User talk:Fixer88/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Fixer88. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))
New Page Review - newsletter #2
- Please help reduce the New Page backlog
This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.
- Getting the tools we need
ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE
Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .
Category:Male boxers by nationality has been nominated for discussion
Category:Male boxers by nationality, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:34, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Katosan (disambiguation) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Katosan (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Katosan (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Onel5969 TT me 18:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Autopatrol
Hi Fixer88, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank You For Your Review
Hello, I really appreciated your time and effort to reviewed my article Super Junior D&E The 2nd Japan Tour ,
Best Regards
Puchicatos (talk) 05:22, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Robert McClenon. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, La Ka Chau, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Robert McClenon (talk) 15:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:American people of Libyan-Jewish descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 16:05, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
New Page Review - newsletter No.2
- A HUGE backlog
We now have 804 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.
The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.
- Second set of eyes
Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.
- Abuse
This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and
- this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
- this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
- This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.
Coordinator election
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
New Page Review - newsletter No.3
Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.
- Still a MASSIVE backlog
We now have 804 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Article reviewed
Hi.. Thanks for reviewing the Semelai people article that I've created. Also not to forget to remove the "New unreviewed article" tag in the article too. Really appreciate your time for going through the article. Thanks again. Jeblat (talk) 16:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Meaningless DAB pages
Please discontinue creating disambiguation pages for languages you don't know, such as Miechucińskie or Marszewska, which are nonsense. Also, please refresh the meaning of the term "disambiguation page". YOu are creating an extra work for other people to cleanup the mess. YOu may also ask me whether you planned Poland-related dab page would make sense. Staszek Lem (talk) 01:16, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Please also add template {{WPDAB}} into talk pages of disambig pages you create. It helps bots and wikipedians to keep track things. Staszek Lem (talk) 01:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Staszek Lem, as described in its documentation, {{WPDAB}} should only be added to talk pages that have content. The tracking is done via the hidden category placed by the {{Disambig}} template on the page itself. – Uanfala (talk) 01:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- OK. Someone else told me something else. I will keep this in mind, thanks. Staszek Lem (talk)
Manual of Style prohibits and/or
and/or is prohibited per Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Μπάμπης Κανδής (talk) 08:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Sava River
While I appreciate hard work you have put in disambiguating links to Sava River and Sava river, it would have been much easier to simply revert undiscussed retargeting of WP:PRIMARYREDIRECTs "Sava river" and "Sava River" to the dab page, which I just did. A lot of effort saved for all involved, and no unnecessary work. No such user (talk) 22:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Afton, Georgia
- added a link pointing to Georgia
- Barretts Mill, Georgia
- added a link pointing to Georgia
- Barrettsville, Georgia
- added a link pointing to Georgia
- Barrons Lane, Georgia
- added a link pointing to Georgia
- Barrow Heights, Georgia
- added a link pointing to Georgia
- Rockbridge, Georgia
- added a link pointing to Georgia
- Whistleville, Georgia
- added a link pointing to Georgia
- Zuta, Georgia
- added a link pointing to Georgia
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Fixer, thanks for your work in disambiguating links. However, in the above article you pointed railcars at the generic article on rail vehicles, whereas it was specifically about the railcar mode of transport i.e. a powered, self-propelled railway coach. I've changed the link to point at the latter. Cheers. --Bermicourt (talk) 10:48, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dana Schweiger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page VOX. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Just to explain, Category:Suburbs of the Gold Coast, Queensland needs the parent category of Category:Gold Coast City because that is the local government area and suburbs are gazetted wrt to the local government area, which has well-defined boundaries. The term "Gold Coast" and corresponding Gold Coast article are vague and unbounded concepts and and describe Gold Coast City and its surrounds. Due to the popularity of the Gold Coast as a holiday destination in Australia, it suits businesses of the surrounding areas to market themselves as being on "Gold Coast" which in turn leads to a public perception that the Gold Coast is much larger than the official Gold Coast City boundaries. The same is true for most large Australian cities, e.g. Brisbane is vague, whereas City of Brisbane is precise. However, there is no ambiguity about suburbs; they have precise boundaries and their gazettal always documents their local government area. Kerry (talk) 04:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Invercargill
Hi Fixer88 - thanks for adding stub articles on Invercargill suburbs... one thing though, if you add any more: the navbox ({{Invercargill}}) should normally go after the references. Grutness...wha? 07:03, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Islands in Western Australia
Suggestion: Islands in WA would probably be more usefully described in terms of their distance from the state capital, Perth, rather the nation's capital Canberra. (Examples: Morley Island, Suomi Island, Turnstone Island, Wooded Island, Oystercatcher Island.) Mitch Ames (talk) 12:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kati Kovács (comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hungarian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Women in Red online editathon on sports
 Welcome to Women in Red's | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 13:41, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 73.61.16.23 (talk) 12:54, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
May 2017
Your recent editing history at Mechmont shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~ GB fan 12:54, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
New Page Review - Newsletter No.4
Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 804 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!
