User talk:EricSparks123

EricSparks123, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi EricSparks123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Hello, I'm Hydromania. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hydromania (talk) 18:33, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nick Foles has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nick Foles was changed by EricSparks123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905293 on 2020-11-12T17:42:12+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:42, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Malcolm Elmore

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Malcolm Elmore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone 15:20, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of LaBryan Ray for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LaBryan Ray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LaBryan Ray until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Cupper52 (talk) 14:13, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with LaBryan Ray. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Your edit to LaBryan Ray has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:John Ross Catching a Pass.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:John Ross Catching a Pass.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please add the appropriate fair use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 01:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello, I'm GhostOfDanGurney. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2022 NASCAR Cup Series, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Silly season speculation articles are not proper sources. :] GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 15:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kyle Murphy (American football, born 1998) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyle Murphy (American football, born 1998) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Murphy (American football, born 1998) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mvqr (talk) 17:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

already provided source

Legal threats

You cannot make legal threats against editors or the Wikipedia. See WP:NLT. Zaathras (talk) 01:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Free speech. EricSparks123 (talk) 01:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Free speech is the right to be free of government censorship. Private entities such as the Wikipedia are not covered by the 1st Amendment. This has been brought to WP:ANI's attention - Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Legal_threats_at_Donald_Trump_talk_page. Zaathras (talk) 01:08, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t care. Supposedly pride yourself on free speech.

Also, was not causing any harm to the page. EricSparks123 (talk) 01:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sals Pizza Mamaroneck

A tag has been placed on Sals Pizza Mamaroneck, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please visit the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Royiswariii (talk) 01:06, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Sals Pizza Mamaroneck, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Royiswariii (talk) 01:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. EricSparks123 (talk) 01:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

No legal threats. Acalamari 01:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EricSparks123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been a longtime user, have added countless quality contributions, and my blocking with no due process is incorrect. I am the greatest writer this page has ever seen. Thank you in advance for unblocking.EricSparks123 (talk) 6:23 pm, Today (UTC−7)

Decline reason:

User does not indicate how they will contribute positively to the encyclopedia. ... discospinster _talk 01:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Non-admin comment:EricSparks123,you literally abusing creating page as well as what you did on Sals Pizza Mamaroneck, and you have speedy deletion on other articles too like Malcom Elmore, and you deleting AfD templates. You got a warnings but you just ignoring it, you're closely to WP:VANDALISM of creating pages. Please this is will be lesson to you. Royiswariii (talk) 02:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]

Hello, EricSparks123,

You can pursue legal action against Wikipedia or you can edit Wikipedia but you can't do both at the same time. Until you withdraw your legal threat, you will not be unblocked. Simple as that.

And as others have said, the first amendment only applies to government censorship, not the governing policies of private organizations like Wikimedia. There are no free speech guarantees on Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it will be interesting to see how your lawyers do against the Wikimedia Foundation's legal team. The foundation has net assets of $255 million and an endowment which has surpassed $100 million. Good luck with your lawsuit. Cullen328 (talk) 08:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I never made legal threats, it was a sibling of mine who typed those. However I do feel taken back by your statistics as nobodies knows my personal financial state. EricSparks123 (talk) 18:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EricSparks123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been a longtime Wikipedia user who has made lots of contributions with no issues. A younger sibling of mine got on my keyboard and began typing random stuff, I come back on and I am blocked. I need to be unblocked as I will continue to put plenty of time and effort into writing and fixing great articles. This was a wrongful block in the first place as there was no legitimate effort put into researching the block and there was no due process. I see others contributing nothing and continually cursing in talk pages and are not blocked, yet I was blocked for “nonsense” that I didn’t even type. Thank you in advance for unblocking.

Decline reason:

Confirmed block evasion as Billygreen$$687. Additionally, if your younger sibling got access to your account, that means it is compromised. WP:COMPROMISED applies. Do not make another unblock request, except as described there. Also, strike two toward WP:3X. Yamla (talk) 19:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would have to agree Billygreen$$687 (talk) 19:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not to assume bad faith, but i'm 70-80% sure @Billygreen$$687 is a sock of @EricSparks123. That, or a really specific first edit. Babysharkboss2!! ^(XXX) 19:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yup, blocked as a CU sock. Babysharkboss2!! ^(XXX) 19:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]