User talk:Fajowy

July 2024

Hello, I'm Mojo Hand. I noticed that in this edit to Battle of Gdeszyn, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mojo Hand (talk) 15:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Battle of Gdeszyn. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 15:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly reported, only one source states that such a "battle" took place, and it is completely biased towards the Ukrainian side. No Polish sources or books mention this, please remove the battle Fajowy (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your latest reversion on Battle of Markuszów is against Wikipedia edit war rules. I worry that you have already broken the three-revert rule, and I certainly do not want to do so. Please desist. I intend to take this further. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 13:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to improve the article, I didn't want to break Wikipedia rules, so I'm sorry Fajowy (talk) 14:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I have explained, according to Wikipedia’s verifiability policy, "All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable". You can't have all that unreferenced material, even if you believe it to be true. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 14:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I understand, you don't have to repeat yourself Fajowy (talk) 14:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability, not truth

Wikipedia works on "verifiability, not truth" as a guiding principle. This policy states that “Wikipedia's content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. That we have rules for the inclusion of material does not mean that Wikipedians have no respect for truth and accuracy, just as a court's reliance on rules of evidence does not mean the court does not respect truth. Wikipedia values accuracy, but it requires verifiability. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 14:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok, but why do you keep creating different discussions, please move, you're writing about the same thing, so why are you creating new discussions? Fajowy (talk) 14:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is obvious. I am addressing different errors. It's not personal. I'm actually trying to help you. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 14:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I probably understand, but we simply can't do it on one disk Fajowy (talk) 14:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello, I saw that you added a small correction to my article, thank you for that, but can you remove the Template that you added because the article itself does not exist on another Wikipedia Battle of Livny @BoyTheKingCanDance Fajowy (talk) 15:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Markuszów moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Markuszów. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have already submitted the article for review @TechnoSquirrel69 Fajowy (talk) 10:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @TechnoSquirrel69 I created a new article, can you check it out? thank you for your help Draft:Samuel Łaski's expedition to Stockholm Fajowy (talk) 20:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Fajowy, these topics are pretty far out of my area of expertise, so I would prefer to leave them for another reviewer who knows better than me. Your draft is already in the queue and will be picked up my someone else in time. Let me know if you have any other questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:27, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer and I understand, but maybe you know who I should write to about this? @TechnoSquirrel69 Fajowy (talk) 16:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would actually advise you not to go asking editors for reviews, Fajowy. In the context of Articles for creation, there is a queue of thousands of articles that have been waiting longer than yours, and attempting to solicit reviewers has not been looked on well in the past as it has the appearance of "jumping the line". If you don't want to wait for a review, you have the option of simply moving the draft to article space yourself. However, keep in mind that AfC is intended as a low-pressure environment to make sure drafts meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria and core policies before publishing; if you choose to bypass the process, the article will be subject to all normal editorial action, including a deletion discussion if necessary. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:40, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your advice Fajowy (talk) 14:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Markuszów (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Markuszów and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:33, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fajowy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:33, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Markuszów (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Markuszów and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 22:29, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Fajowy. Thank you for your work on Attack on Viazovnytsia. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned at target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:25, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]