Jump to content

User talk:FR30799386/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Anti Romeo squads in uttar Pradesh, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jake Brockman (talk) 08:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. An edit you recently made to Punjabi cuisine seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138: I know I just now detected it.Due to inavertent reasons (malfunctioning of ProveIt) the flaw occured. Ill Put the relevant info back from the last version.I am actually trying to remove bare Urls from the page.Also try not to template me again I have suuficient experience with regards to editingFORCE RADICAL (talk) 07:44, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
I didn't get your wp:ping. They are tricky. You need to add the ping, message, your signature, and save all three with a single "Save changes".
Unfortunately, there is a lot of vandalism and bad edits. And not very many wp:RCPers. So, we tend to be quick on the draw. I understand what you are doing, but you might find others confused. Unfortunately with wp:Huggle, there is no "check later to see if they fixed it". Don't worry too much, we all get dinged in the beginning. Eventually, you should get whitelisted and then you're on your own. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:29, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Triology listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Category:Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Triology. Since you had some involvement with the Category:Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Triology redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —swpbT 18:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your RFA question [1]

Here. Hello. I hope you don't mind me asking, but I notice you have not been with very long :) so how do you know about that? (As you say in your edit summary, it was your 'first timer') question. Thanks in advance! — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 14:03, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: I presume you are talking about my knowledge of the 'best known for IP' and his acts. While searching for different notability guidelines and other policy I came across this,To test this users in depth knowledge in ANI (I believe admins should have a huge knowledge of these ANI matters to weed out troublesome users) I asked the particular question.To resolve your doubts about my edit summary 'first timer' was meant to indicate that this was my first ever participation in RFA.11:15, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Ah.  :) Many thanks! — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 11:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your RFA question [2]

One additional gentle request from me too (please feel free to ignore this in case you feel this is OTT). Could you correct the English grammar in your RfA queries and give more context for the same? Thanks. Lourdes 13:19, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Sorry I was late (at answering your request) .Also the question asked by Fortuna was regarding an older Rfa so i have taken the liberty of separating the two questions. English grammar was never my strong point so if you find anything wrong please take the liberty of correcting it immediately from next time onward .If you find it intelligible just ping meFORCE RADICAL@ 04:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, FR30799386/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui  10:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
352 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C National Pension System (talk) Add sources
182 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Chole bhature (talk) Add sources
265 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Bharatiya Jana Sangh (talk) Add sources
44 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Maharashtrawadi Gomantak Party (talk) Add sources
173 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C The Asiatic Society (talk) Add sources
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B Timeline of the Indian general election, 2014 (talk) Add sources
508 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B University of Calcutta (talk) Cleanup
73 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Liberhan Commission (talk) Cleanup
6,274 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA M.S. Dhoni: The Untold Story (talk) Cleanup
330 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Mann Ki Baat (talk) Expand
36 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Single European Sky ATM Research (talk) Expand
22 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Lebanese National Library (talk) Expand
19 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Chitrali cuisine (talk) Unencyclopaedic
22 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Samta Party (talk) Unencyclopaedic
100 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Women and the environment (talk) Unencyclopaedic
31 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Punjabi dhaba (talk) Merge
252 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Saini (talk) Merge
67 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Gandhian socialism (talk) Merge
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C PHEDRA (Arc-jet) high enthalpy wind tunnel (talk) Wikify
10,040 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Dubai (talk) Wikify
1,194 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Infidelity (talk) Wikify
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C ANAS Central Library of Science (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Ali Nagar Pali (talk) Orphan
35 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Rashesh Shah (talk) Orphan
55 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Laxmikant Parsekar (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Tollygunge Agragami F.C. (talk) Stub
62 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ministry of Steel (talk) Stub
302 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Central Statistics Office (India) (talk) Stub
88 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Bhatoora (talk) Stub
24 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Loreto Schools, Kolkata (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:37, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Narada sting operation

Hello! Your submission of Narada sting operation at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 09:50, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 13:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 13:21, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 15:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

DYK for Narada sting operation

On 11 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Narada sting operation, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the journalist behind the Narada sting operation was inspired by Israeli Mossad officer Mike Harari? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Narada sting operation. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Narada sting operation), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter 00:03, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

The article Karimul Haque has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 13:32, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Karimul Haque requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:09, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 26, 2017)

A deadpan emoji.
Hello, Forceradical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Deadpan

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Alice Bah Kuhnke • Footage


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 26 June 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Hi, I just wanted to thank you for your improvement of the article Karimul Haque. At the time I came across the article it did qualify to be nominated for both BLP proposed deletion and speedy deletion due to no credible claim of significance but you fixed both of those. I will no longer pursue deletion of this article, though I can't say with certainty that no one else will or that it would survive a deletion discussion. Cheers, —KuyaBriBriTalk 22:27, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks.Will follow your adviceFORCE RADICAL (talk)

Kohinoor (book)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


You'll find it in the history of Kohinoor (book). You spaced the title incorrectly, and the article did not contain evidence of notability. Deb (talk) 09:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

DebThanks for the prompt reply .FYI you linked it to the wrong page, the author of the book is William Dalrymple (historian) .Assertion of notability follows
  1. http://www.thehindu.com/books/books-authors/Chronicles-of-the-Kohinoor/article16783947.ece
  2. http://www.firstpost.com/living/the-kohinoors-true-and-bloody-history-is-traced-by-william-dalrymple-anita-anand-in-new-book-3150398.html
  3. http://indianexpress.com/article/lifestyle/books/william-dalrymples-book-a-tale-of-the-most-infamous-diamond-kohinoor-4648241/

thanksFORCE RADICAL (talk) 10:34, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. Please add the references to the article. Deb (talk) 10:42, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Just a clarification I hope you are saying that I can replace the redirect with an article or are you asking me to place the sources in William Darymple article FORCE RADICAL (talk) 11:01, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
I'm asking that you include the references if you decide to recreate the article. Deb (talk) 11:11, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This week's article for improvement (week 27, 2017)

Ultraviolet photography is one of the many visual technologies. This image of the rings of Saturn is an example of the application of ultraviolet photography in astronomy.
Hello, Forceradical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Visual technology

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Deadpan • Alice Bah Kuhnke


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

On West Bengal FARC Comment

Hi, Thanks for volunteering at the West Bengal FARC. To-do list will include: 1. Updating the data (economy etc) with updated reference, 2. Getting rid of some images (the article is image-heavy) 3. Going through the prose to, at least, get rid of wrong grammar or errors

After such basic things are complete, we can request WP:GUILD for an improved copyedit. Please let me know your concerns, I will try to help whenever I have time. Thanks, --Dwaipayan (talk) 17:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 28, 2017)

Chickens at a market in Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico
Hello, Forceradical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Chicken as food

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Visual technology • Deadpan


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2017)

The room of the editor-in-chief for the Seattle Daily Times in 1900
Hello, Forceradical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Editor-in-chief

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Chicken as food • Visual technology


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Comment about Karimul Haque

Just so you know, If I had seen Karimul Haque before this edit, I would have probably speedy deleted it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 03:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

RFA

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Hi. Thank you for your participation. Please read WP:RFAV, in particular the section on user questions. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:56, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

I guess I understand what both of you are hinting at .It may have been true for the first two questions which I asked in earlier RFAs but this time my question certainly had a purpose .I had seen Cullen around for a long time helping about in The Teahouse, in fact I respect the way he arbitrates disputes. In RFA I attach a lot of importance to the deletion part but with no CSD log to go upon and the answer to the A7 question not satisfactory (he did not mention the credibility bit) I asked the question to clarify my doubts and I am happy to say my doubts have been resolved .If you think that me asking the question was wrong then you are at your liberty to strike out the question or any further interaction I may have with the candidate. ThanksRADICAL SODA(FORCE) 08:25, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
KudpungOd Mishehu As I had said in the note .I accept that the article was in extremely bad shape and was eligible to be deleted my question was which maintenance tags about which maintained tags/Deletion tags would he have applied in that case which I hope clears up both of your misconceptions.Thanks-RADICAL SODA(FORCE) 10:16, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
My issue is with the fact that a) the en.Wiki is the only Wikipedia left where you would be allowed to participate on a RfA, b) with only just over 100 edits to mainspace you shyould theoretically not even know yet that an RfA system exists, and c) I do not consider it a particularly mature move to even question the knowledge of someone whose work is without blemish and knows more about our guidelines and policies than even I do. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
KudpungSince you brought up this topic my edits are a little exactly 200 at mainspace having edited earlier via another account as disclosed at my user page. After getting warned in my former account I took some time of and read up all the guidelines and in the process discovered the WP:Rfa . As for your other allegations I myself have seldom used Teahouse and thus had limited (I did see him handling a particularly bad tempered editor though) contact with the candidate. How was I to know the candidates credentials ?I had my doubts and I clarified them through a question and then supported him.I do not have any hard feeling with any person nor was this a trick question intact I send each and every new admin a congratulations message whatever my stance may have been. As I have said before feel free to strike out the question and redevel it if you feel it is unadminisible in the RFA. But please remember WP:BITE and WP:AGF which you seem to be throwing out of the window by accusing me of trolling the RFA. RADICAL SODA(FORCE) 11:12, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
I retract my comments at the base of the last comment .I guess your tone made me lose my temper sorryRADICAL SODA(FORCE) 11:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
I understand - my tone is the one I used to use to the students in my classes. The point I'm making is that you are no way ready to be involving yourself in such important meta areas. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:22, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Except a stray support and congratulations for the new admins you can count on me not participating in RFA discussions. If you do find me doing such a thing please give a virtual tap on the back with that tone of your (joking) which should be enough to bring me to my sensesRADICAL SODA(FORCE) 11:45, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, FR30799386/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Joseph2302 (talk) 09:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).


DYK nomination of Karimul Haque

Hello! Your submission of Karimul Haque at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! YE Pacific Hurricane 03:16, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Karimul Haque

On 24 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Karimul Haque, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that tea garden worker Karimul Haque has been awarded India's fourth highest civilian award? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Karimul Haque. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Karimul Haque), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

IronGargoyle (talk) 00:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 30, 2017)

Illustration of Dijkstra's algorithm search, a search algorithm for finding path from a start node (lower left, red) to a goal node (upper right, green) in a robot motion planning problem.
Hello, Forceradical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Search algorithm

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Editor-in-chief • Chicken as food


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 24 July 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

RfA

Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 00:14, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

RfA

Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 00:14, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edits

In case you didn't know, spaces are normally used with punctuation marks.

Instead of this:
  • I like bunnies(rabbits).They are not only cute,but friendly too.
Try this:
  • I like bunnies (rabbits). They are not only cute, but friendly too.

Thank you, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Not a test

I fixed an error, it was not a test, if you read the sentence you will see that the word "_/help" is nonsense in the context of the sentence and the article. Φράγκος Στάθης (talk) 05:22, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Φράγκος ΣτάθηςIts okay.I acknowledge my mistake but from next time onwards always leave an edit summary.I would also like you to change your username since this is English Wikipedia and names in other languages may not be displayed correctly.Also your name may be difficult to understand for other people RADICAL SODA(FORCE) 05:32, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bipin Ganatra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ᐐT₳LKᐬ 10:15, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2017)

The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 9 December 1948. Pictured is an image denoting global participation in the Genocide Convention in 2008.
Hello, Forceradical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Genocide Convention

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Search algorithm • Editor-in-chief


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Bipin Ganatra

Information icon Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ᐐT₳LKᐬ 15:19, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

El cid, el campeador I think you misinterpreted me on your talk page.I am perfectly aware of the policy regarding removal of Speedy Deletion templates, but in this case your application of CSD (A7 criterion) was erroneous (The subject has got a Padma Shri which is India's fourth highest civilian award which is a credible claim of significance) so I applied WP:IAR and went ahead and removed the CSD template and informed you on your talk page about your fault.Thanks-RADICAL SODA(FORCE) 04:55, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2017)

Films based upon the theme of blackmail have been made, such as the 1929 film Blackmail.
Hello, Forceradical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Blackmail

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Genocide Convention • Search algorithm


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 7 August 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Hi again. Do you think Christy Goldsmith Romero is too stubby for another DYK please? Please ping when you reply, or write on my talkpage. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 11:20, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Zigzig20sGenerally any article above 1500 characters is considered eligible for DYK .I advice you to install the script User:Shubinator/DYKcheck .It is officially recognised by DYK and checks most of the criterion. ThanksRADICAL SODA(FORCE) 11:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Zigzig20s Sorry for the short reply (I had some meatspace priorities at that time and so could not respond properly).Yes the article is okay for nomination for DYK. The stub template which you yourself added may be a concern as it may be taken by others to mean that the article is still under-construction . You will surely be able to nominate the article yourself .Just follow the instructions on the top of the nomiations page and fill in the necessary details(hook ,source, Alt1 if needed) and then someone else will review your nom in due courseRADICAL SODA(FORCE) 04:39, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi, can you describe what you're seeing and indicate which browser you're using, what other gadgets or user scripts, etc.? It seems to be working fine for me, but I may be missing something. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 02:54, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

I don't know but the problem seems to have disappeared .I have a gut feeling it was caused by a very slow internet transmission speed and rapid shifting surfing of talkpages .The scripts I use can be found at User:Forceradical/common.js .I use Google chrome as a browser.If I have the same problems again I will inform youRADICAL SODA(FORCE) 05:10, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2017)

An automobile engine is an example of an intermediate good, and is used in the production of the final good, the assembled automobile.
Hello, Forceradical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Intermediate good

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Blackmail • Genocide Convention


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 14 August 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

West Bengal


Hello, Force Radical – You can see that I have completed the copy-edit you requested of West Bengal. Let me know if you have any questions. I just wanted to mention three things:

1) The following sentence, which appears in the middle of the second paragraph in West Bengal#Sports, needs fixing. It does not make sense, particularly the last part of the sentence:

  • Kolkata Knight Riders, East Zone, and Bengal play there, and the 1987 World Cup final was there although in 2011 World Cup.

2) You will see that, several times, I removed the word "as", for example in saying the Hindu College was renamed as the Presidency College. I know the article is written in Indian English, and I suppose this is common in Indian English. I am used to U.S. English, and in U.S. English we ordinarily don't use "as" there. Look through my edits, and see where I removed "as". If you feel strongly that it should be written with "as", feel free to put the word back in, or tell me where you want the word put back in and I'll gladly do it for you.

3) You often used the word "like", to my mind, incorrectly (but again, this may be acceptable in Indian English). For each one, I changed it to either "including" or "such as". It is my understanding that "like" is used to show similarity, as in X looks like, seems like, etc., or Y works like a..., sings like a (using a simile), or as an adverb meaning "in the same way as", as in "Like his brother, he preferred working outdoors." Of course, "like" can be a verb. Except in informal speech, "like" is ordinarily not used to mean "for example". If you feel strongly that this last use of "like" is acceptable in Indian English, that is, instead of "for example," "including" or "such as", feel free to put all, or some, back the way they were (perhaps some would be better than all, because you used "like" quite frequently). Well, that's all. Best regards,  – Corinne (talk) 14:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC) (Amended this paragraph to make it slightly clearer.)

