Jump to content

User talk:Farooqahmadbhat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Farooqahmadbhat, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Farooqahmadbhat! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Welcome to the Teahouse Badge Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

from: Knightrises10

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devepora has been accepted

[edit]
Devepora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 10:28, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Junaid Azim Mattu (November 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not enough evidence they meet WP:NPOL
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 05:54, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bufliaz has been accepted

[edit]
Bufliaz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 06:03, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mehak Zubair (November 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See WP:ENT
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 06:04, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Peer Ki Gali has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Peer Ki Gali. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 06:09, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Tina Dabi

[edit]

Draft:Tina Dabi, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tina Dabi and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Tina Dabi during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 06:56, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for administrators attention - I am looking for help

[edit]

The user Legacypac (talk) is the suspected user on Wikipedia who decline and object quality and notable pages. Please take appropriate action against the said user.

The following article that Legacypac (talk) has declined:

  • If you have any legitimate reasons for objecting to Legacypac's declines of your submissions then you need to say what those reasons are, not just say that he is a "suspected user" (whatever that is supposed to mean). From my checks of a few of the drafts it seems that he has actually been very generous to you, for example simply advising you to reword a draft instead of tagging it for speedy deletion as a copyright infringement, raising a discussion on whether to delete another draft rather than tagging it for speedy deletion as spam and as re-creation of content deleted at an earlier deletion discussion, as many editors would have done. His handling of your drafts seems absolutely fine, from what I have seen of them. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user is on my talkpage and the AfC help desk complaining. Thanks User:JamesBWatson Legacypac (talk) 16:35, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Junaid Azim Mattu (November 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 15:25, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peer Ki Gali has been accepted

[edit]
Peer Ki Gali, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Herman (Village) has been accepted

[edit]
Herman (Village), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 16:32, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Ki Gali moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Peer Ki Gali, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 16:16, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peer Ki Gali has been accepted

[edit]
Peer Ki Gali, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 05:34, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reshnagri has been accepted

[edit]
Reshnagri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 10:28, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Namda has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Namda. Thanks! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:44, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kotranka has been accepted

[edit]
Kotranka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 16:59, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chandimarh has been accepted

[edit]
Chandimarh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yaripora has been accepted

[edit]
Yaripora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JC7V (talk) 19:37, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Ki Gali

[edit]

Hello Farooq, thank you very much for creating the Peer Ki Gali page. I have corrected the coordinates to the ones shown on Google maps. Can you please double check that it is correct? Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 09:05, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kautilya3: This is a matter of concern that you have moved Peer Ki Gali to Pir Panjal Pass" without getting involved in article research. In Fact, you have disrupted the current version which needs administrator's intervention. The Pir Panjal Range should be merged to "Pir Panjal Pass" but not "Peer Ki Gali". The 'pir panjal pass' represents a group of mountains while 'peer ki gali' represents a tourist spot. (Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 09:15, 23 November 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Moreover, sources said, there is no "Pir panjal Pass" But "Peer Ki Gali". The said user (Kautilya3 (talk)) has renamed the article Peer Ki Gali to Pir Panjal Pass without adding sources that could indicate the "peer ki gali" is the "Pir panjal pass". (Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 09:15, 23 November 2018 (UTC))[reply]

That is strange. The Pir Panjal Range says "The Pir Panjal Pass (also called Peer Ki Gali)", and you have added yesterday, a link to the new page without making any correction to the information. Are you now saying that "Pir Panjal Pass" and "Peer Ki Gali" are different places? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:28, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sir, I was looking for the sources that could indicate "Peer Ki Gali" is also known as "Pir Panjal Pass" and i failed to gather the information from reliable sources. Since, you moved "Peer Ki Gali" to "Pir Panjal Pass", I tried a lot to collect the information about your changes and later, i realized that "Peer Ki Gali" and "Pir Panjal Pass" are not same geographically. I am surprised, that a senior user like you moved the page without supplying variable sources. Moreover, the mentioned phrase on Pir Panjal Range "The Pir Panjal Pass (also called Peer Ki Gali)" is not added by me... I have only linked "Peer Ki Gali" to the said page and the rest of words ("The Pir Panjal Pass (also called" ____) were added by another user. (Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 18:36, 23 November 2018 (UTC))[reply]
For native names, English language sources may be hard to get. We do depend on people with local knowledge to add such information without asking for sources. For Kashmir especially, good quality information is very hard to get.
Further, if you bothered to click on the Google maps link I gave you yesterday, you would have noticed that it is showing both at the same place.
Anyway, I have now added a reliable source. So this controversy is now resolved. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 07:10, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, the shrine that you have labelled as that of Nund Rishi, has been labelled on Google maps as a shrine for Sheikh Ahmed Karim. You might want to investigate further. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:43, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have investigated each and every part of Pir Panjal Pass but i am still in doubt whether it should be Peer Ki Gali or Pir Panjal Pass. The truth is; you know better than me and i feel helpless and tired while searching for the sources here and there. Anyway, thanks for showing your interest in PKG or PPP. (Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 12:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chitragam has been accepted