But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.
Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Arts organizations disestablished in 2017 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 17:17, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Fairbank Island (Fairbank Lake) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fairbank Island (Fairbank Lake) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fairbank Island (Fairbank Lake) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 21:57, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
- Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
Technology update:
- Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
- The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
- User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
- User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through
General project update:
- Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Celebrity Big Brother 20
Hi, I'm Alucard 16. Fixer88, thanks for creating Celebrity Big Brother 20!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for creating Celebrity Big Brother 20 its a good start I would recommend adding a few sources to the article.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 14:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguated: Unified Team → Unified Team at the Olympics
Hey, You have done a lot of mistakes with these edits. European competitions linking to Olympics? Example [1]. Can you fix it? --Pelmeen10 (talk) 17:18, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Over Top for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Over Top is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Over Top until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:40, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
Technology update:
- Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.
General project update:
- The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
- Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
- To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Category: Indonesian male novelists
Hi Fixer88, I noticed you created the above category, and I'm a little confused: it says it's a "non-diffusing subcategory" of Category:Colombian novelists, but I can't see any name or reason for linking the two categories... did you mean to add that header? Richard3120 (talk) 02:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- I corrected that mistake, thanks for that. Fixer88 (talk) 13:29, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- No problem – I was sure it must have been an accidental error. Richard3120 (talk) 13:56, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Stub sorting
Please don't use the {{Stub}} tag if you can find a more specific stub tag; stub sort when you can. To do otherwise will backlog Category:Stubs. Thank you. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:24, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Stub sorting
Please don't use the {{Stub}} tag if you can find a more specific stub tag; stub sort whenever you are able. To do otherwise will backlog Category:Stubs. Thank you. (I realize some people aren't able to stub sort very well due to issues surrounding memory or feeling overwhelmed by the unfortunately long list of stub types; sorry if you're one of them). -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 12:16, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, FC Fleury 91 (women), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:15, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Please only disambuiguate topics you are familiar with
Hello. Please avoid disambiguating wikilinks when you don't know what you are doing. It is much better to have a link to a disambiguation page (where the reader can find the specific article) than replacing it with a nonsensical specific link as you did at List of file formats. When you are not 100% sure what you are doing, when you are not familiar with the topic, please refrain from making disambiguation edits. Thanks.—J. M. (talk)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
- Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!
Technology update:
- The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225
General project update:
- On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
- Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
- To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Mississippi Barnstar | |
| Thank you for the new Mississippi articles you created. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:53, 20 September 2017 (UTC) |
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Marina Granovskaia, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:27, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, St. Louis Streetcar, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:30, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Invitation to edit with Women in Red
You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would just like to receive messages about our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. If you would prefer to not receive additional notices of our monthly activities, you can let us know on our opt-out list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.09% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Happening in September: | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
Speedy deletion declined: Precious Plastic
Hello Fixer88. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Precious Plastic, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:05, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, I was going to come and explain this better but I see my script dropped this templated advice already. I declined speedy deletion because it was very easy to identify the subject of the article with a simple Google search. Had you picked A7 (no claim of significance) I probably wouldn't have hesitated, but since I looked into it more it seems like the creator is working on a series of articles in their sandbox, and this will eventually be part of it, so instead I moved it to draft space. Let me know if you have any questions. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:12, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| Thank you for reviewing the article I wrote - Quickshifter. I really appreciate it. : ) Navinsingh133 (talk) 08:22, 27 September 2017 (UTC) |
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing StarCom Racing, Fixer88.
Unfortunately Kudpung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
Unsourced. No claims of significance. Fails WP:ORG Should be PRODed
Note: This article was deleted two days ago.
To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Uskovnica, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing 2009 Mini Challenge UK, Fixer88.
Unfortunately Kudpung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
Unsourced and uncategorised. Plea tag appropriately and make the creator aware
To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 4,000 Holes, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
- We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.
Technology update:
- Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.
General project update:
- The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
- To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)