Hello, Forceradical – In this edit, you made an attempt to clarify the sentence I had said needed fixing. It is still not clear. I will copy the paragraph (minus the citations) here for easy reference:
West Bengal has several large stadiums. Eden Gardens is one of only two 100,000-seat cricket amphitheaters in the world, although renovations will reduce this figure. It is the home to various cricket teams such as Kolkata Knight Riders, East Zone.The 1987 World Cup final was hosted in Eden Gardens .although in 2011 World Cup.
I see you broke up the third sentence into two sentences. Apart from the stray period/full stop before "although", the [new] fourth sentence is not clear. The word "although" is normally used to signal an upcoming contrast with what preceded it. If you look at the first sentence, you will see a correct use of "although". In the [new] fourth sentence, I do not see any contrast between "The 1987 World Cup final was hosted in Eden Gardens" and "in 2011 World Cup" (which, by the way, should be a complete clause, with a subject and a verb). Are you sure you don't mean "also" – "the 1987 World Cup final was hosted at Eden Gardens, and the 2011 World Cup [competition? final?] was held at Eden Gardens" (or something like that)? Was there something different about the 2011 World Cup held at Eden Gardens from the 1987 World Cup final held at Eden Gardens? If so, that difference ought to be made clear. If the only difference was the year, and both were World Cup finals, then you can combine them into one subject: "Both the 1987 and the 2011 World Cup finals were held at Eden Gardens." Also – and this is merely a stylistic consideration – since you use "although" in the second sentence of the paragraph, in such a short paragraph it would be best not to use the word again in the paragraph. There are other ways to signal contrast if you need to, including with "but" or "however". If you need help formulating the sentence, try to explain to me what, if any, the difference is between the two World Cups.
There is another small problem with this paragraph, and that is that there is a slight ambiguity in the pronoun "It" in the third sentence:
It is the home to various cricket teams such as Kolkata Knight Riders, East Zone.
What is "it"? If you look back to the two sentences before this, you see two singular nouns that could possibly be "home" to a cricket team: "West Bengal" and "Eden Gardens [amphitheater]". I guess it's pretty clear that "it" refers to "Eden Gardens", but it would be clearer if you use a noun: "The amphitheater is home to various cricket teams..." By the way, is "amphitheater" the commonly used word for the venue in India? If it is, that's fine. In the US, it is "stadium". Also, if you use "amphitheater", is that Indian English spelling? I think British English spelling would be "amphitheatre", wouldn't it? Finally, you need "and" between the two cricket teams: "such as Kolkata Knight Riders and East Zone".  – Corinne (talk) 14:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Please see this edit. I hope this solves the problem. Also do you prefer the before each cricket team names? (I added the thes) Thanks a lot. Regards, --Dwaipayan (talk) 17:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
I'm sorry, Dwaipayanc, I didn't see this until today. It reads well now, after your re-wording. Good work! I agree that it sounds better with "the" before each team name. I'm wondering, though, about something. In the list of three cricket teams, the first and the third – the Kolkata Knight Riders and the East Zone – sound like real names of teams, but "the Bengal cricket team" does not. Is "the Bengal cricket team" really the name of the team? If not, perhaps you could find the actual name of the team and add it there.  – Corinne (talk) 15:42, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2017)

East Germany erected the Berlin Wall to prevent emigration westward.
Hello, Forceradical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Emigration

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Intermediate good • Blackmail


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

DYK nomination of Bipin Ganatra

Hello! Your submission of Bipin Ganatra at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:01, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

I have requested unblock.RADICAL SODA(FORCE) 09:30, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2017)

Hello, Forceradical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Maya mythology

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Emigration • Intermediate good


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 28 August 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

September copy edit drive

Hi, Forceradical! Thanks for signing-up for the September GOCE drive. I wanted to make sure you have these resources:

Be careful to review any semi-automated edits made by scripts. (I noticed one which correctly moved punctuation to the left side of a reference, but failed to add a trailing space.) When a script detects one problem, there are often other issues lurking nearby.

If you have any questions, please ask at the drive talk page. – Reidgreg (talk) 13:52, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

@Reidgreg--Thanks for the prompt help. Ill look over the reading material (I have read some of the Tony1 exercises).Please review any articles that I do (since I am new to copyediting).I also want to ask if there is a way to filter out articles about a certain topic (ex:India) which need CE--RADICAL SODA(FORCE) 09:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
I may be too busy to do reviewing this month, but you can make a request on the drive talk page (it's only redlinked now because nobody has had anything to say yet, but the coordinators should all be watching it). For finding articles, you can use Wikipedia's search engine to cross-reference categories. For example, you can copy&paste incategory:"India" incategory:"Wikipedia articles needing copy edit from January 2017" into the search box at the top-right. However, I'm weirdly not finding entries that way, so perhaps try the more general India incategory:"Wikipedia articles needing copy edit from January 2017". That gives me 14 results (as of writing this), and if you don't like those you can try the same thing for February and March. I like searching this way because it also shows you a little bit of the article and the overall size (but don't use that wordcount on your article list, as it includes references!). I hope that's of help. P.S.: Since you're new to this, try to pick articles of under 2,000 words. Longer articles become increasingly more difficult to copy edit (more issues, and more difficult to maintain consistency). – Reidgreg (talk) 21:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Radio Erena

Hello! Your submission of Radio Erena at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:02, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2017)

One 24-ounce energy drink has 330 calories, more than a fast-food cheeseburger, and the equivalent of 18 single-serving packets of sugar.
Hello, Forceradical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Calorie

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Maya mythology • Emigration


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 4 September 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

DYK for Bipin Ganatra

On 6 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bipin Ganatra, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bipin Ganatra, an electrician by trade, has voluntarily helped Kolkata firefighters battle more than 100 fires over the past 40 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bipin Ganatra. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bipin Ganatra), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

DYK for Radio Erena

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2017)

A small pond hockey field
Hello, Forceradical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Pond hockey

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Calorie • Maya mythology


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 11 September 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Anjaana Anjaani copyedit

MiniapolisIll try my best the problem is that I have been caught up in pujo preparation if by Mahalaya I do not put up a done template feel free to return it to the list— RADICAL SODA(FORCE)TM 09:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

FYI

Just wanted to give you a heads up on this redirect. Only did it because there were so many versions flying around, it seemed best to redirect to the version that you merged into. Please feel free to undo it, but I thought it was the easiest way to direct people to the current mockup. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![1]

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Thanks for helping to get WP:LANDING up and running. It looks great and your efforts here are much appreciated. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:34, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2017)

A spelling error on a road sign
Hello, Forceradical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Spelling

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Pond hockey • Calorie


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

St. Xavier's High School, Loyola Hall, Ahmedabad

I ask you to please reconsider your tag on the above article. Several of the 16 references in the article are not very "closely associated with the subject," and the claims made in the article are not that incredible. My understanding is that one independent source to show that the institution is what it claims to be suffices; description of the school can come from sources close to the school (which are usually the only ones who care to report about the school). I've checked several pages of Google references and suggest that we should be satisfied with what we have, without the ugly tag. In line with your advisory about being in the midst of exams, I have removed the tag and await your directions on what we can do if you still regard the article as subjective rather than objective fact. Jzsj (talk) 17:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Well,since you have already removed the tag Ill not replace it. As you said some of the sources are not affiliated to the school .It would be best if you could eradicate the sources linked to the school (refs:1,2,3,4,11(blog),15,16) --Forceradical (talk) 04:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2017)

George Lazenby at the Supanova Pop Culture Expo in 2014
Hello, Forceradical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

George Lazenby

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Spelling • Pond hockey


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 25 September 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

September GOCE bling

The Minor Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to Forceradical for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2017 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 15:42, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Glad to see you back! – Reidgreg (talk) 15:42, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2017)

Wikipedia is sometimes criticized for being used as a source of circular reporting.
Hello, Forceradical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Circular reporting

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Hero • George Lazenby


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2017)

A fire sprinkler with red liquid alcohol in the capsule
Hello, Forceradical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Fire sprinkler

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Circular reporting • Hero


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2017)

A 1912 illustration of Robin Hood and Little John
Hello, Force Radical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Little John

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Fire sprinkler • Circular reporting


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 23 October 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2017)

Hello, Force Radical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Choreography

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Little John • Fire sprinkler


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 30 October 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2017)

"Pay no more than Ceiling Prices", WWII U.S. poster
Hello, Force Radical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Price ceiling

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Choreography • Little John


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 6 November 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Proposed deletion of Annie Sinha Roy

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The article Annie Sinha Roy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, as only source is an interview.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Galobtter (talk) 12:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Annie Sinha Roy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Annie Sinha Roy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie Sinha Roy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Galobtter (talk) 10:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2017)

An optical illusion. Square A is exactly the same shade of grey as Square B. (See Checker shadow illusion.)
Hello, Force Radical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Illusion

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Price ceiling • Choreography


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2017)

Hello, Force Radical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Recipe

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Illusion • Price ceiling


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2017)

A student performing schoolwork
Hello, Force Radical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Schoolwork

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Recipe • Illusion


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 27 November 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Force Radical. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2017)

Agriculture in Saudi Arabia: Agricultural fields in the Wadi As-Sirhan Basin, Saudi Arabia. Taken by astronauts on the International Space Station.
Hello, Force Radical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Agriculture in Saudi Arabia

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Schoolwork • Recipe


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 4 December 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2017)

Cover page of the Wikimedia Deutschland 2015 Impact Report
Hello, Force Radical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Report

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Agriculture in Saudi Arabia • Schoolwork


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 11 December 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
3,000 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Lakshadweep (talk) Add sources
1,041 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Mohun Bagan A.C. (talk) Add sources
60 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Dharampal (talk) Add sources
61 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Nandigram violence (talk) Add sources
2,718 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Rajya Sabha (talk) Add sources
64 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start P. P. Choudhary (talk) Add sources
105 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Political families of India (talk) Cleanup
17 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Prakalpana Movement (talk) Cleanup
37 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Biotechnology in India (talk) Cleanup
13 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C S. Natarajan (talk) Expand
390 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Longevity myths (talk) Expand
5,111 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Wi-Fi (talk) Expand
780 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Sunil Grover (talk) Unencyclopaedic
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Kaushal Kishore (politician) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,126 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Ramdev (talk) Unencyclopaedic
38 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs (talk) Merge
6,617 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Constitution of India (talk) Merge
266 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (talk) Merge
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Nishita Nirmal Mhatre (talk) Wikify
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Khiddirpur (talk) Wikify
457 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Indian rupee exchange rate history (talk) Wikify
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub 1991 Kandua hand-chopping (talk) Orphan
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Shweatlana Singh (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Arthur "Smokestack" Hardy (talk) Orphan
112 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (talk) Stub
27 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Federation of Bangladesh Chambers of Commerce & Industries (talk) Stub
131 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Sultanat (talk) Stub
46 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Niranjan Jyoti (talk) Stub
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Aparupa Poddar (talk) Stub
47 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Sanjeev Balyan (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:00, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 51, 2017)

A mechanic at steam pump in an electric power house, 1920, (from a photo study for the WPA).
Hello, Force Radical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Mechanic

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Report • Agriculture in Saudi Arabia


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 18 December 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2017)

A nutrient is a component in foods that an organism uses to survive and grow.
Hello, Force Radical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Nutrient

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Mechanic • Report


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 25 December 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

TonyBallioni (talk) 05:26, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2018)

Economic recovery – a "Project funded by The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act" project sign.
Hello, Force Radical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Economic recovery

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Nutrient • Mechanic


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 1 January 2018 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

A barnstar for you![2]

The Writer's Barnstar
For bringing List of Presidents of India to FL status. Congrats! BTW, do you want to take List of Prime Ministers of India to FLC as well? Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:01, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar, I certainly have plans to take List of Prime Ministers of India to FLC. I am taking some rest before I jump onto another project — comment added by Force Radical 🎆talk

🎄 contribs🎆 04:57, 28 December 2017 (UTC)


Okay then. Also. can you please perform a source review here? Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:15, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
YashthepunisherI just saw your message- On hold-I will certainly do it (it's an interesting article) Once my Windows 10 computer recovers from a feature update . — comment added by Force Radical 🎆talk

🎄 contribs🎆 07:11, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Yashthepunisher Done — comment added by Force Radical 🎆talk

🎄 contribs🎆 09:32, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the comments. Please reply at the FLC. Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:24, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 Done — Force Radical ( TalkContribs ) 07:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Yash, Please take a look here [here] also — Force Radical ( TalkContribs ) 07:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Sure. BTW, what's with your user page? Yashthepunisher (talk) 10:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
YashthepunisherI had during last year pledged to keep West Bengal a featured article at its FARC and had said so at its FARC page, I promptly did some work (the content work I talked about on my userpage) and then forgot about it. I recently came across it and made a desperate attempt to stop it from being delisted but couldn't do much about it due to the ongoing List of Presidents of India FLC. Today it got delisted that's why the message is there. — Force Radical ( TalkContribs ) 10:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Yes, I got to know that. You can work on WB and resolve all the queries raised at its FARC and take it to GA. If you want to. Yashthepunisher (talk) 10:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, Force Radical. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Presidents of India – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for January 26. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:15, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

👍 Like-Thanks for fast tracking the nomination. I have cut out a uninteresting section due to which the character count is at 978 (from 1148) — Force Radical ( TalkContribs ) 12:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2018)

There are about 260 known living species of monkeys. Pictured is a common squirrel monkey.
Hello, Force Radical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Monkey

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Economic recovery • Nutrient


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 8 January 2018 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Edit comments

Hi Force Radical, thank you for your recent contributions on Dipak Misra and List of Vice-Presidents of India. They have helped in improving the article. I just have a suggestion, not about your edits but about the edit comments. I see that most of your edits have been reasonably labeled and easy to parse. Unfortunately, some edit comments are sort of vague like "Okay", "thats that", "that's all". Now this is not something incorrect or wrong on your part but adds a bit of additional work to other editors watching the page. A small improvement here would be to be slightly more precise in what your edit was about. This can also be in short hand given it can get time consuming but will help other edits parse them better. This was not a criticism but just a suggestion. Keep up all the good work and happy editing. Adamgerber80 (talk) 05:33, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Adam-Thanks for the reminder. Will try and follow your advice and correctly use edit summaries.Happy New Year.