[edit]
Chitragam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 16:34, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hirpora has been accepted

[edit]
Hirpora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 16:55, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khadermoh has been accepted

[edit]
Khadermoh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 15:17, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tukroo has been accepted

[edit]
Tukroo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 15:36, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalampora has been accepted

[edit]
Kalampora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 15:40, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amshipora has been accepted

[edit]
Amshipora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 16:54, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanger Wani has been accepted

[edit]
Sanger Wani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:45, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kashmiri handicrafts has been accepted

[edit]
Kashmiri handicrafts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 05:50, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The India Star
Farooqahmadbhat, I award you The India Star for all your hard work in WikiProject India-related articles, especially your recent creation of an article about Kashmiri handicrafts. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 08:23, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Panzer, Shopian has been accepted

[edit]
Panzer, Shopian, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JC7V (talk) 03:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gulistan, Baramulla has been accepted

[edit]
Gulistan, Baramulla, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 16:00, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Noori Chamb

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Noori Chamb at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:27, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siar Baba Waterfall has been accepted

[edit]
Siar Baba Waterfall, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 15:23, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yaadon Ka Idiot Box has been accepted

[edit]
Yaadon Ka Idiot Box, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 15:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yaadon Ka Idiot Box, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mint (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shitlu has been accepted

[edit]
Shitlu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 16:56, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karimabad, Pulwama has been accepted

[edit]
Karimabad, Pulwama, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SemiHypercube ✎ 18:17, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dool, Kishtwar has been accepted

[edit]
Dool, Kishtwar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SemiHypercube ✎ 18:19, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Re: Draft:Kashmir Administrative Service

[edit]

Hello Farooqahmadbhat I have added projects India, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 06:50, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you take the information from? It would be great to include it as sources for the article. Please let me know if you need help. ( To reply click 'edit' next to this section, and add your reply at the end. ) Gryllida (talk) 06:50, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gryllida: Sir, I am working........... I am in process of completing the topic and then i'll supply all the possible and verified sources... Thank you so much... I feel very happy to see the friendly chartered wiki users like you... In fact, people like you, are the foundation of Wikipedia Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 07:00, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kashmir Administrative Service has been accepted

[edit]
Kashmir Administrative Service, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 14:20, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For your excellent work on starting articles such as Kashmiri handicrafts, Peer Ki Gali and Kashmir Administrative Service. (The Original Barnstar, the first on Wikipedia, is given to recognize particularly fine contributions to Wikipedia, to let people know that their hard work is seen and appreciated.) signed, DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 19:36, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission has been accepted

[edit]
Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 12:26, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

TonyBallioni (talk) 16:58, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding voting

[edit]

Please mention your vote in AfD (as its necessary), in bold, example as: Keep, Delete or Comment.(Info:WP:AFDFORMAT)
--Gpkp (u • t • c) 16:25, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jammu and Kashmir State Vigilance Commission has been accepted

[edit]
Jammu and Kashmir State Vigilance Commission, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 16:49, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KikoRiki

[edit]

Hi Farooqahmadbhat!

I am updating KikoRiki's wiki info on behalf of the KikoRiki brand owner.

The copyright owners wanted to update the info that was on the wiki because it's very outdated and negatively impacting the brand. I have a more updates to follow. Please kindly apply the update that I will submit.


Thanks, Fununionriki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fununionriki (talk • contribs) 07:35, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) In that case, you need to read and follow the instructions at WP:COI. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to make constructive changes at any time. Earlier, i reverted the latest changes made by "Fununionriki" because the edits were not cited. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 08:24, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong! Scotland is in Great Britain even children know it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by United10000 (talk • contribs) 05:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation! see, WP:PTOPIC

Tech News: 2018-51

[edit]

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Tech News

  • Because of the holidays the next issue of Tech News will be sent out on 7 January 2019.

Recent changes

  • Some templates that show notices about the content of the page will now be shown on the mobile website. In many cases they were hidden before. [1][2]
  • Admins can no longer unblock themselves, except for self-blocks. A blocked admin can block the user who blocked them but no one else. This is so no one can block all admins on a wiki without being stopped. [3]
  • Advanced item The ParserMigration extension has been removed. It compared the result of two versions of the MediaWiki wikitext parsing pipeline. It was used when we moved to the Remex parsing library instead of Tidy.

Problems

  • <ref> tags can use parameters such as "name" or "group". For example <ref name="adams" group="books">. If a <ref> tag has more than two parameters all parameters are ignored. You don't get a warning that they don't work. This will soon be fixed. [4]

Changes later this week

  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 18 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 19 December. It will be on all wikis from 20 December (calendar).

