helpful if you could revise our drafts as Girlanda Silva Palace. At the time, we translated these three articles Saint Lucius, Villa Brivio, Villa Fiorita. Thank you very much for your help! FrOsmetti (talk) 07:16, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- No problem, I've fixed the title. I'd be more than happy to check your articles! I'll go over Villa Fiorita, Ghirlanda Palace and Villa Brivio today. Let me know if there's anything else I could do. Best of luck, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 13:40, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Paul Signac
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Paul Signac. Legobot (talk) 00:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Israel
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Israel. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
A C de la Rive article
Hello, I am the author of that article, and the first paragraph (or the intro) was, at one time, only the first sentence, and had nothing about him being notable, which had to be added over Sulfurboy denying the article, without reading it, or evidently checking AC de la Rive for notoriety, as the rest of the links did that throughout the rest of the article. I decided to show him both sides notable mentions, including the conspiracists and the scholarly authors. The Wikipedia article on Leo Taxil, who was AC de la Rive's publishing friend, only has one source cited, but was published. Plus, he was also a French author. When I asked Sulfurboy about Taxil and the Taxil Hoax, he knew nothing of it, but feels he is qualified to review an article that he knows nothing of? I also made sure the citations all show the page numbers of the books, citing the source, except one, since it's online version only shows a chapter per page. I will try to find it today, and get the direct page numbers, instead of using chap. 1.
AC de la Rive wrote three paragraphs in his book, Woman and child in Universal Freemasonry, about Albert Pike, the US Confederate General, lawyer, and judge, who has two statues in Washington DC. Those paragraphs were a fallacy, stating that Pike claimed that Adonay (God), and lucifer were one and the same, which came from the Taxil Hoax, and was later recanted. It caused a lot of the hatred toward Freemasonry worldwide, and many conspiracists and several church denominations still quote what he wrote, claiming it to be real. AC de la Rive is mentioned under Leo Taxil, the Taxil Hoax, anti-Masonry, Luciferian Doctrine, and Edith Starr Miller's pages, on Wikipedia, as I write this, and is tied to them. He also has his own article on the French Wikipedia website. If you notice, I did try to keep this article as neutral as possible, and actually shows AC de la Rive in a good light, since he recanted all he wrote that were fallacies.--Craxd1 (talk) 12:24, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- I am aware of his influence in propagating the Lucifer-Masonry hoax, hence my comments he's likely notable. I've found plenty of coverage about him since posting my comments. I'll give the article another look today and probably accept it. Thank you, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 13:43, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. I will remove the notability portion if you want, as that really does not belong there, but it is up to the reviewers.--Craxd1 (talk) 13:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Don't worry about that, as I'll be copy editing the whole thing. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 14:15, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks again. I corrected the citation for the book, Is it True What They Say About Freemasonry, and found that the source I used, on Wikipedia, had the chapter wrong, and the one on the internet. This was all corrected, and the page numbers added. I would suggest removing the rest of the introduction, right after the 1st citation. Neither sides literature really needs to be shown for notoriety, only what is before the 1st citation.--Craxd1 (talk) 16:31, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'd suggest rephrasing it to explain the Masonry bit concisely for the introduction. After all, it's his main notability claim. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 16:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. Give me a bit, and I'll do my best to modify that, and get in more concise.--Craxd1 (talk) 18:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- I finished the Into, but still left the one portion I mentioned about who cited his works at the end of the intro, and will leave it up to you to remove that or not. Thanks for the help, it is appreciated.--Craxd1 (talk) 20:10, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- I figured I better give you a heads up. The article was perfect as you placed it. Later, I was viewing the article on Chick track, and added a citation to Brent Morris book, Is It True What They Say About Freemasonry, and one to a website, in the section for critics. Both the book and website are critical of Chick. An editor, and you know the one, deleted them, and when I admitted I was a Freemason, he looked under my name for my contributions and edits, and tried to either edit out, or revert, any article I had contributed to or edited. When I reverted this article back to yours, which he had slashed, (Personal attack removed) he tagged it. You'll have to look at the talk. Anyhow, I am not against anyone editing it, as long as they're neutral, (Personal attack removed) he did the ones on the Taxil Hoax and the Luciferian Doctrine, which was libelous, stating plainly that Freemasons worshiped Lucifer. I had edited this page, making it not so. (Personal attack removed), and reverted it, which I had to revert back. All these were months old, and discussed in their talk pages, with no negative comments to the edits. The editor would have never known, if I hadn't been at the chick track article. Also, please see about having his tag removed.--Craxd1 (talk) 23:14, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- I finished the Into, but still left the one portion I mentioned about who cited his works at the end of the intro, and will leave it up to you to remove that or not. Thanks for the help, it is appreciated.