PS:Keep up the anti-vandalism work you are doing! — Force Radical∞ ( TalkContribs ) 05:43, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2018)

Culture of Asia – an East Asian cultural region representation
Hello, Force Radical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Culture of Asia

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Monkey • Economic recovery


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

The article Dorris Francis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No real claim of notability in the article, although the presence of a number of sources may constitute a minor claim in and of itself.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 09:20, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India)

Greetings,

It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

Nomination of Dorris Francis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dorris Francis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorris Francis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:47, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2018)

Scarab bearing the name of the Hyksos King Apepi
Hello, Force Radical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Hyksos

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Culture of Asia • Monkey


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Stephen Court Fire at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 09:21, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi

If you find time for it could you take a look at my recent noms at TAFI Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement/Nominations. Would appreciate no matter what !vote as no one is attending the TAFI nom page anymore to give input. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 19:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

eye I have read the above message. I will reply when I have a moment. — Force Radical ( TalkContribs ) 04:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

 Done-Had forgotten about TAFI thanks for the notification  — Force Radical ( TalkContribs ) 09:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC) Could you review my TAFI nom for Prisoner. As always Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2018)

"Welcome to Virginia" sign along northbound Interstate 81 entering Washington County, Virginia from Bristol, Tennessee
Hello, Force Radical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Interstate 81

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Hyksos • Culture of Asia


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Stephen Court Fire

Hello! Your submission of Stephen Court Fire at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! epicgenius (talk) 18:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

FLC

Hi FR, hope you're doing fine. Can you please leave your comments at my FLC? Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:08, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2018)

A selection of internal organs in human anatomy
Hello, Force Radical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Organ (anatomy)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Interstate 81 • Hyksos


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 5 February 2018 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

Supporting Indian Wikipedia Program resource distribution

In 2017 - 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN) and user groups will pilot a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program (Code name: Project Tiger) will:

(a) Support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and
(b) Sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

The objective of the program is to provide laptops and internet stipends for existing editors who need support to contribute more actively. 50 basic model Acer Chromebooks and Internet stipends for 100 contributors are available for distribution. Provided resources are the sole property of the beneficiaries and should be used for the betterment of the movement.

If you're an active Wikimedian, and interested to receive support from this project, please apply. It will take around 10 minutes of your time, and will ask descriptive questions about your contribution to Indic Wikimedia projects.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 7, 2018)

Shredded beef is common in South American cuisine and in Latin American cuisine, and is served with a variety of foods.
Hello, Force Radical.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

South American cuisine

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Organ (anatomy) • Interstate 81


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 12 February 2018 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Stephen Court Fire copy-edit


Hello, Force Radical – I have one or two things I want to mention, but I'll get to them in a little while.  – Corinne (talk) 23:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Corinne-I am all ears, especially if you can give advice to improve my content skills. If you have any concerns regarding the article I will try to resolve them when I will have time  — FR 14:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Corinne-Ping — FR 14:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

I'm sorry for the delay, Force Radical. Here are some thoughts:

1) In the lead, you have these two sentences:

  • The fire was caused by a short circuit in the lifts. A probe by the government into this incident revealed that illegal construction of two storeys and the lack of a fire clearance were major reasons for the blaze.

The first sentence says clearly that the fire was caused by a short circuit in the lifts. The second sentence provides two more reasons. I think you need to do one of two things (depending upon the actual report of the investigation):

(a) mention all three as causes in one sentence, or

(s) maybe change "The fire was caused" to "The fire was started" in the first sentence (but not absolutely necessary) and, in the second sentence, change "were major reasons for the blaze" to "were major factors that contributed to the blaze spreading throughout the building" or "...to the blaze getting out of control". Something like that.

2) In the section Stephen Court Fire#Building, you have this sentence:

  • Stephen Court is a seven-storied building located on plot 18 A in the posh locality of Park Street, Calcutta.

(a) The phrase "the posh locality" presents two problems, to my mind:

(i) "posh" is British/Indian English; American readers are not used to seeing/hearing the word, so may not get the picture;
(ii) "posh" is also a bit subjective. You might consider changing the phrase to "an upscale neighborhood".

(b) I think "seven-storied" should be spelled "seven-storey" – a seven-storey building".

3) In Stephen Court Fire#Aftermath, you have these two sentences:

  • A few residents were allowed to use the building weeks after the fire but had to sign risk bonds for six months. Moreover, the supply of electricity and of water to the building were cut off by the KMC.

(a) You might want to elaborate a bit on "sign risk bonds". Not everyone will know what those are. Perhaps just add a phrase, something like this:

  • ...absolving the city of any liability in case of injury.

(b) I wonder whether it would be possible to supply the reason why the supply of electricity and water were cut off.

4) In the section Stephen Court Fire#Fire, you have this sentence:

  • A woman was reported to have missed her step and fell five floors below.

Readers might wonder whether this woman died from her fall ("fell to her death") or was merely injured. Also, if you can find the information, you might wish to say what she fell onto – the sidewalk? The street?

5) I'm just wondering why there is no mention in the article of accountability. Was no one held responsible for allowing the two extra floors to be built without proper fire-fighting equipment in place and without updating the wiring? Was no one held responsible for allowing the building to be overused, placing a strain on old wiring?

Well, that's all.  – Corinne (talk) 23:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

@Corinne:-I have done all the edits you suggested please take a look  — FR 10:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

6) I want to ask you about a few things in the section Stephen Court Fire#Illegal construction. I will copy the entire paragraph here for ease of reference, and I am going to number the sentences:

  • (1) Around 1930 a fourth storey was added to the building without the necessary civic sanction, followed by two more in 1984. (2) The civic authorities had slapped a notice on the buildings management authorities. (3) In the same year the illegally constructed portion was regularized by the payment of a penalty. (4) A mezzanine floor was also constructed between the ground floor and first floor, the date of construction of which is not known.

(a) The phrase "civic sanction" will not be understood by American readers. Perhaps change it to "without the necessary building permits"? Would that make sense to Indian readers?

(b) I think, in sentence (2), you should mention when the authorities slapped a notice on the buildings management authorities. Also, the past perfect tense, "had slapped", is only necessary if the authorities made that move before 1930. If it wasn't before 1930, I recommend changing "had slapped" to "slapped". Also, I think "a notice" should be "a notice of violation" or "a notice of building code violation".

(c) (i) In sentence (3), you have "in the same year", but this is not clear if you don't give the year in sentence (2).

(ii) It is not clear whether "the illegally constructed portion" refers to the fourth storey built in 1930, the two built in 1984, or both. I think this should be made clearer.

(iii) Instead of "the illegally constructed portion", why not say "the illegally constructed floors, or storeys? If you use "portion", readers might wonder what this portion was.

Now I will continue to take a look at your changes.  – Corinne (talk) 16:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

They look fine. What is a "liftman caretaker"? I know that "liftman" means (in American English) "elevator operator", so that's all right, but why "caretaker"? Do you mean he was a supervisor? Or the full-time liftman?  – Corinne (talk) 17:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Corinne Done. Please take a look — FR 16:59, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, FR30799386. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of General Caste in Sikhism (2nd nomination).
Message added 15:49, 28 February 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sure about the bolded !vote?! ~ Winged BladesGodric 15:49, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

List of Prime Ministers of India

Hi, do have any plans for this list? Yashthepunisher (talk) 18:29, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Not now I will be getting on with citizen 2 list (List of Vice-Presidents of India) once some of my meatspace priorities are resolved. After that's done I'll certainly look forward to bringing citizen 3 list (List of Prime Ministers of India) to FLC.[numbering of citizens according to indiatoday]  — Frc Rdl 07:34, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Cool :) Yashthepunisher (talk) 10:33, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. With 53 contestants qualifying, the groups for round 2 are slightly smaller than usual, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining users.

Our top scorers in round 1 were:

  • United States Aoba47 led the field with a featured article, 8 good articles and 42 GARs, giving a total of 666 points.
  • Germany FrB.TG , a WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points, gained from a featured article and masses of bonus points.
  • India Ssven2, another WikiCup newcomer, was in third place with 403 points, garnered from a featured article, a featured list, a good article and twelve GARs.
  • United States Ceranthor, India Numerounovedant, Minnesota Carbrera, Netherlands Farang Rak Tham and Romania Cartoon network freak all had over 200 points, but like all the other contestants, now have to start again from scratch. A good achievement was the 193 GARs performed by WikiCup contestants, comparing very favourably with the 54 GAs they achieved.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Vanamonde (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta

Hello, FR30799386. You have new messages at Titodutta's talk page.
Message added 18:28, 2 March 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Titodutta (talk) 18:28, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Stephen Court Fire

Hello! Your submission of Stephen Court Fire at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stephen Court fire

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stephen Court fire you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yashthepunisher -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 08:21, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Stephen Court fire

On 12 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stephen Court fire, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Stephen Court fire, which killed 43 people, was caused by a short-circuit? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Stephen Court fire), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 12 March 2018 (UTC)


Beg pardon, but these things bother me. In the article is:
Initially thought to be from a short circuit from a lift in between the fifth and sixth floors, the fire spread upwards and sideways, engulfing ...
The problem is "Initially thought to be from ..." ought to be followed later by what the authorities eventually found the cause to be. But no other discussion of a different cause is stated.
Did you perhaps mean to have something like
The fire is thought to have been initiated by a short circuit from a lift in between the fifth and sixth floors, the fire spread upwards and sideways, engulfing ...
though perhaps using the word 'started' would be better?
Oh, I see in some of the comments above that "fire was started" was mentioned. I'm just looking for the correct meaning to be seen. (And I see your page notice above, but really don't want to "change the meaning" without your approval!) Shenme (talk) 05:15, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
I guess your right as intially is probably a holdover from some of the more gossipy newspapers I summarised. That being said I would suggest that you make the change yourself as I am slightly caught up with meatspace priorities at the moment — FR+ 05:29, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Cool, I see it's updated by you. Thanks! Shenme (talk) 09:48, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Trinetra scam, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Arangetra Velai (cropped).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arangetra Velai (cropped).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Narada sting operation

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Narada sting operation you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 196.80.165.7 -- 196.80.165.7 (talk) 11:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi. You tagged this article but you did not patrol it. Did you notify the creator? Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:36, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Kudpung-I don't have the NPP bit. I just came across it while clicking the random button, found the text to be balantly promotional so I tagged it as such.  — FR+ 11:47, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
After your heads up I took a another look at the page and found it to be unambiguous breaching the copyvio guidelines. And I tagged it as such(with some goof ups due to the unusually laggy mobile interface)  — FR+ 12:09, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:Arangetra Velai (cropped).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Kailash29792 (talk) 18:20, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stephen Court fire

The article Stephen Court fire you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stephen Court fire for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yashthepunisher -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:21, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations on the success :) Also, I think you should list your achievements (FLs, DYKs etc.) and the barnstars in your userpage. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Yashthepunisher- I also had the same idea, Well I am myself amazed at my css skills and I feel that now the page looks seriously good(and different from most other userpages) — FR+ 07:37, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Yes by looking at your edit patterns, no one can guess that your are hardly one year old here. Btw, this list is still missing from your userpage. Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:35, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Force Radical, can you please review my ongoing flc. Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:14, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Yashthepunisher-Ill take it up next week  — FR+ 09:46, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Kerala Blasters

Hey mate, just wanted to inform you that I have finished the Kerala Blasters page edits you wanted me to do. Cheers. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 18:20, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Hey, just want to say thanks for reviewing the page and eventually helping me get it up to GA. This has been something I have been working on for nearly three years so great to see it finally happen. Now to start the next step... getting the page to featured article status. Cheers. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 19:00, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Precious

events in India

Thank you for quality articles about events in India, such as Stephen Court fire, Narada sting operation, Bipin Ganatra and Karimul Haque, for welcoming new users and missing those who died, - user from planet Earth and India, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:29, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

18:09, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

15:21, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

18:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

16:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 May newsletter

The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
  • Republic of Texas Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points
  • India Yashthepunisher, a first time contestant, with two featured lists
  • Cascadia (independence movement) SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles
  • United States Usernameunique, a first time contestant, with fourteen DYKs
  • San Francisco Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
  • South Carolina Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs

So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

16:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

22:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

A note

If you have any suggestions regarding my rather new hobby of closing or relisting AFd's please leave your feed back in this thread. I will try my best to factor the feedback into my editing pattern.

Hi, FR, without any comments on any particular relist, it may be prudential for you to skim through WP:NOQUORUM and WP:RELISTBIAS.Best,~ Winged BladesGodric 10:12, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

@Winged Blades of Godric:-I read all the pages just now and will keep them in mind the next time. BTW Nice to see you pop in ... — FR+ 10:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Just to add, an user just get into a little trouble at AN/I for relisting, so we need to be very careful --Quek157 (talk) 12:47, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, this looked to me like a controversial NAC closure. The opinions were equally split (5/5) and I felt that the "keep" arguments were on the weak side. In any case, with an even split it was not "Most people agree...". Would you mind undoing the close so that it could be closed by an admin? --K.e.coffman (talk) 23:23, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

K.e.coffman-I think you are quoting me out of context...I said Mot people agree that this articles barely topples over the wall into the garden of notability. [sic].I believe except for Handoto and DocumentError all of the !voters(including you) agreed that notability is marginal(for the article).Thus, I don't see how the close was controversial.Thanks — FR+ 05:25, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Just FYI I have reverted my closure based on your advice. — FR+ 05:42, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
For documentation purposes only : the AFD was closed with almost the same verdict by admin SoWhy. — FR+ 08:04, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

17:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi FR30799386! You created a thread called Renominating an Afd at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2018 (UTC)


12:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

I have asked for a deletion review of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana (film) (2nd nomination). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Sam Sailor 13:06, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Revdel

For doc purposes only: this relates to Bedeni Moluar Kotha
You left right as I was about to respond on IRC. :P Unfortunately, the problem text exists in the entire the entire page history, which sorta presents some problems with using WP:RD1. Not sure if it's ripe for WP:G12 in its current state or if just ripe for rewrite or WP:AFD. --slakrtalk / 09:19, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Slakr-I have listed it for rewrite since it does not meet the criterion of G-12. I am pretty sure that no one is going to come forward to rewrite it. — FR+ 11:04, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
PS:Could you RevDel from revid=687725198 till revid=753312324 in Aponjon as a copyvio of [45] ? — FR+ 11:04, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

For documentation purposes only :Page has been revision deleted after an request by me on IRC.
Nice find in Special:Diff/821708193/843301184, follow up by reading and following WP:CV. I'll give you double kudos and a free, virtual serving of shondesh, if you can spot another copyvio in a previous revision of that article, that has yet not been dealt with either. Sam Sailor 10:17, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Sam Sailor-Couldn't find any. PS:Please take a look at the Deletion Reveiw. — FR+ 06:48, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


I request that you undo your "redirect" closure May 17th of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana (film) (2nd nomination) and close it as "merge", as that was the clear outcome of the discussion, see WP:NACD. This is a WP:NACPIT #4 case, and the fact that you then redirect to Kochadaiyaan and thus create a double redirect to Kochadaiiyaan makes the closure look even worse.

A few notes on other closures from May 17th:

The community decided a while back that AFD discussions should normally stay open for at least 168 hours (a full 7 days). There are a number of good reasons to comply with this rule. The intricate details of when to early-close per WP:SNOW is something that should be left to admins and perhaps in a few cases to experienced users. Unrest was not one of these.

And one from May 16th:

  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gargoyle (monster) was correctly closed as "keep" May 16th 06:27:36, and only 30 seconds later you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live in Buenos Aires 1979 as "keep". You may find that some people will suspect you are head counting. This is not a clear keep that should be closed let alone NAC'ed, and the proof is in the fact that the discussion had been relisted by an admin. But it had received no further discussion, and yet you closed it as "keep". Assume that the admin who has been here for six years knows what he is doing when he calls for more discussion by relisting it. Had I been in Onel5969's shoes, I would have asked you to vacate your closure. A much better thing to do in this case is to search for sources, reference the article, flesh it out if possible, and join the discussion in any case.