Meetings

Future changes

  • The Wikimedia Foundation Android app team are working on making it easier to edit on mobile phones. You can read more about these plans. If you have an Android phone and speak at least two languages you can help testing in English. Tell Dchen (WMF) you want to be part of the testing by writing on her talk page or email her.
  • Advanced item tiles.wmflabs.org and wma.wmflabs.org will stop working. They have no maintainers and run an old operating system. Tools which use it could stop working. This includes the mapnik gadget, hill shading, and hike and bike layers. New maintainers could help out and keep it going. [5]

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

20:35, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Farooqahmadbhat. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Aadil Gurezi.
Message added 13:39, 22 December 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:39, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Dool, Kishtwar) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Dool, Kishtwar.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thanks for writing it, it would be great if you could add a source for that it's largest village by area.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|1997kB}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

‐‐1997kB (talk) 05:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy tagging

[edit]

You tagged the above two articles as A7 and put comments in the article. This is disruptive. If you want to comment on your A7, then do so on the article's Talk page. Even then, generally A7s don't require comments by the tagger; the issue should be obvious on its face. For example, the fact that a source returns a 404 is irrelevant to a speedy tag as for an article to survive a7, it requires only significant credible claims, whether they are sourced or not. An article can survive A7 with zero sources. I don't think you're experienced enough to tag articles for speedy deletion; I suggest you stop.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:05, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: With due respect, my intention was not making disruptive edits. In fact, I thought it might help admins to gather the more information about the speedy tagged articles. Now, I came to know that adding comments in A7 articles is disruptive. Thanks a lot. Sir, there are many more articles which needs to be deleted under A7 and G11. If you give me one more chance to tag the articles for speedy deletion, it may help Wikipedia to remove the spam articles. I will be careful in future while tagging the articles. Thanks Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 15:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have once again removed your speedy template the article has a clear claim of notability as "the oldest department store in the State of Penang". Theroadislong (talk) 18:56, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Ignite Media Group

[edit]

Hello Farooqahmadbhat, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ignite Media Group, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 13:33, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DeltaQuad: Sir, thanks for letting me know. I have a question. If G3 is not suitable for the said article, then I think the page deserves G11. The article has been created 9 years ago and still it has not been improved because the constructive sources are not available. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 13:50, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A minor point, you should note that Amanda/DeltaQuad is a female admin, and "Sir" is probably not appropriate Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:33, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker), @Farooqahmadbhat: I suggest using gender neutral terms as needed when talking to users on Wikipedia whose gender you aren't too sure about. Although I don't think it is a policy anywhere, it is still a small point that needs to be considered in general day to day interactions. For further reading see Wikipedia:Gender-neutral language in Wikipedia policies, Singular they, Wikipedia:Gender-neutral language. (I know you are currently blocked, but when and IF you are unblocked, this is something to consider otherwise also if not already considered.) I know I had a little bit of confusion in trying to understand this early on in Wikipedia. Regards. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 09:35, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize for using the gender terms as i was not aware of WP:GNLPOLICY. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 12:33, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:12, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Farooqahmadbhat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reasons for which I have been blocked are baseless. I have never used multiple accounts but sometimes I access Wikipedia through vpn from the same account because we are facing continuous shutdown of internet. Evidences here Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 14:28, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The blocking admin has responded w/o unblocking. See Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Checkuser and Oversight blocks. It's been I guess 56 days. Please follow the unblock instructions from Swarm to appeal to ArbCom. arbcom-en@wikimedia.org Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The user "Bbb23" is following his personal opinions rather than being a sincere wikipedian. I would like to check the evidences collected by Checkuser "Bbb23" for blocking my account. The checkuser claims that i have multiple account or have abused multiple accounts. His claim is completely baseless and untrue based on his mode. His admin rights should be revoked after investigating the matter. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 17:22, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't at all helping your case here. Bbb23 is one of our best administrators, and checkuser evidence is not "baseless", nor a matter of personal opinion. I would try another methodology than this, because I'll faint in shock if another administrator unblocks you based on that particular plea. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:13, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still hoping that an admin will definitely review my account activities once again (including IP) rather than speaking Bbb23's language. Since Bbb23 have removed help template from my talk page, I'll find every possible way to re-check my account by other responsible editors. Thanks Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 19:02, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Bbb23 wasn't hiding your request from administrators. You have an open unblock request, that is all you need, and any administrator who is willing to look at unblock requests will see it. Therefore the "Administrator attention" template was redundant, that's all. I'd like to see you unblocked as you've created several nice articles, and ultimately that's what Wikipedia is about, but as I said above your methodology is inappropriate. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:22, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the case of my wrong methodology, then a warning message would be sufficient. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 19:32, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have struck parts where I was accusing Bbb23 because I just spent some time reading WP:CHECKUSER and realised Bbb23 must have been doing what they felt right. I am blocked for a week now and I still don't know what accounts I used for socking. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 15:42, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Farooqahmadbhat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23651 was submitted on Dec 24, 2018 19:43:28. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 19:43, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

