User talk:Ehdeejay

Welcome!

Hello, Ehdeejay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Free Church of Scotland (1843–1900). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! St Anselm (talk) 21:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Free Church of Scotland (since 1900). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. St Anselm (talk) 03:55, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Free Church of Scotland (1843–1900). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. St Anselm (talk) 05:56, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ehdeejay. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ehdeejay. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Christianity Barnstar
		Dear Ehdeejay, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity-related articles, especially your creation of Archibald Riddell. Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam^Talk 21:34, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

James Fraser of Brea

Hi, I see you have linked the article James Fraser of Brea to the Siege of Inverness (1650) article. However, in the article about James Fraser of Brea it says that it was his father, Sir James Fraser, who held the castle during the siege. Therefore it is somewhat misleading to link from the siege article to the younger James Fraser. Really it should only link to an article about the elder Sir James Fraser.QuintusPetillius (talk) 10:39, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe there should be two articles: Rev James Fraser of Brea and Sir James Fraser of Brea. I'm not sure how Sir James, who died in 1649, could have been in command in 1650. His son, Rev James, was only 11 in 1650. There was another siege in 1649. Maybe the article could be expanded to explain the inconsistency. See also: https://archive.org/details/historicalaccoun1825ande/page/108 --Ehdeejay (talk) 11:33, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for changing the link in the article. Both Anderson and Mackenzie are stating that it was James Fraser of Brea. I suspect that Mackenzie used Anderson as his source. Maybe there are some more up to date sources that could clarify the situation. Thanks. QuintusPetillius (talk) 18:53, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Patrick Anderson of Walston. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:42, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert Dick (salt-grieve)

Hello, Ehdeejay,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Robert Dick (salt-grieve), for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:07, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Shields

Thanks for your contributions to the Alexander Shields article. Things have come a long way since I started it a decade ago as simply "Alexander Shields (1660/1–1700) was a Scottish nonconformist minister, activist, and author" and someone swiftly marked the article for deletion as being of a non-remarkable person!

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexander Colquhoun-Stirling-Murray-Dunlop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Henderson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:22, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For wondrous effort improving Reformed Presbyterian Church of Scotland, which I never expected and honestly just hopelessly tagged in vain. I'm only sorry I didn't notice sooner~! ~Sıgehelmus♗_(Tøk) 01:40, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Josias Welsh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Josias Welsh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://archive.org/stream/genealogicalmemo00byuroge/genealogicalmemo00byuroge_djvu.txt. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- puddleglum^2.0 01:37, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John M'Millan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John M'Millan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majun e Baqi (talk) 15:02, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John M'Millan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, John M'Millan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Majun e Baqi (talk) 15:09, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John M'Millan (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was:

Copyvio concern ~ see here

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John M'Millan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John M'Millan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eternal Shadow Talk 15:40, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ehdeejay! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eternal Shadow Talk 15:40, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:John M'Millan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John M'Millan. Thanks! Eternal Shadow Talk 15:57, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John M'Millan has been accepted

John M'Millan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scottish religion in the seventeenth century, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reformed Presbyterian Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

Thanks for creating the article Thomas Nairn!

(t · c) buidhe 05:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ehdeejay

Thank you for creating Patrick Simson.

User:Buidhe, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice article! Thanks for your contributions.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Buidhe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

(t · c) buidhe 02:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A minor problem

The NewPagesFeed (The place where your articles are tagged at) has a glitch where it says "Potential issues: Copyvio" and this is disrupting both AfC and NPP. This was the cause of my bad copyvio AfC decline a couple weeks ago. Just wanted to let you know beacuse this has been a problem for a while now. Eternal Shadow Talk 01:24, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hi Ehdeejay, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 20:01, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your article creations will no longer be listed in the New Pages Feed, which should reduce or eliminate the false-positive deletion nominations for copyright issues. The bot at CopyPatrol might still flag your additions, but we have a small group of savvy users who assess those reports, so it shouldn't lead to any issues. Cheers, — Diannaa (talk) 20:01, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Covenanters article

Context; this article has not been materially updated or improved for several years; I've effectively rewritten it. So it's not clear to me why you feel entitled to reverse updates without the simple courtesy of asking for an explanation, if needed.

Using the Undo button is discourteous, anti-collaborative and almost guaranteed to solicit a negative response. Robinvp11 (talk) 11:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kirk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Missing cites in John Kid

The article cites "Irving 1881", "Rogers 1871", and "Wodrow 1929" but no such sources are listed in the bibliography. Can you please add? Wodrow seems to be a typo and should be "Wodrow 1835"? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 00:41, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Durie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montrose.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Moncrieff (minister)

Hi, I was just curious about this edit of the Alexander Moncrieff article. It was in the original text created by you, did you pick it up from somewhere else? Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:18, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Glorious Revolution

I'm assuming it was you who added the 'Citations broken' template to this article, apologies if not. Do you have any specific ones in mind? I haven't gone through all of them but I haven't found any yet, so it would be quicker if you could tell me where to start. Thanks in advance. Robinvp11 (talk) 19:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Burns (minister, born 1796), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portobello.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alford, Aberdeenshire ‎

Please be more careful with your reverts. I'm assuming you didn't mean to restore vandalism and non-notable band names. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:27, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Having noticed your recent edit to Gordon Chapel (which I intend to visit this summer, in hopes of getting some photographs of the stained glass), I took a moment to peruse your contributions - keep up the great work! Girth Summit _(blether) 17:36, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just bumped into your edits again at William Gordon of Earlston, after I wrote Earlstoun Castle, where he lived. I borrowed your fact about the novel - if you have a copy of the Donaldson book, would you be able to provide a page number for the assertion that the book was an international bestseller? Cheers Girth Summit _(blether) 09:43, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for John Kennedy of Dingwall

On 11 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Kennedy of Dingwall, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Kennedy of Dingwall was minister of the same church for forty years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Kennedy of Dingwall. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John Kennedy of Dingwall), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]