It is commendable that you want to help out with backoffice tasks, but as WP:NACD says: If you are not fairly experienced, or are unfamiliar with deletion policy or the workings of deletion discussions, do not close such discussions. Having only participated in five AFD discussions prior to May 23rd, you owe yourself more experience by joining discussions before you start closing them. Regards, Sam Sailor 15:16, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Sam Sailor-I will reply to these allegations(concerns)(Note:Never edit Wikipedia™ before sleeping ) in detail on Monday(I am on mobile even now)....in short here are the facts...I agree with you that my closure of Rana(film) was incorrect and I allow you to change it to merge and update docs ...With regards to the early closures....It was mainly due to a difference in time zones...The speedy keep...was a accidental press of a button...I later realised that it should have been keep...as for the case of my speed... our house suddenly ran out of internet access while I was doing the same...when we got back access all the actions that I had performed occured almost simultaneously.Thanks — FR+ 15:57, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
I started closing afd's only after two days of observing other editors...I will certainly take your feedback onboard and start closing discussions next month(I .e after two more weeks of observation) — FR+ 15:57, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
No allegations were made, and it is surprising that my advice is taken as such.
I pointed twice to WP:NACD in my post, and I did that with a purpose. If you had read the very short section in Wikipedia:Deletion process that NACD redirects to, you would have noticed it says:

Closures may only be reopened by the closer themselves, an uninvolved administrator in their individual capacity, giving their reasoning, or by consensus at deletion review.

and you would not make the suggestion I allow you to change it to merge and update docs.... When people link to project space, please make sure to read and understand it. That you do not, is another sign that you are out of your depth here.
A word of advice that I wish you will take with you in real life: be responsible for your mistakes, do not try to make excuses. The speedy keep...was a accidental press of a button...I later realised that it should have been keep.... But if you did realise it, why did you not correct it? The other excuses, "time zones", "ran out of internet access", well, basically you are not taking responsibility, you are trying to blame shift. Trust me, people here on Wikipedia are generally very forgiving when we make mistakes, we assume good faith towards each other, and any editor will recognize your mistakes as such: good faith mistakes. But try the same kind of excuses in a professional work environment, and you will either immediately or eventually find yourself among the unemployed.
The idea that one can start closing afd's only after two days of observing other editors is a naive mistake, but your idea that you can start closing discussions next month(I .e after two more weeks of observation is just wholly unrealistic.
If no admin reverts and recloses Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana (film) (2nd nomination), please do so whenever you have the opportunity. Thanks, Sam Sailor 20:42, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
XFDCloser will look for <!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message)(?:.|\n)*?}}(?:(?:.|\n)+this\ point --> when closing an AFD. Since only the AFD discussion was reverted but nothing was reverted in the article and the talk page, XFDCloser did not do anything there this time. The subsequent manual edit of the talk page here is mistaken: |date2= should be the nomination date, not the closing date, please see the documentation for {{Old AfD multi}}. Solution: in Rana (film) restore Special:PermaLink/840321295, in the talk restore Special:PermaLink/616382852, and in the AFD restore Special:PermaLink/841575085. Then close as "merge". This is a good opportunity to do it manually instead of semi-automatically by script, follow the instructions given at WP:AFD/AI. Let me know, if you have any questions. Sam Sailor 05:44, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Sam Sailor Done - Let me know, if you have any questions  — FR+ 06:35, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Closure of the AFD was correct. The implementation of the outcome was not. Can Wikipedia:Non-admin closure be helpful? Sam Sailor 10:55, 28 May 2018 (UTC) (P.S. Is it logical to hat the TOC on this talk page?)
Well... According to the above mentioned page I had to slap templates on Rana (film) and Kochadaiiyaan .But I invoked WP:IAR and got my hands dirty... — FR+ 11:54, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
PS:The TOC hatting is an interim measure — FR+ 11:54, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
How should the closure be implemented per WP:NOTBADNAC and the instructions given at WP:AFD/AI? Sam Sailor 12:21, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
I think you are referring to this section:
  • On the AfD'd article's page, replace the AfD tag (by removing everything as prescribed in keep above) with the following:

{{Afd-merge to|destination article|debate name|debate closure date}}

  • On the destination article's talk page, add the following (normally above the WikiProject tags):

{{Afd-merge from|nominated article|debate name|debate closure date}}

FR+ 17:30, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Good thinking - now please implement it without further ado. Sam Sailor 05:05, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Sam Sailor-This is seriously getting overboard...can we not WP:IAR instead of jumping through the hoops once more. I mean okay I learnt a lesson but doing the same stuff over and over again seems stretching it a bit too far. I seriously think we can move on from this  — FR+ 05:13, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
This is getting overboard because you refuse to follow procedure and are arguing ad nauseam.
Had you correctly reopened and closed the AFD Monday, this would have been a done deal. You did not. I have gradually given you shorter and shorter instructions. Either you neglect to read or do not understand the project space links I have spoonfed you. And that's okay as well, you will learn little by little by participating.
But when you do not have the experience to do certain tasks, do not understand basic procedures, do not understand the janitorial role of the closer determining consensus at AFD, then please just do as suggested.
A user with just about 500 non-automated edits to main space, hardly enough to file for WP:RFP/NPR, and almost no AFD experience should not run around trying to close AFD discussions.
A user who has never performed a merge themself should not towards three editors with a combined tenure of almost 15 years and participation in 100s of AFDs make a remark like so there is no point in letting a Merge notice languish on top of the page. Perhaps unwittingly, but you do cast the aspersion that I would neglect my duties per Wikipedia:Merging#Merger as a result of a deletion discussion, and I do not in the least enjoy such youthful impetuosity.
The consensus was to merge, but you continue implementing a redirect, Special:Diff/843296933/843297649, and that was not consensus.
Here I what you should do:
  1. Make sure you are logged in on a PC, this procedure can be tricky on a tablet or a smartphone.
  2. Since you do not have the rollback right, but do have Twinkle installed, open up Special:Diff/840321295/841651025 in a new window or tab.
  3. In the left half of the window you should see "Revision as of 2018-05-09T03:46:59". Above it you should see "[restore this version]". Click "[restore this version]".
  4. Then open Rana (film) in edit mode (you can simply do that in the window you just worked in).
  5. Replace the entire AFD template, that is
    <!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled --> {{AfDM|page=Rana (film) (2nd nomination)|year=2018|month=May|day=9|substed=yes|origtag=afdx|help=off}} <!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->
    with
    {{Afd-merge to|Kochadaiiyaan|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana (film) (2nd nomination)|28 May 1018}}
  6. Save the page by clicking "Publish change".
  7. Next open up Kochadaiiyaan in edit mode in a new window or tab.
  8. At the top of the page paste
    {{Afd-merge from|Rana (film)|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana (film) (2nd nomination)|28 May 1018}}
  9. Finally save the page by clicking "Publish change", and you are done.
Can we wrap this up now without more excuses? Sam Sailor 10:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Sam Sailor-I am not commenting on the above based on the assumption that you were angry. I have done whatever you have specified above and then reverted back to the redirect. Please note that I did not implement consensus of the Afd in my last edit. — FR+ 10:45, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
BTW...The reason why I am redirecting the page repeatedly is because the nom of the Afd thanked me when I closed it as a redirect [[46]] and I know that the nom knows more about Indian films than me — FR+ 10:45, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

21:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Why the strikethrough?

So I saw your AfD submission and was going to ask the admins to remove you, but a clickthrough to your userpage and the blocklogs indicates that you aren't blocked, making me very glad that I checked.

I was just wondering why you went for the strikethrough given that it indicates being blocked.

Nosebagbear (talk) 11:13, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Nosebagbear-I don't know of a such a rule...It was just a sort of indication that I intend to be unavailable or very sparsely active for the following week. Now that you have told me about it I'll just go and change the main sig file and remove those styles. — FR+ 11:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
FR30799386 - there certainly isn't a rule, you can keep it like that if you find it interesting. It's just that a common gadget you can turn on marks blocked users with a strikethrough. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:27, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Nah, I decided that I am better of without it  — FR+ 11:33, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

21:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi FR, hope you are fine. Can you please review this article? Yashthepunisher (talk) 03:00, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Yashthepunisher-I am rather busy with some real life priorities and will thus have to decline the offer....Sorry.  — FR+ 05:23, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
It's okay. Cheers! Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:25, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

21:47, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

WikiCup 2018 July newsletter

The third round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  • South Carolina Courcelles, a first time contestant, with 1756 points, a tally built largely on 27 GAs related to the Olympics
  • Scotland Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three GAs on natural history and astronomy topics
  • Cascadia (independence movement) SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with a variety of submissions related to transport in the state of Washington

Contestants managed 7 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 120 good articles, 1 good topic, 124 DYK entries, 15 ITN entries, and 132 good article reviews. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 458 GA reviews, in comparison to 244 good articles submitted for review and promoted. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process; several submissions, particularly in abstruse or technical areas, have needed additional work to make them completely verifiable.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk), Vanamonde (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

00:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

23:10, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

16:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

09:44, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Someone is messing with your sandbox. Just a heads up. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 10:38, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

14:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

Please

go through Narada sting operation and check whether you can improve the prose or other aspect(s) any further:) A GA review might be in order........ At any case, I was wishing for a digital collage of all the accused but regrettably, many of the accused don't have a picture either at en-wiki or at Commons.Any ideas?

P.S.--Have you seen any recently-published scholarly-book on Indian political scapes that has touched the sting?~
P.P.S.--I'm also thinking of refurbishing Saradha Group financial scandal and taking it for a GA trip:)WBGconverse 08:47, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Winged Blades of Godric - I'll take a look in far more detail on Thursday. However, try to avoid CS1 errors and bare links wherever possible. — FR+ 11:55, 31 July 2018 (UTC) reping — FR+ 11:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Winged Blades of Godric - I didn't find any book specifically referring to the Narada sting operation, but still I'll try my best to dig deeper — FR+ 06:24, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Invitation

Dear FR30799386,

You are cordially invited to join the Portals WikiProject.

This is a very active project. We are in the process of completely revamping the entire portal system, and cleaning up the portal namespace. After these are done, we'll be greatly expanding the collections of portals.

We have a newsletter, that covers the progress of portal development, and the latest toys.

If you are interested, sign-up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Portals#Project_participants.

By the way, I'm very interested in what you think of portals. What do you like most about them? What do they lack that they should have? What can't they do, that you would like them to be able to do?

I look forward to your replies.    — The Transhumanist   08:14, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

P.S.: Please {{ping}} me in your reply. Thank you.

19:39, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

To keep you charged up in the cleaning up work that you have been doing recently. Good work. DBigXray 11:56, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

adding Wikipedia:REFILL to your WP:SKIN will make your job easier. Do try it. --DBigXray 11:58, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Reply

Thank you for your posts. I'm not interested only in church articles. I'm involved all kind of articles in Wikipedia. Most of the are related to India, my country. It has places, churches, institutions etc. I didn't try for a biased editing. I think that articles are needed because I think Wikipedia is not only for articles of such as things have great history and features, but also for small places and institutions. They have only small things to say comparing to others. So we can't say that it is not needed. It have only a small data in internet so we can't say that it is not existed or biased. That have sources in books and publications. Sometimes they haven't ISBN or international accept. So kindly please understand about that articles and keep it in Wikipedia. So kindly don't see me as biased editor.--PATH SLOPU (Talk) 16:19, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Path slopu - Let me put things into perspective. First off, the hard fact of life is that Wikipedia does not include what you think should be included, rather it depends on its inclusion criteria the general notability guidelines to determine if a topic is worthy of inclusion. There are some topics where the general notability guidelines are ignored/supersede in favor of a more lenient approach, however these areas are determined by consensus of many Wikipedians and supported by research/evidence showing that there is truly a lack of third-party reliable content. Indian churches however is not such an area. The notability of churches in general is determined by WP:NCHURCH which basically asks editors to check it against the general notability guidelines. Secondly, no one is accusing you of being biased. However your inability to discern reliable sources from self published sources(a trait of editors working in their conflict of interest region) is concerning which is why I took pains to inform you about our conflict of interest guidelines. On a side note having conflict of interest is not something bad, in fact almost every editor has his/her own area of conflict of interest which he/she tries to avoid (even I do). If you have any more doubts you are free to ask. Regards. — FR+ 11:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

17:53, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Portals WikiProject update #016, 15 Aug 2018

Future portal tool

Discussions are underway on the design of a portal tool (user script) that will hopefully have features for modifying portals at the click of a menu item, to make editing them easier. It might do things like change the color for you, add to a selection, add a new section, move a section, and so on.

If you'd like to be involved and suggest features for the tool, please join us at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Portals/Design#What would you want a portal tool to be able to do?.

Progress report: upgrade of portals

As new portal components are built by our Lua gurus, those components are being used to upgrade portals. Each component automates a section of a portal in a particular way.

The sections that are mostly upgraded so far are the Intro, and the Associated Wikimedia section.

The sections currently undergoing upgrade are: Selected image, Categories, and the Intro.

The Intro? Isn't that done already?

Yes, and no.

The upgrade of the excerpt in intros is mostly complete (there are about 70 non-standard portals that still need it).

Now we are doing another upgrade of intros in the form of adding a panoramic picture at the top of the intro, on portals for which such a picture is available on Commons:. Dozens of panoramas have been added so far, and they are really starting to affect the look of portals — the portals that have them look really good.

Regions are the most likely subjects to have panoramas, but a surprising number of other subjects have banner-shaped pictures too. Some examples of non-geographic portals that they have been added to are:

Speaking of pictures, several hundred Selected image sections have been upgraded to include image slideshows.

Progress report: design

The push for automation continues, with new components under continuous testing in the field. As problems are spotted, they are reported to our programmers, who have done a fantastic job of keeping up with bug reports and fixing the relevant Lua modules fast. I am highly impressed.

Construction time on new portals is now down to as little as a minute or less. Though not in general. If you are lucky enough to spot portals that fit the profile of the new tools (their strengths), then a portal can be complete almost as soon as it is created, with the added time it takes to find and add a panorama. Source page titles are not generally standardized, and so it source pages in many cases must be entered manually. Where source page titles follow a standard naming convention, portal creation for those subjects goes quickly.

So, we still have some hurdles, but the outlook on portals is very good. New features, and many improvements to features are on the horizon. I'll be sure to report them when they become available.

What will the portal of the future look like? That is up to you!

See you on the project's talk pages.