26 days have been passed and no action have been taken so far. If i have been blocked for editing habits or contributions then kindly have a look at diff1 diff2 and diff3 too. Does that mean all these similar adits have been done by me? Please reconsider my block for the sake of God. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 07:29, 20 January 2019 (UTC)}}[reply]

Maybe I should better wait till ArbCom looks into this. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 18:15, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2019-02

[edit]

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Tech News writers, editors and translators wish you a pleasant 2019 year.

Recent changes

  • RelatedSites extension has been undeployed. It was used to create interwiki links on Wikivoyage, now handled by Wikidata. [6]
  • Advanced item MediaWiki logstash logging is moving to a new infrastructure. This is an ongoing deployment. [7]
  • Advanced item codesearch.wmflabs.org has been updated, with new and updated repositories and a new search options for code. [8]
  • Advanced item On several wikis, an account named "Edit filter" has been created on December 17 to perform some technical maintenance on AbuseFilter. This account has sysop rights but it's a system user and no human can use it. The account already existed on wikis where AbuseFilter can perform blocks, which are issued using this account. See T212268 for more information and future plans.

Problems

  • Advanced item In AbuseFilter, the "Throttle" action takes three parameters: count, period and groups. They must now strictly respect the requirements listed on mediawiki.org. A list of broken filters is on Phabricator. If you're familiar with AbuseFilter, please take a look and fix them. [9]

Changes later this week

  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from January 8. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from January 9. It will be on all wikis from January 10 (calendar).

Meetings

  • Search Platform Office Hours is rescheduled to January 9. Check the details for time and date.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

18:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-03

[edit]

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • You can now use Google Translate in the content translation tool. [10][11]
  • You can now add captions to files on Commons. Captions are short descriptions of the file. They can be translated to all languages we use. They can't use wikitext markup.
  • Earlier a quoted HTML attribute had to be followed by a space. Now it doesn't. This means that some pages could look different when you save them even if you didn't edit that part of the text. [12][13]
  • Advanced item Templates with <templatestyles> could not show the difference between the live template and the sandbox version when they were tested. This has now been fixed. <templatestyles> has a new wrapper parameter now. You can use it for selectors like .mw-parser-output <wrapper parameter value> <selector from CSS page>. [14]

Problems

  • When you see an edit in the recent changes feed or in the history of a page some of them have tags. Some tags are added automatically. You can also add tags manually. Tags for edits that have been added manually can be edited. This didn't work for a little while. This has now been fixed. [15]

Changes later this week

  • You can move files from your wiki to Wikimedia Commons and keep the file history with the new FileExporter. It will be a beta feature on all wikis from 16 January. If you want to test it you activate it and check your wiki's configuration file.
  • Users who could cause more damage to the wikis if someone took over their account have to have more secure passwords. This includes administrators and other user groups. They can't use passwords that are in a list of common passwords. Accounts with common passwords are easy to take over. The list of common passwords was made longer a few weeks ago and has a different error message. Some user groups have been added to those who can't use common passwords. This is to protect all accounts with user rights that could cause damage. [16]
  • Advanced item The AbuseFilter variable minor_edit has been removed. It was deprecated in 2016. Now you can't use it. You can fix the filters using it. You can find them if you use the search bar on Special:AbuseFilter.
  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from January 15

17:55, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Yaadon Ka Idiot Box

[edit]

Hello, Farooqahmadbhat,

Thanks for creating Yaadon Ka Idiot Box! I edit here too, under the username Rosguill and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The article could use more citations to reviews of the show, rather than interviews with the creator.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 21:31, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ARBCOM?

[edit]

@Bbb23: Is this still with the ArbCom's? Is there anything new?-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 08:21, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dlohcierekim: You'd have to ask ArbCom. Given that the user's unblock request is on hold (not something I would have done pending an appeal to ArbCom), I would recommend changing the user's latest "unblock request" to comments. First, a user should never have more than one outstanding block request at the same time, and, second, it's really just a complaint, not an unblock request anyway.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:01, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shazia Bashir (January 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Praxidicae (talk) 09:14, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mehak Zubair

[edit]

Hello, Farooqahmadbhat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mehak Zubair".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:35, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Junaid Azim Mattu

[edit]

Hello, Farooqahmadbhat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Junaid Azim Mattu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 17:10, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tourism in Shopian district

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Tourism in Shopian district requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:30, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shazia Bashir

[edit]

Hello, Farooqahmadbhat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shazia Bashir".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 15:18, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Farooqahmadbhat&oldid=1219323490"