--Craxd1 (talk) 20:10, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. Give me a bit, and I'll do my best to modify that, and get in more concise.--Craxd1 (talk) 18:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'd suggest rephrasing it to explain the Masonry bit concisely for the introduction. After all, it's his main notability claim. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 16:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks again. I corrected the citation for the book, Is it True What They Say About Freemasonry, and found that the source I used, on Wikipedia, had the chapter wrong, and the one on the internet. This was all corrected, and the page numbers added. I would suggest removing the rest of the introduction, right after the 1st citation. Neither sides literature really needs to be shown for notoriety, only what is before the 1st citation.--Craxd1 (talk) 16:31, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Don't worry about that, as I'll be copy editing the whole thing. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 14:15, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. I will remove the notability portion if you want, as that really does not belong there, but it is up to the reviewers.--Craxd1 (talk) 13:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Indo-Pakistani War of 1971
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Indo-Pakistani War of 1971. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Felix Riebl
A solo album and his work with the Gondwana Choirs doesn't count as notability? - why does Chris Martin have a Wikipedia page and not just the Coldplay one - Felix Riebl fits into the same category — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hc94 (talk • contribs) 22:30, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- Chris Martin easily passes WP:GNG due to extensive coverage about him per se, regardless of his role in Coldplay. The references you've provided do not constitute extensive coverage about Riebl. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 02:38, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
I'm confused what constitutes an 'independent' reference - what kind of reference is not an interview/press release/etc.? This is the only aspect of the Wikipedia notability guidelines which Felix Riebl does not comply with. Yet see Marcus Mumford as an example that most pages of musicians in bands don't either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hc94 (talk • contribs) 22:25, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Eumunida chani
- added a link pointing to Branchia
- Paraulax queulensis
- added a link pointing to Fovea
- Paraulax ronquisti
- added a link pointing to Tarsus
- Uroptychus singularis
- added a link pointing to Flex
- Villa Fiorita, Brugherio
- added a link pointing to Mother earth
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
georgianera
Sources for the blog https://georgianera.wordpress.com/2015/01/15/mrs-bouverie-and-mrs-crewe-two-whig-hostesses-from-the-18th-century/ are given as www.historyofparliamentonline.org; The Gentleman’s Magazine, July-December, 1831, volume CI; Richard Brinsley Sheridan: A Life by Linda Kelly
MaxMLang (talk) 07:00, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- My concern is this might be a copyright violation. Please reword those parts which closely resemble the original text. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 17:10, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Popular Republican Union (2007)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Popular Republican Union (2007). Legobot (talk) 00:04, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
reference update
Hello, is a list of new references added to Roland Bergmann page sufficient now? Regards, WikiSilv (talk) 18:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)WikiSilv
- I'm afraid not. Please see WP:42 for more details on what we're looking for. As a rule of thumb, significant (wholly about the subject, not just mentions in passing) coverage in independent and reliable sources, such as newspapers or books, are considered good sources. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 18:48, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Then I have none, which you (maybe) will consider as RS... and if such article exists, than it will be somewhere hidden and written in German, and if evidence of being on music scene for 30 year is not enough for english Wiki than just remove the page... As far as I know, an interview is not RS, and I found many Wiki pages, where interviews were the only source of information, considered as being independent RS... — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiSilv (talk • contribs) 19:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Israel
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Israel. Legobot (talk) 00:09, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Medford knife And tool - m.k.t
Hello, regarding your comment, how can you write that this, is one source?
Reeder, David (January 1, 2015). "8 Bells and Medford’s challenge to his countrymen". RECOIL.
Webb, Brandon; Doherty, Glen (15 September 2010). 21st Century Sniper: The Complete Guide. New York: Skyhorse Publishing Inc. p. 216–217. ISBN 978-1-61608-001-3. Retrieved 6 August 2015.
Lee, Lee (May 1, 2014). ""Made in America, by American veterans, Damn proudly"". A2Z Metalworker 20 (3): 38–39.
Covert, Pat (2014). "Medford Knives: American-Made Blades". American Handgunner 24 (2): 72–73, 98. Retrieved 6 August 2015.
Šaponjić, Dragan (14 January 2014). "Različiti putevi - cilj isti Borbeni noževi Winkler, Medford i Pohl Force". Kalibar (207). Retrieved 6 August 2015.
"Medford TFF-1 Very Heavy Duty". MESSER MAGAZIN 6 (December - January): 19–20. Retrieved 6 August 2015.
Vuong, Patrick (2013). "Unusual Suspects – Paracord-Wrapped Knives". RECOIL (Source Interlink) 2 (8): 34–37.
Lang, Oliver. "EOD-Messer: Gred Medford EOD Knife". K-ISOM 2 (March-April): 84. Retrieved 6 August 2015.
Berry, Andrew (June 12, 2014). ""Medford Knife and Tool’s Limited Edition Tactical Machete 1"". Personal defense world. Retrieved 6 August 2015.