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   21:04, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

16:46, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

IP edit to WP:AN

I think you edited logged out when this edit was made. The edit originally had an IP address. I changed the IP address to your username and then suppressed the edit and the IP address so others can not see your IP. If I was wrong let me know and I will revert myself. ~ GB fan 12:44, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

GB fan - It was me. Sorry for the inconvenience caused . — fr+ 12:46, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Not a problem. I happened to see it and was able to fix it. If you edit logged out in the future, you can fix the signature yourself and if you want the IP address hidden you can email oversight and someone will take care of removing the IP address. I just happened to be in the right place at the right time. The quicker the edit signature is fixed the easier the suppression of the edits is. ~ GB fan 12:50, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Portals WikiProject update #017, 22 Aug 2018

This issue is about portal creation...

Creating new portals

Myself and others have been testing and experimenting with the new components in upgrading existing portals and in building new portals. They have now been applied in hundreds of portals.

The templates are ready for general use for portal creation.

They are still a bit buggy, but the only way we are going to work the rest of the bugs out is by using them and reporting the bugs as we come across them.

I look forward to seeing what new portals you create!

Be sure to report bugs at WT:WPPORTD.

The main portal creation template is {{box portal skeleton}}.

Portal creation tips

After starting a portal using {{box portal skeleton}}...

  1. Placing a panorama (banner picture) at the top of the intro section is a nice touch, and really makes a portal look good. {{box portal skeleton}} doesn't automatically insert panoramas. So, you will need to do that by hand. They can be found at Commons:. For some examples, check out Portal:Sharks, Portal:Cheese, and Portal:Florence
  2. The search term provided in the Did you know? and In the news sections is very basic and rarely matches anything. It is best to replace that term with multiple search arguments, if possible (separate each argument with a pipe character). For example, in Portal:Capital punishment, see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Capital_punishment&diff=855255361&oldid=855137403 Searches in templates use Lua search notation.
  3. Check the In the news and Did you know? sections for mismatches. That is, sometimes entries come up that shouldn't be displayed. If there are any, refine the search strings further, so they don't return such results.
  4. Finish each portal you've created before creating a new one. We don't want unfinished portals sitting around.

Need a laugh?

Check out the Did you know? section on Portal:Determinism.    — The Transhumanist   02:42, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

HTTP Error 404. The requested resource is not found.

Hi,

Thank you for your message confirmation regarding my changes in the link. As I see the website is not working ( http://www.scmagazineus.com/Hot-or-not-Web-application-firewalls-for-security-and-regulatory-compliance/article/113146/ ). So, I added the relevant blog post to this page. Please acknowledge. https://www.testingxperts.com/blog/7-Crucial-Activities-to-Test-the-Security-of-your-Mobile-Applications — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amankadd (talkcontribs) 08:31, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

@Amankadd:- Go ahead and do it..Only this time update the |title= part — fr+ 08:35, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank You for the approval. I have updated the relevant information link — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amankadd (talkcontribs) 08:38, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

WP:UAA reports on users with no edits

Generally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI: "Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.

For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. So we add the {{UAA|wait}} tag to the report, it goes to WP:UAA/HP for a week or more, and must then be reviewed again to see if the account has since become active before removing it. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:34, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Noted  — fr+ 07:07, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

16:16, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, FR30799386. You have new messages at Path slopu's talk page.
Message added 14:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please see my talk page. PATH SLOPU (Talk) 14:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

WikiCup 2018 September newsletter

The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:

  • South Carolina Courcelles scored a magnificent 4869 points, with 92 good articles on Olympics-related themes. Courcelles' bonus points alone exceeded the total score of any of the other contestants!
  • Hel, Poland Kees08 was second with 1155 points, including a high-scoring featured article for Neil Armstrong, two good topics and some Olympics-related good articles.
  • Scotland Cas Liber, with 1066 points, was in third place this round, with two featured articles and a good article, all on natural history topics.
  • Other contestants who qualified for the final round were Marshall Islands Nova Crystallis, Republic of Texas Iazyges, Cascadia (independence movement) SounderBruce, Wales Kosack and United States Ceranthor.

During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

16:47, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Portals WikiProject update #018, 04 Sept 2018

Bug hunt!

As you know, portals are now supported by a number of new templates, which are in turn supported by some new Lua modules.

Those templates and modules are being put to the test, in the new portals that have been created since this WikiProject rebooted, plus a number of existing portals that have been revamped.

The new portals, and revamped ones, can be found at Category:Single-page portals.

Please browse the new portals at your leisure, and report any and all problems that you spot. Post bug and other portal problem reports at WT:WPPORTD. Please report bugs, quirks, awkward aspects, or anything weird or off that you notice. Compliments and suggestions are also welcome. :)

When you report a bug, please indicate the portal's name, the section that the problem appeared in, and the name of the article appearing (first) in the section with the problem. Most problems will likely be encountered in the Selected general articles" section, due to quirks in a displayed article's wikicode that the lua modules don't handle yet. Your help in spotting those is of utmost value. Thank you.

Don't delete portal subpages just yet

For portals that have been converted to the single-page design, we are not deleting their subpages at this time, because we are working on ways to harvest the data from those pages. For example, the Selected picture subpages include filenames and captions that would be valuable for the image slideshows. Please don't delete portal subpages, for now. They'll be slated for d-batch speedy deletion after harvesting. Thank you.

Development notes

We are currently testing a feature added to {{Transclude files as random slideshow}} that allows it to accept both sourcepages and filenames. Courtesy of Evad37. This will pave the way for harvesting files and their captions from portal subpages, for use in image slideshows.

We need your help

The bulk of the work is being done by a handful of editors. But we can't do it all. We need help with spotting bugs, refining the search parameters in new/revamped portals (in the "Did you know..." and "In the news" sections), adding images to slideshows for a broader selection (they default to showing the images on the root article page but are capable of showing so much more), adding panoramic pictures at the top of the intro section of region portals (cities, counties, states, provinces, countries, continents, and other regions), to name but a few task types.

It is rewarding to be a part of the growing portal phenomenon. And you get to see its expansion and refinement up close.

Feel free to join in on the fun. ;)

Thank you,    — The Transhumanist   06:50, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

The Original Barnstar
This is for your valuable efforts for contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you PATH SLOPU (Talk) 13:49, 9 September 2018 (UTC)


A barnstar for you

The Guidance Barnstar
This is for your valuable guidance given to me in editing enwiki. Thank you PATH SLOPU (Talk) 13:50, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

22:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Trinetra scam

Hello, FR30799386. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Trinetra scam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 06:17, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Sam Sailor The last time I checked, it still had not passed the notability guidelines comfortably enough for me to create an article on it (It is on the borderline of notability). Would it be okay if it were userfied to me? Ping @Fastily: as the deleting admin. — fr+ 11:46, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Yes, go to WP:REFUND and ask for userfication. Sam Sailor 11:54, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 Done - Made request here — fr+ 12:03, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
As you wish, but FYI: WP:DUD. I'd chose userfication and avoid tagging the page with {{userspace draft}}. (please ping on reply) Sam Sailor 12:11, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

21:58, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Portals WikiProject update #019, 22 Sept 2018

Portals progress report

Don't blink. You might miss something.

As of a few days ago, portals had doubled in about a month and a half.

Also, there were 98 incompleted portals in Category:Portals under construction. Now there are just 43.

The WikiProject page has been thoroughly revised

The goals, plans, and task sections have all been updated.

Orphaned portals need a home...

Many new portals are still orphans, and need links pointing to them:

  1. A portal link at the bottom of corresponding navigation footer template. E.g., Template:Machines for Portal:Machines. See examples of a portals link at the bottom of Template:Robotics and Template:Forestry.
  2. A {{Portal}} box in the See also section of the corresponding root article for each portal. If there is no See also section, create one and place the portal template in that. (Rather than placing them in an external links section -- they're not external links).
  3. A {{Portal}} template placed at the top of the category page corresponding to each portal.

All new and revamped portals can be found at Category:Single-page portals.

This is the main list of portals.

Nearly 2,000 of the new portals need to be listed here.

They can be found at Portal talk:Contents/Portals#These are not listed yet. Instructions are included there.

Customized Portal Rating system is now in place

Portals now have a new rating system of their own designed specifically to support portal evaluation! We were trying to use the standard assessment system for articles, but that doesn't fit portals very well.

Many thanks to Evad37, Waggers, AfroThundr3007730, SMcCandlish, Tom, BrendonTheWizard, and Pbsouthwood for their work and input on this.

The new system can be found at the top of all portal talk pages, in the WikiProject portals box. Those with "???" ratings need to be assessed, which makes up most of the older portals.

Most of the new portals were started out with an initial "Low" level of importance when their talk pages were created. Those deserving higher importance should be promoted as you come across them.

Improving the new portals

The starting point for new portals included minimal parameters and content, in the form of default values in the template(s) used for their creation.

Embellishing embedded search strings

So, for the search strings in the "Did you know..." and "In the news" sections, this was the magic word {{PAGENAME}}, which represents the portal's name. Unfortunately, the resulting term is alway capitalized, which limits its effectiveness as a search string for anything but proper nouns. Results for those two sections can be improved, by replacing the "PAGENAME" magic word with multiple search strings, and search strings that begin with lower case letters. There is no inherent limit as to how many search parameters may be included. Lua search notation is used. The more general the subject, the more subtopic search terms you may want to include. For example, on Portal:Avengers (comics), {{PAGENAME}} turned up nothing. But, when more parameters were added, as in the wikicode below...

{{Transclude selected recent additions | {{PAGENAME}} | Iron Man | Spiderman | Antman | Hawkeye | The Hulk | Incredible Hulk | David Banner | Captain America | Scarlet Witch | Black Widow | Tony Stark | Nick Fury | Age of Ultron | Infinity War | months=36 | header={{Box-header colour|Did you know... }}|max=6}}

... that returned several results in the portal's DYK section.

Be sure you make the improvements to both the DYK section and the "In the news" section, as they both require the search strings.

Expanding the slideshow contents

The default starting selection for the image slideshow in most new portals is whatever images happen to be in the corresponding root article (via the PAGENAME magic word). You can improve image slideshows by adding more sourcepages and filenames as parameters in the "Selected images" section of portals.

See Template:Transclude files as random slideshow/doc for instructions.

More exciting things are to come...

Portals used to take about 6 hours or more to create. Now, for subjects that have particular navigation support, we've got that down to about one minute each, with even more content displayed than ever. True, that means the new portals pick you, rather than the other way around. Creating a specific portal that doesn't happen to have the requisite navigation support is still pretty time consuming. But, we are working on extending our reach beyond the low-hanging fruit.

And efforts are ongoing to keep shaving time off of the creation process. Eventually, we may get it down to seconds each.

In addition to improving automation, we're always looking for new features and improvements that we can add to portals, and there is plenty of potential to expand on the standard design so that new portals are even better right out of the starting gate. Additional designs are also possible.

On the horizon, there are many more portals waiting to be created. And we can expect to see at least a few more section types emerge. I never expected slideshows, for example, especially not for excerpts. Who knows where innovation will take us next?

Keep up the great work everyone.

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   07:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

If you like, you can join this wikiproject. Please help to make it a good wikiproject. Thank you--PATH SLOPU (Talk) 15:32, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Path slopu Sorry, I will have to decline your invitation. I am not really knowledgeable about Kollam in particular though I try to my best to edit and keep certain topics relating to India in shape. — fr+ 11:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

15:23, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

For FRadical Bot

Path slopu Thank you . I'll certainly use them to charge up the bot. — fr+ 05:21, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Technical Barnstar
This is for your valuable contributions and efforts in the technical area like bot building, AWB, etc. Thank you for your help. PATH SLOPU (Talk) 13:44, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

17:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

23:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Portals WikiProject update #020, 12 Oct 2018

Whew, a lot has been happening.

A bit of defending of the portals has been needed. But, most activity recently has been directed upon maintenance and development of existing portals.

The majority of portals now use the new design, about 2400 of them, leaving around 1200 portals that still employ the old style.

Newest portals

Please inspect these portals, and report problems or suggest improvements at WT:WPPORTD. Thank you.

MfDs

Since the last issue of this newsletter, Nineteen portals were nominated for deletion. All posted by the same person.

Two portals were deleted.

One resolved as "no consensus".

Sixteen resolved as "keep".

Links to the archived discussions are provided below:

  1. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Air France
  2. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Alexander Korda
  3. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:August Derleth
  4. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Average White Band
  5. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Bee-eaters
  6. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Ben E. King
  7. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Benny Goodman
  8. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Bill Bryson
  9. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Billy Idol
  10. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Billy Ocean
  11. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Bob Hope
  12. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Bobbie Rosenfeld Award
  13. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Body piercing
  14. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Canton, Michigan
  15. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Compostela Group of Universities
  16. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Diplo
  17. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Diversity of fish
  18. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Pebble Beach
  19. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Peter, Paul and Mary

Many thanks to those who participated in the discussions.

To watch for future MfD's, keep in mind that the Portals WikiProject is supported by automatic alerts. You can see them at: Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals#Article alerts: portals for deletion at MfD

Creation criteria

There was also some discussion of creation criteria for portals. The result was that one of the participants in the discussion reverted the portal guidelines to the old version, which has the minimum number of articles for a portal included in there: "about 20 articles", a guideline that was in place since 2009.

Many of the portals that existed prior to April 2018 do not have that many (being limited to however many subpages the portal creator created), and therefore, these portals need to be upgraded to the new design (which automatically provides many articles for display). Using the new design, exceeding 20 articles for display is very easy.

Linking to the new portals

Efforts have been underway to place links to new portals (all 2200 of them created since April).

  1. Link (portal button) from corresponding category pages.  Done
  2. Link from See also section on corresponding root articles. check Partially implemented
  3. Link from bottom of corresponding templates. check Partially implemented
  4. Link for each portal on Portal:Contents/Portals. check Partially implemented

Your help is needed. It is easy to access the page mentioned in #1, #2, & #3 from the portals themselves.

AWBers could do these tasks even faster (that's how the category pages were done), except #4...

Item #4 above pretty much has to be done by hand. (If you can find a way to speed that up, I would be very impressed). The links needing placement can be found at Portal talk:Contents/Portals#These are not listed yet. Instructions are included there.

The conversion effort: news sections

There are still around 1200 old-style portals that have only undergone partial conversion to the new design concepts, still relying on subpages with copied/pasted excerpts that have been going stale for years, out of date (manually posted) news entries, etc.

The section currently being tackled on these is news. You can help by deleting any news section on the old-style portals that has news entries that are years old (that is the dead giveaway to a manual news section). Be sure not to delete the news sections of portals that have up-to-date news, or active maintainers. For maintainers, look at the portal's categories, and/or check the participants list at WP:WPPORT.

Eventually, conditional news sections (that appear only when news items are available for display) will be added using AWB to all portals without a news section.

News items (and even the news sections themselves) are automatically generated for portals that were created using the Basic portal start page. On those portals, there is a hidden comment at the top of the page (that you can see in the edit window), that says this:

<!-- This portal was created using subst:Basic portal start page -->

Design development

Presently, we are in the process of implementing the new design features, creating new portals with them, and installing them in existing portals.

But, what about development of new new design features?

We have a wish department.

Post your wishes at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Portals/Design#Discussions about possible cool new features, and they might come true. Many have already, and for many of those, this is where they were posted.

