User talk:History buffoon

Welcome!

Hello, History buffoon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tutorial to help get you oriented editing Wikipedia)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! We're so glad you're here! dalahäst ^{(let's talk!)} 00:43, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boustead & Co (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FoCuSandLeArN was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Boustead Holdings instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boustead & Co and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 01:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boustead & Co (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Boustead Holdings instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boustead & Co and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:52, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boustead & Co has been accepted

Boustead & Co, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 16:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm DuncanHill. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Michael Voris have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DuncanHill (talk) 00:26, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Voris, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 00:58, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Michael Voris, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 01:02, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I already gave a reason for why I deleted the information on the Talk section. Stop adding it back. History buffoon (talk) 01:04, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See my reply on talk:Michael Voris. Adakiko (talk) 01:05, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just added this. Delete the article. There is no consensus as of this date. History buffoon (talk) 01:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Voris. DuncanHill (talk) 01:48, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't disrupted anything and I'm contacting the Administrators now. History buffoon (talk) 01:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lol !!!! Thanks. History buffoon (talk) 02:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Michael Voris) for a period of 1 week for Vandalism and Edit Warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to discuss this article on the Talk page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:43, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to do so calmly and civilly. If you are uncivil, your block is likely to be made sitewide. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:44, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Who was talking to you? Go away please. History buffoon (talk) 02:45, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lol !!! Thanks. History buffoon (talk) 02:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for making uncivil comments after a warning, as you did at Talk:Michael Voris. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:26, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my gosh! How horrible. What will I do??? History buffoon (talk) 04:30, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]