Webb, Brandon - well know writer, in this field: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandon_Webb_(author) Covert, Pat - American Handgunner - one of the most respected US writers and magazines in the field MESSER MAGAZIN, K-ISOM, Kalibar - same...respected EU writers and magazines in the field....Eytankey (talk) 19:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- I did not say that. I said that I performed my own search and found one source. I have since found a few more print sources, but I don't regard them as extensive either. Let's see what other reviewers have to say. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 20:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- I have the original magazines (hard copy) I can send it to you (PDF). Eytankey (talk) 03:08, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Montes.
I apologize you. But who are you to forbid I say approach of elimination of the article Gala Montes?, I'm giving my point of view, and it is not "fanaticism", stop judging. The fact that edit articles on soap operas do not prevent me to have a say.--Philip J Fry • (talk) 23:24, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- I did not forbid you to do anything, nor did I offer any judgement; stop taking things personally and being overly dramatic, because it furthers the notion you have a soap opera agenda to push. I merely recommended you didn't comment where you have a clear conflict of interest; it's unethical. Your point of view has clearly been stated, as has mine. Now let other editors comment in peace. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 23:35, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Association for Progressive Communications
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Association for Progressive Communications. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Jeff Teravainen Decline
Hi there,
sorry to bother you, but I am trying to find out what more is needed in getting Jeff approved. There are numerous articles on him being the Voice of the Olympics, FIFA World Cup voice etc. There is a CBC News Live interview clip of him and also playing some of his work during it. There is a Sirius Satellite radio interview etc etc. Right now I have added a mention and pic on Dark Matter Show creator Joseph Mallozzi's blog that tells he is on the SYFY TV show Dark Matter. He is also currently filming SYFY's 12 Monkeys. I get it, I am also a V/O artist with 1/10th of the credits and don't have a page. But he is in all these shows and movies etc?
Any advice would be greatful.
Thank you Namarow — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namarow (talk • contribs) 01:47, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Only source about him is this. I'm afraid that's just not enough to attest his notability, no matter what you do. He's non-notable at present. That might change in the future. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 02:03, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Research Administrators Certification Council draft
Hi there, FoCuSandLeArN!
Your comment to me stated: "Sources available in print and academic literature."
I have added sources of these kinds. Are there other sources of which you are aware?
Thanks very much for your kind assistance!
Amgray19 (talk) 19:32, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- See Council, Forest Stewardship. What is certification. retrieved 2/11/05 from the FSC website at http://www. fscus.org/faqs/what_is_certification. php, 2005; Roberts, Thomas. "Everyone's mentor: Perceptions of research administrators on the value of certification." Journal of Research Administration 37.1/2 (2006): 87; ROBERTS, THOMAS J. Perceptions of research administrators on the value of certification. Diss. University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida, 2005; Roumel, Theodore J. "A blueprint for establishing a successful office of sponsored programs: the public health service historically black college and university capacity building program." SRA Journal 26.1 (1994): 5; Phillip A. Barnhart (1994). Guide to national professional certification programs. Human Resource Development Press. ISBN 978-0-87425-965-0.; Dissertation Abstracts International: The humanities and social sciences. University Microfilms. 2006.; Dean O. Smith (8 July 2011). Managing the Research University. Oxford University Press, USA. pp. 129–. ISBN 978-0-19-979338-9.; Ruth G. McRoy; Jerry P. Flanzer; Joan Levy Zlotnik (25 January 2012). Building Research Culture and Infrastructure. Oxford University Press, USA. pp. 86–. ISBN 978-0-19-539964-6.; Elliott C. Kulakowski; Lynne U. Chronister (3 July 2008). Research Administration and Management. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. pp. 26–. ISBN 978-1-4496-6607-1.. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 19:52, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Eagles (band)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eagles (band). Legobot (talk) 00:06, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:India
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:India. Legobot (talk) 00:09, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The Palmer Squares
hello, i was wondering if there was anything i could improve upon on the palmer squares wiki page that would help them get accepted? also i have not been able to figure out how to link in references properly, though all provided do prove any stats or facts stated in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.7.119.231 (talk) 01:06, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- It appears that the group is simply non-notable at this time. To see the relevant guidelines on notability, read WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC. As for the references you've provided, they don't constitute extensive coverage in independent and reliable sources (Youtube, iTunes, etc. are certainly not that). At this point in time it doesn't look as if adding any more references will help, as they are simply non-notable at this point in time. If they do garner enough coverage to pass our notability guidelines in the future please resubmit. For referencing help, see WP:REFB. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 15:12, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
21:04:15, 16 August 2015 review of submission by Dramatic10
- Dramatic10 (talk · contribs)
Hello, Thank you for the opportunity to explain.