Cascade effect

A resource that has been elusive so far will be obtained eventually: categories. That is, the ability to pull category member links to populate a page.

Rather than populate portals directly with such links, it may be more beneficial to the encyclopedia to utilize them in navigation footers, because portals already have the ability to generate themselves based on those.

So, this would create a cascade effect: auto-gathering entries from categories, would enable the construction of new navigation footers, that would in turn support the development of new portals.

The cascade effect would also be felt by existing portals, as existing navigation footers could be expanded using the category harvesting methods, which would in turn expand the coverage of portals that access those navigation footers.

You can help by providing leads about any potential category harvesting methods. Please report anything you know about harvesting categories at WT:WPPORTD. Thank you.

Looking into the future: the quantum portal?

One idea that has been floating around is the concept of a pageless portal. That is, a portal that isn't stored anywhere, instead being generated when you click on a menu item or button.

Many of the new portals were generated by a single click, and then saved via a second click.

Therefore, it seems likely that the portals of the future will employ the one-click concept.

Because of the need for customization by users, this concept would need to be augmented with a way to integrate user contributions. This could be done in at least two ways: posting an existing portal, autogenerating one from scratch if such does not yet exist, or have a special data page for user contributions that is folded into the auto-generated portal.

How soon? That is up to you. All that is needed are persons to implement it.

Until next time...

Keep up the good work on portals. They are improving daily. Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   04:18, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

22:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

23:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Portals WikiProject update #021, 24 Oct 2018

Portals have passed the 4,000 mark.

More new portals...

Here's a list of portals created since the last issue

List of new portals

Please inspect these portals, report problems or suggest improvements at WT:WPPORTD, or develop them further (see below). Thank you.

What's next?

There is still lots to do...

There are many subject gaps that need to be filled. This can be done by creating new portals, or by adding Selected article sections to existing portals. To create a new portal, simply place {{subst:Basic portal start page}} on an empty portal page, and click "Preview". If the portal is complete, click "Save". After you try it, come share your experience and excitement at WT:WPPORTD.

Each new portal is just a starting point. Each portal of the new design can be further developed by:

  • refining the search parameters to improve the results displayed in the Did you know and In the news sections.
  • adding more specific Selected articles sections, like Selected biographies.
  • inserting a Recognized content section.
  • adding more pictures to the image slideshow.
  • placing a panoramic picture at the top of the intro section (especially for geographic portals).

Besides the new portals, there are still about 1200 portals of the old design that need to be converted to the new design.

Many portals need to be de-orphaned, by placing links to them (in the See also section of the corresponding root articles, at the bottom of the corresponding navigation footer templates, and on the corresponding category pages).

Many of the new portals still need to be listed at Portal:Contents/Portals.

Bugs keep popping up in portals. These need to be tracked down and reported at WT:WPPORTD.

Tools are needed to make developing and maintaining portals quicker and easier.

Dreaming up new features and capabilities. Innovation needs to continue, to design the portal of tomorrow, and the portal development-maintenance-system of the future. Automation!

So, if you find yourself with a little (or a lot) of free time, pick an area (or more) above and...

...dive in!    — The Transhumanist   07:25, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

P.S.: FR, there's a bunch of new feature idea posts at WT:WPPORTD.

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

20:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

I thought the script was good. Thank you. Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 01:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

17:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Sorry to hear you weren't well.

Next time you are unwell, be sure to tell us so we can remind you not to nominate articles for AFD! I hope you are feeling better. Jack N. Stock (talk) 09:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Jacknstock I am much better now. However, I am still to fully recover. I am still at a loss as to how I missed the names of the schools yesterday despite having checked the list using the Crtl+F function of the browser.Facepalm Facepalm  — fr+ 14:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Portals WikiProject update #022, 11 Nov 2018

Welcome AmericanAir88

Give a hearty welcome to AmericanAir88, who has adopted working on portals as one of his main purposes on Wikipedia. So far, he has created the following portals:

Way to go!

Where's Evad?

Evad disappeared from Wikipedia on October 18.

He has been, and will continue to be, sorely missed.

Hopefully, he is okay, on a Caribbean cruise or something.

The conversion continues

Portals of the old design, are slowly but surely being converted to the new single-page design.

One factor that has slowed things down is that for many sections, the section header call and section contents call are integrated into a template and buried in a lua module, locking them in on each portal. They have been that way for years.

This means that these sections can't be directly edited like the other sections on the same portal. So, search/replaces affect all the sections except those. So, upgrading headers on these portals, for example, misses the integrated sections and inadvertently results in 2 different header colors.

Before we can continue with the upgrade of these portals, the headers and section contents calls need to be restored to each portal, so that those can be edited in concert with the other sections on the portal, and worked on independently of each other.

This is underway, with a solution implemented on about 1/4 of the affected portals so far. Around 300 of them. The remaining 900 should be done within a couple weeks or so.

Going wide...

We now have banner-shaped pictures included in the introduction sections of 180 portals. The rarity of such pictures has made it difficult to find suitably narrow images for display across the tops of portals.

We have a solution for this, courtesy of FR30799386...

Most pictures are not banner-shaped. But, you can still use them as banners. Here's how:

{{Portal image banner|File:Blueberries .jpg |maxheight=120px |overflow=Hidden }}

Using both maxheight=120px and overflow=Hidden produces this:

Project's status

There are now 4,140 portals, with more being created almost daily. Prior to this project's reboot, portals were created at about the rate of 80 per year. Since April of this year, we've created about 2,600 new portals, or 32.5 years' worth at the old rate.

Of those new portals, about 3/4 of them need links leading to them. Almost all of them are linked to from the category system, but they still need links in article see also sections, at the bottom of navigation templates, and on the main portals list at Portal:Contents/Portals.

Of the 1500 portals created before the reboot, about 300 have been completely converted to the new design so far. About 1100 more have been partially converted, with intros, image slideshows, and associated wikimedia sections getting the most attention.

Discussion has resumed on the portal guidelines.

Until next issue...

See ya round the portal system!    — The Transhumanist   11:42, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

19:22, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

We can observe from Special:Contributions/FRadical_Bot that a bot is running, adjusting archiving templates. It appears that the task being performed is Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FRadical Bot, but this is not linked in the edit summary.

When arriving here on User talk:FR30799386 (only available link Talk page), it states "FR30799386 will be taking an indefinite semi-wikibreak from editing.".

Please, could both of these be corrected with up-to-date information. —Sladen (talk) 09:21, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Sladen Thanks for informing me that you were having issues with the operation of my bot. AFAIK, we are not required to link to the BRFA in the edit summary. Additionally, trying to include a link in the edit summary will actually compromises the general readability of the edit summary since I will have to resort to using symbols to reduce the length of my summary(AWB doesn't allow many characters...). With regards to my user talk page, I intend to keep it the way it is, unless you can find a replacement sentence which means "has reduced editing activity to about two to three edits a day when available". If you did read the grey message box underneath and the edit notice of this page, it very clearly states that I am always available to respond to queries with 48 hours latest. Regards.  — fr+ 09:43, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
(edit conflict) FR30799386, consider how these edits look:
  1. Extensive bot activity without a bot flag
  2. Changing low-level infrastructure (archiving page configurations)
  3. Diffs show names of unrelated second bot (MiszaBot), to an unrelated third bot (Lowercase sigmabot III)
  4. No wiki link
  5. No obvious STOP mechanism
  6. Bot Talk page redirects elsewhere
  7. Redirect end point states editor/bot owner is retired
When looking from the outside, these edits look(ed) extremely suspect—perhaps a case of a hijacked account of some retired editor being used to manipulate archives. So yes, the BRFA did not require linking to the task being done, but it is the easy minimum which would make the edits look less suspect, and thus save time and stress all around. Bot edits should be transparent and self-documenting, not obfuscated. —Sladen (talk) 09:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC) (The BRFA was found via a search engine).
Great to see the proactive adjustment in the edit summary at ~09:11–09:12 Special:Diff/868767540/868767738. An incomplete link to ([[Wikipedia:Bots/Reques) does not reveal which BRFA might be relevant. Please consider prioritising the link and moving it to the front to avoid truncation—perhaps space could be saved by replacing "MiszaBot, MiszaBot I,MiszaBot II, MiszaBot III" with "MiszaBot.*". Thank you also for the Special:Diff/865059798/868771474 updates to the User:FRadical Bot. —Sladen (talk) 10:18, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Sladen,  Done. Thanks for bringing up the concerns with the bot. I think have resolved adequately both issues that you brought up in your original cmt. If you have any more queries, you are most welcomed to ask them here. — fr+ 10:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, FR30799386. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

23:28, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Spamming your proposal

While I understand that you care about that proposal, it is one of more than 200 proposals, all of them important to some (or many) people, many of them relevant directly or indirectly to enwiki as well. We have general pointers to the wishlist survey, but we don't need hundreds of people all trying to rally votes for their proposal all over the place. I note that the wishlist survey page states "A reasonable amount of canvassing is acceptable. You've got an opportunity to sell your idea to as many people as you can reach. Feel free to reach out to other people in your project, WikiProject or user group. Obviously, this shouldn't involve sockpuppets, or badgering people to vote or to change their vote. But a good-faith "get out the vote" campaign is absolutely okay." However, while they may feel this is a good idea, it isn't, and they have no say on what is acceptable canvassing on enwiki (or elsewhere, but elsewhere is not my concern). Fram (talk) 08:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Fram I would suggest that you revert Kudpung also in the spirit of fairness. Else, what you're doing right now amounts to favouritism. — fr+ 08:31, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I revert what I notice, not what people then point out in spite. Fram (talk) 08:36, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
This isn't about spite. When you revert someone next time, take care to make sure that you apply policy uniformly and not on a depending-on-my-mood basis. — fr+ 08:45, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, pardon, but I do not recal having spammed this talk page, or anyone else's for that matter - yet. And if I were to, it would only be to people who are already on mailing lists. 08:52, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
It's not a "depending on my mood" situation. When I revert personal attacks, or copyvio, or delete articles, it usually won't help to claim that I should then also do the same with other pages or edits which may or may not have the same problems, but which I hadn't seen. Fram (talk) 08:57, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Fram, The situation you are referring to doesn't match with today's scenario. There is no readable way you could have overlooked his canvassing while reverting my post.  — fr+ 09:12, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
They didn't post at WP:AN, did they? At least, I don't see the post you seem to be referring to there. That's where I spotted your canvassing. The other reverts I did I found through your contributions (assuming correctly that if someone canvasses in one location, they often do it elsewhere as well), which is another page where Kudpungs edits aren't visible. Fram (talk) 09:18, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Fram@WP:VPM in big capitalized font, exactly above where my post was... — fr+ 09:31, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
P.S. I still don't understand what do you find biased, partisan, about my posts. I took care to avoid a non-neutral tone, and did not even once mention anything about supporting the proposal, only to vote on it. I placed my posts in specific places where I perceived people would be interested in it(WP:AN because rollbacker, admins who regularly use the revert function may be interested in it, WP:VPT for people who may be interested in the proposal from the technical point of veiw etc). — fr+ 09:31, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
" Asking people to support this proposal" (your edit summary) is "did not even once mention anything about supporting the proposal"??? Fram (talk) 09:38, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Fram, so, you're telling me that I can reinstate the posts provided I use a far more neutral edit summary(something of the type of "new section") ?
No, please don't. Not only was the message itself far from the neutral message you pretend it to be, I also have already explained that having 200 proposals posted on all noticeboards is not what these boards are for. Fram (talk) 10:01, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

I would like to note, that I am not pretending anything. There was nothing in the proposal that was out of the line with the canvassing guidelines. However, out of respect for your tenure and experience I will desist from reverting your edit. Additionally, I would prefer that you open a discussion at the relevant noticeboard seeking wider input from the community as to the consensus position on "canvassing" for the Community Wishlist Survey. Regards — fr+ 10:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Fram Please open a discussion at the relevant noticeboard so that this issue can be resolved....Is it allowed to canvass or is it disallowed ? — fr+ 11:12, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Uninvolved editor here: It was definitely canvassing. You weren’t just notifying people of the proposal, you were actively showing your support of it. The message was clearly written in hopes that people would participate AND support it. You can notify of existence and encourage participation. You cannot encourage support of it. Sergecross73 msg me 11:28, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Sergecross73 I guess the words VOTE NOW are extremely appropriate ?  — fr+ 11:33, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Sergecross73, What I was telling Fram just above was that we need a clear consensus position with regards to this fact not the whims and fancies of three administrators and one non-admin.  — fr+ 11:36, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The problem is that your post literally says:
I would like to invite all interested editors (particularly those who edit from mobile devices) to vote for the proposal to add a revert functionality to the mobile interface, so that a strong message may be sent out to the Wikimedia Foundation and its employees to take its mobile user-base seriously and eventually bring the mobile interface at par with other major websites of the internet.
That wording is very clearly advocating a specific position, not just participation or urgency. Sergecross73 msg me 12:32, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

@Kudpung, Sergecross73, and Fram: Please participate at [this discussion regarding canvassing for Community Wishlist Survey]  — fr+ 13:17, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Main talk page

Hi,

I'm assuming that this was in error? Chaheel Riens (talk) 18:41, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Yup — fr+ 12:31, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #023, 25 Nov 2018

There are now 4,180 portals.

Will we break 5,000 by the end of the year?

I know we can. But, that is up to you!

( New portals are created with {{subst:Basic portal start page}} or {{subst:bpsp}} )

Happy Holidays

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Jingling along

The following portals have been created since the last issue:

Keep 'em coming!

By the way, the above list was generated using this Petscan query. It can be easily modified by changing the date. The data page (under the Output tab) also has options for receiving the data in CSV or tabbed format, which some operating systems automatically load into a spreadsheet program for ease of use, such as copying and pasting the desired column (like page names).

In closing

We'll keep it short this issue.

Expect a flood next time. Or the one after that.

Cheerio,    — The Transhumanist   08:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Design flaw in {{Box-header colour}}

There seems to be a need to more precisely control color. During the conversion of existing portals to the one-page model, customized colors are being lost.

There is a request/discussion about it at User talk:Moxy#What about the original colors?.

I thought you might be able to provide some input.    — The Transhumanist   23:36, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

eye I have read the above message. I will reply when I have a moment. — fr+ 12:13, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

22:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

16:12, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Technical Barnstar
Thank you for creating this
.

For creating an "Undo" button for the mobile editing interface. This will be really helpful when dealing with vandalism, can this code also be used on Wikimedia Commons? Donald Trung (talk) 15:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Donald Trung Thank you..... The script should work in Commons. — fr+ 07:46, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

17:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

20:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Careful who you lend your phone to...

