User talk:Eytankey

Eytankey, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Eytankey! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Medford knife And tool (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Medford knife And tool and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:03, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Medford knife And tool (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Medford knife And tool and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:57, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Medford knife And tool has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Medford knife And tool. Thanks! Sulfurboy (talk) 16:15, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:55, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Medford knife And tool has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Medford knife And tool. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 17:06, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Medford knife And tool (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Medford knife And tool and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 17:17, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Medford knife And tool (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Medford knife And tool and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 19:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Medford knife And tool has been accepted

Medford knife And tool, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 20:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Medford

You probably want to talk to the company and get a complete list of articles written about them. Pieces in Blade, American Handgunner, Knives Illustrated and even Tactical Knives will carry more weight. The book is this reference<ref name="WebbDoherty2010">{{cite book|last1=Webb|first1=Brandon|last2=Doherty|first2=Glen|authorlink2=Glen Doherty|title=21st Century Sniper: The Complete Guide|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=ClPffwtcYGMC&pg=PA216|date=15 September 2010|publisher=Skyhorse Publishing Inc.|location=New York|isbn=978-1-61608-001-3|pages=216–217}}</ref>. I'm working on 5 magazine articles currently and have little time for wiki, so email me through my page if you run into any problems.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 17:37, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! will do. Eytankey (talk) 19:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Take the following as your guide: We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources.

This lets you know, broadly, where to place the articles in order for references to them to establish notability.

I suggest you avoid the founder's ethos and stick 100% to the corporation if you can. Fiddle Faddle 20:36, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note taken, I will tell you when the draft will be ready, thank you! Eytankey (talk) 17:57, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Medford Knife and Tool - M.K.T (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Medford Knife and Tool - M.K.T and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 07:20, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know this will be disappointing, but, when you read the long comment I left on the draft I think you will understand why I have declined it today. Fiddle Faddle 07:52, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I read it, thank you for the long explanation; I don't know what else I can do... :( I looked and looked, translated reviews..., If you don't think it will survive delete process then I think It is better to wait. Thank you. Eytankey (talk) 08:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All you can do is to keep looking. The probable best short term approach is to work with (grrr, my brain has forgotten his name!) the editor from the Blades project to choose which weak references to remove and which to retain, and to keep seeking the strong ones you need. The more I read about the org the more I want a knife! But that doesn't get the baby bathed! I'd hate this article to get trapped by the "Re-creation of previously deleted material" rule, so be wise and refine the draft quietly until you are sure it will pass. If you get it to that state and let me know I'll be happy to offer you advice. As I said before, we want to accept articles. Fiddle Faddle 08:41, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Medford Knife and Tool - M.K.T has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Medford Knife and Tool - M.K.T. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 08:59, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think the only extra thing you can do is to ask at the AFC Helpdesk for all the advice anyone is willing to give you. It's difficult when one feels that something deserves a place but then cannot find the things that allow it to have one, the more so when some bizarre orgs make the cut. The thing to do is to disconnect yourself emotionally from the draft and view it as a surgeon working on a patient they have no interest in except with regard to the procedure they are performing. Fiddle Faddle 09:21, 12 August 2015 (UTC).[reply]

I appreciate your advice, I will try to look more. Thanks Eytankey (talk) 09:55, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Medford Knife and Tool - M.K.T has been accepted

Medford Knife and Tool - M.K.T, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

StarryGrandma (talk) 22:16, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congratuations

Now, cross your fingers that it stays. I am staying well clear and will offer no opinion either way Fiddle Faddle 22:49, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

you helped me doing it right, and for that I thank you! Eytankey (talk) 16:31, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]