I have so many articles, videos and projects, that I tried to narrow down for you by giving you links to my history, If you go into the links http://everythingbernadettecooper.tumblr.com/ or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klymaxx or https://drive.google.com/file/d/0By4RdX5078UtV2tRRG1DdFRHLW8/view?usp=sharing or https://drive.google.com/file/d/0By4RdX5078UtMWRIMXNjeWlJUlk/view?usp=sharing this will provide much info for you. Please let me know specifically what is needed. Everything in the draft is verifiable, I thought I was doing well with the info I sent at the bottom of the draft.
Thank you,
Bernadette cooper
Dramatic10 (talk) 21:04, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- There's no need for you to provide me links to your Google Drive. Just place the appropriate references as citations in the article. Thank you, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 21:52, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- The Nostalgist
- added a link pointing to Victorian
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
ANDY BABIUK submission
Symbol opinion vote.svg Comment: A few sentences copied from http://www.amazon.com/Beatles-Gear-Fours-Instruments-Studio/dp/0879309563/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1439122771&sr=1-1&keywords=beatles+gear. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 19:52, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Yes They were used because I wrote them for Amazon... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.67.50.196 (talk) 17:55, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- You cannot add material that is present elsewhere. See WP:COPY. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 18:06, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Military Frontier
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Military Frontier. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Draft: Jonno Turner
Hi, thanks for taking the time to check this submission. Just to clarify, he is also a published author - https://www.waterstones.com/book/so-you-think-you-know-all-about-football/jonno-turner/ben-fraser/9781849537636 - and has been written interviewed by several global publications such as the New York Times. Let's talk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jiirtih (talk • contribs) 17:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of urban areas by population
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of urban areas by population. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
AfC
Hi Help Desk -- Thanks very much for responding to my submission. I have gotten other entries in Wikipedia in years past, but the process has certainly tightened up!
I asked to be "adopted" by a several Wikipedia editors but never got a response, so I just decided to barrel ahead with my submission. Based on the feedback, I am not sure what I have done wrong. I did use copyrighted material, but I credited it in the footnotes. I also used other Wikipedia references when possible. I just think I need someone to take me by the hand and help me step-by-step through the process.
I also have a photo of the church building that I took myself, which I would like to include with the article. I do not want any credit for the photograph, and will be happy to sign any waiver.
Again, many thanks for your kind response. I am hopeful that you can help me get this included. I believe it is a worthy subject. --Stan Wellborn — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stan Wellborn (talk • contribs) 00:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hello there! For Wikipedia's adoption program, see Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user. Unfortunately attribution is not enough when it comes to copying material from elsewhere; we have a very strict policy regarding copyright. I'm not really knowledgeable on its intricacies, but that link should have plenty of information about what you should do. As for the photo, uploading it to commons from your personal camera shouldn't be a problem if you provide the relevant details in the Commons upload wizard. As for the notability of the church itself, that's a whole different issue, as we'd have to attest whether it has significant coverage from independent sources, or any historical value per se. Let me know if you need further guidance. Cheers, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
thanks
thanks sir for your feedback but i work my own no copyright from any one and give me tips about how to improve wikipedia (Needreview talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:50, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what submission you're referring to, but WP:COPY should clear any doubts. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 10:43, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
I copied the notice to User:JS Hoyer here since that editor created the article. I just noticed it as a possible G13 issue in the future and moved the article to draft space. I don't think it was technically up for submission but I don't know how the AFC process works on that end. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:03, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Ricky81682: The article is most likely to be edited/improved while on mainspace. It is a widely used botanical term, hence my acceptance. Your move from draftspace proved most useful! Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 10:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oh and while we're at it, I dunno if the Draft:Dayna Lynne North editor is still active and willing to edit the submission. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 10:45, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your help
Thanks for helping with Boustead & Co! History buffoon (talk) 21:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for editing! Hope you stay. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 21:45, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Wilson
HI - Yes, William C. Wilson is the author on the article referenced.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC122088/
Wilson WC, Smedira NG, Fink C, McDowell JA, Luce JM. Ordering and Administration of Sedatives and Analgesics during the Withdrawal and Withholding of Life Support from Critically Ill Patients. JAMA. 1992;267:949–952. doi: 10.1001/jama.267.7.949.
Georgedocument (talk) 22:27, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- OK, thanks! I believe he passes WP:PROF, so I'll probably copy edit the article tomorrow. Regards, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 22:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Siachen Glacier
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Siachen Glacier. Legobot (talk) 00:10, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
XenDesktop
Just wanted to say thanks for reviewing and accepting my XenDesktop submission. I know it was a little tricky because of the redirect—I appreciate you working through it! Heatherer (talk) 14:45, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Heatherer: No worries! Your drafts are in a sense much easier to gauge than what we usually see at AfC. How are you getting along on Wikipedia? FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 14:49, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Cyrano de Bergerac
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cyrano de Bergerac. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 21 August 2015 (UTC)