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Regarding this edit; I've temporarily blocked your account to prevent whoever you lent your phone to from editing Wikipedia until they give it back to you, hopefully within the next 24 hours. -- The Anome (talk) 11:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

The Anome, You can unblock, I am in control of the account and the phone. Additionally, could you please delete/oversight that edit(I mean remove all traces of it)? The person(my 17 year old cousin) has been dealt with and given a strong talking to. I will take adequate measures to prevent such an incident in the future. Regards. — fr+ 13:58, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Unblocking. I will also hide the edit. -- 15:14, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ouch. Well, if the Secret Service come calling, at least you'll know why.    — The Transhumanist   13:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

New Page Reviewer granted

Hi FR30799386. Apart from adding your account to the list of Afc reviewers, your account has also been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Minor user rights can now be accorded on a time limited or probationary period, so do check back at WP:PERM/NPR in case this concerns your application. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance. so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Lourdes 03:19, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #024, 26 Dec 2018

Last issue, I mentioned there would be a flood, and so, here it is...

Portals status

We now have 4,620 portals.

And the race to pass 5,000 by year's end is on...

Can we make it?

The New Year, and the 5,001st portal, await.

( New portals are created with {{subst:Basic portal start page}} or {{subst:bpsp}} )

Evad is back!

After disappearing in mid-thread, Evad37 has returned from a longer than expected wikibreak.

Be sure to welcome him back.

Improved cropping is coming to Portal image banner

User:FR30799386 is working on making {{Portal image banner}} even better by enabling it to chop the top off an image as well as the bottom.

Many pictures aren't suitable for banners because they are too tall. Therefor, User:FR30799386 added cropping to this template, so that an editor could specify part of a picture to be used rather than the whole thing.

Upgrade of flagship portals is underway

Work has begun on upgrading Wikipedia's flagship portals (those listed at the top of the Main page).

So far, Portal:Geography, Portal:History, and Portal:Technology have been revamped. Of course, you are welcome to improve them further.

Work continues on the other five. Feel free to join in on the fun.

Spotting missing portals that are redirects

In place of many missing portals, there is a redirect that leads to "the next best topic", such as a parent topic.

Most of these were created before we had the tools to easily create portals (they used to take 6 hours or more to create, because it was all done manually). Rather than leave a portal link red, some editors thought it was best that those titles led somewhere.

The subjects that have sufficient coverage should have their own portals rather than a redirect to some other subject.

Unfortunately, being blue like all other live links, redirects are harder to spot than redlinks.

To spot redirects easily, you can make them all appear green.

What's new in portal space?

Here are the new portals since the last issue:
  1. Portal:17th century
  2. Portal:18th century
  3. Portal:Absinthe
  4. Portal:Abuse
  5. Portal:Academic degrees
  6. Portal:Acari
  7. Portal:Acipenseriformes
  8. Portal:Actas
  9. Portal:Actinopterygii
  10. Portal:Activision
  11. Portal:Aerobatics
  12. Portal:Aeroflot
  13. Portal:Aesop
  14. Portal:Afrosoricida
  15. Portal:Aichi
  16. Portal:Airlines
  17. Portal:Air traffic control
  18. Portal:Akon
  19. Portal:Alan Turing
  20. Portal:Alfred Nobel
  21. Portal:Alice Paul
  22. Portal:Allahabad
  23. Portal:Allgemeine-SS
  24. Portal:Allium
  25. Portal:Aluminium
  26. Portal:Alvarezsauroidea
  27. Portal:Alveolata
  28. Portal:Amazon
  29. Portal:Amino acids
  30. Portal:Ancient Greek philosophy
  31. Portal:Andalusia
  32. Portal:Andes
  33. Portal:Animax
  34. Portal:Antennas
  35. Portal:Anthrax (American band)
  36. Portal:Antibiotics
  37. Portal:Antidotes
  38. Portal:Antifungals
  39. Portal:Antimony
  40. Portal:Antivirus software
  41. Portal:Aquifers
  42. Portal:Arachnids
  43. Portal:Armadillos
  44. Portal:Armour
  45. Portal:Art movements
  46. Portal:Arvicolinae
  47. Portal:Asanas
  48. Portal:Association of Southeast Asian Nations
  49. Portal:AstraZeneca
  50. Portal:Asturias
  51. Portal:Asus
  52. Portal:Atoms
  53. Portal:Automation
  54. Portal:Aylesbury
  55. Portal:Aztecs
  56. Portal:Bags
  57. Portal:Banks
  58. Portal:Basalt
  59. Portal:Batgirl
  60. Portal:Bats
  61. Portal:Bay Area Rapid Transit
  62. Portal:Beijing Subway
  63. Portal:Belo Horizonte
  64. Portal:Ben Affleck
  65. Portal:Binondo
  66. Portal:Biodiversity of Colombia
  67. Portal:Biomes
  68. Portal:Blue Origin
  69. Portal:Board games
  70. Portal:Boca Raton, Florida
  71. Portal:Bruno Mars
  72. Portal:Budapest Metro
  73. Portal:Buffalo, New York
  74. Portal:Bullying
  75. Portal:Busan Metro
  76. Portal:Buteoninae
  77. Portal:C++
  78. Portal:Cairo Metro
  79. Portal:Canadian art
  80. Portal:Character encoding
  81. Portal:Character encodings
  82. Portal:Charity
  83. Portal:Chemical engineering
  84. Portal:Chemical synthesis
  85. Portal:Chickenpox
  86. Portal:Chili peppers
  87. Portal:Chongqing Rail Transit
  88. Portal:Climate
  89. Portal:Communication
  90. Portal:Community of Madrid
  91. Portal:Computer files
  92. Portal:Concurrent computing
  93. Portal:Conservation biology
  94. Portal:Containers
  95. Portal:Contract bridge
  96. Portal:Convicts in Australia
  97. Portal:Copenhagen Metro
  98. Portal:Crochet
  99. Portal:Cucurbita
  100. Portal:Culture of Albania
  101. Portal:Culture of Argentina
  102. Portal:Culture of Armenia
  103. Portal:Culture of Assam
  104. Portal:Culture of Australia
  105. Portal:Culture of Austria
  106. Portal:Culture of Azerbaijan
  107. Portal:Culture of Bahrain
  108. Portal:Culture of Bangladesh
  109. Portal:Culture of Belarus
  110. Portal:Culture of Belgium
  111. Portal:Culture of Belize
  112. Portal:Culture of Bengal
  113. Portal:Culture of Cornwall
  114. Portal:Culture of Djibouti
  115. Portal:Culture of England
  116. Portal:Culture of Kerala
  117. Portal:Culture of Somalia
  118. Portal:Culture of West Bengal
  119. Portal:Curitiba
  120. Portal:Databases
  121. Portal:Data mining
  122. Portal:Data storage
  123. Portal:Deforestation and desertification
  124. Portal:Delta Air Lines
  125. Portal:Demi Lovato
  126. Portal:Demography
  127. Portal:Desalination
  128. Portal:Development of the human body
  129. Portal:Disease
  130. Portal:Disney Princess
  131. Portal:Dmitri Mendeleev
  132. Portal:Dublin
  133. Portal:DVD
  134. Portal:Eating
  135. Portal:Electronic components
  136. Portal:Elizabeth Cady Stanton
  137. Portal:Elizabeth I of England
  138. Portal:Ellie Goulding
  139. Portal:Embedded systems
  140. Portal:Embroidery
  141. Portal:Emmeline Pankhurst
  142. Portal:Emmy Awards
  143. Portal:Enugu
  144. Portal:Euro
  145. Portal:Eurostar
  146. Portal:Even-toed ungulates
  147. Portal:Executables
  148. Portal:Experimental aircraft
  149. Portal:Falkland Islands
  150. Portal:Fibers
  151. Portal:File sharing
  152. Portal:File systems
  153. Portal:Frankfurt
  154. Portal:Gaels
  155. Portal:Galicia (Spain)
  156. Portal:Gardens
  157. Portal:Gemstones
  158. Portal:Geotechnical engineering
  159. Portal:Geothermal power
  160. Portal:Glass
  161. Portal:Glass production
  162. Portal:GLONASS
  163. Portal:Guangzhou Metro
  164. Portal:Habitats
  165. Portal:Hall of Fame for Great Americans
  166. Portal:Helicopters
  167. Portal:Helmets
  168. Portal:Helsinki
  169. Portal:Hilary Duff
  170. Portal:Hiroshima
  171. Portal:History of computing
  172. Portal:Honey bees
  173. Portal:Honolulu County, Hawaii
  174. Portal:Hubble Space Telescope
  175. Portal:Hummingbirds
  176. Portal:HVAC
  177. Portal:Hymenoptera
  178. Portal:Intermodal containers
  179. Portal:International Council for Science
  180. Portal:International Space Station
  181. Portal:Interstate Highway System
  182. Portal:IOS
  183. Portal:IPv6
  184. Portal:Ithaca, New York
  185. Portal:James Webb Space Telescope
  186. Portal:Jammu and Kashmir
  187. Portal:JavaScript
  188. Portal:Jay-Z
  189. Portal:John Major
  190. Portal:Kabul
  191. Portal:KFC
  192. Portal:Khuzestan Province
  193. Portal:Launch vehicles
  194. Portal:Laundry
  195. Portal:Lenovo
  196. Portal:Leo Tolstoy
  197. Portal:Library classification systems
  198. Portal:Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II
  199. Portal:Longevity
  200. Portal:Los Angeles International Airport
  201. Portal:Love
  202. Portal:Lyra (constellation)
  203. Portal:MacOS
  204. Portal:Macroeconomics
  205. Portal:Madrid
  206. Portal:Mail
  207. Portal:Malaria
  208. Portal:Malware
  209. Portal:Manhattan Project
  210. Portal:Mao Zedong
  211. Portal:Marrakesh
  212. Portal:Mathematics and art
  213. Portal:Mattel
  214. Portal:Mayotte
  215. Portal:Media culture
  216. Portal:Media manipulation
  217. Portal:Medications
  218. Portal:Men
  219. Portal:Metalworking
  220. Portal:Metropolitan Transportation Authority
  221. Portal:Michael Faraday
  222. Portal:Microeconomics
  223. Portal:Milan Metro
  224. Portal:Military aircraft
  225. Portal:Military deception
  226. Portal:Mixed reality
  227. Portal:Modern history
  228. Portal:Mood disorders
  229. Portal:Morpeth, Northumberland
  230. Portal:Moscow Metro
  231. Portal:MPEG
  232. Portal:MTR
  233. Portal:Multihulls
  234. Portal:Museums
  235. Portal:Music of Scotland
  236. Portal:NASA
  237. Portal:National anthems
  238. Portal:Natural language processing
  239. Portal:Neoplasms
  240. Portal:New Delhi
  241. Portal:Northern Cyprus
  242. Portal:Nuclear weapons
  243. Portal:Nuts
  244. Portal:Odd-toed ungulates
  245. Portal:Ores
  246. Portal:Organ transplantation
  247. Portal:Orthoptera
  248. Portal:Oslo
  249. Portal:Palmyra
  250. Portal:Pan-Africanism
  251. Portal:Panasonic
  252. Portal:Parrots
  253. Portal:Parties
  254. Portal:Peanuts
  255. Portal:Peanuts (comic strip)
  256. Portal:Perl
  257. Portal:Permaculture
  258. Portal:Pesticides
  259. Portal:Physical fitness
  260. Portal:Physiology
  261. Portal:Plant nutrition
  262. Portal:Porcelain
  263. Portal:Ports and harbors
  264. Portal:Pre-Columbian era
  265. Portal:Prehistoric Scotland
  266. Portal:Private transport
  267. Portal:Programming languages
  268. Portal:Programming paradigms
  269. Portal:Prostitution
  270. Portal:Protests
  271. Portal:Psychological manipulation
  272. Portal:P. T. Barnum
  273. Portal:Public housing in the United Kingdom
  274. Portal:Public transport in Helsinki
  275. Portal:Public transport in Istanbul
  276. Portal:Pueblos
  277. Portal:Pune
  278. Portal:Quilting
  279. Portal:Racing
  280. Portal:Radiation
  281. Portal:RAID
  282. Portal:Rail transport in Argentina
  283. Portal:Rail transport in Finland
  284. Portal:Rail transport in Germany
  285. Portal:Rail transport in Israel
  286. Portal:Rail transport in Malaysia
  287. Portal:Rail transport in Norway
  288. Portal:Rail transport in Singapore
  289. Portal:Rail transport in Spain
  290. Portal:Rail transport in Sri Lanka
  291. Portal:Rail transport in Thailand
  292. Portal:Rail transport in the United Arab Emirates
  293. Portal:Realism (arts)
  294. Portal:Recycling
  295. Portal:Religion in China
  296. Portal:Religion in Egypt
  297. Portal:Religion in Iran
  298. Portal:Religion in Israel
  299. Portal:Religion in Mexico
  300. Portal:Religion in Mozambique
  301. Portal:Religion in Myanmar
  302. Portal:Religion in Norway
  303. Portal:Religion in Pakistan
  304. Portal:Religion in Poland
  305. Portal:Religion in Portugal
  306. Portal:Religion in Romania
  307. Portal:Religion in Scotland
  308. Portal:Religion in South Africa
  309. Portal:Religion in Sweden
  310. Portal:Religion in Thailand
  311. Portal:Religion in Turkey
  312. Portal:Religion in Zimbabwe
  313. Portal:Republic of Artsakh
  314. Portal:Revolutions
  315. Portal:Reykjavík
  316. Portal:Rhythm
  317. Portal:Rocket engines
  318. Portal:Rodenticides
  319. Portal:Roofs
  320. Portal:Roscosmos
  321. Portal:Roses
  322. Portal:Rowing
  323. Portal:RuPaul
  324. Portal:Saint Helena
  325. Portal:Sales
  326. Portal:San Juan, Puerto Rico
  327. Portal:San Marino
  328. Portal:São Paulo
  329. Portal:Scottish art
  330. Portal:Scottish clans
  331. Portal:Sex work
  332. Portal:Shinkansen
  333. Portal:Shipbuilding
  334. Portal:Silk
  335. Portal:Simple living
  336. Portal:SkyTrain (Vancouver)
  337. Portal:South Ossetia
  338. Portal:Space Shuttles
  339. Portal:SpaceX
  340. Portal:Spike Lee
  341. Portal:SQL
  342. Portal:Starbucks
  343. Portal:Statue of Liberty
  344. Portal:Stem cells
  345. Portal:Stonehenge
  346. Portal:Street newspapers
  347. Portal:Stuttgart
  348. Portal:Submarines
  349. Portal:Suffragettes
  350. Portal:Susan B. Anthony
  351. Portal:Systems
  352. Portal:Tallinn
  353. Portal:Tashkent
  354. Portal:Telephony
  355. Portal:Tents
  356. Portal:Tigers
  357. Portal:Tobacco
  358. Portal:Tomatoes
  359. Portal:Toronto Transit Commission
  360. Portal:Tortoises
  361. Portal:Transnistria
  362. Portal:Transport in Afghanistan
  363. Portal:Transport in Barcelona
  364. Portal:Transport in Belgium
  365. Portal:Transport in Bristol
  366. Portal:Transport in Bucharest
  367. Portal:Transport in Buckinghamshire
  368. Portal:Transport in Cardiff
  369. Portal:Transport in Chennai
  370. Portal:Transport in China
  371. Portal:Transport in Edinburgh
  372. Portal:Transport in Glasgow
  373. Portal:Transport in Guyana
  374. Portal:Transport in Hong Kong
  375. Portal:Transport in India
  376. Portal:Transport in Ireland
  377. Portal:Transport in Israel
  378. Portal:Transport in Kiev
  379. Portal:Transport in London
  380. Portal:Transport in Somerset
  381. Portal:Transport in Tamil Nadu
  382. Portal:Transport in Tiruchirappalli
  383. Portal:Transport in Vietnam
  384. Portal:Transport in Warsaw
  385. Portal:Tuberculosis
  386. Portal:Twitter
  387. Portal:Umayyad Caliphate
  388. Portal:United States Armed Forces
  389. Portal:United States Congress
  390. Portal:USB
  391. Portal:Valencian Community
  392. Portal:Vijayawada
  393. Portal:Voting
  394. Portal:Washington Metro
  395. Portal:Waterfalls
  396. Portal:Weapons
  397. Portal:Weaving
  398. Portal:Web browsers
  399. Portal:Websites
  400. Portal:Wendy's
  401. Portal:Women's prisons in the United States
  402. Portal:Woodworking
  403. Portal:World Chess Championships
  404. Portal:Yangtze

Keep 'em coming!

