User talk:WikiSilv

March 2015

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mad Max (band), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 07:13, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mad Max (band). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Nothing should be added to the infobox beside band members. See template:Infobox musical artist. The source you keep removing is better than anything you have provided to date and if you think it provides "wrong and incomplete information", then perhaps your information is wrong and incomplete. Feel free to take that specific source to WP:RSN. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:05, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Roland Bergmann, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Removing {{better source}} is not appropriate, even for a draft. Either replace the source with a {{citation needed}} or leave the other in-place. This article is nominated for submission to main space and I am trying to save reviewers time and warn them of pitfalls. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:52, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Mad Max (band). Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:32, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is requested

Please add your comments at Primary source, but is it acceptable to discuss basic information on a band? as another editor has requested your side of the discussion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Roland Bergmann has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Roland Bergmann. Thanks! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 16:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roland Bergmann (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Alpha Monarch was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roland Bergmann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

♔ MONARCH ^{Ask me} 17:56, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! WikiSilv, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ♔ MONARCH ^{Ask me} 17:56, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Roland Bergmann concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Roland Bergmann, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:44, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Roland Bergmann

Hello, WikiSilv. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Roland Bergmann".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]