User talk:Fahim Mostafa324

Welcome!

Hi Fahim Mostafa324! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --🐦DrWho42👻 00:03, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Zero non-primary sources cited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Fahim Mostafa324/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 23:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fahim Mostafa324! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 23:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Fahim Mostafa324

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Fahim Mostafa324 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:40, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand

kindly specify my mistakes

i may correct them Fahim Mostafa324 (talk) 13:19, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not a "how to".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Fahim Mostafa324/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Microscopic Photography, from its old location at User:Fahim Mostafa324/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 01:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Urban photography, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 15:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The conclusion made it seem like an essay

so i deleted it to make the article more encyclopedic Fahim Mostafa324 (talk) 15:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Draft:Urban photography, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 06:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Microscopic Photography (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Microscopic Photography and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 01:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Fahim Mostafa324/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Fahim Mostafa324/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Microscopic Photography (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

tone is totally inappropriate for an encyclopaedia and Wikipedia is not a "how to manual".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Microscopic Photography and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

tone is not appropriate for an encyclopaedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Fahim Mostafa324/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Fahim Mostafa324, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Theroadislong (talk) 14:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Urban photography has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Urban photography. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
24	Photography in China (talk)	Add sources
367	Candid photography (talk)	Add sources
22	Staged photography (talk)	Add sources
83	Chromogenic print (talk)	Add sources
47	Straight photography (talk)	Add sources
12	Jhargram Raj (talk)	Add sources
344	Bohemian style (talk)	Cleanup
95	Tarasankar Bandyopadhyay (talk)	Cleanup
339	Turkish television drama (talk)	Cleanup
40	Humayun Azad (talk)	Expand
9	Mike Hawkins (musician) (talk)	Expand
922	Mackenzie Crook (talk)	Expand
158	Music of West Bengal (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
9	Fake Plastic Snow (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
272	Rab C. Nesbitt (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
27	Gum printing (talk)	Merge
30	Gum bichromate (talk)	Merge
110	Bohag Bihu (talk)	Merge
192	Culture of Bengal (talk)	Wikify
3	Sandra Rotman (talk)	Wikify
39	Medinipur division (talk)	Wikify
3	Brent Clayton (talk)	Orphan
2	Berta Sieradzki (talk)	Orphan
2	Alan L. Cohen (talk)	Orphan
18	Photography in Korea (talk)	Stub
6	Colin Gilbert (talk)	Stub
14	Photography in Serbia (talk)	Stub
20	Gordon McCorkell (talk)	Stub
130	Paul Riley (actor) (talk)	Stub
114	Great Trinity Forest (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Urban photography has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Urban photography. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Urban photography (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

your own blog is NOT a reliable independent source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Urban photography and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:33, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Urban photography (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is the third submission with no change to citing properly and essentially ignoring reviewers comments. If you submit again without any change, this draft will be rejected with no option to re-submit

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Urban photography and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 18:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I put so many citations in reference. i keep adding new ones. I try to change it every time. what else can i do? Fahim Mostafa324 (talk) 23:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citations go inline to the article body, not as a big group at the bottom. Read WP:REFB - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 23:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

can you check if it's alright now>? Fahim Mostafa324 (talk) 00:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And if there's any other lackings please mention them all... Fahim Mostafa324 (talk) 00:04, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Urban photography has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Urban photography. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 00:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Urban photography has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Urban photography. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 01:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Urban photography (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

references are still poor quality.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Urban photography and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 06:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Urban photography has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Urban photography. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 11:56, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moved

I've moved your draft to User:Fahim Mostafa324/sandbox, as you requested.

The meaning of "street photography" has been fluid. It's often applied to photography that's more or less in the spirit of Cartier-Bresson, Frank, Winogrand and so forth but carried out not in the street but instead on the beaches, in the countryside or indoors. These days it's less often applied to the work of, say, Berenice Abbott; but it certainly has been so applied. I suspect that it would be easy to find reliable sources that would extend "street photography" to include Tony Ray-Jones but not Abbott; and would put Abbott and perhaps much of the work of René Burri in "urban photography". Best tip is to depend on reliable sources for this: as so many books can be "borrowed" from the Internet Archive, this shouldn't be too difficult. -- Hoary (talk) 23:33, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, I'm Manticore. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Photography have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. — Manticore 00:48, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Unish20 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 06:08, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 17:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Microscopic Photography

Hello, Fahim Mostafa324. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Microscopic Photography, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:14, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Microscopic Photography

Hello, Fahim Mostafa324. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Microscopic Photography".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:53, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]