And I'll see you next issue.

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   08:08, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi,

I really like and appreciate this template/lua module you created. It really makes a difference in the appearance of portals (see Portal:Blackberries and Portal:Blueberries). I was wondering if I could make a request/suggestion for improving it further...

To make this template fully versatile, could you modify the lua module to accept a parameter to set the starting pixel amount from the top? Then, between that and the max height parameter (working from the specified top, down), an editor of a portal could set the exact portion of a picture that he wants to display as a banner.

Then, skyline pics with too much sky could be cropped closer to the city's skyline, for example. There would be many other situations where editors would like to set the range displayed in a pic to get the best cropping to produce a banner from a non-banner picture.

I hope you like this idea.

I look forward to your reply.

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   12:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

I'll take a look tmrw morning.... — fr+ 15:09, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
What did you see?    — The Transhumanist   08:40, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Transhumanist I am trying to mockup a proof-of concept in my sandbox, it isn't going as per plan though. — fr+ 06:58, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

A banner that could benefit from better cropping control...

And here is Niagara Falls!

Niagara falls, from the Canadian side
Niagara falls, from the Canadian side

Well, if you look closely, you can see the reflection of the falls in the clouds.    — The Transhumanist   08:52, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

I can make the waterfall appear by adding the style margin-top: -450px to class portal-banner-image in Template:Portal image banner/styles.css. Of course, that would mess up hundreds of other pictures by chopping people's heads off, etc. I don't know whether there is any way to parameterise this as something like margin-top: -{{{croptop|0}}}px. Things I've tried that don't work but may have potential:
  • <span style="margin-top: -450px">{{Portal image banner…}}</span> — no effect
  • <style> portal-banner-image {margin-top: -450px} </style> — no effect (only works in the HTML head, not the body)
  • crop: rect(…) within .portal-banner-image in styles.css — no effect
It's not a solution but I hope that I'm on the right track and have some detail wrong which FR can fix. Certes (talk) 12:16, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Certes, I did mockup a basic proof-of-concept at my User:FR30799386/sandbox, however the problem is with displaying the cropped area reliably over devices with different veiwport sizes, the moment I try to resize my browser window with the current setup, it scrolls downwards thus ruining the whole thing. — fr+ 10:44, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Agreed. That looks great to me by default, but I can easily make it look awful by messing around with window sizes (in Firefox on Ubuntu). CSS is probably the weakest area of my web skills; anything I produce tends to be functional rather than pretty. Certes (talk) 13:12, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
The Transhumanist, could you provide more examples of images needing cropping? The proof-of-concept works on the image (after a lot of brainstorming) but I'd like to test it some more images before I put it live. — fr+ 05:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Transhumanist,^^^^^^^(reping) — fr+ 17:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
I don't think I got any repings. How many did you do?
As for pics, any skylines or cityscapes with lots of sky above them would make good test cases. Let me see if I can find some...

|maxheight=140px |overflow=Hidden|croptop=10

Hope these help.    — The Transhumanist   03:49, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

The Transhumanist, does it work as expected ? — fr 10:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

I thought you wanted some pics to try it out on. Now I know by "test case" you mean something the other person did. I've added parameters to the pics above.    — The Transhumanist   11:31, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Transhumanist, I used them in preview mode, to test my proof-of-concept, so you actually didn't see me using them

By the way, the caption doesn't show up when maxheight is used

Note, that the above example includes a caption. It has just disappeared for some reason. Just a heads up. I hope you find this bug report helpful. Cheers.    — The Transhumanist   08:56, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

I have resolved it. — fr+ 06:58, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Missing XfD notice

So, you Reviewed a page (a page I created) [167], but I did not get a notice you also put it up for speedy deletion. How come this is (not) in the screening process? -DePiep (talk) 05:02, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Please stop spending Good Editors Time on this. -DePiep (talk) 05:05, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
DePiep, it must be an error with the software, cause I checked the "Notify the creator" checkbox on twinkle.... — fr 05:06, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Additionally, please answer the query which I made on your t/p. Regards. — fr 05:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
OK, I forget all about this by now. -DePiep (talk) 05:09, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

The new cropping capability you added has now been tested in place.

See Portal:Niagara Falls.

Makes all the difference.

Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   10:22, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Great  — fr 10:44, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #025, 30 Dec 2018

We can now crop the tops of pics to make banners

Before, we could only cut off the bottom of pics.

User:FR30799386 has pulled it off, and made the upgrade to {{Portal image banner}}...

So, this:

Niagara falls, from the Canadian side
Niagara falls, from the Canadian side

Becomes this:

Niagara falls, from the Canadian side
Niagara falls, from the Canadian side

Here's the code for the above banner:

{{Portal image banner|File:American Falls from Canadian side in winter.jpg | [[Niagara falls]], from the Canadian side |maxheight=175px |overflow=Hidden|croptop=10}}

To see it employed in a portal, check out Portal:Niagara Falls.

About that end of the year goal...

We were racing against time to create 5,000 portals by the end of the year (just for the heck of it).

We made it. We've passed the 5,000 portals mark, with time to spare!

And the 5,000th portal is Portal:Major League Baseball, by Happypillsjr.

Congratulations!

What's next?

The 10,000th portal mark. But...

...there is plenty else to do in addition to building new portals:

  1. The new portals need to be linked to from the encyclopedia.
  2. On those portals about subjects that are not typically capitalized, the search parameters need to be refined/expanded, to maximize the chances of Did you know and In the news items being found and displayed.
  3. A Recognized content section needs to be added to each portal that has a corresponding WikiProject.
  4. Addition of a category on those portals that lack a subject category.
  5. Implement the portal category system, adding the appropriate categories to each portal.
  6. Upgrade, and complete (as per the tasks enumerated above), the old-style portals that are not regularly maintained, which have not been converted yet (about 1,100 of them).
  7. Find and fix the remaining bugs in the underlying lua modules.
  8. Build portal tools (scripts) to assist in the creation, development, and maintenance of portals.
  9. Build a script to help build navbox footer templates, via the harvesting of categories, amongst other methods.
  10. Update the portal building instructions.
  11. Update the portal guideline.
  12. Refine the programming of the portals to reduce their load time.
  13. Design and develop the next generation of portals and portal components.

And whatever else you can dream up.

But most of all, have a...

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   12:37, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
I reward this Barnstar for revising my newly created article as quick as a flash. Thanks! Mullafacation (talk) 10:35, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 1

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup!

Hello and Happy New Year!

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Happy New Year, FR30799386!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Wishing you a prosperous and happy new year. Good to see that you are back from your wikibreak. — fr 11:58, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Script

Please have a talk with Earwig aprior to mass-deployment; because AFAIK, there's a finite bound on mass-calling &use_engine=1 through the API per credit-limitations. I note that he has said The tool's current API may not scale to the amount of traffic that the New Pages Feed would require. over T193809. FWIW, though the WMF integrated the alternate CopyPatrol engine into the PageTriage; per T203012, they had been careful enough to exclude certain low-byte pages from being screened for copyvio; to avoid meaningless usage of credits. WBGconverse 15:57, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

See T193559; for more details. WBGconverse 16:12, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
I've sent him a mail.  — fr 04:29, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Sorted out. — fr+ 17:51, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

I've been having fun with the new cropping features of this template/module.

Check out Portal:Hummingbirds.    — The Transhumanist   01:28, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

 — fr+ 12:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Note

Please note that I am aware of ARBIPA. Regards. << FR 17:44, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

18:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

mobileUndo script

Hi. I noticed you removed the "beta" warning from this script's page, here, but didn't change the infobox's status from "beta" to something else. Can I ask why? I was going to highlight the release in the updated section of User:DannyS712/SPP 02, but if its not actually out of beta I wouldn't. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 05:20, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Sure, updated << FR 05:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
You could add some stuff about Enterprisey's User:Enterprisey/script-installer.js too. << FR 05:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
I already am planning on mentioning the gadget discussion. Was there something else? --DannyS712 (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Nah, the gadget discussion about it... << FR 05:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Information icon Hello, I'm Qualitist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Om Thanvi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Qualitist (talk) 06:55, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

  • To claim that the relisting admin has comprehension issues is unproductive and should be dealt on their talk page than spam something which has been already admitted by the creator. Aside from this recent edit war, your bludgeoning has been unproductive. Consider refraining from any further misconduct. Qualitist (talk) 06:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
    Qualitist, Shiv has been badgering, not me. If you feel that I am making unproductive edits WP:ANI is that way. Additionally, don't template the regulars .Regards. — fr+ 07:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
You are replying everyone who has voted for keep and you are failing to convince anyone to change their vote, your comments often include personal attacks. That's textbook of bludgeoning and disruption. Now stop edit warring. Qualitist (talk) 07:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Qualitist, Please list all personal attacks I have made so far in the AFD. As I have said before, if you feel that I am disruptive, my edits are vandalism/spam or that I have been making personal attacks against anybody, WP:ANI is that way. If you don't, I certainly will when I have time. Regards. — fr+ 07:45, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
For User:FR30799386/communicator.js! Looks great so far. Enterprisey (talk!) 22:04, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

17:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #026, 20 Jan 2019

Well, here's the first issue of the new year. Enjoy...

New participants

A hearty welcome to new arrivals to the portals department:

Harvesting categories tool prototype

DannyS712 has created a user script prototype, User:DannyS712/Cat links, that can pull members from a category, a functionality we've been after since the project's revamp last Spring. Now, it's a matter of applying this technique to scripts that will place the items where needed, such as with a section starter script and/or portal builder script.

New portals since last issue

  1. Academic publishing
  2. Accounting
  3. Adam and Eve
  4. African Great Lakes
  5. Al Green
  6. Alternative views
  7. America's Next Top Model
  8. Andaman and Nicobar Islands
  9. Angles
  10. Applied mathematics
  11. Arabic
  12. Areas of mathematics
  13. Atlanta metropolitan area
  14. Atlantic Ocean
  15. Big Bash League
  16. Bijelo Dugme
  17. Bill Cosby
  18. Boats
  19. Bombardier Aerospace
  20. Bruce Willis
  21. Canadian law
  22. Cannons
  23. Caribbean American
  24. Chinese American
  25. Chinese Canadians
  26. Chinese gardens
  27. Chris Brown
  28. City
  29. Common law
  30. Criminal law
  31. Czechoslovakia
  32. Data
  33. Data warehouses
  34. DC Comics
  35. Deities
  36. DeKalb County
  37. Destiny's Child
  38. Differential equations
  39. Discrete geometry
  40. East Asia
  41. Economy of China
  42. Economy of India
  43. Economy of Malaysia
  44. Economy of the United Kingdom
  45. Ellen DeGeneres
  46. Email clients
  47. E
  48. Equations
  49. European Americans
  50. Filipino Americans
  51. Football in Algeria
  52. Fox Corporation
  53. Fractions and ratios
  54. Functional analysis
  55. Game theory
  56. Girlguiding
  57. Gloucestershire
  58. Grazhdanskaya Oborona
  59. Greek diaspora
  60. Habsburg Monarchy
  61. Hilbert's problems
  62. Hoodoo Gurus
  63. Hyundai Motor Company
  64. Iggy Azalea
  65. Indian Ocean
  66. Infinity
  67. Information theory
  68. Integrals
  69. Irish diaspora
  70. Irrational numbers
  71. Italian diaspora
  72. Japanese diaspora
  73. J. Cole
  74. Jennifer Lopez
  75. Jessica Lange
  76. John Fogerty
  77. Kehlani
  78. Kiev
  79. K. Michelle
  80. Knot theory
  81. Kool & the Gang
  82. Lakes in China
  83. Lake Van
  84. Leonardo DiCaprio
  85. Limerick
  86. Literary composition
  87. Long Island Rail Road
  88. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
  89. Lukas Graham
  90. Mathematical optimization
  91. Matt Damon
  92. Merchant ships
  93. Metallic means
  94. Metro-North Railroad
  95. Microsoft Windows
  96. Military of India
  97. Miss America
  98. Modulation
  99. Moon landing
  100. Mozilla
  101. Music of Ireland
  102. Narratives
  103. Nashville
  104. Nassau County
  105. Norfolk
  106. Nottinghamshire
  107. One Life to Live
  108. Overseas Chinese
  109. Percentages
  110. Probability distributions
  111. Public Broadcasting Service
  112. Quezon City
  113. Raven-Symoné
  114. R. Kelly
  115. Rodeo
  116. RuneScape
  117. Sarah Silverman
  118. Saturn rockets
  119. Science and technology
  120. Sesame Street
  121. Seth MacFarlane
  122. Ships
  123. Shipwrecks
  124. Shropshire
  125. Spaceports
  126. Space suits
  127. Spanish diaspora
  128. Steam locomotives
  129. Suffolk
  130. Suzuki
  131. Tanks
  132. Tensors
  133. The CW
  134. Thomas Aquinas
  135. T.I.
  136. TISM
  137. Tom Cruise
  138. Toni Braxton
  139. Toyota
  140. Transportation in the Philippines
  141. True Blood
  142. Violin
  143. Virgin Group
  144. Vladimir Putin
  145. Volkswagen
  146. Volume
  147. Warner Bros.
  148. Warships
  149. Warwickshire
  150. Washington D.C.
  151. [[Portal:Watercraft|
  152. Web syndication
  153. Wikis
  154. Witchcraft
  155. Women's sports
  156. World of Warcraft

What else is going on

There have been some discussions at Wikipedia talk:Portal guidelines.

DreamyJazz is working on a bot to place links to portals on root articles, category pages, and navigation footer templates.

Portal bugs are getting dealt with soon after they are reported.

Lots of wikignome activity (using Hotcat, etc.).

Keep up the good work.    — The Transhumanist   09:37, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Budham Singh vandalizer

Howdy. I wonder, when is the Wikimedia going to 'range block' that mobile editor on the India related articles. GoodDay (talk) 16:23, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!  << FR (mobileUndo) 06:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC) Signed for archive bot << FR (mobileUndo)